Some people think that getting a degree from university is the best way to guarantee a good job, others believe that it would be better to go straight into work and get experience instead. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:

Sample 1:
Getting a good job in this competitive world is extremely difficult. Some people believe that getting a degree from university is the best way to get a good job. However, some people believe that it would be better to go straight into work and get an experience instead. Let us expand on these details. I believe that a degree as well as work experience are both mandatory to secure a job nowadays. Getting a degree is the basic qualification that is required by any company or firm to hire a candidate. Some companies have a policy of not hiring candidates if they do not hold the requisite qualifications. For example, companies hire software engineers if they have a degree in IT, Computer Science or any other relevant field. The relevant experience in the field can be an additional benefit in this case. However, there are also cases wherein no degree is required. For example, people that work in businesses, entrepreneurship or opening a restaurant. There are many small-scale businesses in India including handicrafts, carpet making, etc. These businesses do not require a particular degree. Moreover, these are only based on the hands-on experience of the employees. Such businesses, however, do not have a fixed timeline. They may gain profit at some point while at other times the profits might dip. Therefore, it can be somewhat said that experience and education vary as per the nature of the job. I, however, believe that a degree and relevant work experience is paramount for a good job in this competitive world.
Sample 2:
Education is fundamental in today's world and is therefore an apex for getting a good job. Some people however believe that only work experience is sufficient to get a good job. I believe that only work experience can get people good jobs, but the chance of it is minimal. People with experience and no degree can also sometimes start with menial jobs and then further move on to good jobs. People are also of the opinion that the time they might spend pursuing a degree can be utilized by getting hands-on experience.
In fact, several people overseas are known to get good jobs not because of their educational background but due to their hands-on experience. In India however this has still not gained momentum, as here people stress more on the importance of degree. Big MNCs never hire candidates unless they have the required educational background. Having a good degree can get candidates a job anywhere. Holding a degree is the minimum requirement of every company, especially in India. To get a good job in the field of engineering, medicine, science, etc, all require a degree to get a good job in the industry. I strongly believe that a degree and work experience are both essential to survive nowadays. A degree can open the doors for some amazing opportunities and work experience can further create a plethora of opportunities. Thus, both are equally important.
Sample 3:
A good degree can create manifold opportunities for candidates looking to secure a good job in the industry. It is often debated whether candidates should pursue a good degree or directly get hands-on experience. People believe that the time they spend on getting a degree can be effectively spent to get the required work experience. I, however, disagree with this as I strongly believe that candidates must get a good degree. After getting a basic degree candidates can also go for higher studies. After pursuing higher studies, candidates can get a job in any of the fields they desire, provided it is relatable to their degree. Also, in India, getting a good job without a degree is nearly impossible. Such candidates can only get jobs in a field which has a learning curve. For example, a sales representative in a store can be hired with minimal experience and an educational background. The job requires strong communication skills, and the rest can be learned at the job. There are other such jobs as a hairdresser, electrician, etc., all require minimal education experience and have more to do with their hands-on experience. Even though it is a popular belief that candidates must get a degree to get a good job, it entirely depends on the nature of the job that people are seeking. People working as hairdressers and electricians consider their jobs to be good. In such cases, work experience is prioritized over educational qualifications. Thus, it entirely depends on and varies from one person to another and is decided accordingly.
Sample 4:
In the contemporary job market, a dichotomy exists between the valuation of academic degrees and hands-on experience. Some argue that a university degree is paramount for securing prestigious employment, while others advocate for immediate immersion in the workplace to gain practical experience. This essay contends that both pathways have merit, depending on individual career objectives, with a slight inclination towards the value of experience.
University education provides a comprehensive foundation, equipping students with theoretical knowledge and critical thinking skills. For instance, careers in medicine and engineering unequivocally require a degree for foundational knowledge and safety reasons. However, the academic path is not solely about acquiring knowledge; it also fosters a sense of discipline, time management, and the ability to research and analyze complex issues. These transferable skills are highly valued in any professional setting, illustrating that university education is not merely a means to an end but a significant contributor to personal and professional development.
Conversely, diving directly into the workforce offers immediate practical experience and the opportunity to develop soft skills such as communication, teamwork, and problem-solving in real-world contexts. Many successful entrepreneurs and tech innovators, for example, have eschewed formal education in favor of practical experience, which propelled them to the forefront of their industries. This route can also lead to earlier financial independence and the possibility of climbing the career ladder through merit and experience rather than academic qualifications. Therefore, while the path might be unconventional, it can lead to substantial professional success and fulfillment.
In summary, the value of university education and direct work experience varies based on personal goals and industry demands. A degree can unlock specific career paths and expand intellectual horizons, whereas practical experience offers swift skill application and problem-solving. A tailored combination of both may serve as the ideal strategy for achieving professional excellence.
Sample 5:
The debate between the benefits of academic qualifications and the advantages of entering the workforce directly is perennial. This essay posits that while formal education furnishes individuals with critical foundational knowledge, hands-on experience offers invaluable practical insights, suggesting a harmonious blend of both approaches may be most beneficial.
Educational institutions are not merely factories of information; they are crucibles where critical thinking and analytical skills are honed. For example, the rigors of a law degree are indispensable for anyone aiming to practice in legal fields, demonstrating how certain professions necessitate academic credentials. Beyond vocational training, university life instills resilience and adaptability, skills imperative in navigating the complexities of modern workplaces. Furthermore, the collaborative projects and internships offer real-world insights within a controlled environment. However, this traditional pathway is not without its drawbacks, including the significant financial burden and the time invested, which could delay entry into the workforce, potentially making it less appealing to those wary of accruing debt.
On the other hand, diving into work immediately after secondary education can offer a head start in career progression and financial independence. This route enables individuals to cultivate soft skills such as leadership, teamwork, and time management in real-time, skills that are often underdeveloped in academic settings. Engaging in the workforce early also allows for the exploration of various career paths without the commitment of a degree. The story of tech moguls who forewent formal education in favor of entrepreneurial pursuits illustrates that success is not solely the province of the degree-holders, championing the value of innovation and practical experience. Nonetheless, this approach may limit opportunities in fields where professional qualifications are mandatory, potentially hindering long-term career advancement in certain sectors.
In summary, both academic qualifications and direct work experience offer unique advantages towards career development. Ideally, a tailored blend of the two aligns best with achieving professional success, enhancing employability, and ensuring comprehensive personal growth for today's dynamic job landscape.
Sample 6:
The question of whether getting a degree from university is the best way to guarantee a good job or whether it is more advantageous to go straight into work and get experience instead has been a subject of considerable debate. The crux of the discussion lies in the merits of theoretical knowledge acquired through a university education versus the practical skills and insights obtained from direct work experience. This essay will critically explore these contrasting perspectives, while also acknowledging the benefits of early workforce entry, such as hands-on learning and early professional networking.
Proponents of higher education purport that a university degree is a gatekeeper to a prosperous career. They argue that academic qualifications equip students with a comprehensive understanding of their chosen field, building a solid foundation of theoretical knowledge. For example, professionals in fields such as medicine, law, or engineering are requisite to have a thorough academic grounding to ensure competence in their practice. Moreover, a university degree often serves as a prerequisite for numerous high-paying jobs. Consequently, it's contended that attaining a degree can propel one’s career trajectory and increase their earning potential.
Conversely, advocates for immediate entry into the workforce posit that real-world experience is indispensable. They believe that hands-on experience garnered from an early start in the workforce can bestow practical skills and knowledge that academia often falls short of delivering. For instance, a budding entrepreneur may gain more valuable insights from directly diving into the business world than spending years studying business theories. Additionally, this route enables individuals to establish professional networks, gain early financial independence, and avoid substantial student debt. However, it is essential to understand that different career paths necessitate different types of preparation. Therefore, while some professions indeed demand formal education, others are more suited to learning 'on the job'.
In summary, the argument between the value of university degrees and the importance of hands-on experience is complex and multifaceted. Each pathway offers its unique benefits and setbacks. Thus, it is critical to assess individual needs and career goals before making such a consequential decision. Therefore, there isn't a 'one-size-fits-all' answer, but rather a broad spectrum of paths leading to fulfilling careers.
Sample 7:
It is a widely held view that a formal university degree is the key to securing a promising career. Conversely, some argue that gaining immediate work experience outweighs the benefits of tertiary education. I am of the conviction that the relevance of a degree or practical experience largely depends on the specific profession in question.
Primarily, numerous professional roles necessitate specialized knowledge that can only be acquired through academic study. Occupations such as physicians, engineers, legal practitioners, or educators require a comprehensive understanding of theoretical principles in their respective fields. For example, aspiring surgeons must grasp intricate concepts of anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry before they can confidently and safely perform operations. Likewise, engineers must delve deep into abstract principles of physics and mathematics to design structures or systems. Thus, in such research-intensive fields, the role of formal education is indisputable.
Contrastingly, vocational professions tend to value hands-on experience and training over academic credentials. Professions like electricians, carpenters, or plumbers demand a significant amount of practical skill, honed over time in real-world environments. Similarly, in the dynamic landscape of digital marketing or entrepreneurship, direct industry exposure and acquired skills often trump a formal degree. To illustrate, many hospitality establishments, not only in Australia but also globally, prioritize candidates with substantial experience over those with hospitality degrees. Here, skills acquired in the trenches of work are deemed more valuable than academic qualifications.
However, a growing number of professions today, such as architecture or industrial design, necessitate a balance of both formal education and hands-on experience. Additionally, in the era of remote and digital work, it is conceivable that the lines between academic and practical knowledge will continue to blur, making an integrated approach even more pertinent.
In conclusion, while certain careers demand the rigorous academic training provided by universities, others place a higher premium on practical skills and industry experience. Ultimately, the debate between formal education and practical experience is not a matter of superiority, but one of suitability to a given professional context.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
- Sổ tay dẫn chứng nghị luận xã hội năm 2025 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay Giáo dục Kinh tế & Pháp luật 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Tuyển tập 30 đề thi đánh giá năng lực Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, TP Hồ Chí Minh (2 cuốn) ( 150.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.
In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.
Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.
Sample 2:
The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common.
In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.
In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.
Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.
Sample 3:
The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.
Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.
In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.
In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.
Sample 4:
The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.
At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.
Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.
Sample 5:
The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.
In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.
Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.
Sample 6:
The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.
Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.
Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.
In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.