Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 184 Lưu

Some people believe that family is more important than friends. To what extent do you agree and disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

In today’s era, when the world has morphed into an utterly engaging competitive foreground where everybody is busy and entangled in their stifle, dedicating proper time to our loved ones has become really difficult. Some people contend that family is more important than friends, while some propound that it is not the case. However, I find myself agreeing with the former statement and shall be putting forth my views in the subsequent paragraphs.

The family has always been a first and the prime countenance of any individual. If we extend the ambit of our immediate relations, family is the first staunch port that we come across. Time and again, it has been proven how a faltering individual has been buttressed by their family. Ultimately, they are the ones who turn out to be the only abode while we are made to face the hardships of life. Therefore, it makes sense to rely upon and dedicate one’s time to cultivating and strengthening the roots of the family terms.

Moreover, if one draws a comparison between their family and friends, the former knows the nuances of the individual’s personality and the know-how of their situations at all times, not necessarily corresponding to a single tonality of life, while one tends to show the superficial sides or the people they choose to be with the friends. Upon some unforeseen and unfortunate circumstances, it has been commonly seen how family members perceive the emotions of what an individual was or had been going through while friends generally miss taking notes of an intrinsic persona of the individual. In such a scenario, one should most certainly keep up with one’s kins and family relations.

Though, some would say, friends can better understand what one is going through as they are presumably closer, yet, as one sees around, people sketch their personalities in front of their friends and artificially present themselves before them.

In conclusion, it can be said that one should dedicate their time towards one’s family to have a better hold on themselves and to mutually own up to their needs as they are the true essence of love, emotions, sympathy, and happiness in the long run.

Sample 2:

Many believe that family obligations outweigh those towards friends. In my opinion, though this varies by individual to some extent, family holds the stronger claim.

Those who feel friends are more important argue that as an adult, friends are more influential. While still living at home, there is little doubt that one’s family has more sway; this reverses after university when a person lives on their own. They will probably end up spending more time with friends from work or school, especially if they are living far from home. Additionally, friends are chosen, and family is not. This autonomy in selecting a circle of friends means that they are more likely to, relative to one’s family, share similar beliefs and personal qualities.

Nonetheless, friends pass in and out of life and family lasts forever. Family has, naturally, the greatest influence in the developmental years of life when researchers believe the majority of identity formation takes place. Coupled with genetic factors, this is why family members have similar attitudes and beliefs, in general. Unlike friends, a person’s relationship with their family, assuming they are not estranged, will span their entire life. At various points throughout adulthood, most people will turn to their immediate or extended family for critical advice or support, strengthening familial bonds. This enduring link makes family a more powerful force than friends.

In conclusion, though friends can take on increasing value, family has the greatest importance taken as a whole. It is therefore key that families stay in touch and maintain friendly relations.

Sample 3:

The debate over whether family ties hold greater significance than friendships is a multifaceted one. I firmly believe that while family provides foundational support, the value of friendships cannot be understated, as both play crucial roles in personal development and emotional wellbeing.

Firstly, the inherent bond shared with family members is unparalleled. From the moment of birth, families play a pivotal role in shaping our values, beliefs, and behaviors. This unique relationship, often characterized by unconditional love and support, is foundational to our sense of security and identity. For instance, in times of crisis, families often become the primary source of comfort and assistance, exemplifying the irreplaceable nature of these bonds. Furthermore, familial connections are not just about emotional support; they also include the transmission of cultural heritage and traditions, which are vital for personal identity and continuity.

On the other hand, friendships offer a different spectrum of emotional and social support that complements familial relationships. Friends, chosen based on mutual interests, values, and understanding, provide a sense of belonging outside the family unit. They introduce new perspectives, challenge our thoughts, and encourage personal growth in ways that family members might not. For example, while family provides a safety net, friends often propel us out of our comfort zones, facilitating personal development and self-discovery. This dynamic interaction with friends plays a pivotal role in shaping our adaptability, empathy, and social skills.

In conclusion, while the importance of family is undeniable, friendships hold an equally significant place in our lives. Both family and friends contribute uniquely to our emotional resilience and social development, making it impossible to deem one more important than the other. Therefore, the essence of this discussion lies not in prioritizing one over the other but in recognizing the invaluable contributions each brings to our lives.

Sample 4:

The significance of family compared to friendships sparks considerable debate. This essay posits that while familial bonds are inherently valuable for foundational support, the enriching experiences friendships provide are equally indispensable. The ensuing discussion will explore the unique benefits of both relationships.

Familial ties, inherently imbued with deep-rooted emotional connections, offer unparalleled support and a sense of belonging that is difficult to replicate. The role of family in nurturing, guiding, and shaping individuals from infancy through adulthood is critical, laying the groundwork for personal values and ethics. For example, the family unit is often the first social structure a person encounters, teaching fundamental social skills and providing a framework for understanding the world. This intrinsic support system not only offers comfort in times of distress but also plays a pivotal role in the development of an individual’s character and worldview.

Contrastingly, friendships introduce a dynamic aspect of social support, characterized by mutual interests, voluntary connections, and personal growth. These relationships, often formed on the basis of shared experiences and ideologies, provide a platform for exploring diverse perspectives and developing social skills beyond the familial context. An illustrative example is the way friends can influence one’s choices, aspirations, and resilience. The voluntary nature of friendship allows for a selection process based on compatibility and shared values, fostering environments where individuals can express themselves freely and evolve.

In summary, while the foundational support of family is indispensable, the unique contributions of friendships are equally vital to an individual’s social and emotional development. Both familial bonds and friendships offer distinct and complementary benefits that collectively enrich a person’s life. Acknowledging the value of each, without diminishing the importance of the other, is key to understanding their integral roles in human development.

Sample 5:

It is considered by some that family members account for more parts than close friends. Since families offer immediate support and lifetime impact, I strongly agree with this viewpoint.

To begin with, it has been repeatedly demonstrated how shaky people are buttressed by their family. They provide the crucial assistance in times of adversities regardless of circumstances, including financial difficulty, mental sickness, or physical incapacity. Parents, for instance, can assist children in any circumstance even when their offspring are unable to provide any monetary incentives in exchange, whereas close friends are unlikely to provide this free support. In the worst case, parents are likely to use most of their retirement savings to help their loved ones to get through significant financial hardships. Family is therefore the final resort for receiving most assistance.

Another aspect is that people often act and think like their family members. To put it another way, because individuals spend the majority of their time with their family, it seems sense that they would think and act similarly to them. For instance, because I was raised in a conservative home and was taught that there should be no sexual activity before marriage, I ended my relationship with my former lover in accordance with this deeply ingrained belief. Families therefore exert a variety of influences and are crucial in shaping people's attitudes and behaviours.

In conclusion, I still firmly believe that family should be prioritized over friends because in the end, while we are forced to deal with life's difficulties, family members are the only ones who provide us unwavering assistance with sustainable influence.

Sample 6:

Making comparisons between friends and family members, considering family members more important than friends and vice versa, has been a common practice since long. The pitch of these comparisons, and prioritizing both over each other, becomes sharper and shriller, when a family or an individual is passing through a turbulent phase.

Family members are an important part of the life of any individual, as a person, born and brought up in an environment of family is trained to behave and face life in all its diverse dimensions. A child, from its birth, always looks up to its elders for love and affection, which ultimately develops into strong lifelong bonding. The parents, and brothers and sisters, fulfill the emotional and psychological needs of an individual and always stand by him or her whenever there is a need.

Apart from that, even if relations between family members are strained, they do not turn their backs at each other when the situation arises, and always come to the rescue of each other. People have experienced that they can share even their ill feelings more openly with their family members and still keep their relations sweet and on friendly terms. For instance, people in need of morals or any kind of support, including financial, can easily bank upon their parents and siblings.

However, friends are considered to be close to heart, with whom an individual can easily share even the darkest of secrets, without fear of secret being let out to others. Pals, or buddies, as they may be called, are always there when an individual needs them, especially when a person is in pain and needs a shoulder to cry on.

To conclude, I personally feel, even though friends and family both have their distinct importance and role for an individual, parents and siblings hold more relevance for an individual.   

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.

Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.

At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.

In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.

Sample 2:

Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.

To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.

Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.

To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.

Sample 3:

There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.

The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.

There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.

In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.

Sample 4:

Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.

To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.

However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.

In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.

Sample 5:

Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.

In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.

In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.

Lời giải

The graph shows the number of people taking part in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.

Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.

In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.

Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.

Sample 2:

The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common. 

In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.

In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.

Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.

Sample 3:

The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.

Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.

In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.

In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.

Sample 4:

The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.

Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.

At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.

Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.

Sample 5:

The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.

Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.

In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.

Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.

Sample 6:

The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.

Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.

Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.

In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP