Câu hỏi:
10/01/2025 130Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
The debate on whether parents should encourage children to engage in organized group activities or foster independence through solitary pursuits is pivotal. This essay contends that a balanced approach is vital, discussing first the benefits of group activities in developing social and physical skills, and then the advantages of solitary activities in nurturing creativity and self-reliance. Both aspects are argued to be crucial for a child's holistic development.
On the one hand, organised group activities offer invaluable opportunities for children to develop essential social and interpersonal skills. Participation in such activities, whether they be team sports, music ensembles, or academic clubs, enables children to cultivate teamwork, leadership, and empathetic skills. For example, being a part of a football team not only hones a child's physical abilities but also teaches them about cooperation, resilience, and strategic thinking. Moreover, these settings often provide a platform for children to forge lasting friendships and understand diverse perspectives. Therefore, it is clear that parents should encourage their children to take part in organised group activities, as these experiences are instrumental in shaping well-rounded individuals.
Conversely, the importance of solitary activities cannot be overlooked. Independent pursuits like reading, creative writing, or exploring nature foster self-reliance, introspection, and imagination. A child engrossed in a book, for instance, not only improves their literacy but also embarks on a journey of imaginative exploration, often leading to heightened creativity and critical thinking. Such activities empower children to be comfortable with their own company, encouraging a sense of self-sufficiency and inner strength. In a world that is increasingly interconnected, the ability to be independent and self-motivated is a valuable asset.
In conclusion, while organised group activities undeniably contribute to social and emotional learning, the benefits of solitary pursuits in fostering independence and creativity are equally significant. A balance between the two, tailored to each child’s unique disposition and interests, is key.
Sample 2:
The debate over whether parents should encourage their children to engage in organised group activities or allow them to develop autonomy through solitary pursuits is multifaceted. In my opinion, parents should motivate children to work on their own because though spending spare time in group activities can teach children some practical social skills, being their own can help them follow their instinct freely and pursue their interest.
In their free time, children should engage in group projects since it helps them integrate into society and acquire various life skills. This involvement might take the shape of team sports, group projects, or artistic endeavours. For instance, during athletics, students are split up into several groups that compete against and support one another at the same time. These group inclusions cultivate in young brains a feeling of social connection and communication. In reality, youngsters may only benefit from friendship and communication abilities when they are exposed to various cooperative activities. According to several studies, working as a team teaches kids important practical skills like discipline and communication, which eventually enable them to succeed in both their personal and professional lives.
However, individual activities have a profound impact on personal development because staying alone would give children an edge in terms of their freedom of thought and work. For instance, they can get involved in the solo cocurricular activities like creative computer games that assist the children with some effective brain culture and concentration practice. Furthermore, getting along with a team demands a specific timing with the other team members, which is not the case when they pass their time alone because different children have different spare time schedule. In addition, children’s productivity and health issues are directly related to the way they spend their leisure, and they enjoy this time most if they can pass it exactly the way they want. In other words, being solo in the spare time leads a child to gain distinct aptitude since their individual hobbies lack any adult authority that may suppress their innate abilities.
In conclusion, even though working in groups can teach children valuable lessons about teamwork and communication, I still believe that letting kids work alone on their hobbies allows them to do the things they enjoy doing the most, and this freedom of thought and activities helps them maintain top health and exceptional talent.
Sample 3:
The debate over whether parents should encourage their children to engage in organised group activities or allow them to develop autonomy through solitary pursuits is a topic of considerable discussion. I contend that an integrated approach, fostering both communal engagement and individual creativity, is most beneficial. This essay will delve into the merits of group involvement, extoll the virtues of independent play, and ultimately argue for a balanced blend of both methodologies to enrich the tapestry of childhood development.
Proponents of the notion that "parents should encourage their children" to "take part in organised group activities in their spare time" assert that such interactions are pivotal for holistic development. In the crucible of group dynamics, children learn the art of cooperation, appreciate the value of teamwork, and hone their social skills - capabilities that are indispensable in the scaffolding of a well-rounded character. For instance, a child partaking in a community sports league not only engages in physical exercise but also learns the importance of strategic thinking and camaraderie. Furthermore, structured group activities often offer a scaffolded environment where children can develop resilience and a competitive spirit within a safe framework, preparing them for the inevitable challenges of adult life.
Conversely, there are strong advocates for the importance of solitary pursuits, where children learn to be self-sufficient and imaginative. When children are left to their own devices, they often engage in creative play that fosters independent thinking and problem-solving skills. For example, a child building a castle from blocks or engrossing in a book navigates a personal journey of discovery and learning, mastering the ability to entertain and educate themselves without external stimuli. This self-reliance is an essential life skill, cultivating a sense of inner resourcefulness that can be a wellspring of innovation and introspection in later life.
In my view, while both approaches yield significant advantages, balanced amalgamation is ideal. Encouraging children to diversify their activities to include both group interactions and individual pursuits seems most conducive to fostering a comprehensive skill set. The synthesis of social collaboration and personal ingenuity equips children with versatile arsenal to navigate the complex tapestry of life.
In conclusion, a harmonious approach that incorporates both supervised group activities and individual self-directed play seems to best serve a child's development. Encouraging a balance between social collaboration and independent discovery equips young individuals with a broad spectrum of skills, preparing them adeptly for the complexities of life.
Sample 4:
While some claim that kids should be encouraged to participate in group activities, others believe they should be allowed to busy themselves on their own. Although there are many things that contribute to kids having a good education, in my opinion, intellect and social skills are the two most important criteria. I will explain the concept in more depth.
On the one hand, allowing children to fill their own time helps them grow intellectually and develop their thought processes. Since children can concentrate better in a quieter setting, they can broaden their knowledge and more accurately recall what they have learnt. Investing time in learning is essential since information is the main factor that enables kids to live better lives. Furthermore, it is generally accepted that students who study in this manner perform better academically than those who do not.
However, since individuals cannot survive in the real world alone, it is more crucial that they are social individuals rather than intellectual individuals without sociability. Group activity is the most effective strategy to increase a child's harmony. The ability of kids to function as a team is a crucial component of their evaluation, and this quality may be enhanced through team building exercises. Kids cannot play soccer alone, for instance, and must cooperate as a team to succeed. Participating in group activities teaches them important life skills like giving and setting shared goals that are crucial as they become older. So, it is far more beneficial to teach them how to collaborate when they are still young.
There are both benefits and drawbacks to both points of view, but since the world is not a place where a person can live alone, the social component should be prioritized. Children should thus acquire this skill when they are still young and engage in a variety of social activities rather than pass the leisure on their own.
Sample 5:
Children need to spend their time productively. Many parents believe that their children should participate in activities which are organised in groups while many others give importance to the ability of children to keep themselves occupied when they are not with friends. In my opinion, children need to socialise with their peers as well as learn to be productive when they are alone.
Children must be a part of the activities that are organised with their friends. They attain numerous skills such as teamwork, leadership roles, social and communication skills. In other words, they learn how to interact with other people, which is a skill crucial for achieving success in life. By participating in group activities, children can make friends who have similar interests, which ultimately leads to happiness in the future. Children also get a chance to meet people from different cultural backgrounds that can help them to learn about several places and cultures. Humans are social beings and hence interacting with other children is vital for their mental well-being.
However, children also need to spend some time alone to develop certain qualities which are difficult to achieve when being occupied with others. They should have time to reflect on themselves and identify their interests when alone and bored. They also need to focus on academics so that they get good scores in exams which are required to achieve their dreams and aspirations. Children can also spend time developing in their leisure like painting, poetry, reading, writing stories, learning a new craft and many more. It is particularly useful when they want to relax and have a break from stressful schoolwork or job demands in the future when they grow up.
I believe that parents should give equal importance to their children to participate in group activities as well as encourage them to be productive when they are alone. For instance, there should be activities like sports, dance, scouting and theatres, which can help children not only in attaining the skill but also learn social and communication skills. In addition to this, children need to spend some quality time alone to discover themselves and be productive. Being alone helps children to be creative as boredom leads to creativity. If they learn to enjoy on their own, children will remain occupied, which keep them away from depression due to loneliness.
To conclude, parents must encourage and guide their children to be active in group activities as well as learn to enjoy time alone by doing productive work. By doing so, children will get a chance to develop themselves, and they get equipped to face challenges life throws on them.
Sample 6:
In modern society, many people maintain that parents ought to persuade their children to engage in group activities in their spare time while others assert that they should be allowed to freely enjoy their leisure pursuits. Concerning this, I would concur with the former opinion and will discuss both viewpoints in the following essay.
Granted, children can hugely benefit from keeping themselves occupied with their own leisure activities. Firstly, they will have total freedom in exploring and submerging themselves in their own interests or hobbies under no constraint from their parents, which can help bolster their confidence and promote their mental well-being. Secondly, independent engagement in desired activities could greatly promote some important problem-solving skills among children. To illustrate, young puzzle enthusiasts, who are interested in mathematical riddles and complex logic puzzles such as sudoku and Rubik’s cube, often demonstrate a highly creative mind and intellectual capacity.
Nevertheless, I believe that children should be spurred by their parents to partake in structured group activities for numerous benefits. One of them is that children will have an opportunity to accumulate numerous interpersonal skills while collaborating with their partners to successfully perform a collective task. Undoubtedly, this set of skills is highly valuable in social and work settings where efficient teamwork and rational communication are greatly appreciated. Furthermore, coordinated activities can also help children develop their mental and physical capacity. To illustrate, popular team sports, such as football and basketball, mainly aim to shape young children into resilient and determined individuals through regular training and competition.
In conclusion, although some might argue that it is essential for children to experience various leisure activities by themselves, it is my firm belief that they ought to receive encouragement from parents to join organized group activities for the accumulation of soft skills and improvements in mental and physical health.
Sample 7:
In the modern, fast-paced world, the question of how children spend their free time sparks debate. Advocates for organized group activities contend that they impart valuable social skills and teamwork, crucial for personal and professional growth. Engaging in team sports or group projects teaches collaboration, effective communication, and interpersonal navigation, broadening horizons by exposing children to diverse perspectives.
Conversely, proponents of independent play emphasize the benefits of unstructured free time in fostering creativity, problem-solving, and self-discovery. Activities chosen independently, be it reading, drawing, or exploring nature, cultivate autonomy and decision-making abilities, contributing to a child’s emotional well-being. The independence gained nurtures a strong sense of identity and self-esteem.
The key lies in finding a harmonious blend between these approaches. Encouraging a mix of both organized group activities and independent play allows children to benefit from social interaction while honing their ability to entertain themselves. Striking this balance ensures the development of a well-rounded skill set, including social competence, creativity, and the capacity for independent thought.
In conclusion, the debate over encouraging organized group activities versus fostering independent play is not binary. A balanced approach that incorporates both aspects is essential for nurturing a child’s overall development, preparing them to face the challenges of the future with a well-rounded skill set.
Sample 8:
There has been an increasing debate as to whether children should be encouraged to participate in organised group activities, or they should be free to choose their activities on their own in their free time. In this essay, I will shed some light on both the views and give my opinion.
To begin with, organised group activities allow children to socialize with people in their immediate vicinity. Children learn to interact with the people in their society. To illustrate this, one can organise picnics among families which will provide enough room for children to socialize. Additionally, children learn various team building activities like working in a group competing with their peers, coping up with pressure etc. Furthermore, children learn the right attitude from being in a group.
On the other hand, children should be independent in choosing their activities in their free time. This gives the freedom of thought and children learn to take up challenges and responsibilities. However, there is a possibility that certain children will take wrong routes. Due to technological advancements, children are more prone to playing video games, socializing themselves on the internet. This will detach them from their immediate social circle. Children can be given freedom of thought, but adult supervision is necessary to ensure that they do not take the wrong path.
In conclusion, having considered both the views, I think an organised group activity is more beneficial for children. Children are the future of society, and their nurturing cannot be ignored.
Sample 9:
Whether children ought to be motivated to engage in group sports or do activities on their own in their spare time is a matter of great concern for many parents. Group activities, without any doubt, teach some important skills but letting children play or do things they like independently also nurture their creativity. Personally, I think that doing their favourite activities independently has more benefits.
Taking part in organized group programmes has many advantages for children. One of the major benefits is the development of social skills. That is to say that children can learn how to live in harmony, share joy and sorrow with others and compromise in a certain situation. With group activities, children will eventually understand that not everything will happen in their own way, and they will naturally learn how to back down or choose a different path. Moreover, teamwork teaches how to play someone’s role in order to achieve a common goal.
Conversely, children thrive positively when parents give them unscheduled leisure time. It also nurtures their creativity. Thus, when children devote their spare time to making role-play discoveries, take part in self-directed play, and heal their own bouts of restiveness, they can light their inner sparks. If play is child-driven, according to many studies, they can discover areas of interest on their own, develop creativity, and eventually involve completely in the passions they wish to engage, which in turn nurture cognitive development. Moreover, undirected and unstructured play helps offspring learn self-advocacy skills, how to live harmoniously, to negotiate, to share, and how to resolve conflicts. American Academy of Pediatrics suggests that unstructured play is essential to the cognitive, emotional, and social well-being of children. Lastly and most importantly, independent, creative, and child-driven play protects children against the effect of stress and pressure.
In conclusion, while organized sports are helpful for children, I believe unstructured free play is of paramount importance for a child’s all-round development. Therefore, parents should allow their children to engage in active child-driven play in their free time most of the time while also sometimes letting them play with a group of other children.
Sample 10:
In today's world, parents often have a dilemma about how their children should spend their free time. While some people believe that engaging in organised group activities is the key to a child's development, others argue that it is crucial for children to learn how to occupy themselves. This essay will explore both these views. As far as my opinion goes, parents should maintain a balance when it comes to their children's free time activity by motivating them to participate in group activities while also permitting them to sometimes choose their own leisure activities.
On the one hand, proponents of encouraging children to participate in organised group activities say that it helps children learn social skills such as cooperation, teamwork, and leadership. For example, when children participate in team sports like soccer or basketball, they learn the importance of working together towards a common goal and develop cooperation and teamwork. On top of that, they develop physical skills, including coordination and agility which help them stay healthy. For instance, engaging in regular physical activities through these group activities promotes overall fitness and well-being, reducing the risk of lifestyle-related health issues in the long run.
On the other hand, many people express that children should be encouraged to learn how to occupy themselves. When children are given free time, they use their imagination and creativity to keep themselves engaged. They learn to think independently, make decisions, and solve problems on their own. Furthermore, when children are not occupied with structured activities, they can experience a sense of relaxation and freedom, which can improve their mental well-being. Research works show that unstructured free time allows young children to follow their interests and pursue hobbies, like painting or building, enhancing their self-expression and nurturing their passions.
In my opinion, both approaches have their merits, and parents should find a balance between the two. Children should be encouraged to participate in group activities, but they should also be given free time to pursue their interests and hobbies.
In conclusion, parents should find a balance between structured and unstructured time to ensure their children's overall development. Children need opportunities to learn social and physical skills, but they also require free time to explore their interests and develop their creativity.
Sample 11:
In today's fast-paced world, parents are often faced with the plight of how to occupy their children's free time. Some people suggest that children should be encouraged to participate in group activities, while others believe that it is crucial for children to learn to occupy themselves independently. In this essay, I will discuss both views and explain why I support the idea that parents should encourage their children to partake in organised group activities.
On the one hand, those who believe that children should learn to occupy themselves independently argue that it is an essential life skill that fosters creativity and imagination. Children who have the ability to entertain themselves are less likely to become bored or reliant on external stimuli and are better equipped to handle unstructured time. They can also develop a stronger sense of self and a more active imagination. For instance, studies have shown that children who spend their free time reading and engaging in imaginative play have better cognitive development and are more successful in academic pursuits.
On the other hand, those who believe that children should participate in group activities argue that it provides numerous benefits. Group activities can help children build important social skills, such as cooperation and teamwork. Children can also learn valuable life skills, such as leadership and communication, which can be beneficial later in life. Additionally, group activities can expose children to new interests and hobbies, which can broaden their horizons and provide them with a sense of purpose. For example, participating in a team sport can help children develop physical fitness, teamwork, and social skills.
In my opinion, parents need to encourage their children to participate in organised group activities because they provide numerous outstanding benefits that can help children develop important skills and interests. Encouraging children to participate in team activities can also promote socialisation and help children build positive relationships with their peers.
In conclusion, while it may be beneficial for children to sometime occupy themselves independently, I believe that parents should encourage their children to participate in organised group activities. These activities can provide children with valuable life skills, promote socialisation, and broaden their horizons.
Sample 12:
There have been conflicting views on how children should spend their free time. While planned group activities build obedience and cooperation in children, I believe it is more important for them to practice entertaining themselves on their own because it helps them develop problem-solving skills.
On the one hand, organized group activities foster obedience and cooperation because they assign children a common goal, whether it is the harmony that a choir strives to achieve or the scores that a football team aims for. To accomplish their goal, children must work with each other and follow the instructions provided by a group leader. However, I think programming each minute of an activity doesn't give children enough room to use their imagination and, therefore, stifles their creativity.
On the other side of the argument, some argue that by finding activities on their own, children can improve their ability to tackle problems. During boring times throughout the day, they learn to be creative and resourceful to discover methods to entertain themselves only when there isn't any aid or interference from adults. For example, when feeling bored, a shy girl may become more sociable and go ahead and invite the neighbor kids over. I agree with this argument because problem-solving is a crucial life skill. As children grow up, they will encounter obstacles and have nobody but themselves to count on to get through such tough situations.
In conclusion, even though organized group activities help children become more obedient and cooperative, I believe self-directed activities bring the greater benefit of fostering problem-solving skills and should therefore be prioritized.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Everyone has different dreams when it comes to where they wish to live. Personally, I think it is very desirable to live in a large city. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, cities offer a great environment for raising children, and I am a person who values family above all else. Urban areas have numerous parks and recreation centers which encourage children to lead vital and healthy lives, and they also have well-funded community centers which contribute to the intellectual development of young people. My own experience demonstrates the value of such facilities. Both my husband and I work full time jobs and are not home when our two sons finish school. This is not a problem, though, as both of them go directly to a local community center when their classes are over. Our eldest son participates in a computer club there, while our youngest son practices photography. Their participation in these programs sets my mind at ease, as without access to the community center they would just sit at home all alone. This situation compares favorably to a friend of mine who lives in a small town and recently had to hire an expensive babysitter to watch her children when they get home from school, as she was not able to locate any meaningful activities for them to take part in.
Secondly, large cities offer cultural experiences that adults can enjoy and appreciate. Most major cities have a plethora of museums, ethnic restaurants, libraries, theater groups and other stimulating and cosmopolitan facilities. My city is no exception. For instance, my colleagues and I spend every Friday evening visiting a new ethnic restaurant for dinner. Over the past three months we have enjoyed food from more than a dozen different national cuisines. Meanwhile, my sons and I go to a different museum once a month and I have found that I enjoy our visits almost as much as they do. These are the sort of outings that are only possible in a heavily populated urban area. Small towns offer easy access to beautiful natural scenery, but I prefer the intellectual and cultural stimulation that my city offers.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that living in a large city is preferable to living in a small town. This is because cities are better places to raise children, and because they offer stimulating intellectual and cultural experience that grown-ups can enjoy.
Sample 2:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city, so I have experienced the good and bad
sides of both. I never thought that I would like to live in a big city, but I was wrong. After ten years of living in one, I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Small towns and big cities both have some problems in terms of transportation. In a small town, you have to own a car to ensure comfortable living. You can't get around without one because
there isn't any kind of public transportation. Big cities generally have heavy traffic and expensive
parking, but there you have a choice of taking public transportation. It's not free, but it's often cheaper than driving when you consider gas and time. Especially if you don't have a car, you're
better off in the city.
I love the excitement of big cities. Small towns have a slow pace. Large cities mean you have to
adapt to a variety of situations, like finding a new route to work or trying a new restaurant. I enjoy that challenge very much. Another source of the excitement of city living is the variety of cultural activities available. There is a wide assortment of theatre, music and dance performances
available in big cities. These things are rare in small ones.
The final thing I like about large cities is the diversity of the people. The United States is made up of people of different races, religions, abilities, and interests. However, you seldom find such a variety of people in a smaller town. I think that living in an area where everyone was just like me would quickly become boring.
Of course, security is a concern, and that's one area where small towns are superior to big cities.
Still, I would rather be a bit more cautious and live in a large city than feel secure but bored.
Sample 3:
Where should we live? Some may choose to live in big cities, while others like the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside. As far as I am concerned, I would like to live in a big city because living in a big city has more advantages than living in the countryside.
To begin with, the city is the symbol of human civilization and there are many facilities for living, recreation and health care. Therefore, living there is more convenient than living in countryside. For example, we can find plenty of malls around our neighborhood, where we can buy everyday necessities at a low price. Furthermore, people are more concerned about their health and safety than other things in their lives. In big cities, medical facilities and emergency services are more easily accessible than in the countryside. Big cities also have convenient transportation and utility systems. They also offer faster Internet connections. These all make our life easier in big cities.
In addition, we can take part in a variety of events in big cities. Human beings like to live together and need to interact with each other. In a big city, the population density is high therefore there are always plenty of social activities, sports events and concerts. There are more recreational places in big cities, such as opera houses, movie theatres, clubs, and swimming pools. You will have many kinds of entertainment in big cities and meet many people. In the countryside, however, life may be dull and quiet, and you may only have a few neighbors. Living alone with few activities can easily cause mental diseases.
Some may argue that the pollution in cities makes people sick. However, with automobiles and modern highways we can easily take a break to expose ourselves to fresh air in the countryside and sunshine on the beach.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that living in big cities is much better than living in countryside because of the advanced facilities and social activities in cities. Moreover, the autos and highways
enable us to enjoy the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside.
Sample 4:
In our modern world, people have different opinions on where the best place would be to live, and many argue that living in a small town is the ideal location, while others argue that living in a big city is preferred. Both places have their benefits and drawbacks, but I would prefer to live in a big city. This is because big cities offer diverse job opportunities, cultural experiences, and convenient amenities.
Big cities have a broader range of job opportunities than small towns. In a big city, one will have a chance to secure a job in various sectors and pursue a career. Many big companies and industries are typically located in larger cities, which means that job seekers have plenty of options. Moreover, a big city offers numerous opportunities for growth, as one can change jobs and pursue their passion. The job market in big cities also offers higher salaries and better benefits. Hence, for those who want to make a radicle career change and those who want to earn a decent living, a big city is the ideal place to live.
Cultural experiences are another reason why I prefer to live in a big city. Big cities offer diverse and unique cultural experiences that small towns
cannot, such as trying new foods and attending cultural festivals. In big cities, there is always a movie or a theatre show to attend, a concert or sporting event to watch, a museum or an art gallery to visit. The diversity of cultural experiences in big cities provides people with various opportunities to learn and broaden their horizons, which is an enriching experience.
Convenient amenities are also reasons why I prefer to live in big cities. Cities are often equipped with modern infrastructure. Cities have better medical facilities, public transportation systems, and essential services like banks and grocery stores. Big cities have a good public transportation system that is well-planned and suitable for people who do not own private cars. People in big cities have access to modern medical facilities with well-trained medical specialists.
Despite the benefits, big cities have some drawbacks. One of the most significant drawbacks is the high cost of living. Housing and rent are expensive in larger cities compared to small towns. Moreover, noise pollution and air pollution are common in big cities. Residents must always be aware of their surrounding environments to protect themselves from the effects of pollution. Additionally, congestion and crowding are other issues that plague many big city neighborhoods.
In conclusion, while big cities have their issues, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Big cities offer more job opportunities, an array of cultural experiences, and convenient amenities. Therefore, for me, getting the chance to live and experience all of this makes living in a big city very appealing.
Sample 5:
People seldom agree with one another, even on such trivial issues as the preference between living in a big city and a small town. It’s a bit hasty to claim that it is better to live in a big city than in a small town, or vice versa.
Living in a big city has several benefits. First, there are more job opportunities readily available in big cities compared to small towns. Furthermore, not only are there more job positions in big cities, but the quality of these positions is much higher as well. In addition, the pay is often more competitive.
Second, children are likely to receive a higher-quality education compared to their counterparts in small towns. For families, children’s education is always a top priority.
Finally, big cities generally offer a superior overall standard of living compared to small towns. There are more commodities and services available in city markets, more public utilities, and even a greater variety of television channels.
However, living in a small town also has its advantages. People in small towns often enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle. Most are free from the high work-related stress common in big cities. Although the average pay is lower, the cost of daily necessities, such as vegetables and meat, is usually more affordable.
Instead of experiencing the loneliness often prevalent in big cities, children in small towns may grow up more healthily due to harmonious relationships among residents. People in small towns don’t have to wake up as early in the morning, as there are no traffic jams, and drivers tend to be more cautious, reducing the likelihood of accidents. While they may have fewer television channels, they have more friends readily available for socializing and entertainment.
As for my current situation, although I long for the cozy atmosphere and close relationships among neighbors and friends, which are often unique to small towns, I have chosen to live in one of the biggest cities in my country - Beijing. This is because I have found a good job here with a decent salary. I think I would prefer living in a small town when I retire one day.
Sample 6:
In English, there is a well-known fairy tale about a poor country boy, Dick Whittington, who goes to London believing that the streets of the city are “paved with gold.” The story is a classic “rags to riches” tale. Dick eventually becomes the Lord Mayor of London. Like the hero of that story, I always find wonder and adventure in cities.
Cities contain a fascinating assortment of people. Whenever I walk around a shopping precinct at midday on a weekend, I am captivated by the variety of individuals hurrying through the shops. Sometimes, I simply sit on a public bench and observe the diverse streams of shoppers passing by.
Today, in the age of globe-trotting transport and advanced communication, city life is more diverse than ever. Capital cities are now highly cosmopolitan and eager to attract foreign trade and currency. There is a contemporary English joke that says, “You can never find an Englishman in London.”
Whether rightly or wrongly, governments and local authorities tend to prioritize building public amenities in big cities. Money is invested in transportation, libraries, parks, and museums. Often, countries compete to construct the most impressive “showcase” buildings. For example, Malaysia has built a skyscraper taller than anything in New York. Similarly, within large countries, regions compete with each other: New York against Chicago, Shanghai against Hong Kong, or Beijing.
All of this benefits city dwellers. The magic of the Dick Whittington story is rekindled in me whenever I enter a library housed in a magnificent building. For university students studying art or music, large cities often offer galleries and public performances. Even as a teenager, I appreciated living in a city because it gave me the opportunity to attend rock concerts by my favorite bands several times a year.
Architecture shapes the urban landscape. For those who appreciate it, a city can be as visually exciting as the Himalayas. A modern metropolis resembles a mountain range with its height, light, and solidness. At the same time, old buildings add to its charm - quaint, unspoiled side streets, or shops and homes from distant ages. Even someone who spends their entire life in one large city could continue discovering its architectural secrets well into old age.
Humans are “social animals.” They talk, interact, and create. Cities provide libraries, universities, and café bars where people can meet and share ideas with others of their kind.
Sample 7:
Some people would like to live in a small town because the surroundings could be more picturesque, and people are friendlier compared to people in a big city. However, in my opinion, living in a big city is more effective and beneficial based on the following reasons.
First, living in a big city is convenient. Thanks to public transportation, any place in a big city is usually accessible. Without driving, you have many options among buses, trains and subway. Taxis are also available on almost every corner of the city. Besides, it is easy to find a restaurant or food stands in your neighborhood within walking distance whenever you are hungry. There are also convenience stores all over, so city residents can buy any stuff easily at any time without bothering to drive to a certain place to get what they need. Convenience is the best what a city can offer while a small town is less likely to.
In addition, a big city provides more education opportunities. The residents have easier access to schools and education resources, so do they to faculty and advanced facilities. Take teachers for example, they are willing to teach in a big city because of the better salary and there are more resources they need available in libraries and related institutes when they want to go further to sharpen their teaching skills. Similarly, when children plan to take some talented courses such as piano, art, and the like, a city with more options and business activities is where parents want their children to live and grow.
Here is another perfect example to illustrate my preference of a city. I used to be a volunteer in an elementary school in a small town. Although the town was lovely and clean, there was some inconvenience caused in daily life. First, less bus service was provided, so people usually had no choice but to wait a long time to take the bus. Second, restaurants and food stands were all closed after nine o’clock, so it’s hard to find something to eat if you are hungry late in the evening. Lastly, teachers in the elementary school might need to teach many courses with different subjects, when necessary, because of a lack of faculty, that is, an English teacher could be asked to teach math or science as well. Also, the facilities in the classroom and the science lab were old- fashioned. From my observation, people can live peacefully in a small town but actually there are more opportunities and availability a big city can offer.
Last but not least, infrastructure and public services are usually prominently featured in a big city. When I want to exercise on a rainy day, I can go to the sport center without worrying about places to go. In contrast, I might be trapped at home in a small town in the same situation. Besides, public services like medical care and care centers are fully developed for people with a pressing need. Libraries also provide better book circulation and activities to cater for their readers, which is not very likely to take place in a town with the number of people which is small. For people who like tranquility and secure, small towns are the best choice. However, for those who prefer economic prosperity, a variety of things to do, places to go and activities to join, the better choice is in a big city. I happen to be the one who prefers the latter and enjoys the lives in it.
Sample 8:
It is crucial to choose a place which suits you to live because where you live has influence over the quality of your life and happiness. Compared to those who prefer to live in a small town with a quiet environment, living in a big city to take advantage of the modern conveniences that it can offer is my choice.
First of all, the public transportation system is one of amenities people can benefit from. Big cities usually provide a well-developed transportation network, such as bus, train, subway and airport, so people in the city have very easy access to the vehicles that can help them reach any destination they want to. In contrast, the convenience of public transportation is usually not found in a small town, where people might tend to drive or use other means of transport to get about.
Besides, there are more opportunities for either finding a job or taking education. With a larger population, more jobs are available for everyone to find than those in the countryside. Take where I live for example, although the job market is very competitive, university graduates often move to Taipei, which is the major city in Taiwan. If you need to develop a skill, it is also likely that you will achieve it and then get a job successfully. More importantly, there are also more educational opportunities and a lot of different courses and institutions available. There is always availability of learning something new or developing practical skills in a big city.
Furthermore, cities can provide a variety of entertainment options every day. There is always something fun to do in a big city to keep people of all different interests from getting bored. Cities provide a lively nightlife, all types of shows, museums and sports facilities. Additionally, you will be able to connect with other people who share the same hobbies at different events.
While the lifestyle in a small town is less stressful, the city lifestyle has a lot of opportunities for people. Personally, I prefer to live in a big city which offers a variety of many options. In the meanwhile, I like the energy and the convenience in a big city. City life can have many positive impacts compared to rural life.
Sample 9:
There are many differences between living in a big city and a small town. Therefore, we must choose based on our personal preferences and needs. If you prefer a calm and peaceful environment, small towns are suitable for you. However, if you want to develop yourself, big cities are the best places to learn and acquire skills essential for your future.
In life, the most important thing for everyone is, of course, health. If someone’s health deteriorates, they might lose everything they have. Small towns often provide a healthier environment. You can enjoy peaceful rivers, mountains, abundant greenery, and a clear night sky filled with stars. Life there is calm and free from the excessive noise of big cities, as the population and number of cars are much smaller. However, living in a small town can mean missing out on global news, fashion trends, and other advancements.
On the other hand, living in a big city provides more opportunities for personal growth and the chance to enhance your competitive skills. Over time, this can help you establish your own identity and attitude in society. People in big cities are often motivated to work hard to support their families. However, city life comes with challenges, such as air pollution and waste management issues. If we do not address these problems, they could have serious consequences for our future.
In conclusion, small towns offer comfort and tranquility, while big cities are dynamic and full of opportunities. Personally, I would choose to live in a big city first to improve myself. Later, when I want to rest and prioritize my health, I would move to the countryside or a small town.
I hope you can choose the place that best suits your needs and appeals to you.
Sample 10:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city. I didn't think I would like to live here, but I was wrong. I think life is much better in a big city. Transportation is much more convenient, everything is more exciting, and there is a greater variety of people. I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Transportation is easier in a city. In a small town, you have to have a car to get around because there isn't any kind of public transportation. In a city, on the other hand, there are usually buses and taxis, and some cities have subways. Cities often have heavy traffic, and expensive parking, but it doesn't matter because you can always take the bus. Using public transportation is usually cheaper and more convenient than driving a car, but you don't have this choice in a small town.
City life is more exciting than small town life. In small towns usually nothing changes. You see the same people every day, you go to the same two or three restaurants, everything is the same. In a city things change all the time. You see new people every day. There are many restaurants, with new ones to choose from all the time. New plays come to the theaters and new musicians come to the concert halls.
Cities have a diversity of people that you don't find in a small town. There are much fewer people in a small town and usually they are all alike. In a city you can find people from different countries, of different religions, of different races - you can find all kinds of people. This variety of people is what makes city life interesting.
Life in a city is convenient, exciting, and interesting. After experiencing city life, I could never live in a small town again.
Sample 11:
If you were asked to choose between living in a big city or a small town, where would you prefer to live? Some people might choose to live in a small town because the environment is cleaner, and it fosters closer relationships with others. This suggests that living in a small town has its benefits. However, I believe there are three key reasons why living in a big city is more advantageous.
First, living in a big city provides greater opportunities to gain advanced knowledge and develop oneself. In contrast, the range of educational options in a small town is often limited. Furthermore, the presence of many students in a city creates a competitive environment that encourages us to work harder. While education may not be the only important aspect of life, it remains essential because we rely on knowledge throughout our lifetime.
Second, living in a city allows us to meet more people and adapt to society more easily. For example, interacting with diverse individuals helps us learn about their personalities and characteristics. Building relationships and making friends in a city can greatly benefit us as we grow older. By communicating with people in a big city, we gain a better understanding of how society functions and what we need to do to thrive. Therefore, city life prepares us to navigate societal challenges more effectively.
Lastly, living in a big city offers more job opportunities. Securing employment is a crucial aspect of life, and cities typically provide a wider variety of workplaces, such as companies, factories, and universities. For instance, becoming a professor is more achievable in a city where universities are abundant. In contrast, small towns cannot guarantee the same level of employment opportunities.
In conclusion, while small towns have advantages like friendlier communities and a cleaner environment, I believe living in a big city is more beneficial. Cities offer better educational opportunities, greater chances to meet people and adapt to society, and more job prospects. For these reasons, I would prefer living in a big city over a small town.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
500 bài Đọc hiểu ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 21)