Câu hỏi:
10/01/2025 191
Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organised group activities in their free time. Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
The debate on whether parents should encourage children to engage in organized group activities or foster independence through solitary pursuits is pivotal. This essay contends that a balanced approach is vital, discussing first the benefits of group activities in developing social and physical skills, and then the advantages of solitary activities in nurturing creativity and self-reliance. Both aspects are argued to be crucial for a child's holistic development.
On the one hand, organised group activities offer invaluable opportunities for children to develop essential social and interpersonal skills. Participation in such activities, whether they be team sports, music ensembles, or academic clubs, enables children to cultivate teamwork, leadership, and empathetic skills. For example, being a part of a football team not only hones a child's physical abilities but also teaches them about cooperation, resilience, and strategic thinking. Moreover, these settings often provide a platform for children to forge lasting friendships and understand diverse perspectives. Therefore, it is clear that parents should encourage their children to take part in organised group activities, as these experiences are instrumental in shaping well-rounded individuals.
Conversely, the importance of solitary activities cannot be overlooked. Independent pursuits like reading, creative writing, or exploring nature foster self-reliance, introspection, and imagination. A child engrossed in a book, for instance, not only improves their literacy but also embarks on a journey of imaginative exploration, often leading to heightened creativity and critical thinking. Such activities empower children to be comfortable with their own company, encouraging a sense of self-sufficiency and inner strength. In a world that is increasingly interconnected, the ability to be independent and self-motivated is a valuable asset.
In conclusion, while organised group activities undeniably contribute to social and emotional learning, the benefits of solitary pursuits in fostering independence and creativity are equally significant. A balance between the two, tailored to each child’s unique disposition and interests, is key.
Sample 2:
The debate over whether parents should encourage their children to engage in organised group activities or allow them to develop autonomy through solitary pursuits is multifaceted. In my opinion, parents should motivate children to work on their own because though spending spare time in group activities can teach children some practical social skills, being their own can help them follow their instinct freely and pursue their interest.
In their free time, children should engage in group projects since it helps them integrate into society and acquire various life skills. This involvement might take the shape of team sports, group projects, or artistic endeavours. For instance, during athletics, students are split up into several groups that compete against and support one another at the same time. These group inclusions cultivate in young brains a feeling of social connection and communication. In reality, youngsters may only benefit from friendship and communication abilities when they are exposed to various cooperative activities. According to several studies, working as a team teaches kids important practical skills like discipline and communication, which eventually enable them to succeed in both their personal and professional lives.
However, individual activities have a profound impact on personal development because staying alone would give children an edge in terms of their freedom of thought and work. For instance, they can get involved in the solo cocurricular activities like creative computer games that assist the children with some effective brain culture and concentration practice. Furthermore, getting along with a team demands a specific timing with the other team members, which is not the case when they pass their time alone because different children have different spare time schedule. In addition, children’s productivity and health issues are directly related to the way they spend their leisure, and they enjoy this time most if they can pass it exactly the way they want. In other words, being solo in the spare time leads a child to gain distinct aptitude since their individual hobbies lack any adult authority that may suppress their innate abilities.
In conclusion, even though working in groups can teach children valuable lessons about teamwork and communication, I still believe that letting kids work alone on their hobbies allows them to do the things they enjoy doing the most, and this freedom of thought and activities helps them maintain top health and exceptional talent.
Sample 3:
The debate over whether parents should encourage their children to engage in organised group activities or allow them to develop autonomy through solitary pursuits is a topic of considerable discussion. I contend that an integrated approach, fostering both communal engagement and individual creativity, is most beneficial. This essay will delve into the merits of group involvement, extoll the virtues of independent play, and ultimately argue for a balanced blend of both methodologies to enrich the tapestry of childhood development.
Proponents of the notion that "parents should encourage their children" to "take part in organised group activities in their spare time" assert that such interactions are pivotal for holistic development. In the crucible of group dynamics, children learn the art of cooperation, appreciate the value of teamwork, and hone their social skills - capabilities that are indispensable in the scaffolding of a well-rounded character. For instance, a child partaking in a community sports league not only engages in physical exercise but also learns the importance of strategic thinking and camaraderie. Furthermore, structured group activities often offer a scaffolded environment where children can develop resilience and a competitive spirit within a safe framework, preparing them for the inevitable challenges of adult life.
Conversely, there are strong advocates for the importance of solitary pursuits, where children learn to be self-sufficient and imaginative. When children are left to their own devices, they often engage in creative play that fosters independent thinking and problem-solving skills. For example, a child building a castle from blocks or engrossing in a book navigates a personal journey of discovery and learning, mastering the ability to entertain and educate themselves without external stimuli. This self-reliance is an essential life skill, cultivating a sense of inner resourcefulness that can be a wellspring of innovation and introspection in later life.
In my view, while both approaches yield significant advantages, balanced amalgamation is ideal. Encouraging children to diversify their activities to include both group interactions and individual pursuits seems most conducive to fostering a comprehensive skill set. The synthesis of social collaboration and personal ingenuity equips children with versatile arsenal to navigate the complex tapestry of life.
In conclusion, a harmonious approach that incorporates both supervised group activities and individual self-directed play seems to best serve a child's development. Encouraging a balance between social collaboration and independent discovery equips young individuals with a broad spectrum of skills, preparing them adeptly for the complexities of life.
Sample 4:
While some claim that kids should be encouraged to participate in group activities, others believe they should be allowed to busy themselves on their own. Although there are many things that contribute to kids having a good education, in my opinion, intellect and social skills are the two most important criteria. I will explain the concept in more depth.
On the one hand, allowing children to fill their own time helps them grow intellectually and develop their thought processes. Since children can concentrate better in a quieter setting, they can broaden their knowledge and more accurately recall what they have learnt. Investing time in learning is essential since information is the main factor that enables kids to live better lives. Furthermore, it is generally accepted that students who study in this manner perform better academically than those who do not.
However, since individuals cannot survive in the real world alone, it is more crucial that they are social individuals rather than intellectual individuals without sociability. Group activity is the most effective strategy to increase a child's harmony. The ability of kids to function as a team is a crucial component of their evaluation, and this quality may be enhanced through team building exercises. Kids cannot play soccer alone, for instance, and must cooperate as a team to succeed. Participating in group activities teaches them important life skills like giving and setting shared goals that are crucial as they become older. So, it is far more beneficial to teach them how to collaborate when they are still young.
There are both benefits and drawbacks to both points of view, but since the world is not a place where a person can live alone, the social component should be prioritized. Children should thus acquire this skill when they are still young and engage in a variety of social activities rather than pass the leisure on their own.
Sample 5:
Children need to spend their time productively. Many parents believe that their children should participate in activities which are organised in groups while many others give importance to the ability of children to keep themselves occupied when they are not with friends. In my opinion, children need to socialise with their peers as well as learn to be productive when they are alone.
Children must be a part of the activities that are organised with their friends. They attain numerous skills such as teamwork, leadership roles, social and communication skills. In other words, they learn how to interact with other people, which is a skill crucial for achieving success in life. By participating in group activities, children can make friends who have similar interests, which ultimately leads to happiness in the future. Children also get a chance to meet people from different cultural backgrounds that can help them to learn about several places and cultures. Humans are social beings and hence interacting with other children is vital for their mental well-being.
However, children also need to spend some time alone to develop certain qualities which are difficult to achieve when being occupied with others. They should have time to reflect on themselves and identify their interests when alone and bored. They also need to focus on academics so that they get good scores in exams which are required to achieve their dreams and aspirations. Children can also spend time developing in their leisure like painting, poetry, reading, writing stories, learning a new craft and many more. It is particularly useful when they want to relax and have a break from stressful schoolwork or job demands in the future when they grow up.
I believe that parents should give equal importance to their children to participate in group activities as well as encourage them to be productive when they are alone. For instance, there should be activities like sports, dance, scouting and theatres, which can help children not only in attaining the skill but also learn social and communication skills. In addition to this, children need to spend some quality time alone to discover themselves and be productive. Being alone helps children to be creative as boredom leads to creativity. If they learn to enjoy on their own, children will remain occupied, which keep them away from depression due to loneliness.
To conclude, parents must encourage and guide their children to be active in group activities as well as learn to enjoy time alone by doing productive work. By doing so, children will get a chance to develop themselves, and they get equipped to face challenges life throws on them.
Sample 6:
In modern society, many people maintain that parents ought to persuade their children to engage in group activities in their spare time while others assert that they should be allowed to freely enjoy their leisure pursuits. Concerning this, I would concur with the former opinion and will discuss both viewpoints in the following essay.
Granted, children can hugely benefit from keeping themselves occupied with their own leisure activities. Firstly, they will have total freedom in exploring and submerging themselves in their own interests or hobbies under no constraint from their parents, which can help bolster their confidence and promote their mental well-being. Secondly, independent engagement in desired activities could greatly promote some important problem-solving skills among children. To illustrate, young puzzle enthusiasts, who are interested in mathematical riddles and complex logic puzzles such as sudoku and Rubik’s cube, often demonstrate a highly creative mind and intellectual capacity.
Nevertheless, I believe that children should be spurred by their parents to partake in structured group activities for numerous benefits. One of them is that children will have an opportunity to accumulate numerous interpersonal skills while collaborating with their partners to successfully perform a collective task. Undoubtedly, this set of skills is highly valuable in social and work settings where efficient teamwork and rational communication are greatly appreciated. Furthermore, coordinated activities can also help children develop their mental and physical capacity. To illustrate, popular team sports, such as football and basketball, mainly aim to shape young children into resilient and determined individuals through regular training and competition.
In conclusion, although some might argue that it is essential for children to experience various leisure activities by themselves, it is my firm belief that they ought to receive encouragement from parents to join organized group activities for the accumulation of soft skills and improvements in mental and physical health.
Sample 7:
In the modern, fast-paced world, the question of how children spend their free time sparks debate. Advocates for organized group activities contend that they impart valuable social skills and teamwork, crucial for personal and professional growth. Engaging in team sports or group projects teaches collaboration, effective communication, and interpersonal navigation, broadening horizons by exposing children to diverse perspectives.
Conversely, proponents of independent play emphasize the benefits of unstructured free time in fostering creativity, problem-solving, and self-discovery. Activities chosen independently, be it reading, drawing, or exploring nature, cultivate autonomy and decision-making abilities, contributing to a child’s emotional well-being. The independence gained nurtures a strong sense of identity and self-esteem.
The key lies in finding a harmonious blend between these approaches. Encouraging a mix of both organized group activities and independent play allows children to benefit from social interaction while honing their ability to entertain themselves. Striking this balance ensures the development of a well-rounded skill set, including social competence, creativity, and the capacity for independent thought.
In conclusion, the debate over encouraging organized group activities versus fostering independent play is not binary. A balanced approach that incorporates both aspects is essential for nurturing a child’s overall development, preparing them to face the challenges of the future with a well-rounded skill set.
Sample 8:
There has been an increasing debate as to whether children should be encouraged to participate in organised group activities, or they should be free to choose their activities on their own in their free time. In this essay, I will shed some light on both the views and give my opinion.
To begin with, organised group activities allow children to socialize with people in their immediate vicinity. Children learn to interact with the people in their society. To illustrate this, one can organise picnics among families which will provide enough room for children to socialize. Additionally, children learn various team building activities like working in a group competing with their peers, coping up with pressure etc. Furthermore, children learn the right attitude from being in a group.
On the other hand, children should be independent in choosing their activities in their free time. This gives the freedom of thought and children learn to take up challenges and responsibilities. However, there is a possibility that certain children will take wrong routes. Due to technological advancements, children are more prone to playing video games, socializing themselves on the internet. This will detach them from their immediate social circle. Children can be given freedom of thought, but adult supervision is necessary to ensure that they do not take the wrong path.
In conclusion, having considered both the views, I think an organised group activity is more beneficial for children. Children are the future of society, and their nurturing cannot be ignored.
Sample 9:
Whether children ought to be motivated to engage in group sports or do activities on their own in their spare time is a matter of great concern for many parents. Group activities, without any doubt, teach some important skills but letting children play or do things they like independently also nurture their creativity. Personally, I think that doing their favourite activities independently has more benefits.
Taking part in organized group programmes has many advantages for children. One of the major benefits is the development of social skills. That is to say that children can learn how to live in harmony, share joy and sorrow with others and compromise in a certain situation. With group activities, children will eventually understand that not everything will happen in their own way, and they will naturally learn how to back down or choose a different path. Moreover, teamwork teaches how to play someone’s role in order to achieve a common goal.
Conversely, children thrive positively when parents give them unscheduled leisure time. It also nurtures their creativity. Thus, when children devote their spare time to making role-play discoveries, take part in self-directed play, and heal their own bouts of restiveness, they can light their inner sparks. If play is child-driven, according to many studies, they can discover areas of interest on their own, develop creativity, and eventually involve completely in the passions they wish to engage, which in turn nurture cognitive development. Moreover, undirected and unstructured play helps offspring learn self-advocacy skills, how to live harmoniously, to negotiate, to share, and how to resolve conflicts. American Academy of Pediatrics suggests that unstructured play is essential to the cognitive, emotional, and social well-being of children. Lastly and most importantly, independent, creative, and child-driven play protects children against the effect of stress and pressure.
In conclusion, while organized sports are helpful for children, I believe unstructured free play is of paramount importance for a child’s all-round development. Therefore, parents should allow their children to engage in active child-driven play in their free time most of the time while also sometimes letting them play with a group of other children.
Sample 10:
In today's world, parents often have a dilemma about how their children should spend their free time. While some people believe that engaging in organised group activities is the key to a child's development, others argue that it is crucial for children to learn how to occupy themselves. This essay will explore both these views. As far as my opinion goes, parents should maintain a balance when it comes to their children's free time activity by motivating them to participate in group activities while also permitting them to sometimes choose their own leisure activities.
On the one hand, proponents of encouraging children to participate in organised group activities say that it helps children learn social skills such as cooperation, teamwork, and leadership. For example, when children participate in team sports like soccer or basketball, they learn the importance of working together towards a common goal and develop cooperation and teamwork. On top of that, they develop physical skills, including coordination and agility which help them stay healthy. For instance, engaging in regular physical activities through these group activities promotes overall fitness and well-being, reducing the risk of lifestyle-related health issues in the long run.
On the other hand, many people express that children should be encouraged to learn how to occupy themselves. When children are given free time, they use their imagination and creativity to keep themselves engaged. They learn to think independently, make decisions, and solve problems on their own. Furthermore, when children are not occupied with structured activities, they can experience a sense of relaxation and freedom, which can improve their mental well-being. Research works show that unstructured free time allows young children to follow their interests and pursue hobbies, like painting or building, enhancing their self-expression and nurturing their passions.
In my opinion, both approaches have their merits, and parents should find a balance between the two. Children should be encouraged to participate in group activities, but they should also be given free time to pursue their interests and hobbies.
In conclusion, parents should find a balance between structured and unstructured time to ensure their children's overall development. Children need opportunities to learn social and physical skills, but they also require free time to explore their interests and develop their creativity.
Sample 11:
In today's fast-paced world, parents are often faced with the plight of how to occupy their children's free time. Some people suggest that children should be encouraged to participate in group activities, while others believe that it is crucial for children to learn to occupy themselves independently. In this essay, I will discuss both views and explain why I support the idea that parents should encourage their children to partake in organised group activities.
On the one hand, those who believe that children should learn to occupy themselves independently argue that it is an essential life skill that fosters creativity and imagination. Children who have the ability to entertain themselves are less likely to become bored or reliant on external stimuli and are better equipped to handle unstructured time. They can also develop a stronger sense of self and a more active imagination. For instance, studies have shown that children who spend their free time reading and engaging in imaginative play have better cognitive development and are more successful in academic pursuits.
On the other hand, those who believe that children should participate in group activities argue that it provides numerous benefits. Group activities can help children build important social skills, such as cooperation and teamwork. Children can also learn valuable life skills, such as leadership and communication, which can be beneficial later in life. Additionally, group activities can expose children to new interests and hobbies, which can broaden their horizons and provide them with a sense of purpose. For example, participating in a team sport can help children develop physical fitness, teamwork, and social skills.
In my opinion, parents need to encourage their children to participate in organised group activities because they provide numerous outstanding benefits that can help children develop important skills and interests. Encouraging children to participate in team activities can also promote socialisation and help children build positive relationships with their peers.
In conclusion, while it may be beneficial for children to sometime occupy themselves independently, I believe that parents should encourage their children to participate in organised group activities. These activities can provide children with valuable life skills, promote socialisation, and broaden their horizons.
Sample 12:
There have been conflicting views on how children should spend their free time. While planned group activities build obedience and cooperation in children, I believe it is more important for them to practice entertaining themselves on their own because it helps them develop problem-solving skills.
On the one hand, organized group activities foster obedience and cooperation because they assign children a common goal, whether it is the harmony that a choir strives to achieve or the scores that a football team aims for. To accomplish their goal, children must work with each other and follow the instructions provided by a group leader. However, I think programming each minute of an activity doesn't give children enough room to use their imagination and, therefore, stifles their creativity.
On the other side of the argument, some argue that by finding activities on their own, children can improve their ability to tackle problems. During boring times throughout the day, they learn to be creative and resourceful to discover methods to entertain themselves only when there isn't any aid or interference from adults. For example, when feeling bored, a shy girl may become more sociable and go ahead and invite the neighbor kids over. I agree with this argument because problem-solving is a crucial life skill. As children grow up, they will encounter obstacles and have nobody but themselves to count on to get through such tough situations.
In conclusion, even though organized group activities help children become more obedient and cooperative, I believe self-directed activities bring the greater benefit of fostering problem-solving skills and should therefore be prioritized.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
- 250+ Công thức giải nhanh môn Toán 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay Vật lí 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Tuyển tập 30 đề thi đánh giá năng lực Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, TP Hồ Chí Minh (2 cuốn) ( 150.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action.
Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Firstly, they say that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s smoke by going to places where it is allowed. If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted. In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke wherever they wish.
However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. First and foremost, it has been proven that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s health, not only the smoker. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sides in the body. It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person. It is also the case that people’s health is more important than businesses. In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by, for example, allowing smoking areas.
In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places. This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development.
Sample 2:
The earlier we can ban smoking in public places, the better it would be for humankind. Having foreseen the same, many offices and governing bodies imposed a strict ban on public smoking. This measure is generally applauded by the majority of mass. However, the opposing minority interrupts this ban as an act of arrest on one's free will. Let us discuss this moot issue below.
It is generally agreed and even proven with scientific studies, that smoking is injurious to health. The health problems that smoking can induce are numerous. Cancer is among the major detrimental effects of smoking on one’s health. As clearly shown on cigarette packages, smoking is a primary cause of cancer. Furthermore, the effects of smoking on the systemic and peripheral circulation in the human body are appalling, as put forward by medical experts. The havoc of this insane habit is so horrifying that research points towards its possible harmful effects on unborn children, even. Smoking is considered as a culprit among the many, behind congenital birth defects and anomalies.
Another factor significant to this context would be the financial constraints imposed by smoking. In many developing countries, where people work on daily wages, the habit of smoking has an atrocious impact on their quality of life. In the majority of the mediocre families, around the world, smoking drains the significant part of their family budgets. For example, I witnessed many problems with reference to my father being a chronic smoker and the financial crisis it caused.
The amount of carbon and other toxic elements exhaled into the atmosphere by active smokers has reached such dizzy heights that its effect on passive smokers is more or less a reality now. In fact, the effect of first-hand smoke is seen permeable to even the second and third-hand smokers in the spectrum. The significance of the public ban on smoking is not just justifying but a necessity as it calls for. As a result, it is widely banned in some offices and institutions. Awareness programmes are being conducted all around the world against this habit.
Though the public ban on smoking is an individual constraint to one's freedom, considering the passive effects of smoking I would strongly agree with the ban. In my view, this would be a punitive measure to safeguard the health and wealth of the public or the society.
Sample 3:
Smoking has inevitably been a concern of governments around the globe considering how to manage and educate smoking people. This is due largely to the danger of the substance contained in cigarettes, nicotine. As its drawback may also occur for the people near the smokers, policies related to this, particularly in public places, should be taken into account; whether it should be banned or not.
I personally think that forbidding such a dangerous activity will be much more beneficial, as it can prevent others from developing a vulnerable respiratory system. Moreover, this can keep the places so clean that people could always find them fascinating with less air pollution. However, governments should consciously provide some special places which, in this case, can be used for smoking.
On the other hand, people who have currently become addicted to smoke would find it hard to avoid smoking in such places. As a result, they may smoke, breaking the rule and not even feeling guilty. For this reason, there are two steps then to encounter this probable emerging problem. First, some strict laws and appropriate punishments, such as to pay more tax or to give any charity orphans or others needing. Second, education is one of the most prominent and essential ways to change people’s belief in terms of having their cigarette burnt.
However, banning such activity in public places is not merely a way to prevent others from harming smoke, but it will, to a larger extent, possibly be able to elevate people’s awareness of how dangerous smoking is.
To sum up, despite it being difficult for smokers to quit, the policy which bans smoking in public places should be applied in order to save others. Nonetheless, people’s education in terms of the drawbacks of smoking is a part of this aim.
Sample 4:
Smoking has been a major public health issue for decades, and despite numerous efforts to discourage the habit, it continues to be a prevalent problem in society. Not only does smoking harm the individual who partakes in the habit, but it also poses a significant risk to those who are in close proximity to the smoker. For this reason, many argue that smoking should be banned in public places in order to protect the health and well-being of the general population.
First and foremost, it is widely known that smoking causes a myriad of health issues for the individual who smokes. From lung cancer to heart disease, the negative impact of smoking on one's health is undeniable. However, what is often overlooked is the fact that secondhand smoke can also have serious consequences for non-smokers. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), secondhand smoke contains over 7,000 chemicals, hundreds of which are toxic and about 70 that can cause cancer. When non-smokers are exposed to these harmful chemicals, they are at an increased risk for developing the same health issues as smokers, including lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory problems. This means that not only are smokers jeopardizing their own health, but they are also putting those around them in harm's way.
Furthermore, smoking in public places can have a negative impact on the overall environment. Cigarette butts, which are the most common form of litter, contain toxic chemicals that can leach into the soil and water, posing a threat to wildlife and polluting the ecosystem. In addition, the smoke itself contributes to air pollution, which can have detrimental effects on the environment and public health. By implementing a ban on smoking in public places, we can reduce the amount of secondhand smoke that non-smokers are exposed to and mitigate the environmental impact of smoking.
While some may argue that a ban on smoking in public places infringes upon an individual's right to smoke, it is important to consider the greater good of the population. The potential health risks and environmental impact of smoking far outweigh the desire of an individual to smoke in public spaces. By implementing a ban on smoking in public places, we can protect the health and well-being of both smokers and non-smokers, as well as the environment.
In conclusion, smoking not only harms the smoker, but also poses a significant risk to those who are nearby. With the potential health risks and environmental impact in mind, it is clear that smoking should be banned in public places. By doing so, we can create a healthier and safer environment for all members of society.
Sample 5:
In the present era, there is a rising trend of smoking, especially among the younger generation. Smoking has evident detrimental effects on both the smoker and the people in his surroundings. It is claimed that smoking should be prohibited in public areas. I strongly agree that smoking should be banned publicly to prevent its negative aspects on people.
To begin, there are many drawbacks of smoking which have progressive impacts on both individual and environmental level. First and foremost, it increases the risk of many health related issues in human beings, due to presence of disease producing chemicals in tobacco . For instance, a rising trend of lung related diseases, like tuberculosis and lung cancer, has been reported in smokers. Furthermore, smoke not only damages the body of the smoker, but also results in many unfavourable outcomes in the surrounding people. Moreover, it is very distressful and challenging for non-smokers to work in smoking places. So, there is urgent need to halt smoking in populated areas.
There is, however, a faction that claims that there are some challenges in preventing public smoking. Firstly, many resources will be consumed to construct specified smoking areas to restrict smoking at workplace and other public places. Simultaneously, there might be no checks and balances on people who are constrained to stay in specific smoking places.
To recapitulate, although there are few disadvantages of stopping people from smoking publicly, it has many beneficial impacts. I strongly agree to halt smoking in populated areas because it will remarkably decline the percentage of health related problems. Moreover, in the same way, it can aid in developing a comfortable environment at the workplace, as well as at other public places like shopping malls, restaurants and public transport.
Sample 6:
In the contemporary era, it is a moot point that smoking has detrimental effects on the smoker as well as the people living around him. A significant chunk of the community welcomes the conception, whereas the remaining members oppose the same. In this essay, I will explain this point of view in detail with the relevant examples to support my argument.
I am in agreement to a large extent with the aforementioned notion. Multifarious reasons can be discussed to justify my stance. The most conspicuous one is the smoker himself welcomes deadly diseases like cancer (mouth and lungs), kidney failure to his body. For instance, a cigarette contains killing components like tobacco, nicotine, and carbon monoxide these destroy the airbus of the lungs. As a consequence, a person’s digestive system starts to stop working. Its impacts do not appear overnight but if its consumption lasts for years a brutal death can knock at your door. Additionally, it is more harmful to passive smokers. To illustrate this, I would quote an instance of my friend who is suffering from lung cancer. However, he had never smoked in his life. He got infected just because his father is an active smoker. Having lived in the same house inhaling cigarette smoke he got affected.
On the other hand, I do have some grounds against the central idea. First and foremost, rationale is it may bring some of the businesses to an end. For instance, pubs and discos are usually visited by a proportion of 80% of smokers. If it is banned completely, it will wash off the above-mentioned businesses.
To put it in a nutshell, I personally believe that it is difficult to persuade people to quit but it must be prohibited in public places. Moreover, in clubs, there should be a separate area for smoking so passive smokers would not suffer.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.