Some people think that having a set retirement age (e.g. 65 years) for everybody, regardless of occupation, is unfair. They believe that certain workers deserve to retire and receive a pension at an earlier age. Do you agree or disagree? Which types of workers do you think should benefit from early retirement?

Sample 1:

As the number of senior individuals continues to rise, interest in retirement benefits is increasing as well. Pension is one of the most important advantages of retirement. However, the eligibility age is debatable. Numerous nations have age requirements for obtaining pensions. In spite of this, I believe that age should be more flexible for every individual. Specifically for people whose jobs entail a great deal of physical exercise.

To begin with, every family and individual has a unique life and family plan. Consequently, forcing people to retire at a set age does not seem rational. It should have a fair duration so that people can retire in accordance with their goals. For instance, if the law permits people to get their pension between the ages of 60 and 70, then people can plan their post-retirement life with flexibility and to the greatest extent possible.

Particularly, occupations in the trade, hospitality, and athletics necessitate different physical activities. Due to the characteristics of jobs, it is difficult for workers to continue working past age 65. In other words, it is physically impossible to continue working and earning an income in those jobs when people are old, whereas office employment may be maintained regardless of age. In other words, the age rule must be loosened if certain positions may be filled for reasonable reasons.

In conclusion, it is irrational to have a predetermined age requirement for retirement and pension. Respecting varied life plans and job characteristics, it is possible to have a flexible period, allowing individuals to construct their own retirement plans.

Sample 2:

In some nations, the idea of lowering the retirement age is becoming increasingly popular. Some individuals believe that having an age requirement for employment is absurd. This essay will show why positive discrimination is crucial in such circumstances.

Obviously, it is essential to establish a trustworthy and equitable work environment. Therefore, everyone's current retirement age is the same. Everyone must retire at age 65, notwithstanding the fact that various circumstances apply to older ages. The fundamental issue is the pensions that retired people get. For instance, if a person attains financial independence at the age of 50, others will be able to replicate this position since they will acquire wealth without working or exerting any effort. To guarantee equity, the government obliges that everyone retires at age 65.

However, each individual has their unique difficulties and interests, so this age must be taken into account. Especially as an employee age, health concerns can be a disadvantage. Moreover, in addition to these disadvantages, everyone has their own life goals; therefore, establishing a specific age restricts the freedom of humanity. For instance, many seniors intend to travel the world, see new locations, and experience new cultures. In addition, several of them fantasize about switching careers or launching their own enterprises. In this way, early retirement paradoxically restricts human rights and respect.

In conclusion, this essay argues that workers should determine their own retirement age and that doing so is detrimental to equality. I believe that workers with critical illnesses who are willing to sacrifice their pension for their ambitions should be eligible for early retirement.

Sample 3:

A number of individuals do not comprehend that a fixed retirement age for everyone, regardless of their occupation, is fair. These individuals believe that certain workers should begin their retirement earlier than others. This essay will explain the evidence that some professionals (such as bus drivers and firefighters) should be eligible for early retirement.

Firstly, it is indisputable that a bus driver is under significantly more strain than a person working in an office or a store. This professional has been subjected to the stress of traffic for a number of years, requiring their whole concentration throughout the day without a single blink because they are responsible for a great number of lives during their route. This strain is exemplified by the fact that they have little tolerance for error, although in other pursuits, a mistake may be viewed as part of their development.

Secondly, it is completely unfair for an elderly firefighter (e.g., over 60 years old) to pursue a victim inside a burning building. Despite the fact that a person of this age often possesses extensive job experience, this employment involves vigorous physical activity. In addition, this professional consistently puts their life at risk. Therefore, it is just to provide them with this benefit. However, in certain occupations, it is normal to have an individual around 60 years old. This is represented by a salesperson in a retail store, who is in a safe and secure environment and is not exposed to potentially dangerous situations.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that employees who work in stressful environments should be able to retire and get a pension earlier than the general population.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, various work types stand out in business life, resulting in a range of workloads, some of which are distinct from others. Some contend that having a standard age for retiring for all workers, irrespective of profession, is unjust. This point of view is totally sensible, as some professions related to health and the military field have physically challenging tasks, and their own health is negatively affected while performing these duties.

First of all, job profession types such as military or health service servants make people strenuous and laborious for workload. To put it another way, compelling labor lies behind their own profession. To cite an instance, surgeons confront a set of challenges while they are in operation, and they should be extremely attentive when cutting or sewing any zone in the patient’s body. Therefore, people working in jobs requiring caution should have the right to retire early from their jobs.

Secondly, professions such as military service or the healthcare industry may trigger some health problems. To elaborate in detail, spending time in these types of professions causes some health disorders. To exemplify, staff dealing with the security of our country and are exposed to severe distress conditions for a long time, may suffer from psychological disorders. Therefore, employers should take this problem into account, and authorities should provide deserved retirement, earlier compared to other job branches.

To conclude, the idea that employees should be able to retire and commence receiving a pension earlier based on certain occupations is totally reasonable on the grounds that some professions related to health and the military field entail highly physical labor and may experience negative effects on workers’ health. That governments impose acts associated with early retirement might open an accurate window into employees.

Sample 5:

Many governments set an arbitrary retirement age such as sixty five, but some people are physically worn out or mentally exhausted before they reached this age. While some people believe the set age is reasonable, others think it should be more flexible with exemptions for certain workers. In my opinion, a fixed retirement age is actually best for everybody because it is the easiest and fairest arrangement, but I think a tribunal could be established to decide whether individual workers deserve to receive a pension at an earlier age.

Before the new economy, when most people had a single occupation for life, it would have made a lot of sense to allow some manual laborers or people working in psychologically stressful roles to retire earlier. Today, however, so many people change jobs and shift between industries every few years that it is difficult to make these distinctions.

An ideal middle ground would be to have a set retirement age for everybody, but to create a tribunal that could hear individual cases. A sixty-year-old who had been a miner for forty years could get an early pension, for example, whereas someone of the same age who had spent only eight years mining in his twenties would not.

Two types of workers would benefit from early retirement. First are those who work in tough physically demanding conditions such as construction workers, coal miners and welders. The others are in a high stress position where sound judgement is crucial for public safety. Emergency medical practitioners and air traffic control operators are two such examples.

With people’s working lives differing on an individual basis, it is difficult to classify them into large groups and distribute pensions accordingly. Nevertheless, many individuals still deserve an early pension and in some cases our well-being may depend on giving it to them.

Sample 6:

Fixed retirement age is a hotly debated issue, and people's opinions are often split when it comes to the right age to part from work. When some recommend a fixed retirement age, which, according to them, is a win-win proposition both for employees and employers, others believe in early retirement facilities. I accord with the latter point of view.

It is undeniable that setting different retirement ages for different professions is complex to manage for the government, and it would create discontent among many. That is why a state-wise fixed retirement age is in place in most countries in the world. It not only ensures fairness and equality but maintains the ratio of young and experienced workers' proportion in most sectors.
However, forcing employees to work till a fixed age, like until 65 or 70, is an archaic method that has more demerits than merits. Moreover, letting employees retire early can create job opportunities for fresh-graduates, and this will have a positive impact on the unemployment issue. For instance, many Europeans leave their job before they turn 60, and as a result, youngsters get job opportunities.

Finally, when people are given free will to retire early, they work more enthusiastically and contribute more to the company they work for. They can also contribute to the local economy by setting up small businesses afterwards, which also creates job vacancies. Some retirees travel the world and contribute to tourism industries. So, I believe that professionals like architects, nurses, technicians, politicians, military personnel, journalists and teachers should be given choices to retire early. This way, they could enjoy their free time after a career filled with hard work and can also contribute to the economy and tourism industry.

In conclusion, early retirement options can be beneficial in a tremendous way for the government, employers and employees. It could be a type of appreciation for the great effort of those workers who can fulfil their job objectives pretty accurately during their service years.

Sample 7:

Retirement age is a controversial issue and having a single policy for all professionals is not practical according to many. While some people think that a pre-set retirement age would be helpful both for the government and the citizens, others often disagree. This essay delves into this issue and gives a brief description of what type of workers would benefit from early retirement.

To start with, 65 years as the retirement age seems quite acceptable to many. This is the age when a person becomes physically weak and wants to enjoy life without taking extra pressure on the occupation. Moreover, this ensures that the government can plan the retirement scheme for the retirees properly and does not face any problem in supporting those senior citizens who retired from their jobs.

However, this is not the case in all professions and that is why many disagree with the set departure age. They also say that some professionals should have the freedom to leave their jobs early and enjoy the benefits of early retirements. They express their view on the ground that 65 years is too late and some particular employees who want to enjoy their post-retirement years by travelling or doing something on their own. For instance, many employees dream of traveling to different parts of the world after their retirement and if they wait till 65, it becomes physically more challenging. Moreover, people who are in professions like teaching, politics and research have things to contribute even after they are 60. But this is not the case in many professions, and they should be given the chance to take early retirements and create opportunities for the new. For instance, an IT professional might want to leave a full-time job when he is 45 and start his own company. If he is forced to work in a company till 65, he would never be able to fulfil his dream and a young graduate would not be able to find a job.

Getting back to the question of who would get advantages from early retirement, I think there are many professionals who can do so. First of all, any doctor can retire from his job and start a private clinic to serve more people at a convenient time. Similarly, engineers and technicians can leave their job at around 40 and start their own business, travel the world and get involved in innovative works. I think anyone who has a better plan that continuing their job after 45 should be able to do so.

To conclude, a set evacuation age is helpful for certain mediocre professions but not for the people who have their own dreams and plans. The government should consider letting employees take early retirement to give chances to the fresh graduates and to let the aged people achieve their aspirations.

Sample 8:

The debate on retirement age and whether it should be set keeping in mind the type of role a person is employed in has been a pressing issue. Since the job market is becoming more dynamic by the day, people are more inclined towards having a flexible retirement age. It is widely believed that early retirement is necessary for certain jobs. I wholeheartedly agree with this notion. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on the topic and justify my views on the same.

First and foremost, we must acknowledge that the requirements of a particular profession are distinctly different from another. Some roles are physically demanding, while others need the incumbent to be mentally focused. For example, blue-collar jobs in the fields of manufacturing, installation of machinery, repair and maintenance are manual labour intensive. Thus, the performance of the employees tends to diminish as they get older. Therefore, expecting such individuals to be productive after the age of 60 is unreasonable.

Furthermore, it is not just the unskilled workers who are susceptible to declining productivity due to old age. People tend to lose their physical as well as their mental strength after a certain age. With the rising cases of health complications among the general public, such occurrences are more widespread. The ability to carry out tedious responsibilities that come along with professions like law, accounting and also teaching can also run out as workers get older. Therefore, it is crucial to make sure that such factors are kept in mind when deciding the time for an employee to retire.

However, it is understandable that adopting such a framework will be a strenuous task for the organization, and it might also affect many economically backward families because the individual may be the sole bread-earner. Nevertheless, it is a significant step that needs to be taken for the betterment of both the employers and the personnel.

Finally, an organization must recognize the needs of their workforce. Consequently, to maintain productivity and to create a healthy work culture, certain workers should be allowed to retire early with a decent pension scheme, depending on their physical and mental capabilities.

Sample 9:

Some often argue that it is not fair to set the retirement age of an employee, for example, to 65 years. They also opine certain employees should retire and be given pension at an earlier age. I think the option of retirement should be preferably made based on the individual himself. It seems to me that those who had overstressed during their service need to retire early.

The major reason why I support voluntary retirement is because of the fact that only an employee knows his potential to its best. For example, some prefer to retire early and seek pension because they feel either incapable of pursuing their career, or the external circumstances would not allow them to do so. On the other hand, there are certain employees who are young in their minds, and this reflects in their attitude towards work. I feel such people should be given ample opportunities and time so that the organization can make use of their service to the maximum.

I definitely feel that employees working in certain sectors benefit from an early retirement and pension. Those who had strained their brains and muscles to the extreme, and those who had met tough emotional challenges during work fall in this category. Defense personnel and laborers of mine are pertinent examples of this type of employee.

To conclude, I feel retirement should be made voluntary except in exceptional cases. I also think there would be fewer disputes when an overstressed employee is extended an early retirement and pension.

Sample 10:

The concept of a universal retirement age, such as 65 years, has been a subject of contention, with arguments asserting its inequity across diverse occupations. I concur that certain professions warrant an earlier retirement due to the unique demands they impose on individuals. This essay will explore the rationale behind early retirement for physically demanding and high-stress jobs.

Physically demanding roles, such as construction workers or firefighters, subject individuals to extreme physical stress that can exacerbate health issues over prolonged periods. These professions often involve rigorous physical activity, exposure to hazardous materials, and a significant risk of injury, which can lead to chronic conditions. Consequently, extending the retirement age for these workers not only endangers their health but also compromises the quality of work they are able to deliver. For instance, a comprehensive study revealed that firefighters experience a notably higher rate of cardiovascular diseases compared to the general population, emphatically underscoring the need for them to have the option to retire earlier to mitigate such grave health risks effectively.

Similarly, occupations with high emotional and psychological demands, such as healthcare professionals and educators, warrant consideration for early retirement benefits. These workers endure constant stress, emotional drain, and the potential for burnout due to the intense nature of their duties, which demand high levels of empathy and continuous, thoughtful engagement with individuals' well-being and educational needs. Allowing early retirement offers these dedicated professionals a well-deserved respite and ensures that their sectors remain highly productive with a workforce that is both mentally fit and deeply motivated. For example, numerous teachers who opt for early retirement report significant improvements in their mental health and overall life satisfaction, vividly illustrating the profound benefits and positive impact of implementing such forward-thinking policies.

In conclusion, a one-size-fits-all retirement age neglects the unique demands and risks of certain jobs. Prioritizing early retirement for those in physically strenuous and high-stress roles is crucial for their well-being and the quality of their work, fostering a fairer and healthier society.

Sample 11:

The debate over a universal retirement age has garnered considerable attention, with many advocating for adjustments based on occupational demands. I staunchly support the notion that retirement should not be uniformly dictated but instead tailored to the nature of the work, especially for professions that impose severe physical and mental strains on workers.

Occupations such as healthcare and mining undeniably present unique challenges that justify an earlier retirement age. Healthcare professionals, for example, face relentless stress and irregular hours that can have profound effects on their physical and mental health. The continuous exposure to high-stress environments, coupled with the physical demands of long shifts, often results in burnout. According to a comprehensive study by the American Medical Association, over 40% of healthcare workers experience burnout symptoms before reaching the age of 60, clearly underscoring the need for earlier retirement options to preserve health and maintain quality of care. This preventative approach not only enhances the longevity of healthcare workers’ careers but also ensures they can provide optimal care throughout their tenure.

Similarly, miners work under hazardous conditions that are not only physically demanding but also perilous. The daily risk of accidents in such environments increases with age, as physical agility and sensory acuity typically decline. Research from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health highlights a significant increase in mining accidents involving workers over 55, compared to their younger counterparts. This data compellingly argues for policies that permit these workers to retire earlier, ensuring their safety and well-being. Early retirement for miners would not only reduce the incidence of work-related injuries but also decrease the long-term health costs associated with such high-risk occupations.

In conclusion, tailoring retirement ages to occupational demands is crucial. Professions like healthcare and mining pose significant risks, necessitating earlier retirement to preserve health and safety. Adjusting policies accordingly not only respects workers' contributions but also ensures a more sustainable workforce.

Sample 12:

The circumstances of being retired is an ongoing debate. There is an opinion that profession plays a key role in deciding the age of retirement and some individuals should have a right to retire before others. I completely agree with this statement and in my essay, I will explain the reasons and some kinds of jobs. 

It is obvious that some humans have a more exhausting programme in their business life than others, namely health workers. They have obligatory shifts in order to make a constant treatment for their patients. Additionally, it is mostly impossible to prefer working only during the day. To be more precise, almost everyone has to work in the hospitals even at night while other people sleep. In a survey which was conducted by the Psychology Department of Uludag University between 2022-2023, it was found that working during the day is less stressful than at night and the stress level of some individuals, who work just weekdays and during the day, is lesser. From my view, everyone deserves to have a healthy lifestyle and we should take action for early retirement in order to both encourage people to work in medicine and give health workers a chance to maintain a healthy life.

There should be some arrangements for early retirement for certain jobs such as health workers and miners. As people get older, they lose their concentration to maintain their jobs and this situation may result in accidents. For instance, a nurse who is in her 50s cannot be as effective as a young colleague. So, it is reasonable to make them retire at an early age on behalf of both them and their patients. Additionally, miners need to be careful while doing their risky jobs. However, it is inevitable to make more mistakes with an increased age. 

In conclusion, in my opinion, it is sensible to impose early retirement for some professions such as health workers and miners because of the nature of these jobs and workers’ harsh working conditions. 

Sample 13:

The imposition of a uniform retirement age, typically at 65, has sparked debate over its fairness across different professions. This essay argues that the notion of a fixed retirement age does not account for the diverse demands and risks associated with various occupations, particularly advocating for early retirement for physically intensive and high-stress roles.

Physically intensive occupations, such as those in construction and emergency services, impose a significant toll on workers' physical health. The strenuous nature of these jobs, coupled with exposure to potential hazards and the relentless physical demands, unequivocally demands a reassessment of retirement age policies. For example, research robustly highlights that construction workers are notably prone to musculoskeletal disorders, suggesting a tailored retirement age could significantly prevent long-term health deterioration and enhance quality of life.

Similarly, professions experiencing high levels of emotional and psychological stress, including healthcare workers and teachers, present a compelling case for early retirement considerations. The chronic stress associated with these pivotal roles can precipitate burnout, adversely affecting both performance and mental health, thus undermining the efficacy of the services provided. An illustrative, comprehensive study on healthcare professionals demonstrated a direct, undeniable correlation between job stress and the quality of patient care, reinforcing the argument for allowing these dedicated workers to retire earlier to maintain high service standards and safeguard their well-being.

In conclusion, adhering to a universal retirement age overlooks the specific challenges and health risks inherent in certain professions. Recognizing the need for differentiated retirement ages, especially for jobs that are physically demanding or involve high stress levels, is crucial for protecting workers' health and ensuring the continuation of quality services. Such a policy shift would not only honor the contributions of these workers but also contribute to a more adaptable and compassionate society.

Sample 14:

There is a popular view that a fixed retirement age should not be applicable to everyone, some specific sector workers could be counted as exceptional regarding this age limit rule. I certainly support this idea considering the risk and hostile workplace conditions of some professions. I will elucidate why the key workers like health professionals and construction staffs could be allowed to reap their early retirement benefits.

The value of the working hours varies in accordance with different time, culture, and context. In fact, it goes according to the necessity of a society, and more importantly, it depends on a country’s overall economic structure. Here in Brazil, in the late nineteen fifties, construction workers were highly paid mostly because of the nation´s rapid development. This contrasts with today´s situation in which their income is below the national average. Nevertheless, in both contexts, their retirement age limit has been the same even though the payment and workload are varied.

In addition, we know that some labours have more exposure to riskier work environment, and this should be addressed by the National Providential system. It is ridiculous to put both the comfort office workers and the workers of life-threatening adverse atmosphere in the same basket. This irrational common ground mechanism is a clear reflection of governmental ignorance to the key workers who dedicate their everything at a relatively younger age than the other groups. It includes construction workers, miners, radiologists, and many blue colour workers who are always exposed to health risk and end up with losing work fitness at an early age. Considering this scenario, governments are obliged to support them with early retirement age benefits.

In conclusion, each society has its own values and needs. We must take into account all the labour risk factors as key criteria for setting up the retirement age limit. In fact, a great community is the one that respects individual distinctions and appraises them accordingly.

Sample 15:

Nowadays, superannuation is determined at a pre-defined period by the higher authorities. However, some people believe that fixing the retirement age for every employee, irrespective of their work, is totally an injustice. According to their perspective, certain employees should have a chance to get after-service benefits at their earlier phase. I completely agree with them. This essay will shed light on the reasons behind it in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, there are various factors which support this. Firstly, some workers indulged in tasks which cost them their liberty and freedom to enjoy their time with their family and relatives. Early retirement provides them with the opportunity to utilize that period. For instance, an Army personnel is not able to find time for his personal life due to the tough situations present in the work environment, however, retirement at an early age will enable them to accompany their close ones. Secondly, People suffering from some sort of medical ailments will also get advantages from this scheme as well.

On the other hand, it also benefits myriad people working in various sectors. Primarily, Workers who are serving the nation will get benefit from this scheme. It will enable them to enjoy their life to the fullest. For example, Military personnel, as well as Policemen who perform regular duties, deserve to receive a pension at an earlier stage than others. Additionally, Persons with health-related issues can also be included in the list of persons who are eligible to enjoy this perk.

To conclude I would like to reiterate that government and lawmakers should make policies for the aforesaid categories of workers in order to assure their interests. Therefore, I agree with the above-said question that some employees deserve to retire at an earlier age.