Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 197

Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

It is argued that providing more sports centres or health clubs would be the most effective method for improving public health. From my point of view, however, proper health education would be a better measure.

On the one hand, people’s health has been greatly enhanced thanks to participation in sports facilities. It is an undeniable fact that fitness levels are increased by taking part in physical activities such as doing daily exercise or playing sports. Therefore, the increasing popularity of gym classes or sports clubs gives people more chances to improve their health. After a hard day at work, many residents in my neighbourhood attend evening yoga classes in order to keep fit and stay healthy.

On the other hand, I would argue that increasing the provision of sports amenities would have little impact on public health. This can be explained by the fact that many people who paid for an annual gym membership failed to go entirely after just one month. Therefore, I think that it is more important to educate citizens about basic health awareness. A person would easily avoid some potential health problems if he is equipped with sufficient basic knowledge about medicine and health care. For example, when a child knows more about the adverse effects of smoking, he might be less likely to take up this bad habit in his adulthood. Public campaigns and health protection programmes, thus, should be promoted so that people know how to protect their health effectively.

In conclusion, the growing prevalence of sports facilities has brought a wide range of health benefits for people; yet I personally believe that raising public awareness through health campaigns would have a more positive impact on improving people’s health.

Sample 2:

To improve public health, some people suggest that sports can play a vital role. It is said that “Healthy mind is in a Healthy body”. By increasing the number of sports facilities, we can create an environment of courage, sportsmanship, and tolerance. The minds of youth can also be directed towards healthy activities through sports promotion.

However, some people believe that sports facilities alone are not sufficient to improve public health. There are many socio-economic factors that gravely affect public health, such as water & sanitation, rampant population & pollution, lack of hygienic manners and social unrest. These factors need to be addressed to improve overall public health.

In my opinion, in a country like Pakistan, where people are living under the “shadow of fear” due to prevailing terrorism in the country we need a diverse approach. Speaking of flourishing poverty, inflation, and unemployment – availing sports facilities could be a luxury. And then there is a vast majority of areas deprived of basic health facilities, where one doctor is available for thousands of people. Sports can play a role but only if people are content with their lives.

There is a dire need for government to take solid actions to improve the general well-being of the people. Firstly, it must improve the security situation in the country to give peace of mind to the public. Secondly, it must improve the water & sanitation system and must put a serious check on pollution increase and should take steps to reduce poverty, illiteracy and unemployment. Thirdly, the society must improve general hygiene level to have a positive impact on overall public health.

Sample 3:

Public health has been always one of the sophisticated issues in each society and over the last several years, there have been lots of efforts made by governments to improve public health in some countries. However, some believe that extending sports facilities in each corner of the country can have a deep effect on this matter; some others opine that other ways would be more appreciated to have a healthy society. So, this essay has tried to cover both of mentioned views and then will suggest one of the best strategies to increase health indicators.

Availability of the sports facilities can make a situation where anyone in any place can do exercise and undeniably it affects some parameters of public health in a society. Put another way, these days people can easily find gems near their houses, and they don’t need to waste time and cost of going to some specific areas to do exercise. By contrast, over the last few years, people should spend time for the mentioned purpose and most of the times they don’t attend to do exercise as they find it difficult because of the shortage of sports facilities.

However, making sports facilities in each street or residential areas can have a bit effect on public health, this cannot encourage people to do exercise lonely. Hence, public awareness about the role of exercising in health would be considered besides extending gems. For example, the media should be more concerned about public health and broadcast some suitable programs to show the importance of exercising on physical and mind health. Also, there should be held several meetings in schools and universities to invite people to go to gyms by describing its benefits.

I think, therefore, if people know that exercising is such a long-term investment as they don’t need to pay for serious diseases in older age, they would be interested in using sports facilities; however, enough sports facilities should be constructed in each part of cities and villages.

Sample 4:

A group of people believe that by adding more sports facilities in the community, it will increase the public awareness about a healthy lifestyle. On the contrary, others think that the idea is ineffective, and they believe that there are other ways which are more effective and efficient. The following essay will discuss in detail the two statements.

On the one hand, some people think that the best solution for improving public health is by providing a lot of sports facilities in the society. The existence of jogging tracks facilities, athletic fields, basketball halls or football grounds in residential areas would trigger the residents into doing some exercises. With the increasing number of people who do physical exercises, it is expected that the rate of several diseases which are caused by unhealthy lifestyles, such as diabetics, heart attack or obesity would be reduced. Consequently, public health expenditures would be declined and could be allocated for other important aspects such as education or public transportation.

On the other hand, another group of people believe that building some sports facilities in the community would not be effective without health education campaigns. It is undeniable that health campaign is an essential matter since it is important to open the mind of the public about having a healthy lifestyle. The campaign should be well prepared, socialised properly and implemented thoroughly, therefore, the public will get the awareness about healthy lifestyles. Once people have realised about the lifestyles, then they would utilise the sports facilities that have been built by the government.

In conclusion, several people think that adding more sports facilities in the neighbourhood would improve the public health, but others believe that it would only have a small effect. There are other things that should also be prepared besides building the facilities. In my opinion, I do believe that building some sports facilities in residential areas should be aligned with health education campaigns, therefore, the facilities would be utilised by the public.

Sample 5:

The government has a vested interest in the mental and physical well-being of its citizens. In recent years, there has been an increased spending by government to improve the sports infrastructure to encourage people to stay healthy. But it can be argued that providing sports facilities alone will not be enough to motivate the people to stay fitter but other incentives are required to make the people stay fit. This essay analyses the benefits of government actions to promote public health and suggests other methods that can be employed to improve them.

Firstly, physical and psychological benefits created by sports activities contribute to a better healthy body. Regular practice of games like badminton and basketball increases the heart rate and burns the deposited fat from the body that in turn can help improve the health of the individuals. Furthermore, engaging in games can improve concentration and relieve stress accumulated at the workplace. Thus, sports-related activities help the people in leading a healthy lifestyle.

However, the bigger challenge for the government is to create awareness about health and instil interest in their mind to engage in sports-related activities. Creating sports facilities in several places of cities may not generate a lot of interest among the public to use them. They have to create awareness campaigns and incentivise the sports facilities so that the general public can appreciate the benefits of using them. It can be achieved through advertisement campaigns and special prizes for good attendance.

In conclusion, the government should aim at creating a healthy society by not only creating sports facilities but also encouraging the public to use the facilities. I strongly believe that governments following the above-mentioned actions will lead to a healthy society.

Sample 6:

There are those who claim that the best way to uplift public health is through adding more sports facilities. However, others say that this would produce few effects on public health and that other alternatives are needed. These views will now be discussed, and I will give my opinion at the end of the essay.

Some people believe that having a lot of sports facilities is the best way to improve public health. They think that with the availability of these recreational facilities will shift the attention of people from doing drugs and/or other detrimental vices to sports, which is also a form of exercise. In our community, for instance, members of the local council in cooperation with the youth sector proposed the constitution of a gymnasium was finished early last year. It became the venue for different events not only within our community but also the neighbouring community. Since the construction of the sports facility, the local health station has reported a significant decrease in clinical visits of the locals.

On the other hand, other people think sports facilities will have little effect on public health and that other measures are needed. They believe that there are activities that are more effective and more important, health programs for example. For them, having an activity that everyone can participate in is more effective than building more sports facilities. Perhaps activities, like conducting a daily exercise or helping the local health department in locating ill people within the community, would be a greater help. As for my experience, I was once a volunteer in our health station wherein we do look for people in the community needing health attention and we refer them to the municipal health office for evaluation and treatment.

In conclusion, I think both views are of great help in improving public health. We, the residents, to the best of our ability should cooperate and help our community leaders in improving public health.

Sample 7:

Many people believe that sports facilities are essential for improving public health as sporting activity helps to maintain a body diet. But sports facilities are not the only solution to improve public health. While a healthy place lets us live a healthy life, living in a dirty place and bad foods lead to numbers of health problems. In my opinion, other measures are required to improve public health along with the increase of sports facilities.

Sports facilities are very important for public health either directly or indirectly. If you exercise regularly, you will have less disease than others who do not exercise at all. Besides this, doctors always prescribe walking in the morning for controlling various diseases like diabetes. Moreover, sports facilities let the children grow up healthy and tall. Furthermore, to the fact, sporting activity keeps you away from getting addicted to alcohol or drugs. So, the importance of sports facilities cannot be ignored in any way.

On the other hand, other measures like reducing water contamination, environmental pollution, air and sound pollution etc. are important to improve public health. Doctors often emphasize the need for fresh air, which is essential for maintaining good health. Moreover, there are a number of deadly viruses transmitted via air and water. So, if we can reduce air and water pollution, it will help to improve public health certainly.

Finally, everybody needs to understand the reasons behind health deterioration. All specialist doctor related to public health emphasises the importance of pollution free environment, balanced diet as well as an increase of sports facilities. In my opinion, various measures need to be taken to improve public health by the appropriate authorities rather than concentrating on a particular issue like increasing sports facilities only.

Sample 8:

Certain people believe that to improve people's physical condition more gyms and similar infrastructural objects have to be built. Opponents state that these actions will not be productive, and other actions have to be made. In my opinion, although sports facilities are increasingly gaining popularity, they cannot noticeably affect the population's health.

Initially, it is obvious that gyms have always been a decent alternative to nightclubs or bars, considering that youngsters are often visitors there. The British Association of Doctors stated that 80% of jobs involve sitting in the office. As we know, our ancestors did a lot of physical works during their lives. Therefore, we ought to visit fitness centres to load ourselves with exercise; otherwise, you will be weak and maybe even ill. The main problem is the growing number of these facilities does not mean that more visitors will come.

Moreover, there are other important aspects of well-being. For example, a proper diet without red meat and sugar might be healthier than a morning jog. The government should pay more attention to advertising healthful organic groceries thereby reducing a consumption of food full of chemicals and pesticides. Secondly, the concept of fit lifestyle has to be introduced and become a compulsory part of school education. Lastly, to prevent addictions and improve public health prices on alcohol and tobacco products may be increased.

In conclusion, to improve public health objects such as swimming pools, stadiums and gyms are required. However other measures focused on healthy diet, advertising organic food or proper education will be more beneficial.

Sample 9:

Health is wealth. Without health, no one can lead a good life because good health is essential for people to work, to think, and even to lead a basic life. However, whether ‘physical activity is enough or not to lead a better social life’ is a debatable one. There are strong reasons behind both the views. However, I opt to the fact that sports activity is not enough for good health because a perfect man needs both physical and mental activity and other factors like proper diet, awareness among people, health care facilities and a healthy lifestyle also contribute towards a healthy life.

Firstly, from childhood, a person starts to do physical activity such as walking, running, playing but he does not know the importance of such actions or exercises. When he grows up, he knows the needs of exercise. This is his mental awareness. So, health will not be fulfilling with sports only as it needs mental power also. In current society, parents are least bothered by the physical health of their children and for themselves as well. Both parents in many cases are working and to make their life easier they rely on fast food and unhealthy foods. Not only that, most of the people are living in flats or apartments, so children are not getting enough space to play. Due to this, children are becoming more prone to obesity, and it leads to an unhealthy life and can make juvenile diabetics and other obesity-related illnesses. Nowadays there are varieties of sports or indoor activities like yoga, karate, or dance. These activities provide wellness to the mind and body. For example, in my place, we have camps or part-time classes for children and adults for yoga, swimming, karate and dance. These facilities should be made available for our convenience and less price.

If a person is physically fit with sports and not knowing about the importance of how to be healthy it will be worthless. For example, there are many sportspersons using alcohol or cigarettes. They are not thinking about their health because smoking and alcoholism can lead to an unhealthy lifestyle in future. Health awareness should be emphasised from childhood. So, at first, parents should be educated about this matter because nowadays parents want to make their children more intelligent in academic level. Community leaders such as teachers, doctors, and nurses should teach the public about the importance of physical and mental wellness. Public health means not only physical or mental well-being but rather it includes environmental wellbeing also. Proper disposal of waste, maintaining green life and deforestation are the main factors which help to maintain our environment safe.

To sum up, not only sports activities but also mental awareness is important to maintain good health because prevention is better than cure.

Sample 10:

Health is considered as the uttermost crucial element in people's lives and no country can ever dream to prosper if its citizens have a poor health condition. Every year the government spends billions of dollars to recuperate public health of the country. Some people think that government can actually save moolah by investing in building sports centres rather than squandering annually on medical supplies while others argue that it would make little difference.

Prevention is better than cure and it is indisputable that many diseases that people are suffering from these days are due to an unhygienic lifestyle that people are embracing these days. Lack of physical activity added to extreme work stress and junk foods are making people more and more vulnerable to diseases like blood pressure, diabetes and depression and its medications aren’t cheap either. It is evident that huge sums are reimbursed for treatment of these diseases. If the government opens sports centres and people take up a healthy habit of doing physical work out there, not only will it make them immune to these diseases, but they will also thrive both professionally and personally as a healthy body is superior to unhealthy one any day.

However, the mere concentration on sports centres to improve health conditions is not far from its fair share of controversy and critics either. Many disputes that it is only one aspect of possible many to the uplift health status of the country and snuggling it while completely overlooking others won't be of any use. For instance, people living in rural parts of our country do physical work all day and yet they do have poor health conditions. Lack of proper medical facilities, health awareness and malnutrition are leading to the untimely death of many by a simple disease like diarrhoea in places like Jajarkot and Ropla every year. Now the policy of setting up sports centres there while ignoring the real issues would not be anything more than a parody.

Sample 11:

People believe there exisits several ways to improve public health and well-being. They are grouped according to these measures that they support. Some of the people say that the increasing number of sports facilities results in more public health. Also, they assert that this way is the best. However, others claim that an increase in the number of sports facilities slightly affects the public health than other measures which are more important. In my opinion, not the latter but the former group's point of view is more realistic and worth believing.

To begin with the former, they choose the best way to increase healthiness level by increasing the number of sports facilities. Although sport is a good way to stay healthy, making a bulk of sports facility is not enough to encourage people to do sport. For example, there are lots of sports centres around the city charging on an annual basis and open until midnight, but there are not enough regular members. Most of the members started with full excitement to join each activity but could not afford to do what they promised. Actually, why this situation arises usually has many reasons, but the point is that only sports facilities are not enough to encourage people to participate in sports and maintain good health.

The latter opinion, which is more realistic, claims that more important other measures are required to improve public health rather than the sports facility. During our lifetime we changed our lifestyles a lot. Especially, people give different priorities to the ways which affect their health than before. These ways can be categorised mainly into three groups, such as eating habits, working styles and living area. First, people eat much more junk food than before, affecting their health in the worst way. Then, working conditions become harder than before which also change healthiness level to the negative sides. Finally, living areas are not clean enough to be healthy now. Thus, priority has to be given to those three ways to make them good for human health, but not to sports facilities.

To conclude, people may have different thoughts about how to increase public health. Some of them insist on increasing the number of sports facilities is the best way but others do not agree with them. Although sports is an important task for human health, solely it is not enough for improvement.

Sample 12:

A problem of modern societies is the declining level of health in the general population with conflicting views on how to tackle this worrying trend. One possible solution is to provide more sports facilities to encourage a more active lifestyle. 

Advocates of this believe that today’s sedentary lifestyle and stressful working conditions mean that physical activity is no longer part of either our work or our leisure time. If there were easy to-reach local sports centers, we would be more likely to make exercise a regular part of our lives, rather than just collapsing in front of a screen every evening. The variety of sports that could be offered would cater for all ages, levels of fitness and interests: those with painful memories of PE at school might be happier in the swimming pool than on the football pitch. 

However, there may be better ways of tackling this problem. Interest in sport is not universal and additional facilities might simply attract the already fit, not those who most need them. Physical activity could be encouraged relatively cheaply. For example, by installing exercise equipment in parks as my local council has done. This has the added benefit that parents and children often use them together just for fun, which develops a positive attitude to exercise at an early age.

As well as physical activity, high tax penalties could be imposed on high-fat food products, tobacco, and alcohol, as excessive consumption of any of these contributes to poor health. Even improving public transport would help: it takes longer to walk to the bus stop than to the car.

In my opinion, focusing on sports facilities is too narrow an approach and would not have the desired results. People should be encouraged not only to be more physically active but also to adopt a healthier lifestyle in general.  

Sample 13:

Public health issues have always been a long-term problem for many governments, and this has caused even more concerns these days with the ever- growing number of people suffering from modern diseases such as obesity or stress. While some people believe that the key to solving such a problem lies in the number of sports amenities at the public's disposal, I would side with those who are of the opinion that more measures are needed.

Investing in more sports facilities seems to be a feasible solution for some. This might be because the more equipment there are, the more convenient it is more for people to practice sports. As a result, the increasing amount of equipment can act as an incentive for people to exercise more regularly. However, the problem of public health is a complicated one that stems from a variety of factors such as poor diet and work-life imbalance, and the lack of exercise is just one of them. Therefore, buying more sports equipment alone might be too simplistic a solution.

Clearly, if the problem of public health is resolved, more measures will be required. First, the rapid development of the fast-food industry is to blame for the increasing number of people opting for this kind of food on a regular basis as an alternative to nutritious home-cooked meals, and thus, imposing a higher tax on such unhealthy food can curb the number of consumers and encourage people to switch to healthier options instead. Second, if people suffer from stress or other health conditions as a result of a lack of work-life balance, they should learn to prioritize their time more effectively. This means that they should seriously reflect on the way their time is spent and make a list of their top priorities at work and home, thereby optimizing their time to achieve their goals while still being able to balance their life. Seemingly, a change in lifestyle is essential in solving the problem.

In conclusion, addressing the issues of public health via increasing access to sports amenities alone is not enough. I believe that other methods should be introduced, and both the governments and individuals should join hands to make it happen.

Sample 14:

The improvement of public health is a crucial objective for societies worldwide, and various perspectives exist regarding the most effective approach. Some individuals argue that increasing the number of sports facilities is the optimal solution, while others contend that alternative measures would yield better results. This essay will discuss both viewpoints and present my opinion.

Proponents of expanding sports facilities assert that such an increase would directly contribute to enhanced public health. Access to a greater number of sports facilities would encourage participation in physical activities, thus combating sedentary lifestyles and reducing the prevalence of obesity and associated health issues. Moreover, these facilities often act as social centers, fostering community interaction and bolstering mental well-being.

Conversely, critics argue that merely augmenting the number of sports facilities is insufficient for improving public health on a larger scale. They maintain that a more comprehensive approach, encompassing public health campaigns and educational initiatives, is necessary to raise awareness and promote healthier habits. For instance, initiatives highlighting the significance of a balanced diet, regular exercise, and the detrimental effects of smoking can profoundly impact public health.

In my view, both approaches offer valuable contributions, and a combination thereof would yield the most favorable results in enhancing public health. While sports facilities can promote physical activity and social interaction, educational campaigns and public health initiatives are instrumental in raising awareness and fostering a society-wide understanding of the importance of healthy lifestyles.

In conclusion, although the expansion of sports facilities can be a positive factor in promoting better public health, it should not be regarded as the sole solution. A comprehensive strategy, incorporating both the development of sports facilities and the implementation of public health campaigns and educational programs, is more likely to achieve a substantial and lasting impact on public health. By adopting such a multifaceted approach, societies can work together to create a healthier and more active population, benefiting individuals and communities alike.

Sample 15:

The complex nature of public health has spurred ongoing debates on the most effective strategies for improvement. While some advocate for expanding sports facilities, others argue that such measures may offer limited impact. This essay explores both perspectives and delves into additional measures contributing to enhanced public health, followed by my own viewpoint.

Proponents assert that elevating public health hinges on promoting physical activity through sports. Accessible and well-maintained sports facilities inspire communities to embrace regular exercise, fostering a healthier lifestyle. Physical activity correlates with numerous health benefits, including weight management, cardiovascular health, and mental well-being. Additionally, these facilities serve as communal spaces that encourage social interaction, positively impacting mental health.

Conversely, skeptics argue that merely expanding sports facilities may not comprehensively address public health challenges. They highlight the pivotal roles played by factors such as lifestyle choices, dietary habits, and socio-economic conditions. Relying solely on sports-centric approaches may overlook individuals disinclined to participate in such activities, necessitating alternative strategies for health improvement.

Creating a holistic public health strategy involves considering factors beyond sports facilities. Crucial components include public health campaigns, education on healthy living, affordable healthcare access, and policies promoting nutritious diets. Addressing social determinants of health, such as income inequality and environmental factors, is equally vital for comprehensive health outcomes.

While expanding sports facilities shows promise in promoting physical activity and community well-being, it may not serve as a panacea for all public health challenges. A multifaceted approach, incorporating public health campaigns, education, and policies addressing various determinants, is imperative. Personally, I believe that integrating diverse, community-tailored strategies is key to fostering a healthier society, striving for sustained improvements in public health.

Sample 16:

It is often argued that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities whilst others feel that this would have little impact on public health and other measures are required. Increasing the number of sports facilities might be beneficial but in addition to that awareness about health and physical activity should be created amongst people through various campaigns.

The improvisation in sports facilities would affect public health in a good way. People would have easy access to better equipment, playing areas which is like to encourage them to indulge in sports regularly or whenever they have free time. It would burn off their calories, making them less prone to chronic diseases like hypertension or diabetes. For example, if good equipment and playing areas are made available in a residential complex, more people would come and play.

However, other measures like awareness campaigns must be organized to motivate people to indulge in sports activities. These campaigns would give people a better understanding of the importance of physical activity and how greatly it affects the human body. It would encourage them to either go for a walk or play their favorite sport whenever they have time. For example, In Singapore, such campaigns are run often which has motivated people to include any form of sports in their daily routine.

In conclusion, public health would not be improved by increasing the number of sports facilities alone but other method such as encouraging people and keeping them motivated to practice the same on a daily basis is also required.

Sample 17:

Over the last half-century, the pace of change in the life of human beings has increased beyond our wildest expectation. This rapid change has made our life more stressful and increasingly complex. Consequently, it has had a negative impact on the public health with the appearance of many diseases among people. Although, there are some commentators who believe that the major portion of the health budget should be diverted into the treatment of these diseases. I`m strongly inclined to the view that prevention is more important through the construction of more sports facilities as well as encouraging people to practice sports.

Firstly, it's very understandable that sports play a fundamental role not only in preventing diseases such as diabetes, obesity and high blood pressure but also in the treatment of them. For example, a recent study conducted in London has shown that an increased number of people practicing sports regularly significantly decreased the incidence of obesity by about 25%. In addition, sports facilities are places of social activities which in turn improve the psychological condition of people thus protecting them from diseases related to stress such as depression and anxiety disorders. Lastly, improving the fitness of the individuals, particularly youngsters, will increase the productivity of society in addition to improving the public health. Undoubtedly, increasing numbers of leisure centers will positively influence the public health.

On the other hand, a strong argument can be made on the opposite side. Opponents state that building new hospitals is more important for the public health since it will reduce the long waiting lists of hospitals. For instance, recent statistics in Canada have demonstrated that the waiting lists of hospitals rose by about 50% during the last two years. Furthermore, a wide sector of the population does not have access to medications because they are not covered by insurance. Therefore, a major part of the health budget should be allocated to provide all people with medicine. Moreover, many people in our society are homeless, thus the government should provide them with suitable housing and so that this will prevent the spread of contagious diseases among them.

To sum up, certainly, it goes without saying that prevention is better than cure. Therefore, the pros of the increasing numbers of sports centres outweigh the cons. This can be achieved by longer-term health education and specific nationwide publicity campaigns.

Sample 18:

Public health, which often determines how happy and productive citizens in a country are, is a concern for people and administrations alike around the world. However, when it comes to measures of its improvements, opinions vary. I believe improved sports facilities have a correlation with better health for the general public, but other measures should be fed into the system.

To begin with, sports facilities and amusement amenities naturally encourage people to use those facilities and thus increase the hours they spend doing exercise or physical exertion. A park or a gymnasium full of people talks in favour of this argument. If the authority builds more health clubs, sports fields and parks, thousands more would start using those. Moreover, sports reduce the risk of obesity and heart diseases and increasing the number of sports centres in local communities can help community members lead an active life and thus prevent deadly diseases.

Nevertheless, sports centres alone cannot guarantee the sound health of the citizens. Public awareness about the dangers of a sedentary lifestyle is required. On top of that, including health-related subjects in schools and participation of private organisations are required. Lessons students learn from schools have a great impact on the life they choose to lead. Besides, private organisations should arrange amenities for their employees to take part in sports activities within the office premises. Organisations like Google and Facebook, for instance, have already welcomed this practice and raised health awareness among their employees.

To conclude, I wholeheartedly welcome the idea of establishing more sports facilities for community members as these amenities are very useful for a healthy society. I also believe that other measures along with this initiative are required to build a healthy nation.

Sample 19:

The topic of improving public health often leads to discussions about the role of sports facilities. While some argue that increasing the number of sports facilities is the key to enhancing public health, others maintain that it may have limited impact and advocate for alternative measures. In this essay, I will explore both perspectives. Personally, I believe that other measures are also required.

Proponents of the first view believe that increasing sports facilities can significantly contribute to better public health. They argue that providing accessible and well-equipped facilities encourages physical activity and promotes a more active lifestyle. For instance, it is undeniable that regular exercise has numerous health benefits, including improved cardiovascular health, weight management, and reduced risk of chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension. By creating more sports facilities, individuals are more likely to engage in physical activity, leading to enhanced overall health and well-being.

On the other hand, critics of this view contend that solely increasing sports facilities may not yield substantial improvements in public health. They argue that factors such as personal motivation, education, and access to healthcare services are equally crucial. Merely having sports facilities does not guarantee their utilisation by the population, as individuals may face barriers such as lack of time, financial constraints, or limited awareness of the benefits of exercise. Moreover, public health concerns extend beyond physical activity and require comprehensive measures that address nutrition, mental health, and environmental factors.

In my opinion, while the availability of sports facilities is undoubtedly important, it is not the sole solution to improving public health. A multifaceted approach is required, encompassing various strategies. This includes promoting physical activity through sports facilities but also focusing on education, awareness campaigns, and policies that support healthy lifestyles. Additionally, ensuring access to affordable healthcare services, addressing social determinants of health, and implementing measures to improve nutrition and mental well-being are crucial components of a comprehensive public health strategy.

In conclusion, it is expected that by adopting a comprehensive strategy that includes adequate sports facilities in the community, affordable healthcare service, improved nutrition and food safety, and finally access to psychological support, societies can make significant strides in improving public health and well-being.

Sample 20:

Participating in sports regularly is beneficial for our health but whether more sports centres mean a healthier nation is controversial. I believe a few more measures along with increasing public sports facilities are required to ensure good health for general people.

Not everyone can afford gymnasium fees, nor have the time to travel to a park located in a distant part of the city. A busy and competitive lifestyle is the primary reason many people do not adopt exercise into their daily routine. However, a great percentage of them feel the need to exercise and have a desire to get involved in outdoor activities. If the government establishes more sports and recreational centres, their participation would be ensured. Sports are always engaging and probably easier to get involved in than doing exercises in a gymnasium. This initiative would encourage more youths to take up sports rather than playing video games at home.

However, establishing more sports centres and maintaining all of them are expensive and it does not guarantee the participation of all community members. A government can rather educate people through campaigns which would include the necessity of an active lifestyle and the importance of a balanced diet – another important factor for a healthy life. Besides, poverty in many Third World countries is deep and parents would not take their children to sports centres when they are starving. These parents need a way to feed their children, and the government should first ensure proper nutrition for all citizens and then invest in recreational activities.

To conclude, more sports centres are beneficial for people looking for a way to lead an active life, but this alone cannot enhance public health. Proper food supply for the poor and a balanced diet for all should be maintained before taking expensive initiatives.

Sample 21:

In any society, public health has always been one of the most complex challenges. And over the past few years, governments in various nations have made a lot of efforts to promote public health. However, some think that expanding sports facilities around the nation could have a significant impact on this issue. Others believe that there are other approaches that would be more valued in achieving a healthy society. Thus, this essay has attempted to address both of the above points of view before giving one of the most effective ways to raise health indices.

Sports facilities can make it possible for anyone to exercise anywhere, which unquestionably affects various aspects of a society's public health. To put it another way, folks may now readily discover gyms close to their homes. Additionally, people are not required to spend money or time travelling to particular locations to exercise. As opposed to previous years, folks should make time for the aforementioned purpose. Moreover, individuals frequently avoid exercising because they find it challenging due to the lack of sporting facilities.

However, adding sports facilities to every neighbourhood or street may have a small impact on public health. People cannot be encouraged to workout alone by this. Therefore, in addition to extending resources, public knowledge of the benefits of exercise might be taken into consideration. For instance, media outlets need to care more about public health. And air some appropriate programmes to demonstrate the value of exercise for both physical and mental wellbeing. Additionally, a number of events at colleges and universities have to be held to encourage people to see gyms by outlining their advantages.

To summarise, I believe that if people exercise regularly, they won't have to worry about suffering major illnesses as they age. They'd be enthusiastic about using athletic facilities. However, sufficient sports facilities should be built in all areas of towns and cities.

Sample 22:

The government has a stake in the psychological and physical health of its people. Government spending on enhancing sports facilities has expanded recently in an effort to motivate citizens to maintain their health. However, it can be claimed that simply having sporting facilities won't be enough to inspire individuals to maintain their fitness. Additional incentives are needed. This essay examines the advantages of government initiatives to advance public health. And it will also offer suggestions for additional approaches that could be used to enhance them.

First, participating in sports has positive effects on the physical and mental health of the body. Regular practice of sports like badminton and basketball raises heart rate and burns fat that has been stored in the body. It can improve people's health. Additionally, playing games can help with concentration and reduce stress in the office. Sports-related activities assist individuals in living healthy lifestyles.

The government's main task is to raise people's consciousness of their health and pique their enthusiasm for participating in sports-related activities. The public may not be very interested in using sports facilities that have been built in various locations around cities. To encourage the use of the sporting facilities and raise public awareness of their advantages, awareness programmes must be developed. Campaigns to raise awareness of it and special incentives for good attendance are two ways to do it.

In summary, the government should work to create a healthy society by building sports facilities and encouraging people to use them. I firmly believe that if governments take the above-mentioned necessary steps, a healthy society will be formed. However, it is important that as residents, we work together and support the efforts of our local authorities to improve public health.

Sample 23:

People think there are numerous ways to enhance overall public health and wellbeing. They are organised into groups based on the policies they support. Some claim that an increase in sports facilities leads to better public health. Additionally, they claim that this method is the greatest. Others contend, however, that the expansion of sports facilities has a less significant impact on public health than other, more crucial factors. My viewpoint is that the former group's point of view is more reasonable and deserving of belief, not the latter.

Starting with the former, they decided that expanding the number of sports facilities is the greatest way to raise the level of health. Making a lot of sports facilities is not enough to inspire people to participate in sport, even though it is an excellent way to keep fit. For instance, there are many sporting facilities throughout the city that charge an annual fee and are available until midnight. But not enough regular members. Most of the members began each activity with great excitement, but they were unable to follow through on their promises because of financial constraints. Actually, there are a variety of reasons why this situation occurs. But the key one is that having just sports facilities is insufficient to inspire people to exercise and keep up their health.

The latter, more pragmatic viewpoint maintains that other, more crucial measures, not just the sports facility, are needed to improve public health. In our lifetimes, we have made significant lifestyle changes. In particular, people now prioritise their health differently than they did in the past. These practices can primarily be divided into three categories, including dietary routines, work preferences, and living arrangements. First, people consume considerably more junk food than they did in the past, which is detrimental to their health. Then, working circumstances deteriorate further, affecting healthiness levels negatively. Last but not least, living conditions nowadays are not clean enough to be safe. As a result, sports facilities must come last when it comes to prioritising those three measures that will improve human health.

In conclusion, various individuals may have diverse ideas on how to improve public health. Some of them insist that building more sports facilities is the greatest solution, but others disagree. Even if engaging in sports is good for your health, it won't help much on its own.

Sample 24:

There is ongoing debate about whether increasing the number of sports facilities is the most effective way to improve public health. While some argue that more sports facilities would lead to a healthier population, others contend that this approach alone would have limited impact and call for alternative measures. In my view, while increasing access to sports facilities can contribute to public health, it should be accompanied by other initiatives to maximize its effectiveness.

Proponents of enhancing public health through the expansion of sports facilities argue that they provide opportunities for physical activities and encourage people to engage in regular exercise. These advocates believe that by creating more venues for sports and recreational activities, individuals of all ages will be motivated to lead active lifestyles. Sports facilities, such as gyms, swimming pools, parks, and stadiums, can offer a wide range of options for people to choose from, catering to various fitness preferences, abilities, and interests. Giving people access to such facilities could potentially combat sedentary behaviors and reduce the prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases like obesity, cardiovascular issues, and diabetes.

On the other hand, opponents argue that merely increasing sports facilities will not significantly improve public health outcomes. They contend that several factors contribute to poor public health, including socioeconomic status, education, and access to healthcare, which cannot be addressed solely through sports facilities. It is crucial to acknowledge that barriers like affordability, location, and time constraints prevent a significant portion of the population from utilizing these facilities. For individuals who cannot afford memberships or live in areas lacking accessible facilities, increasing the number of such venues may have limited impact.

To achieve a comprehensive improvement in public health, I believe that increasing sports facilities should be combined with a holistic approach encompassing education, awareness campaigns, and community engagement. Educational programs promoting the importance of physical activity, healthy eating habits, and disease prevention can empower individuals to make informed choices about their well-being. Additionally, awareness campaigns could be targeted towards disadvantaged communities, addressing both financial and geographical barriers to accessing sports facilities. Collaborations with local organizations and schools can further encourage participation through community events and sports programs, thereby fostering a sense of inclusivity and providing alternatives for those unable or unwilling to visit formal sports facilities.

In conclusion, while increasing the number of sports facilities can contribute to improving public health by encouraging physical activity, it is not a standalone solution. Combining this approach with education, awareness campaigns, and community engagement is essential for maximizing its impact. By embracing a multidimensional strategy, societies can work towards creating a healthier and more active population.

Sample 25:

There is much debate over the issue of how to help improve public health, and some people have suggested that there should be more sports facilities available. Others, however, say that this would have a minimal impact on the situation. This essay will look at both views and argue that it would indeed only have a small positive impact.

Those who support building more public sports facilities believe that they will encourage more people to participate in regular exercise. This is logical, but there are already many public sports facilities available, and it has had little impact. The only people who would likely benefit are children, and while this is important, children already have plenty of places to get exercise. Whilst millions of pounds could be spent on building new facilities, it seems that there is little that would really be contributed to helping solve this crisis.

Even if there was an uptick in the number of people doing exercise, it would not eliminate the public health crisis as exercise is only one small part of it. While it is true that exercise is good for the human body, it is nearly impossible to burn off the number of calories that the average person is now consuming. Even if a person were to run a marathon, it would not negate the damaging effects of going to McDonald’s for lunch. That person would still end the day in a calorie surplus and therefore continue to gain weight. When you consider that few people can run marathons, it becomes obvious that the culprit for poor public health is not exercise but rather diet.

In conclusion, it would be good to have more public sports facilities and there may be some small benefit to this, but unfortunately it would not be a significant benefit, and other measures would need to be taken too.

Sample 26:

At present, public health is declining as an increasing number of people in countries around the world are suffering from diseases such as diabetes, liver disease, cardiovascular problems, and cancer. While taking exercise goes some way to dealing with these issues, it is not the only, nor even the most important method for solving such problems, and the facilities provided for exercise do little to tackle poor public health.

With a view to tackling obesity-related illness, many governments have spent vast sums of money on sports facilities and China highlights this point. Residential districts are full of exercise equipment, there are a large number of gymnasiums available and many new public swimming pools have been constructed. In theory, these measures would encourage people to exercise more and thus improve overall public health. However, in practice, people do not use these facilities due to a range of alternative, low energy entertainment options such as playing video games or watching television and, as a result, the majority of people do very little exercise which means such investment wastes public funds.

In light of these arguments, alternatives are required to deal with public health, and education is the most important solution. Many people lead unhealthy lifestyles because they are not well-informed about the health risks that they are taking, such as consuming high levels of cholesterol from food. If more time is spent teaching people from an early age about the importance of a healthy diet, they will grow up to be careful about the sorts of food that they consume. High energy diets are a major factor in obesity and solving the issue of food intake is half the battle. Furthermore, education could change social values about sports and teach people that regular physical exercise is essential, thus improving the effectiveness of existing public sports facilities.

In conclusion, building more sports facilities would do little to alleviate current problems with people’s health because social values are not focused on the links between exercise and health, and it does nothing to solve dietary imbalance. By changing the education system, it would be possible to change eating and exercise habits amongst the younger generations, thus this is the best way to improve public health.

Sample 27:

Public health has become a major concern for various groups, governments and related organizations. While some people favor projects such as increasing opportunities for people to exercise through providing public facilities such as sports centers, other people and interested parties believe that there are alternative and more effective measures that could be taken to increase the general health level of the public.

It is one thing to build a sports center; it is quite another thing to get people to use it. At the heart of the argument lies motivation. Based on human behavior, we can see that health is very much a personal choice. People choose to lead a healthy lifestyle or not. Many people do regular exercise, with or without public facilities being available, simply walking every day or jogging in the local park. It is simply their personal choice to do these activities. Other people choose to do little or no exercise, even though their village, town or city may have many superb facilities available to them. That is also their personal choice.

Many organizations have suggested that education is the key to improving health, as education seems to be the answer for everything. However, we have already seen this fail in several high-profile areas such as drinking, smoking and fast food.

Many research groups and others who support a healthy lifestyle have spent years trying to educate the public through various campaigns, pointing out the negative side effects of these bad habits and showing the way to healthier options. The results have been far less than impressive.

In the UK alone, there are more young people smoking now than in the past, in spite of all the health campaigns warning of the risks. Excessive alcohol consumption is still a social problem, and governments are now complaining that obesity related health conditions are putting a strain on public health services, which can be traced back to the rise in popularity of fast food and convenience food in popular culture.

From this we can see that simply providing facilities or trying to inform people through campaigns and advertising is not the most effective way to change public behavior, if that is the desired result.

Sample 28:

In many countries, public health is declining. While adding more sports facilities might improve sports participation, I believe that this alone would not make much difference to people's health and that it is also necessary to make fast food more expensive.

Some think that building more sports facilities can lead to an increase in sports participation. Many people do not exercise regularly because there is nowhere in their neighborhood where they can participate in activities they enjoy. If, for example, more basketball courts were built in a neighborhood, basketball lovers who live there would play the sport more often. However, I and others think this would have little impact on people's health if they don't change their unhealthy diet.

We think it is also important to increase the price of fast food. Many people over-consume it because it is cheap. For example, in the United States, a twenty-piece box of Chicken McNuggets costs only 5 dollars. If a 20 percent tax was implemented on fast food, many consumers probably wouldn't order some at all, let alone overeat. Since over-consumption of fast food is a major culprit in causing obesity, a regulation like this could be extremely effective in terms of preventing health problems associated with being overweight, such as heart disease and diabetes.

In conclusion, even though increasing the number of sports facilities might encourage people to exercise more often, I think this alone does little to improve health. To achieve a better result, fast food should also be sold at a higher price.

Sample 29:

Some people propose that the ultimate method of making the general public healthier is to build more places where they play sports, while others believe this initiative is futile and other policies are warranted. In this answer, I will discuss the rationales behind these two views before showing why I favor the latter.

On the one hand, increasing the availability of sports amenities could somewhat help improve public health. A crucial part of staying healthy is staying physically active and making it easier for people to play sports is a good measure to this end. Furthermore, the greater presence of basketball courts, callisthenics parks or other such amenities and, more importantly, the sight of people using them could inspire sedentary onlookers to exercise more.

However, I side with those who say that the aforementioned approach would bring. about little results if any. This is because increasing the number of sports facilities does not automatically translate to greater participation. In most cities today, despite the ubiquity of places where people can play sports for free, the majority of the population remains sorely inactive, and health problems related to lack of exercise are on the rise.

To meaningfully improve the health of the public, it must be acknowledged that fitness is only part of the equation. A whole host of factors, including affordable access to healthcare, advancement of medical treatment, enforcement of food safety and so on, all influence how healthy the population is and must be acted on. The recent outbreak of the novel Coronavirus is a powerful testament to this and how immaterial fitness is in the grand scheme of things.

In conclusion, having more places where people can participate in sporting activities is always welcome, but it is not by any stretch the optimal way to improve public health. Instead, a combination of steps is needed to holistically enhance people's health and prevent diseases.

Sample 30:

The construction of new sports facilities is definitely needed in an environment where people’s health is in a declining state. However, there are those who believe that the way to improving people’s health should lie in other measures that governments have to come up with to get people to live more healthily. This essay shall discuss both views followed by my opinion.

In many countries around the world, sports facilities are being neglected, with existing ones under threat of closure and being replaced by housing and commercial developments. The lack of sports facilities has directly led to a sharp decline in the general public’s involvement in sports activities. This is the major reason for ill health and excessive weight nowadays. If a wider range of sports and fitness facilities (swimming pools, basketball courts and gymnasiums etc.) were available, then people would be more willing to spend time in these facilities to train their bodies and to improve their fitness, instead of living a sedentary life at home watching television, playing video games or using computers.

However, the building of such facilities may become a waste of time and taxpayers’ money if they are built far away from where people live or if they are too expensive to use. There are scenes of empty sports grounds in many cities because it takes too much trouble to get there, and many sports clubs are receiving fewer guests because they charge unreasonably high membership fees. In these cases, the government should be spending more on advertising a healthier lifestyle instead of just wasting money on facilities that are not going to be actively used by the people. For example, people need to know that little things like jogging or taking the stairs provide as many benefits as using exercising equipment in a sports club.

As good health is a basic human need and healthy individuals lead to a healthy nation, I believe that government should do both – increase the number of sports facilities as well as take other measures to improve people’s health such as awareness campaigns through various media. The sports facilities should be easily affordable and accessible by the people.

All in all, the government should be spending more money on the campaigns of getting the people to be more involved in a healthier lifestyle and also spending some money on sports facilities that are affordable and within reach of the general public.

Sample 31:

Reformation in public healthcare facilities has been a contentious issue for quite a long time. While some people propose that incorporating several sports facilities can work like a charm for the public health sector, others opine that health concerns many other factors that need equal precedence. In my opinion, the latter perception is more viable, and I shall elaborate on the same in the following paragraphs.

It is a well-known fact that regular exercise and active involvement in sports keep an individual healthy in mind and body. As a result, many initiatives have been taken to augment the construction of yoga centers, gyms, public swimming pools, etc. Furthermore, they have been established for the public so that they can afford to engage themselves in such invigorating activities, which in turn will create a robust population.

However, like a section of people, I believe that a sole focus on sports facilities will not have a consequential impact on public health. It is because a substantial number of the global population does not have access to food, safe drinking water and sanitation, which constitute the necessities of every human. As there is a shortage of the bare minimum requirements, health is adversely affected by malnutrition and ailments like marasmus, scurvy, xerophthalmia, to name a few. Moreover, there is a dearth of public awareness of a number of diseases or health conditions, some of which are fatal to life. Consequently, many people fall prey to them. For example, it took more than three decades to eradicate polio in most countries due to a lack of awareness and healthcare benefits. Likewise, in recent years, socio-economic issues like unemployment, inflation, etc., have created psychological pressure on every individual, resulting in mental disorders.

In conclusion, I would like to say that even though the government is taking steps to encourage people to improve public health, it is of utmost importance that instead of just investing in building sports facilities, we should be involved in bringing in a wholesome change in the public health sector by creating consciousness, increasing the availability of fundamental needs and supporting each other.

Sample 32:

There is debate about whether building more sports facilities is the most effective strategy to enhance public health. This article will look at both points of view and offer my personal viewpoint.

Supporters contend that expanding the availability of sports facilities can improve the general public's health. They think that making sports facilities easily accessible and well-equipped promotes physical activity and aids in the fight against sedentary lifestyles, which are major causes of numerous health problems including obesity and cardiovascular illnesses. Sports facilities also enhance community involvement and social contact, which promotes overall wellbeing.

However, some contend that concentrating only on sports facilities might not be enough to boost public health. They stress the significance of using a complete approach that addresses socioeconomic variables that affect health outcomes, promotes health education, and ensures access to affordable healthcare. They contend that spending money on preventative measures might have a bigger influence on public health than reactive ones, such as campaigns for health promotion and better healthcare.

In my view, expanding sports facilities should be a part of a larger public health initiative even though it can contribute to encouraging physical activity and community well-being. Numerous variables, such as socioeconomic status, educational attainment, and access to healthcare, are important health determinants that must be addressed. A more thorough and long-lasting effect on public health may be achieved by adopting a holistic strategy that integrates the provision of sports facilities with health education campaigns, preventative healthcare services, and programmes to address health inequities.

In addition, it is critical to guarantee that all facets of society, regardless of age, gender, ability, or socioeconomic level, have access to sporting facilities. The removal of participation obstacles and the creation of inclusive settings that accommodate various needs and preferences should be prioritised.

Increasing the number of sports facilities can help the people's health, but this can only be done as a part of a larger public health plan that tackles all of the factors that affect health. We can build healthier communities by integrating investments in sports facilities with initiatives to minimise health inequities, health education, and preventative healthcare.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.

Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.

At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.

In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.

Sample 2:

Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.

To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.

Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.

To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.

Sample 3:

There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.

The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.

There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.

In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.

Sample 4:

Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.

To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.

However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.

In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.

Sample 5:

Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.

In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.

In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Everyone has different dreams when it comes to where they wish to live. Personally, I think it is very desirable to live in a large city.  I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, cities offer a great environment for raising children, and I am a person who values family above all else.  Urban areas have numerous parks and recreation centers which encourage children to lead vital and healthy lives, and they also have well-funded community centers which contribute to the intellectual development of young people.  My own experience demonstrates the value of such facilities. Both my husband and I work full time jobs and are not home when our two sons finish school. This is not a problem, though, as both of them go directly to a local community center when their classes are over. Our eldest son participates in a computer club there, while our youngest son practices photography. Their participation in these programs sets my mind at ease, as without access to the community center they would just sit at home all alone.  This situation compares favorably to a friend of mine who lives in a small town and recently had to hire an expensive babysitter to watch her children when they get home from school, as she was not able to locate any meaningful activities for them to take part in.

Secondly, large cities offer cultural experiences that adults can enjoy and appreciate.  Most major cities have a plethora of museums, ethnic restaurants, libraries, theater groups and other stimulating and cosmopolitan facilities.  My city is no exception. For instance, my colleagues and I spend every Friday evening visiting a new ethnic restaurant for dinner. Over the past three months we have enjoyed food from more than a dozen different national cuisines.  Meanwhile, my sons and I go to a different museum once a month and I have found that I enjoy our visits almost as much as they do. These are the sort of outings that are only possible in a heavily populated urban area. Small towns offer easy access to beautiful natural scenery, but I prefer the intellectual and cultural stimulation that my city offers.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that living in a large city is preferable to living in a small town.  This is because cities are better places to raise children, and because they offer stimulating intellectual and cultural experience that grown-ups can enjoy.

Sample 2:

I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city, so I have experienced the good and bad

sides of both. I never thought that I would like to live in a big city, but I was wrong. After ten years of living in one, I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.

Small towns and big cities both have some problems in terms of transportation. In a small town, you have to own a car to ensure comfortable living. You can't get around without one because

there isn't any kind of public transportation. Big cities generally have heavy traffic and expensive

parking, but there you have a choice of taking public transportation. It's not free, but it's often cheaper than driving when you consider gas and time. Especially if you don't have a car, you're

better off in the city.

I love the excitement of big cities. Small towns have a slow pace. Large cities mean you have to

adapt to a variety of situations, like finding a new route to work or trying a new restaurant. I enjoy that challenge very much. Another source of the excitement of city living is the variety of cultural activities available. There is a wide assortment of theatre, music and dance performances

available in big cities. These things are rare in small ones.

The final thing I like about large cities is the diversity of the people. The United States is made up of people of different races, religions, abilities, and interests. However, you seldom find such a variety of people in a smaller town. I think that living in an area where everyone was just like me would quickly become boring.

Of course, security is a concern, and that's one area where small towns are superior to big cities.

Still, I would rather be a bit more cautious and live in a large city than feel secure but bored.

Sample 3:

Where should we live? Some may choose to live in big cities, while others like the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside. As far as I am concerned, I would like to live in a big city because living in a big city has more advantages than living in the countryside.

To begin with, the city is the symbol of human civilization and there are many facilities for living, recreation and health care. Therefore, living there is more convenient than living in countryside. For example, we can find plenty of malls around our neighborhood, where we can buy everyday necessities at a low price. Furthermore, people are more concerned about their health and safety than other things in their lives. In big cities, medical facilities and emergency services are more easily accessible than in the countryside. Big cities also have convenient transportation and utility systems. They also offer faster Internet connections. These all make our life easier in big cities.

In addition, we can take part in a variety of events in big cities. Human beings like to live together and need to interact with each other. In a big city, the population density is high therefore there are always plenty of social activities, sports events and concerts. There are more recreational places in big cities, such as opera houses, movie theatres, clubs, and swimming pools. You will have many kinds of entertainment in big cities and meet many people. In the countryside, however, life may be dull and quiet, and you may only have a few neighbors. Living alone with few activities can easily cause mental diseases.

Some may argue that the pollution in cities makes people sick. However, with automobiles and modern highways we can easily take a break to expose ourselves to fresh air in the countryside and sunshine on the beach.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that living in big cities is much better than living in countryside because of the advanced facilities and social activities in cities. Moreover, the autos and highways

enable us to enjoy the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside.

Sample 4:

In our modern world, people have different opinions on where the best place would be to live, and many argue that living in a small town is the ideal location, while others argue that living in a big city is preferred. Both places have their benefits and drawbacks, but I would prefer to live in a big city. This is because big cities offer diverse job opportunities, cultural experiences, and convenient amenities.

Big cities have a broader range of job opportunities than small towns. In a big city, one will have a chance to secure a job in various sectors and pursue a career. Many big companies and industries are typically located in larger cities, which means that job seekers have plenty of options. Moreover, a big city offers numerous opportunities for growth, as one can change jobs and pursue their passion. The job market in big cities also offers higher salaries and better benefits. Hence, for those who want to make a radicle career change and those who want to earn a decent living, a big city is the ideal place to live.

Cultural experiences are another reason why I prefer to live in a big city. Big cities offer diverse and unique cultural experiences that small towns

cannot, such as trying new foods and attending cultural festivals. In big cities, there is always a movie or a theatre show to attend, a concert or sporting event to watch, a museum or an art gallery to visit. The diversity of cultural experiences in big cities provides people with various opportunities to learn and broaden their horizons, which is an enriching experience.

Convenient amenities are also reasons why I prefer to live in big cities. Cities are often equipped with modern infrastructure. Cities have better medical facilities, public transportation systems, and essential services like banks and grocery stores. Big cities have a good public transportation system that is well-planned and suitable for people who do not own private cars. People in big cities have access to modern medical facilities with well-trained medical specialists.

Despite the benefits, big cities have some drawbacks. One of the most significant drawbacks is the high cost of living. Housing and rent are expensive in larger cities compared to small towns. Moreover, noise pollution and air pollution are common in big cities. Residents must always be aware of their surrounding environments to protect themselves from the effects of pollution. Additionally, congestion and crowding are other issues that plague many big city neighborhoods.

In conclusion, while big cities have their issues, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Big cities offer more job opportunities, an array of cultural experiences, and convenient amenities. Therefore, for me, getting the chance to live and experience all of this makes living in a big city very appealing.

Sample 5:

People seldom agree with one another, even on such trivial issues as the preference between living in a big city and a small town. It’s a bit hasty to claim that it is better to live in a big city than in a small town, or vice versa.

Living in a big city has several benefits. First, there are more job opportunities readily available in big cities compared to small towns. Furthermore, not only are there more job positions in big cities, but the quality of these positions is much higher as well. In addition, the pay is often more competitive.

Second, children are likely to receive a higher-quality education compared to their counterparts in small towns. For families, children’s education is always a top priority.

Finally, big cities generally offer a superior overall standard of living compared to small towns. There are more commodities and services available in city markets, more public utilities, and even a greater variety of television channels.

However, living in a small town also has its advantages. People in small towns often enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle. Most are free from the high work-related stress common in big cities. Although the average pay is lower, the cost of daily necessities, such as vegetables and meat, is usually more affordable.

Instead of experiencing the loneliness often prevalent in big cities, children in small towns may grow up more healthily due to harmonious relationships among residents. People in small towns don’t have to wake up as early in the morning, as there are no traffic jams, and drivers tend to be more cautious, reducing the likelihood of accidents. While they may have fewer television channels, they have more friends readily available for socializing and entertainment.

As for my current situation, although I long for the cozy atmosphere and close relationships among neighbors and friends, which are often unique to small towns, I have chosen to live in one of the biggest cities in my country - Beijing. This is because I have found a good job here with a decent salary. I think I would prefer living in a small town when I retire one day.

Sample 6:

In English, there is a well-known fairy tale about a poor country boy, Dick Whittington, who goes to London believing that the streets of the city are “paved with gold.” The story is a classic “rags to riches” tale. Dick eventually becomes the Lord Mayor of London. Like the hero of that story, I always find wonder and adventure in cities.

Cities contain a fascinating assortment of people. Whenever I walk around a shopping precinct at midday on a weekend, I am captivated by the variety of individuals hurrying through the shops. Sometimes, I simply sit on a public bench and observe the diverse streams of shoppers passing by.

Today, in the age of globe-trotting transport and advanced communication, city life is more diverse than ever. Capital cities are now highly cosmopolitan and eager to attract foreign trade and currency. There is a contemporary English joke that says, “You can never find an Englishman in London.”

Whether rightly or wrongly, governments and local authorities tend to prioritize building public amenities in big cities. Money is invested in transportation, libraries, parks, and museums. Often, countries compete to construct the most impressive “showcase” buildings. For example, Malaysia has built a skyscraper taller than anything in New York. Similarly, within large countries, regions compete with each other: New York against Chicago, Shanghai against Hong Kong, or Beijing.

All of this benefits city dwellers. The magic of the Dick Whittington story is rekindled in me whenever I enter a library housed in a magnificent building. For university students studying art or music, large cities often offer galleries and public performances. Even as a teenager, I appreciated living in a city because it gave me the opportunity to attend rock concerts by my favorite bands several times a year.

Architecture shapes the urban landscape. For those who appreciate it, a city can be as visually exciting as the Himalayas. A modern metropolis resembles a mountain range with its height, light, and solidness. At the same time, old buildings add to its charm - quaint, unspoiled side streets, or shops and homes from distant ages. Even someone who spends their entire life in one large city could continue discovering its architectural secrets well into old age.

Humans are “social animals.” They talk, interact, and create. Cities provide libraries, universities, and café bars where people can meet and share ideas with others of their kind.

Sample 7:

Some people would like to live in a small town because the surroundings could be more picturesque, and people are friendlier compared to people in a big city. However, in my opinion, living in a big city is more effective and beneficial based on the following reasons.

First, living in a big city is convenient. Thanks to public transportation, any place in a big city is usually accessible. Without driving, you have many options among buses, trains and subway. Taxis are also available on almost every corner of the city. Besides, it is easy to find a restaurant or food stands in your neighborhood within walking distance whenever you are hungry. There are also convenience stores all over, so city residents can buy any stuff easily at any time without bothering to drive to a certain place to get what they need. Convenience is the best what a city can offer while a small town is less likely to.

In addition, a big city provides more education opportunities. The residents have easier access to schools and education resources, so do they to faculty and advanced facilities. Take teachers for example, they are willing to teach in a big city because of the better salary and there are more resources they need available in libraries and related institutes when they want to go further to sharpen their teaching skills. Similarly, when children plan to take some talented courses such as piano, art, and the like, a city with more options and business activities is where parents want their children to live and grow.

Here is another perfect example to illustrate my preference of a city. I used to be a volunteer in an elementary school in a small town. Although the town was lovely and clean, there was some inconvenience caused in daily life. First, less bus service was provided, so people usually had no choice but to wait a long time to take the bus. Second, restaurants and food stands were all closed after nine o’clock, so it’s hard to find something to eat if you are hungry late in the evening. Lastly, teachers in the elementary school might need to teach many courses with different subjects, when necessary, because of a lack of faculty, that is, an English teacher could be asked to teach math or science as well. Also, the facilities in the classroom and the science lab were old- fashioned. From my observation, people can live peacefully in a small town but actually there are more opportunities and availability a big city can offer.

Last but not least, infrastructure and public services are usually prominently featured in a big city. When I want to exercise on a rainy day, I can go to the sport center without worrying about places to go. In contrast, I might be trapped at home in a small town in the same situation. Besides, public services like medical care and care centers are fully developed for people with a pressing need. Libraries also provide better book circulation and activities to cater for their readers, which is not very likely to take place in a town with the number of people which is small. For people who like tranquility and secure, small towns are the best choice. However, for those who prefer economic prosperity, a variety of things to do, places to go and activities to join, the better choice is in a big city. I happen to be the one who prefers the latter and enjoys the lives in it.

Sample 8:

It is crucial to choose a place which suits you to live because where you live has influence over  the quality of  your life and  happiness. Compared to those who prefer to live in a small town with a quiet environment, living in a big city to take advantage of the modern conveniences that it can offer is my choice. 

First of all, the public transportation system is one of amenities people can benefit from.  Big cities usually provide a well-developed transportation network, such as bus, train, subway and airport, so people in the city have very easy access to the vehicles that can help them reach any destination they want to. In contrast, the convenience of public transportation is usually not found in a small town, where people might tend to drive or use other means of transport to get about. 

Besides, there are more opportunities for either finding a job or taking education. With a larger population, more jobs are available for everyone to find than those in the countryside. Take where I live for example, although the job market is very competitive, university graduates often move to Taipei, which is the major city in Taiwan. If you need to develop a skill, it is also likely that you will achieve it and then get a job successfully. More importantly, there are also more educational opportunities and a lot of different courses and institutions available. There is always availability of learning something new or developing practical skills in a big city.

Furthermore, cities can provide a variety of entertainment options every day. There is always something fun to do in a big city to keep people of all different interests from getting bored. Cities provide a lively nightlife, all types of shows, museums and sports facilities. Additionally, you will be able to connect with other people who share the same hobbies at different events.

While the lifestyle in a small town is less stressful, the city lifestyle has a lot of opportunities for people. Personally, I prefer to live in a big city which offers a variety of many options. In the meanwhile, I like the energy and the convenience in a big city. City life can have many positive impacts compared to rural life.

Sample 9:

There are many differences between living in a big city and a small town. Therefore, we must choose based on our personal preferences and needs. If you prefer a calm and peaceful environment, small towns are suitable for you. However, if you want to develop yourself, big cities are the best places to learn and acquire skills essential for your future.

In life, the most important thing for everyone is, of course, health. If someone’s health deteriorates, they might lose everything they have. Small towns often provide a healthier environment. You can enjoy peaceful rivers, mountains, abundant greenery, and a clear night sky filled with stars. Life there is calm and free from the excessive noise of big cities, as the population and number of cars are much smaller. However, living in a small town can mean missing out on global news, fashion trends, and other advancements.

On the other hand, living in a big city provides more opportunities for personal growth and the chance to enhance your competitive skills. Over time, this can help you establish your own identity and attitude in society. People in big cities are often motivated to work hard to support their families. However, city life comes with challenges, such as air pollution and waste management issues. If we do not address these problems, they could have serious consequences for our future.

In conclusion, small towns offer comfort and tranquility, while big cities are dynamic and full of opportunities. Personally, I would choose to live in a big city first to improve myself. Later, when I want to rest and prioritize my health, I would move to the countryside or a small town.

I hope you can choose the place that best suits your needs and appeals to you.

Sample 10:

I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city. I didn't think I would like to live here, but I was wrong. I think life is much better in a big city. Transportation is much more convenient, everything is more exciting, and there is a greater variety of people. I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.

Transportation is easier in a city. In a small town, you have to have a car to get around because there isn't any kind of public transportation. In a city, on the other hand, there are usually buses and taxis, and some cities have subways. Cities often have heavy traffic, and expensive parking, but it doesn't matter because you can always take the bus. Using public transportation is usually cheaper and more convenient than driving a car, but you don't have this choice in a small town.

City life is more exciting than small town life. In small towns usually nothing changes. You see the same people every day, you go to the same two or three restaurants, everything is the same. In a city things change all the time. You see new people every day. There are many restaurants, with new ones to choose from all the time. New plays come to the theaters and new musicians come to the concert halls.

Cities have a diversity of people that you don't find in a small town. There are much fewer people in a small town and usually they are all alike. In a city you can find people from different countries, of different religions, of different races - you can find all kinds of people. This variety of people is what makes city life interesting.

Life in a city is convenient, exciting, and interesting. After experiencing city life, I could never live in a small town again.

Sample 11:

If you were asked to choose between living in a big city or a small town, where would you prefer to live? Some people might choose to live in a small town because the environment is cleaner, and it fosters closer relationships with others. This suggests that living in a small town has its benefits. However, I believe there are three key reasons why living in a big city is more advantageous.

First, living in a big city provides greater opportunities to gain advanced knowledge and develop oneself. In contrast, the range of educational options in a small town is often limited. Furthermore, the presence of many students in a city creates a competitive environment that encourages us to work harder. While education may not be the only important aspect of life, it remains essential because we rely on knowledge throughout our lifetime.

Second, living in a city allows us to meet more people and adapt to society more easily. For example, interacting with diverse individuals helps us learn about their personalities and characteristics. Building relationships and making friends in a city can greatly benefit us as we grow older. By communicating with people in a big city, we gain a better understanding of how society functions and what we need to do to thrive. Therefore, city life prepares us to navigate societal challenges more effectively.

Lastly, living in a big city offers more job opportunities. Securing employment is a crucial aspect of life, and cities typically provide a wider variety of workplaces, such as companies, factories, and universities. For instance, becoming a professor is more achievable in a city where universities are abundant. In contrast, small towns cannot guarantee the same level of employment opportunities.

In conclusion, while small towns have advantages like friendlier communities and a cleaner environment, I believe living in a big city is more beneficial. Cities offer better educational opportunities, greater chances to meet people and adapt to society, and more job prospects. For these reasons, I would prefer living in a big city over a small town.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Vietjack official store
Đăng ký gói thi VIP

VIP +1 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 1 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +3 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 3 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +6 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 6 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +12 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 12 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay