Câu hỏi:
10/01/2025 642
It is better for college students to live in schools than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?
It is better for college students to live in schools than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
Many students are faced with the dilemma of whether to live in a university dormitory or at home with their parents. From my perspective, a dormitory is evidently the better option for most students.
Firstly, there is a common belief that living with their parents is better for students’ personal development. Many people argue that students living at home may fully concentrate on their academic studies because their parents are likely to support them in various ways, such as by doing household tasks. However, I believe some students may become over-reliant on their parents as a result, and thus do not develop the ability to live independently in the future. By contrast, students who live in dormitories must assume responsibility in all aspects of life. Therefore, they may acquire the skills necessary for self-reliance, ranging from financial management and problem-solving to meal planning and home management, all of which are essential to foster the all-round personal development of this group of students.
In addition, there are several distinct advantages of choosing on-campus residences. The most evident advantage is that students who choose this type of accommodation would have easy access to libraries and various learning resources that are readily available at university. Another clear benefit is that those living in student accommodation are exposed to a diverse environment with people from various social and cultural backgrounds. As a result, students are better prepared to live in today’s multi-cultural world.
From the issues outlined above, one can conclude that living on a university campus is a better choice for students than living at home with their parents. I predict that the number of students choosing to live in university accommodation will remain high in the future.
Sample 2:
There has been a question whether students should start an independent life in a dormitory on campus. Some people say it is better that way; however, my firm conviction is that it depends on the culture of the region where certain groups of students are living.
This practice is popular in Western-based societies, like the US or the UK. Independence from parents at a young age is largely accepted and encouraged, especially when students reach 18 and are able to make a living on their own. The majority of them seek a temporary job near school to gain work experience, and others might spend time participating in youth clubs and activities on campus. This element, I think, is closely linked to their development and future success.
However, in many Asian countries, Vietnam for example, where traditional values of family bond have a significant role to play in youths’ lives and national ethos, I suspect that it would bring more harm than good. It is, however, common for family members to live separately when they are pursuing tertiary education because most universities in Vietnam are located in major or municipal cities. Students from other provinces have to stay at the dormitory or rent a room off campus in order not to disrupt their study. I would see this as a detrimental sign to family relationships because it would possibly lead to the sad disappearance of the country’s long-standing culture.
Due to my aforementioned argument, I do not suppose living at schools away from family is always a better decision for a college student is a valid point.
Sample 3:
As young adults enter college, they are presented with the choice of boarding at school or living with their parents. This essay is going to argue that student accommodation is the optimal choice for undergraduates. This point will be illustrated by looking at how living at home is simply unfeasible for most students, and the benefits accrued from staying in a dormitory.
Today, very few students attend a local college or university, thus the idea of them staying at home during school term is implausible. This is particularly valid in developing nations, where most colleges are concentrated in urban centers. Daily commute would be difficult for those who live in rural areas or even suburban residents. To these students, on- campus housing is obviously the more sensible option. For example, in Vietnam, rural citizens tend to move to the city for college and share a dorm room instead of commuting from their residences.
The choice of living at school is reinforced by the fact that it fosters personal growth in ways that are not otherwise possible with living at home. For instance, when boarding at a dormitory, students with discrepant preferences would learn to make compromises. This is not necessary if they live with their parents who are generally more accommodating. In addition, living away from home also teaches students to be more independent, because they must manage their personal finances as well as taking care of their own nutritional needs. In fact, Americans who lived in fraternity houses during college have reported that they became more self-reliant as a result of having to budget and cook for themselves.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it makes more sense for college students to live on campus, for the reasons provided above.
Sample 4:
The debate over whether students should embrace independent living in campus dormitories has been ongoing. While some advocate for this approach, my belief is steadfast that its suitability hinges on the cultural context of the student population.
This practice is popular in Western-based societies, like the US or the UK. Independence from parents at a young age is largely accepted and encouraged, especially when students reach 18 and are able to make a living on their own. The majority of them seek a temporary job near school to gain work experience, and others might spend time participating in youth clubs and activities on campus. This element, I think, is closely linked to their development and future success.
Nevertheless, in various Asian nations, such as Vietnam, where traditional familial values hold considerable sway over the youth and national identity, I am inclined to believe that the consequences may outweigh the benefits. However, it is a common practice for family members to reside separately during their pursuit of higher education due to the concentration of universities in major cities. Students from other provinces often have to reside in dormitories or rent off-campus accommodations to avoid disrupting their studies. I perceive this trend as potentially harmful to family ties, as it may contribute to the erosion of the country's longstanding cultural heritage.
Considering my earlier argument, I do not find the assertion that living away from family at educational institutions is always the best choice for college students to be entirely valid.
Sample 5:
The decision of whether college students should live on campus or at home with their parents significantly impacts their academic and personal growth. I strongly believe that living in schools offers greater benefits for college students than staying at home.
First and foremost, living on campus fosters independence and responsibility. Students learn to manage their time, finances, and daily activities without constant parental supervision. These skills are crucial for transitioning into adulthood. For instance, students who live in dormitories must handle tasks such as budgeting for meals, doing laundry, and balancing academic commitments, which prepare them for life after graduation.
Additionally, residing in schools promotes social interaction and networking opportunities. College campuses often host a variety of events, clubs, and activities that encourage students to connect with peers from diverse backgrounds. This not only helps build lifelong friendships but also enhances communication and teamwork skills. Furthermore, proximity to academic resources like libraries, study groups, and faculty offices makes it easier for students to stay engaged with their studies.
On the other hand, living at home might provide financial savings and emotional support. However, it can also limit students' exposure to new experiences and their ability to develop autonomy. The comfort of home may lead to dependence on parents and a lack of motivation to explore challenges independently.
In conclusion, while living at home has its advantages, the opportunities for personal growth, academic engagement, and social development make living in schools a better choice for college students. It equips them with essential life skills and experiences that shape their future success.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The maps illustrate the layout of a museum and its grounds in 1957 and the changes that had occurred by 2007.
Overall, the museum building was extended, serving more purposes with additional rooms for exhibitions and education, and a parking area replaced part of the garden. This extension, however, resulted in a reduction of the green space in the museum’s grounds.
Looking first at the interior of the building in 1957, upon entering the entrance hall, visitors would have seen a local history room on their left and a museum storeroom on the right, while beyond the entrance hall was a space for the largest room, the national history exhibition. Fifty years later, the entrance had been relocated to a new extension left of the original, where visitors first encountered a shop. To its right were the reception area and an adjacent coffee shop. The local history room was moved to the center of the building, and beyond it were two brand new sections for special exhibitions and an education center.
Outside the grounds of the museum, a road ran along the southern side of the map, which remained unchanged in 2007. However, the road that branched off from it, leading to the entrance hall had been removed by 2007, and a new car park was developed southeast of the museum. Finally, there used to be many green spaces in the layout, most of which had disappeared by the latter year, except for the garden in the northwest corner.
Sample 2:
The illustrations depict changes to a museum building and grounds in 1957 and 2007. Overall, the building has become much larger, and the number of trees has been greatly reduced.
Looking first at the grounds of the museum, the picture in 2007 shows that all the trees have been removed from the roadside, and also most of them to the left and to the rear of the museum. The driveway leading up to the museum has also been removed and a car park has been built by the roadside.
In terms of the building itself, the entrance has been moved from the middle of the building to the left-hand side of the building, where a new museum shop has been built. From there, visitors can go into a new reception room. A cafe has been built on the right-hand side of the building replacing the museum storage room. The National History exhibition room has been turned into a local history room. A special exhibitions room and an education centre have also been added.
Sample 3:
The illustrations depict changes to a museum building and grounds in 1957 and 2007.
Overall, the building has become much bigger with the appearance of new facilities while the number of trees has been greatly reduced.
Regarding the surroundings, in 2007 all the trees along the roadside were all removed, the same case happened to most of the ones to the west and north of the building. Moreover, a parking lot was built in front of the museum, where there used to be a driveway.
In terms of the establishment, the entry was moved from the middle of the building to the west, where a new museum shop was constructed. From there, visitors can enter a reception room. A cafe was built on the bottom - right corner of the museum, replacing the storage room. The National History exhibition room was converted to the local history room. There were also the additions of an education centre and a special exhibitions space to the far side of the building.
Sample 4:
The illustrations depict the significant changes that have occurred to a museum building and its surrounding grounds between 1957 and 2007. The building has undergone a significant expansion, while the number of trees on the property has been greatly reduced.
The first noticeable change in the grounds is the complete removal of trees from the roadside, as well as the majority of trees to the left and rear of the museum. Additionally, the driveway leading up to the museum has been removed and replaced with a car park built by the roadside.
The building itself has also undergone significant changes. The entrance has been moved from the middle of the building to the left-hand side, where a new museum shop has been built. Visitors can enter the building through this new entrance and find themselves in a new reception room. A cafe has also been built on the right-hand side of the building, replacing the museum's storage room. The National History exhibition room has been converted into a local history room, while a special exhibitions room and an education center have been added.
In summary, the museum building has undergone significant expansion and modernization. There has been the addition of new facilities such as a museum shop, reception room, cafe, special exhibitions room, and education center. The surrounding grounds have also undergone significant changes, with the removal of the majority of trees and the replacement of the driveway with a car park. This reflects the evolution of the museum's role in the community and its efforts to better serve its visitors.
Sample 5:
The diagrams depict alterations occurring in a nearby museum and its vicinity from 1957 to 2007. In general, the museum's premises were expanded, accompanied by the addition of various amenities. However, the green space surrounding the primary structure diminished in size over five decades.
In 1957, the museum was established at the heart of an extensive garden. A road ran in front of the building, positioned westward on the map. Visitors accessed the museum by traversing a small path from the main road leading to the entrance hall. Comprising three main rooms, the museum primarily served exhibition purposes. The largest room housed the national history exhibition on the northern side. Adjacent to the national history exhibition on the eastern side, a museum storeroom was situated opposite a local history room.
The year 2007 witnessed numerous enhancements in the museum, including an expansion in size and the incorporation of various sections. The original path was eliminated, and the entrance was relocated westward, leading to a museum shop. Adjacent to the shop, on the right side, was the reception area, accompanied by a coffee shop. Doubling in size, the local history room was located next to the reception and cafe, expanded eastward. Another significant change was the establishment of a special exhibitions area and education center on the eastern flank. To accommodate a new car park, a section of the garden south of the museum was cleared.
Sample 6:
The first map shows what a local museum and its surroundings looked like in 1957. The second map shows how they changed after 50 years.
In general, it is clear that there used to be more green space in 1957. Also, the museum became bigger over time.
In 1957, there were a lot of green trees in front of the museum, behind it, and on the left side of it, too. To go inside the museum, there was a path that led to an entrance hall. The museum had three parts, namely a local history room, a museum storeroom, and a national history exhibition.
In 2007, the garden was only on the side of the museum, not all around it like before, because there was already a car park in front of the museum. The entrance was moved to the left of the museum, right behind the car park, and led to a museum shop. The museum no longer contained the storeroom and the national history exhibition. However, the local history room became larger and stood at the center. Before it, people built a reception and a cafe. After it, people made an education center and special exhibitions.
Sample 7:
The maps illustrate the changes happening in a local museum and its surrounding area between 1957 and 2007. Overall, the area of the museum building was enlarged with various facilities added; however, the green area around the main building was reduced in size after 50 years.
In 1957, the museum was constructed at the center of a large garden. There was a road in front of the building, on the west of the map. To reach the museum, visitors needed to take a small pathway from the main road leading to the entrance hall of the building. The whole museum consisted of three main rooms mainly used to serve the exhibition purposes. The largest room was the national history exhibition in the north of the building. Next to the national history exhibition in the east, there was a museum storeroom, which was opposite a local history room.
The year 2007 experienced many developments in the museum including the size expansion and the addition of various sections. The old pathway was removed, and the entrance was moved to the west, leading to a museum shop. On the right of the museum shop was the reception with a coffee shop on the right. The local history room situated next to the reception and cafe to the east was doubled in size. Another noticeable change was the introduction of a special exhibitions area and education center on the eastern side. To the south of the museum, part of the garden was cleared to make room for a new car park.
Sample 8:
The two maps illustrate the transformation that took place in a local history museum and its environs between 1957 and 2007.
Overall, the museum and its grounds witnessed a number of dramatic changes, the most significant of which are the expansion of the museum and the disappearance of most trees in the garden.
In the green area surrounding the building, the number of trees located in the north dropped tremendously in the 50-year period; as a result, there were only a small number of trees left in the northwest. The main building in the center of the map had only three exhibition rooms in 1957, with a national history exhibition on the top, a local history room on the left, and a museum storeroom on the right. Then in 2007, it was expanded northwards with new special exhibitions and an education center, and westwards with a souvenir shop. The national history exhibition was converted into a local history room in the heart of the museum. Another change is that the former local history room, the main entrance hall, and the storeroom were replaced with the reception and a coffee shop.
The main entrance in the middle of the map allowing access to the building from the main road was relocated to the front of the museum shop. However, the pathway connecting the main road to the gallery has been eliminated. All of the trees in the south were also cleared to make way for the construction of a car park to serve visitors.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo