Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 84

Parents are the best teachers. Do you agree or disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Most believe that parents educate their children better than teachers, but many also think that teachers have higher training qualifications. Parents, in my opinion, are the best teachers in the world because they instill in their children a strong sense of morality from an early age.
First of all, parents are the most important people in everyone’s life. When children are six years old, they already know their social background’s knowledge as the pillar of the community. For example, a baby's brain is like an empty canvas and parents draw skills like eating, walking, and speaking on it. And also, in a book by Sadhguru, it’s mentioned that “family is the university and parents are the teachers”.

Many people feel that instructors and educational institutions are unable to impart moral principles and life lessons to pupils, or in other words, they are unable to deliver education. true, unadulterated goodwill. Learning programmes such as mathematics, physics, geography, and science allow students to gain knowledge and skills. In contrast to family and college texts, professors do not teach us how to have a happy life. As a result, parents know their child's positives and weaknesses, so they help them overcome such shortcomings to live with prosperity. 

Recent research has shown that children's confidence comes with the kind of relationship they have with their families, and with confidence, they can acquire new qualities. So, I agree that parents are the first and best teachers because they provide us with the most valuable early lessons that we cannot get in school or in books.

Sample 2:

Most children in the age of globalization face many obstacles and need help to overcome them. However, many people believe that teachers and society are the most effective educators. I think that parents have a significant impact on the development and education of their children. I feel this for the following reasons, which I will discuss in the following essay.

When a child comes into the world, it's only his or her parents who are known to him or her. When they begin to grow, they try to replicate the attitudes and behaviours of their parents. According to most scientists, by the age of five, a child's personality is largely developed. At this age, their only source of information will be their parents. Due to these reasons, children often wish to follow in their parents’ footsteps.

In addition, generally, all children have developed both abilities and problems, that’s why teachers should work with them to fix these problems. Due to time constraints, teachers can only teach once or twice. Furthermore, parents who have more time with their children, and especially mothers, will not be tired of repeating the same lessons to their infants. 

Finally, parents recognize the strengths and weaknesses of their children. Thus, individuals are better equipped to retain talent and improve their weaknesses. For example, if you are low on confidence, your parents will help you overcome your inadequacies. 

I agree that parents are the most effective role models for their children. Since parents care for their children more than anyone else, it is possible that their children will mimic them.

Sample 3:

It is a controversial issue that parents are our best teachers. Numerous people these days admit that teachers and society are the best teachers, but I firmly believe that parents play a vital role in encouraging their children. And I hold up this perspective in the discussion further in the essay.

Before all else, since their birth, parents have always been there as their children's first tutors. They will induce them with important skills that they would need to face the "real world," such as speaking, walking, and social interaction. Growing up, how to speak and make their decisions right from wrong, etiquette, ethics, and so on. 

Furthermore, more than anyone, parents are the closest and involved in all activities of their infants. As a result, they know their child's positives and weaknesses, so they help them overcome such shortcomings. Parents always want them to be successful, so they are unable to instil negative values in them. In the end, parents are more dedicated than teachers. Parent involvement in their children's education is essential even if they do not have formal educational training, but they make sure that their children are aware of the importance of knowledge from schooling. Parents should not teach their children chemistry or biology; instead, they should teach them independence and confidence, which are essential in life.

In conclusion, it is undeniable that parents are the best teachers. That's because they are like the first idol to children whom they idolize. They care about their children more than anyone else and they know each and every trait of their children.

Sample 4:

Obviously, the first teachers we have in our lives in most cases are our parents. They teach us to speak, walk, ride a bike, behave ourselves etc. From my everyday experience and observation, I can totally agree with the statement that parents are the best teachers. In the following paragraphs I will try to support my answer with some reasons and examples.

First of all, I would say that parents are our very first teachers. They with great patience pass down the essential knowledge that we need in order to join "the real world". Children often copy their parents' habits and traits because children are sure that parents do only right things. Often children's first wish is to be like their mother or father. Parents are the best teachers because they wish their children a success and they do not teach them bad things.

However, in order to succeed in today’s world, children need more than just to know good manners and be able to read and write. They need real teachers who would teach them logic, mathematics, literature, foreign language, management etc. Moreover, they need to communicate with children of the same age. Adolescence is a period when children learn more from their friends than from their parents. At this age many young people reject their parents' advice and warnings. They begin to learn from their own experience, make conclusions and analyze their first mistakes. It is very important for parents in this period to be supportive and patient. Children may slam the door and refuse to do some things because they want to feel independence.

Another important aspect of this is that parents are the first people who must worn their children about the danger of drugs and cigarettes and how to avoid and say "No" when they need to. In the modern world parents must talk with their children about everything because it can save their life and make them happier. So, the role of parents is really important because it gives the strength and understanding of the real world.

In conclusion, I think that parents are the best teachers because they give their knowledge that cannot be taken from books when it needs to be known by children.

Sample 5:

Obviously, the first teachers we have in our lives in most cases are our parents. They teach us to walk, to speak, and to have good manners before we reach “the real world”. More than even the professional teachers that we have at school, parents are generally the most involved in the development and education of children.

Almost for sure our parents are the best teachers at the beginning of our lives, which actually corresponds to the parents’ role in nature. Parents are most committed and involved in teaching their children; they have a kind of instinct to sacrifice a part of themselves for the betterment of their children. They love us and have great patience while passing down their knowledge to us. They wish us success and thus will not teach us bad things. And of course, implicit learning occurs when children unconsciously copy some of their parents’ habits and styles of behavior.

During the second stage of child development, adolescence, parents can still be in the best position to offer advice even though the children might not accept it. In this case, perhaps the child’s friends would be the best teachers. Adolescents are notoriously rebellious in many cultures and may automatically reject any advice from their parents. My first marriage, for instance, was solely a matter of doing the opposite when my parents tried to intrude in offering their advice. So, in such matters, parents should be much more flexible and be rather the partners with their children. So, we can see that being a teacher of a growing child becomes more and more complicated as the time passes and many parents are simply not able to meet the increased demands.

On the other hand, I would say that parents are not professional teachers, and they tend to be very biased by their love for their children. So, wishing good things and an easy life may prevent children from maturing. In any case, parents usually can present only one viewpoint of the world, while good teaching should be based on different attitudes. Thus, when children go to school and have a great diversity of teachers, they learn much more than their parents could probably give them. Furthermore, once our parents get older, they become more conservative and cannot always be objective in regard to modern trends and fashions. Thus, we need to take their advice with caution during that period. However, some kind of intuition that I believe shared between relatives about what everybody needs and great love that exists in families still makes our parents very good teachers and advisers at any time.

In conclusion, while parents are not the ideal teachers, and well-rounded children will generally need a great diversity of teachers in their lives in order to have a more accurate view of the world, parents are generally the most committed of all teachers and have the greatest emotional investment in their children and their future.

Sample 6:

Our entire education system is based on what we accumulate each day of our life. In spite of the fact that schoolteachers are those who give us lots of information in a variety of fields, our parents are still the best teachers; they start their educational process as soon as we are born and never stop teaching us.

In the initial years of our life, our parents are involved in guiding us, in modulating our personality and making us understand the differences between right and wrong. When I was five, my parents bought me a dog; they taught me how to take care of him, feed him, play with him and bathe him. Thus, I learned that we all have responsibilities.

Even if parents are not specialized in education, their role in teaching the children to be aware of the need to improve their knowledge at school is tremendous. Our parents are not supposed to teach us Math, Chemistry or Biology, but they are very much involved in giving us lessons about being independent, strong and confident in ourselves. As my mother said to me, “fight your own battles because I will not be always able to protect you.”

Teenagers have to be informed about all the negative effects that can occur if using drugs, drinking alcohol, or smoking. Regarding this issue, parents have to cooperate with schoolteachers to make children aware of those possible risks.

I believe that parents are the best teachers because their lessons last forever. My parents are old now. Even when I am a grown-up person, I consider that they can still give me very good advice when I need it, based on their life experience. My parents have the most important role in my education during my life and I will always be grateful for everything they have taught me.

Sample 7:

Throughout all the years in my life, I was influenced by my parents in many fashions, from the way of thinking to the trifle everyday habits. No doubt, we inherit the gene from our parents and get basic knowledge and norms from them. What we learned from our parents in the early years will be encoded in our mind and be reflected in nearly every aspect of our behaviors. But in terms of teaching, I do not think it’s our parents who are the best teachers.

As is known to all, a child will be better trained with a systematic education. However, except those parents who are schoolteachers themselves, few parents grasp the systematic way of teaching. On the one hand, children can only learn a large scope of knowledge step by step from formal education at schools. On the other hand, parents can only teach their children sporadic knowledge. It is obvious that the young will be better equipped through formal education in classroom.

From an emotional perspective, the bond between a child and their parents is so strong that parents may struggle to provide more objective guidance than a schoolteacher can. Some parents tend to shield their children from hard work and, in extreme cases, even spoil them by allowing them to do whatever they want. All of this stems from the parents' love for their children. However, from an objective standpoint, hard work is sometimes a necessary step toward success. While parents should not be blamed for loving their children, such love can become an obstacle to providing objective guidance.

With the coming of the knowledge economic, we may find that our parents’ knowledge is becoming obsolete. In a changing world, the young are always the first to fashion the news ideas and technology. The elderly, however, are always not used to such rapid changes. Thus, conflicts are inevitable between parents and their children. Accordingly, the young are no longer willing to commit to their parents’ ideas. To catch the tide of such changes, it is of the best interest for the young to learn from the open world instead of from the obsolete knowledge of their parents.

All this is not to say that learning from parents is useless. In fact, even in the rapidly changing world, the scope of parents’ knowledge still has great influence on their children, especially on young children. But for the young to get the most needed knowledge, they should not solely rely on what they learned from their parents.

Sample 8:

Nowadays, some may hold the opinion that parents are the best teachers. But others have a negative attitude. As far as I am concerned, I agree with this statement because, obviously, the first teachers we have in our lives in most cases are our parents. They teach us how to walk, how to speak, and what good manners and bad manners are before we reach the real world. Therefore, parents are the people who influence their children most, and children will carry on the qualities of their parents. More than even the professional teachers that we have at school, parents are generally the most involved in the development and education of children. The reasons are presented below.

One of the primary reasons is that our parents are the teachers at the beginning of our lives, which actually corresponds to the parents’ role in nature. First, parents are most committed and involved in teaching their children and have a kind of instinct to sacrifice a part of themselves for the betterment of their children. Second, they love their children and have great patience while passing down their knowledge to us. They wish us to become successful and thus will not teach us bad things. Surely, children will unconsciously copy some of their parents’ habits and styles of behavior. Besides, parents will become their first role models.

There is also a more subtle point we must consider. During the second stage of child development, adolescence, parents can still be in the best position to offer advice even though the children might not accept it. In this case, perhaps the child’s friends would be the best teachers. Adolescents are notoriously rebellious in many cultures and may automatically reject advice from their parents. In such matters, parents should be much more flexible and rather be friends with their children. However, many parents simply are not able to meet the increased demands, being teachers of their growing children.

What is more, I would say that parents are not professional teachers, and they tend to be very biased by their love of their children. As a result, wishing for good things and an easy life may prevent children from maturing. Frequently, parents usually present only one viewpoint of the world, while good teaching should be based on different attitudes. For this reason, children may learn probably more if they have a great diversity of teachers other than the parents. Furthermore, technology develops very quickly; and parents may not always be objective in regard to modern trends and give children proper advice. However, I believe that the care and love among family members still makes our parents very good teachers and advisers at any time.

Taking into account of all these factors, we may reach the conclusion that parents are obviously the most committed of all teachers. Although well-rounded children will generally need a great diversity of teachers, parents can provide them with the greatest emotional support in their lives without a substitute.

Sample 9:

Parents are the most committed, the most influential, and almost the best teachers any child can have. The amount of time a child spends interacting with parents makes them the most influential force in a child’s life. The child gets to learn the most basics of things like walking, speaking and interacting with others. It is under the protection of parents that a child learns to behave in society and to comfort him or herself.

Although parents are the most influential teachers in their children’s lives, they may not be regarded as the best teachers. Parents generally provide a biased view of the world; they always favor their child, and thus they cannot provide a complete panoramic view of society. Also, parents may set a bad example for their child by abusing and fighting amongst themselves. Psychologists and recent crime charts have proved that young outlaws generally come from disrespectful families and have grown up in extreme environments.

A child interacts with many kinds of teachers at schools and colleges. Although these teachers, being professionals, have limited time to devote to a child, they provide a complete and diverse view to their students. They provide unbiased guidance to a child.

During the years of adolescence, children tend to be aggressive and non-conforming to others’ views. So, parents need to act like friends rather than teachers to get their experiences through to their children. Eventually, it is the parents who provide an environment for a child to develop and mature, and thus have the capacity to be the best teachers to their child. What is important is to provide an unbiased view to their child, to motivate independent thinking and actuate timely maturation.

Sample 10:

Parents play a crucial role in the development of their children, and it is often argued that they are the best teachers. While I agree that parents have a significant influence on their children’s lives, I believe that they may not always be the best teachers in every aspect.

Firstly, parents are undoubtedly the first teachers in a child’s life. They teach basic skills such as walking, talking, and social interaction. Moreover, they instill values and beliefs that shape a child’s personality and behavior. However, when it comes to academic education, parents may not always have the expertise or knowledge to provide the best guidance. In today’s complex and rapidly changing world, children need to acquire a wide range of skills and knowledge that may go beyond their parents’ expertise.

Furthermore, parents may also have biases and limitations that could hinder their ability to be effective teachers. They may impose their own beliefs and opinions on their children, which can limit their exposure to diverse perspectives. Additionally, some parents may lack the patience and understanding required to teach certain subjects or skills, leading to frustration and conflicts in the learning process.

On the other hand, professional teachers are trained to deliver comprehensive and unbiased education to students. They have the expertise to teach various subjects and skills to cater to different learning styles. Moreover, teachers provide a structured learning environment that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and social interaction, which may not always be present in a home setting.

In conclusion, while parents undoubtedly have a significant influence on their children’s lives and play an essential role as their first teachers, I believe that they may not always be the best teachers in every aspect. Professional educators have the expertise and skills to provide a well-rounded education that goes beyond the scope of parental guidance.

Sample 11:

As a parent myself, I have mixed feelings about the statement "Parents are the best teachers." While I believe that parents hold a significant role in teaching their children essential life values and skills, I also recognize that teachers and other individuals play crucial roles in shaping a child's education and overall development. Thus, I disagree with the statement, as I believe there are various individuals who contribute to a child's learning and growth.

While parents are the first teachers in a child's life and play a crucial role in instilling fundamental values and morals, they may not always have the necessary expertise in specific academic subjects or professional skills. Teachers, on the other hand, are trained professionals who have the expertise and educational background to teach children a wide range of subjects and skills. They often possess techniques and strategies for effectively conveying information in a way that suits the diverse learning styles of students, something that parents may not always possess.

Moreover, teachers provide a social environment that is different from the one at home. They offer opportunities for children to interact and collaborate with peers, building essential social and communication skills that cannot be learned solely from parents at home. In addition, teachers can expose children to diverse perspectives and experiences, broadening their understanding of the world and fostering a more inclusive mindset.

Furthermore, there are numerous individuals outside of the family and traditional educational institutions who can also play a significant role in teaching children. Coaches, mentors, community leaders, and other role models can offer unique lessons and guidance that contribute to a child's growth and development.

That being said, it is undeniable that parents are crucial educators in a child's life. They have the most significant influence on a child's early years, shaping their character, behavior, and attitudes towards learning. Parents instill values, manners, and work ethics, all of which are essential for a child's personal and academic success. They provide emotional support and guidance, nurturing their children through challenges and setbacks. Additionally, parents often serve as the primary source of encouragement and motivation for their children.

In conclusion, while parents are undeniably influential in their children's lives and provide vital teaching and guidance, they are not the only or necessarily the best teachers. Instead, a collaborative effort among parents, teachers, and other individuals is essential for a well-rounded and comprehensive education and development of a child. Each plays a distinct role in shaping a child's values, skills, and understanding of the world, and it is crucial to recognize and appreciate the contributions of all individuals involved in a child's growth and learning.

Sample 12:

It is often pointed out by many that parents are the best teachers one can have. I agree with this opinion because while it is true that teachers, friends, and personal experiences can provide some valuable lessons, parents hold a unique position in shaping an individual’s character and guiding them throughout their lives.

To begin with, parents have a unique position in shaping an individual’s life. Firstly, parents are the first teachers that a child ever has. They play a critical role in instilling values, beliefs, and moral principles in their children. For instance, parents can teach children the value of honesty, hard work, and perseverance, which can serve them well throughout their lives. Since most children mimic their parents and learn from their behaviours, parents have the most significant role in shaping a child’s character and values.

Secondly, parents have an intimate knowledge of their children’s strengths and weaknesses, aspirations, and desires. This knowledge enables them to tailor their guidance to meet the unique needs of their children. For example, when I was struggling with anxiety during my school years, my parents were able to provide me with the emotional support and guidance that I needed to overcome my fears and achieve my goals. I took professional counselling and talked to many friends about this issue. Ultimately, my parents were my best source of hope and help.

In conclusion, the unique position that parents hold in shaping their children’s character, guiding them through their lives, and providing emotional support and guidance makes them invaluable mentors and the best teachers that no other source can match.

Sample 13:

Many argue that parents are the best teachers for their children. While parents play an important role in shaping the lives of their children, I disagree with the statement that parents are the best teachers. In this essay, I will explain why I believe that parents are not always the best educators and that other sources such as teachers, books, good friends, and personal experience can sometimes provide better guidance.

To begin with, parents might not always have the necessary knowledge and expertise to provide the best guidance to their children. For instance, parents may not be able to teach their children technical or specialized skills that are required for certain professions. In such instances, a professional mentor or teacher may be better equipped to deliver the required training and expertise. Moreover, parents may have biases and prejudices that might influence their guidance, which can hinder the development of their children. For instance, study after study has shown that most parents do not believe that their dear children can get involved in delinquency and immoral acts, and thus ignore early signs of such deeds.

Furthermore, parents might not always be the best teachers because of the emotional bond they share with their children. Parents might find it difficult to provide unbiased advice and criticism to their children, which can hinder their children’s growth and development. For instance, parents may be reluctant to criticize their children for fear of hurting their feelings, which can prevent their children from learning from their mistakes and improving themselves.

Finally, personal experiences, learning from books, and interactions with friends and peers can also provide valuable lessons and insights that parents may not be able to provide. Personal experiences can be valuable because they provide individuals with a hands-on experience of the real world, allowing them to learn from their mistakes and gain practical knowledge. Likewise, books open up new windows of knowledge for us. Friends and peers can also offer a different perspective and challenge our beliefs, which can broaden our horizons and promote personal growth.

In conclusion, while parents are undoubtedly important figures in our lives, I believe that they are not always the best teachers. Teachers, mentors, books, personal experiences, and friends can also provide valuable guidance and insights that are essential for personal growth and development.

Sample 14:

Parents can be the best teachers for every child coming on this earth. I agree with this statement as no learning institution can be compared with the parents as they are role models for their children since they open their eyes in this world till they are fully grown up and matured.

To start with, when the child is born, he sees his parents as his guide, mentor and teacher who will teach him how to speak, eat, drink, live, wear, interact etc. No one will be with him when he is crying for anything, it will be the parents who will be with him for every problem and his / her every need. Even during his education days he will observe and learn that the school although is the learning institution but the moral and ethical values learned from parents are far greater than any learning center and parents will be the one who wants the children to be the best in this world and they want their children not to repeat the mistakes that they have done in their lives which any learning institution won’t care for as they can’t give individual attention to every student.

On the other hand, we see that generally the children who are orphans or could not get the attention from their parents don’t have that foundation of ethical, moral and social values as compared to the ones who have been trained by their parents despite all of them having gone to schools, colleges etc. The only difference between them is parents.

If the parents are not well educated, they could still prove to be good teachers for their children but that will be of less fruitful from the highly educated parents as educated and learned parents will have more vision and more horizon as compared to the unlearned.

I would like to conclude by stating that parents can be a turning point for their children if they strive to teach them every step of living life.

Sample 15:

It is an arguable question nowadays about whether parents are the best teachers or not. I totally agree with this statement.

In the first place, parents spend much more time with their children than anyone in the child’s life, even though they are schooling, but they spend a little time out of the whole day in school with their teachers, and all the rest is spent with their parents. This gives the parents much room to show their children the right way and how to live their lives on the right path. Also, children copy the lifestyle of their parents usually, and this is also a source of learning. For instance, parents who frequently quarrel and fight in front of their children train the child’s mind to dislike relationships in the future due to what he or she has witnessed earlier.

Furthermore, one would say teachers are the best source of whatever the child learns, but it is obvious how the teachers are much more concentrated on their courses rather than shaping the character of the child. And also, since there are many children at an instance for a single teacher at the moment, it is difficult for them to focus on a single child at a time. But parents do know their children very well, and even when something is going wrong with the child, it is the parent who will be able to identify it earlier so as to correct it for the child.

In summary, parents are the best teachers since they spend much of the child’s them with them together and also as their lifestyle is copied by their children at home.

Sample 16:

Parents shape their children from the beginning of their children’s lives. They teach their children values. They share their interests with them. They develop close emotional ties with them. Parents can be very important teachers in their children’s lives; however, they are not always the best teachers.

Parents may be too close to their children emotionally. For example, they may limit a child’s freedom in the name of safety. A teacher may organize an educational trip to a big city, but a parent may think this trip is too dangerous. A school may want to take the children camping, but a parent may be afraid of the child getting hurt.

Another problem is that parents sometimes expect their children’s interests to be similar to their own. If the parents love science, they may try to force their child to love science too. But what if the child prefers art? If parents enjoy sports, they may expect their child to participate in different teams. But what if the child prefers to read?

Parents want to pass on their values to their children. However, things have changed. The children of today are growing up in a world different from their parents’ world. Sometimes parents, especially older ones, can’t keep up with rapid social or technological changes. A student who has friends of different races at school may find that his parents have narrower views. A student who loves computers may find that her parents don’t understand or value the digital revolution.

Parents are important teachers in our lives, but they aren’t always the best teachers. Fortunately, we have many teachers in our lives. Our parents teach us, our teachers teach us, and we learn from our peers. Books and newspapers also teach us. All of them are valuable.

Sample 17:

The claim that parents are the best educators is one that is frequently debated among sections of society. Birth givers apparently play a significant role in their children’s education, however in order to determine whether or not they are the ultimate educators, it is crucial to carefully weigh the benefits and limitations of their instructional role. The forthcoming paragraphs will mention factors supporting the crucial contributions of parents in education, while also addressing any potential shortcomings.

Primarily, parents serve as the primary educators of their offspring, assuming the fundamental responsibility of imparting knowledge and life skills from infancy. To substantiate, they play a pivotal role in facilitating the acquisition of language and the development of motor abilities, thereby building the foundation essential for continuous learning throughout one’s life.

Secondarily, parents provide their children with practical life skills that go beyond academic subjects by setting up brilliant real-life examples for them to learn from. To explain, these skills encompass essential abilities such as cooking, financial budgeting, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication, all of which hold immense value for achieving success in the real world.

Although parents demonstrate proficiency in various domains, they may not possess expertise in all academic subjects. In specialized fields, professional educators may be more proficient at delivering comprehensive instructions for achieving learning objectives. Educational institutions provide avenues for children to engage with their peers, thereby promoting essential social competencies, and collaborative abilities, and cultivating an acceptance of diversity. Depending solely on parental guidance may result in a dearth of such social abilities essential for interaction with the real world.

To recapitulate from the above discourse of discussion, it can be deduced that undoubtedly parents are crucial educators in their children’s lives for imparting early education and inculcating moral values along with practical life skills, a well-rounded approach that combines parental guidance with formal education is often the most effective for the holistic development to young individuals.

Sample 18:

It is often suggested that fathers and mothers are the most important factors when it comes to teaching a child. I completely agree with this opinion as parents are more engaged in their child’s personal life and more devoted than the teachers. 

First and foremost, parents are more involved in their child's activities since they share a home. There is no question that parents are a child's first and best teachers. In the majority of childhood development, parents spend the most time with their children and thus have the biggest influence on them. Because of this, our fathers and mothers can instill values in us that will last a lifetime. Furthermore, just by living in the home, children can learn tremendously from observing their parents and their behavior. Honest, hardworking, and kind parents, for instance, innately show characteristics themselves, and so their children gradually learn these qualities in the most natural and effective way.

In addition to being physically intimate with their children, parents’ devotion to their offspring is absolutely immense. This unending love from parents is the strongest motivation a teacher could ever have; they truly would do anything to see their children succeed. Parents are also familiar with their children’s strengths and weaknesses and can tailor their instruction accordingly. Furthermore, parents usually have more patience than school teachers and are more willing to listen to their children’s concerns. Specifically, a recent study has delved into this matter and researched the flexibility of home-schooling. In the study, because the children could choose to study either through contextual learning or by pursuing passions, it was discovered that interest-led learning develops skills and knowledge across all academic areas.

In conclusion, I fully support the opinion of parents being the most effective teachers because they are more involved and dedicated to their children's personal lives than teachers.

Sample 19:

When it comes to educating a child, it is frequently believed that parents are the most crucial factor. This viewpoint is one that I fully concur with as parents can continuously teach their children without interruption and basic life values like morality or honesty must be first taught by the parents.

First of all, children constantly learn things subconsciously from their surroundings, especially their parents. This is because children’s mind at an early age is like a sponge, soaking up huge amounts of information from their environment. They are absorbing everything around her, effortlessly, continuously, and indiscriminately. Specifically, the growth that occurs throughout a child's first six years is extremely significant. By the age of five, children have developed 85% of their essential brain structure. Thus, parents always teach their children unintentionally just by being their role models. Evidently, they are the most suitable teachers for a child, particularly in early childhood development.

Furthermore, children should be taught morals, integrity, and principles at an early age by their own parents. These life values are too crucial to be learned later in school. Not being able to make a choice between right and wrong can often greatly confuse young individuals. From the earliest time when children start interacting with others, they are acquiring these new values, thus the sooner they can sort it out, the better. This is where parents can assist and guide. Perhaps the best example of this would be the result from a recent study from Oxford University. Toddlers who have close relationships with their parents are four times more likely to fully grasp morals before adulthood. As morals are not innate and do not come as pre-built knowledge, it is the parents’ responsibility to teach these concepts as early as possible. 

In conclusion, I completely believe that parents are unique in their capacity to create an early learning environment for their children, and they are also the most suitable teachers to give moral lessons.

Sample 20:

When it comes to teaching a child, many people believe that the most key component is the parents. I strongly disagree with this viewpoint as parents are usually less professional in terms of academic knowledge and time constraints in adult life can also affect the quality of homeschooling.

School teachers are certainly more knowledgeable regarding the general education curriculum. The reason is that educating children has been their main profession for potentially for many decades. Even though teachers’ presence is usually temporary and limited compared to parents, their significance and academic knowledge are absolutely immense as they were trained specifically for teaching children. Moreover, because there are stringent admission requirements for the profession, candidates often have considerable professional experience and must undergo a challenging teaching performance evaluation that is moderated across schools and universities. Today, in Vietnam for instance, more than half of all teaching graduates have another degree in addition to an education major. As it is shown, teachers are experts in their particular field.

Furthermore, some parents are not quite suitable to teach either academically or emotionally. Many mothers and fathers are often too exhausted after a working day to start their second job of teaching their children maths and science. Additionally, the majority of parents only want to experience positive emotions whenever their children crave attention. To demonstrate, a survey from Singapore reveals homeschooling by parents mostly only leads to stress and frustration, these are the types of emotions parents tend to escape. Having this mood of weariness certainly is detrimental when it comes to effective teaching. Therefore, the reality is that school teachers are more instrumental in education as they already dedicate most of their time to their students.

In conclusion, from my perspective, teachers truly are the backbone of youth education as they possess invaluable academic skills and knowledge, the factors that most parents do not have the time nor the skill to master.

Sample 21:

Parents are frequently cited as being the most important factor in educating a child. I reject this perspective as parents often make one-sided judgments and can hardly notice their child’s weaknesses. Moreover, conflicts between parents and children in schooling may also negatively affect their emotional relationships. 

Experienced educators are concerned about the trendy “my-child-is-special” mentality among parents. This one particular statement is quite emblematic even though they are often well-intentioned to keep children in high spirits. The reality is that this thinking is becoming an epidemic threatening children’s education as a whole. With clouded judgments, parents simply cannot be competent teachers as they generally view their child as a perfect being. Moreover, these parents are also the ones limiting their children's progress toward high-level ambitious learning because they overlook and ignore their child’s weaknesses. Chinese parents, for instance, are infamous because they push their children over their limits to be future doctors, lawyers, or engineers. This one-dimensional mentality is unhealthy and if these parents are directly in charge of their child’s education, the results would be even more detrimental.

Furthermore, fathers and mothers are too emotionally invested in their children to be able to teach them effectively. In early education, conflicts when teaching a child are inevitable. Children are both inquisitive and rebellious, so they often attempt to ask questions repeatedly while also not following given instructions. These scenarios would lead to frequent conflicts that usually spill into normal daily life and ultimately damage the parent-child relationship. Specifically, in the recent pandemic, Covid 19, most children required assistance from their parents with schoolwork. However, due to extra demands from homeschooling on parents, they perceived more stress and household chaos, thus levels of parent-child conflicts rose triple. Consequently, during this period, the children reportedly performed worse academically.  

In conclusion, personally, parents are unsuitable to be instructors of their children since their judgment is sometimes skewed, and homeschooling would cause undesired commotions that would harm the parent-child connection.

Sample 22:

In the words of Matthew L. Jacobson, “Behind every child who believes in himself is a parent who believed first.” This statement throws light on a popular belief that parents are the best teachers a child can have. Out of twenty-four hours in a day, a child stays in close touch with the parents longer than his/her teacher or peers. In my opinion, the notion in the essay holds true.

When a child is born, his/her first nurturing contact is from the mother. As one grows up, parents and very close relationships like siblings and grandparents are the ones who take part in their all-round development. It is the parents who teach them their first words, how to sit, walk, basic etiquette and, in this way, they lay the foundation to education. Parents prepare their wards to face the “real world” as they cross the threshold from an infant to a young boy with patience and love that no one in the whole world can offer.

Adolescence is a very difficult time in the life of an individual. Most people tend to get deflected from their course of action as they are confused and easily influenced. During this time, parents play a very substantial role in their lives. They not only mentor their child but also act as role models for them. It is their responsibility to assist the youngsters if they go astray and bring them back on the right track without punishing and demotivating them. Apart from this, a child imitates their parents from a very young age. This makes them the true reflection of their parents and their characters are shaped by the personality and behaviour of their parents. For example, if the parents are sober, educated people, the child will mostly become steady and informed. On the other hand, children of criminals bear the burden of their parents as society considers them corrupt even if they are well-behaved. As a result, they tend to become disillusioned and cynical.

However, when it comes to specialized education, teachers are more imperative than parents. Although parents can guide them, they need their teacher to explain concepts. Moreover, some parents tend to become biased towards their children and provide them with unnecessary advantages. Fortunately, this number is few.

In the end, although teachers play an essential role in the life of a child, parents are the first and best teachers for their child as they are present by their side and observe as an individual evolves from an infant to a mature adult.

Sample 23:

With the worsening academic performance of students and the rising victims of drugs and other social vices among youngsters, it is arguable whether schools, the environment where they spend the majority of their time, are best placed to educate children. Some argue that parents will fare better at the task.

On one side, parents know their offspring best, accompanying them during a significant segment of their childhood and adolescence. As such, being more aware of the weaknesses and personality traits of their children, parents can tailor their teaching methods accordingly. Statistics further back the fact that those students who are regularly assisted in completing their school homework by their parents perform better than those who are not.

Nevertheless, while some parents act excellent role models, others fail to follow suit. Nowadays, with the demanding responsibilities at work, parents can spare little quality time with their offspring. With time, both groups grow into perfect strangers to each other, impeding the critical teaching and learning process. On the other hand, alcohol or drugs have ruined the life of other adults, leaving a bleak future for their children. In turn, these children tend to replicate their parents’ mistakes, trapping future generations in a vicious cycle. It can further be argued that most parents are ill-prepared for the academic education of their children as they do not possess a formal qualification and undergo stringent teaching training as teachers do.

To conclude, both teachers and parents are equally responsible to breed our future generation of responsible adults. While teachers seem to be best suited for the intellectual development of children, parents can focus more on inculcating them with the appropriate cultural and social values. Though both are likely to err at times, children can, nevertheless, rely on the support of the other party.

Sample 24:

Nowadays modern society requires people to be educated. And in order to get educated people have to learn new things every day. People study when they are children, when they are young, when they are adults. The process of education is constant. But the most crucial part of education is going on in childhood. Kids need good teachers. And I believe the best ones for them are their parents. Namely parents spend much time together with children, they perfectly know the needs of their sons and daughters, nothing saying about they normally concern about them.

Actually, parents and children are together a lot of the time. If the parents are good of course. Parents do not have to put new knowledge into kids at specified hours like at school. Appropriate moments for teaching appear in natural way when for example some things happen.

It is known, parents know what children need for fair. And parents teach exactly those things children want to know.

Finally, parents are such people who do care indeed. It is a notorious fact, several teachers at school and at university do not like their job. They consider education as just a way to earn some money. On the contrary, normal parents want the best destiny for their little kids.

So, parents have all the features to be the splendid teachers for their children. And when kids grow up, they do not forget about that significant role their parents played in their lives. Parents deserve respect and care.

Sample 25:

It is a well-known fact by everybody that education has an important place in our life. Nowadays, some may hold the opinion that parents are qualified enough to give education to their children. But others have a negative attitude that professional teachers' experiences and positive effects on a child are undeniable facts about his or her education base. As far as I am concerned, I hold the idea that parents are not the best teachers in that parents are not as well-informed as teachers, the class atmosphere is required in education and children may feel alone because their friends are going to school.

To begin with, I agree with the statement that teachers have a better educational background than parents without reservation since teachers may also be parents, but they study especially for being a teacher. Besides the professional information they have, they have got experience in this area for years. To be more precise, everybody has an area that they are good at, so parents should not be teachers for their children.

Another reason why I agree with the above statement is that I strongly believe that children should be familiar with the atmosphere of a class as much as they can experience competition, know how to share their ideas without hesitation and gain self-confidence. In other words, children cannot improve their social skills while they have education at home.

Last but not least, although some people may disagree, I personally think that it is not fair to keep your child at home while his or her friends are going to school and making new friends. For instance, when a child becomes a teenager, he or she wants to spend time with his or her friends, share feelings etc. If the child is not going to school, he or she will not have so many friends, so it is hard to do things like that I mentioned. This puts a lot of pressure on the child and causes him or her to feel alone.

Sample 26:

It is a well-known fact by everybody that parents have an important impact on their children's teaching. Nowadays, some may hold the opinion that parents are the best teachers, but others have a negative attitude. As far as I am concerned, I hold the idea that parents are the best teachers for their own children in that teaching can be started at a very early age by parents, the parents can direct their children in line with their abilities, and children can be more succesful when they are educated by their parents.

To begin with, I agree with the statement that education should start at an early age, because children can learn easily while growing up. Professional education starts at six or seven years old, until these ages children live with their parents and learn many things from them. What I am trying to say is that parents are the first teachers of their children, and they work hard to teach them in the most correct way.

Another reason why I agree with the above statement is that I strongly believe parents know their children better than anyone else, as they have observed them since birth. In other words, children grow up with their family and show their abilities and strengths to their parents. So, their parents can decide on the correct teaching methods and areas for their children.

Last but not least, although some people may disagree, I personally think that people can be more successful if they do not feel stressed. To illustrate, a professional teacher can be more authoritative than the parents of his or her students, then they learn some things as a responsibility from their teachers and forget these things after a while, but their parents do not create stress on children, and they can learn things intentionally. So, they can be more prospering in this way.

All in all, teaching can be done by parents at little ages correctly, the education which is compatible with the children's abilities can be provided by the parents, and the children can be more successful with the education given by their parents. Taking into account of all these factors, we may reach the conclusion that parents can be the best teachers for children.

Sample 27:

Parents are undoubtedly one of the most influential and important figures in a child's life. From the moment a child is born, parents are the primary source of love, care, and guidance. As a result, many people believe that parents are the best teachers for their children. However, this statement is not universally true, as there are several factors to consider.

On one hand, parents play a crucial role in shaping a child's values, beliefs, and behaviors. They are the first teachers a child encounters, and they have a significant impact on their early development. Parents are usually the ones who introduce their children to language, social skills, and basic life skills. Furthermore, they serve as role models, and children often learn by observing their parents' actions and behaviors. This is why many people assert that parents are the best teachers for their children, as they have an intimate understanding of their child's needs and can provide individualized attention and guidance.

On the other hand, it is important to acknowledge that parents may not always be the best teachers for their children in every aspect of life. For instance, parents may not possess the necessary expertise or knowledge to teach their children certain subjects, such as advanced mathematics or science. In addition, there are instances where parents may have outdated or biased views on certain topics, which could hinder a child's education and growth. Moreover, there are situations where the relationship between a parent and child may not be conducive to effective teaching and learning, as conflicts of interest or lack of communication may arise.

In light of these considerations, it is evident that while parents are undeniably influential and important teachers in a child's life, they may not always be the best teachers for every aspect of a child's education and development. Therefore, it is essential to recognize the importance of other educational resources and figures, such as teachers, mentors, and other family members, in a child's life. These individuals can provide different perspectives, expertise, and support, which can supplement and enrich a child's learning experience.

In conclusion, while parents play a crucial role in teaching and shaping their children, they may not always be the best teachers for every aspect of a child's education and development. It is essential to acknowledge the importance of other educational resources and figures in a child's life to ensure a well-rounded and comprehensive learning experience.

Sample 28:

According to the Cambridge advanced learner's dictionary, the word teacher is the one whose job is to teach in a school or college. But in my opinion, the teacher can be anyone who gives us knowledge, experience and good advice. Therefore, if I were asked who my best teachers are, I would have no hesitation in saying those are my parents who taught me the first lessons and many things in my life in the best way.

Obviously, I received many first lessons from my parents when I was a child, which is very important in my life. Those are lessons on how to crawl, how to stand, how to speak, how to walk, how to ride a bike, especially, how to behave in a proper manner. All of these things are very important in my whole life. Therefore, I believe that no one in the world can be the best teacher but our parents.

Furthermore, my parents are also the best teachers to teach me many things in my life in the most efficient way. At school or colleges, I was given a lot of knowledge in many subjects, such as mathematics, literature, geology or even ethics lessons which taught me what I should do and what I mustn't do. But all of these were only what I studied in theories. As a research pointed out, people remember 90% of what they do, 75% of what they see and 20% of what they hear. Therefore, I refer to the actions of my parents in reality than the lectures. Also, a moral lesson at school can't teach me about kindness better than my own parents who always helped others when they were in trouble. Day by day and in an automatic way, the parents become the teachers who we can learn about many things in life with the best reality, their actions become the model for all of us to follow.

Another important factor is related to moral sense, which include societal rules and norms that vary from culture to culture. However, it is shaped in our homes by our parents, so we accept them and agree with the reality of them. For instance, American people and Vietnamese people are different with each other because they grow in different societies and different families. Generally, most people accept the rules of own family, so parents are the best teachers, too.

In conclusion, I believe that parents are the best teachers because we have learned a lot of knowledge which is not taken from books. So, we cannot deny that parents are the most influential people in our lives. All in all, most people learn most of things from their parents and this fact makes them the best teachers except for some situations.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.

Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.

At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.

In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.

Sample 2:

Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.

To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.

Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.

To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.

Sample 3:

There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.

The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.

There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.

In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.

Sample 4:

Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.

To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.

However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.

In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.

Sample 5:

Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.

In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.

In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Everyone has different dreams when it comes to where they wish to live. Personally, I think it is very desirable to live in a large city.  I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, cities offer a great environment for raising children, and I am a person who values family above all else.  Urban areas have numerous parks and recreation centers which encourage children to lead vital and healthy lives, and they also have well-funded community centers which contribute to the intellectual development of young people.  My own experience demonstrates the value of such facilities. Both my husband and I work full time jobs and are not home when our two sons finish school. This is not a problem, though, as both of them go directly to a local community center when their classes are over. Our eldest son participates in a computer club there, while our youngest son practices photography. Their participation in these programs sets my mind at ease, as without access to the community center they would just sit at home all alone.  This situation compares favorably to a friend of mine who lives in a small town and recently had to hire an expensive babysitter to watch her children when they get home from school, as she was not able to locate any meaningful activities for them to take part in.

Secondly, large cities offer cultural experiences that adults can enjoy and appreciate.  Most major cities have a plethora of museums, ethnic restaurants, libraries, theater groups and other stimulating and cosmopolitan facilities.  My city is no exception. For instance, my colleagues and I spend every Friday evening visiting a new ethnic restaurant for dinner. Over the past three months we have enjoyed food from more than a dozen different national cuisines.  Meanwhile, my sons and I go to a different museum once a month and I have found that I enjoy our visits almost as much as they do. These are the sort of outings that are only possible in a heavily populated urban area. Small towns offer easy access to beautiful natural scenery, but I prefer the intellectual and cultural stimulation that my city offers.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that living in a large city is preferable to living in a small town.  This is because cities are better places to raise children, and because they offer stimulating intellectual and cultural experience that grown-ups can enjoy.

Sample 2:

I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city, so I have experienced the good and bad

sides of both. I never thought that I would like to live in a big city, but I was wrong. After ten years of living in one, I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.

Small towns and big cities both have some problems in terms of transportation. In a small town, you have to own a car to ensure comfortable living. You can't get around without one because

there isn't any kind of public transportation. Big cities generally have heavy traffic and expensive

parking, but there you have a choice of taking public transportation. It's not free, but it's often cheaper than driving when you consider gas and time. Especially if you don't have a car, you're

better off in the city.

I love the excitement of big cities. Small towns have a slow pace. Large cities mean you have to

adapt to a variety of situations, like finding a new route to work or trying a new restaurant. I enjoy that challenge very much. Another source of the excitement of city living is the variety of cultural activities available. There is a wide assortment of theatre, music and dance performances

available in big cities. These things are rare in small ones.

The final thing I like about large cities is the diversity of the people. The United States is made up of people of different races, religions, abilities, and interests. However, you seldom find such a variety of people in a smaller town. I think that living in an area where everyone was just like me would quickly become boring.

Of course, security is a concern, and that's one area where small towns are superior to big cities.

Still, I would rather be a bit more cautious and live in a large city than feel secure but bored.

Sample 3:

Where should we live? Some may choose to live in big cities, while others like the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside. As far as I am concerned, I would like to live in a big city because living in a big city has more advantages than living in the countryside.

To begin with, the city is the symbol of human civilization and there are many facilities for living, recreation and health care. Therefore, living there is more convenient than living in countryside. For example, we can find plenty of malls around our neighborhood, where we can buy everyday necessities at a low price. Furthermore, people are more concerned about their health and safety than other things in their lives. In big cities, medical facilities and emergency services are more easily accessible than in the countryside. Big cities also have convenient transportation and utility systems. They also offer faster Internet connections. These all make our life easier in big cities.

In addition, we can take part in a variety of events in big cities. Human beings like to live together and need to interact with each other. In a big city, the population density is high therefore there are always plenty of social activities, sports events and concerts. There are more recreational places in big cities, such as opera houses, movie theatres, clubs, and swimming pools. You will have many kinds of entertainment in big cities and meet many people. In the countryside, however, life may be dull and quiet, and you may only have a few neighbors. Living alone with few activities can easily cause mental diseases.

Some may argue that the pollution in cities makes people sick. However, with automobiles and modern highways we can easily take a break to expose ourselves to fresh air in the countryside and sunshine on the beach.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that living in big cities is much better than living in countryside because of the advanced facilities and social activities in cities. Moreover, the autos and highways

enable us to enjoy the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside.

Sample 4:

In our modern world, people have different opinions on where the best place would be to live, and many argue that living in a small town is the ideal location, while others argue that living in a big city is preferred. Both places have their benefits and drawbacks, but I would prefer to live in a big city. This is because big cities offer diverse job opportunities, cultural experiences, and convenient amenities.

Big cities have a broader range of job opportunities than small towns. In a big city, one will have a chance to secure a job in various sectors and pursue a career. Many big companies and industries are typically located in larger cities, which means that job seekers have plenty of options. Moreover, a big city offers numerous opportunities for growth, as one can change jobs and pursue their passion. The job market in big cities also offers higher salaries and better benefits. Hence, for those who want to make a radicle career change and those who want to earn a decent living, a big city is the ideal place to live.

Cultural experiences are another reason why I prefer to live in a big city. Big cities offer diverse and unique cultural experiences that small towns

cannot, such as trying new foods and attending cultural festivals. In big cities, there is always a movie or a theatre show to attend, a concert or sporting event to watch, a museum or an art gallery to visit. The diversity of cultural experiences in big cities provides people with various opportunities to learn and broaden their horizons, which is an enriching experience.

Convenient amenities are also reasons why I prefer to live in big cities. Cities are often equipped with modern infrastructure. Cities have better medical facilities, public transportation systems, and essential services like banks and grocery stores. Big cities have a good public transportation system that is well-planned and suitable for people who do not own private cars. People in big cities have access to modern medical facilities with well-trained medical specialists.

Despite the benefits, big cities have some drawbacks. One of the most significant drawbacks is the high cost of living. Housing and rent are expensive in larger cities compared to small towns. Moreover, noise pollution and air pollution are common in big cities. Residents must always be aware of their surrounding environments to protect themselves from the effects of pollution. Additionally, congestion and crowding are other issues that plague many big city neighborhoods.

In conclusion, while big cities have their issues, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Big cities offer more job opportunities, an array of cultural experiences, and convenient amenities. Therefore, for me, getting the chance to live and experience all of this makes living in a big city very appealing.

Sample 5:

People seldom agree with one another, even on such trivial issues as the preference between living in a big city and a small town. It’s a bit hasty to claim that it is better to live in a big city than in a small town, or vice versa.

Living in a big city has several benefits. First, there are more job opportunities readily available in big cities compared to small towns. Furthermore, not only are there more job positions in big cities, but the quality of these positions is much higher as well. In addition, the pay is often more competitive.

Second, children are likely to receive a higher-quality education compared to their counterparts in small towns. For families, children’s education is always a top priority.

Finally, big cities generally offer a superior overall standard of living compared to small towns. There are more commodities and services available in city markets, more public utilities, and even a greater variety of television channels.

However, living in a small town also has its advantages. People in small towns often enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle. Most are free from the high work-related stress common in big cities. Although the average pay is lower, the cost of daily necessities, such as vegetables and meat, is usually more affordable.

Instead of experiencing the loneliness often prevalent in big cities, children in small towns may grow up more healthily due to harmonious relationships among residents. People in small towns don’t have to wake up as early in the morning, as there are no traffic jams, and drivers tend to be more cautious, reducing the likelihood of accidents. While they may have fewer television channels, they have more friends readily available for socializing and entertainment.

As for my current situation, although I long for the cozy atmosphere and close relationships among neighbors and friends, which are often unique to small towns, I have chosen to live in one of the biggest cities in my country - Beijing. This is because I have found a good job here with a decent salary. I think I would prefer living in a small town when I retire one day.

Sample 6:

In English, there is a well-known fairy tale about a poor country boy, Dick Whittington, who goes to London believing that the streets of the city are “paved with gold.” The story is a classic “rags to riches” tale. Dick eventually becomes the Lord Mayor of London. Like the hero of that story, I always find wonder and adventure in cities.

Cities contain a fascinating assortment of people. Whenever I walk around a shopping precinct at midday on a weekend, I am captivated by the variety of individuals hurrying through the shops. Sometimes, I simply sit on a public bench and observe the diverse streams of shoppers passing by.

Today, in the age of globe-trotting transport and advanced communication, city life is more diverse than ever. Capital cities are now highly cosmopolitan and eager to attract foreign trade and currency. There is a contemporary English joke that says, “You can never find an Englishman in London.”

Whether rightly or wrongly, governments and local authorities tend to prioritize building public amenities in big cities. Money is invested in transportation, libraries, parks, and museums. Often, countries compete to construct the most impressive “showcase” buildings. For example, Malaysia has built a skyscraper taller than anything in New York. Similarly, within large countries, regions compete with each other: New York against Chicago, Shanghai against Hong Kong, or Beijing.

All of this benefits city dwellers. The magic of the Dick Whittington story is rekindled in me whenever I enter a library housed in a magnificent building. For university students studying art or music, large cities often offer galleries and public performances. Even as a teenager, I appreciated living in a city because it gave me the opportunity to attend rock concerts by my favorite bands several times a year.

Architecture shapes the urban landscape. For those who appreciate it, a city can be as visually exciting as the Himalayas. A modern metropolis resembles a mountain range with its height, light, and solidness. At the same time, old buildings add to its charm - quaint, unspoiled side streets, or shops and homes from distant ages. Even someone who spends their entire life in one large city could continue discovering its architectural secrets well into old age.

Humans are “social animals.” They talk, interact, and create. Cities provide libraries, universities, and café bars where people can meet and share ideas with others of their kind.

Sample 7:

Some people would like to live in a small town because the surroundings could be more picturesque, and people are friendlier compared to people in a big city. However, in my opinion, living in a big city is more effective and beneficial based on the following reasons.

First, living in a big city is convenient. Thanks to public transportation, any place in a big city is usually accessible. Without driving, you have many options among buses, trains and subway. Taxis are also available on almost every corner of the city. Besides, it is easy to find a restaurant or food stands in your neighborhood within walking distance whenever you are hungry. There are also convenience stores all over, so city residents can buy any stuff easily at any time without bothering to drive to a certain place to get what they need. Convenience is the best what a city can offer while a small town is less likely to.

In addition, a big city provides more education opportunities. The residents have easier access to schools and education resources, so do they to faculty and advanced facilities. Take teachers for example, they are willing to teach in a big city because of the better salary and there are more resources they need available in libraries and related institutes when they want to go further to sharpen their teaching skills. Similarly, when children plan to take some talented courses such as piano, art, and the like, a city with more options and business activities is where parents want their children to live and grow.

Here is another perfect example to illustrate my preference of a city. I used to be a volunteer in an elementary school in a small town. Although the town was lovely and clean, there was some inconvenience caused in daily life. First, less bus service was provided, so people usually had no choice but to wait a long time to take the bus. Second, restaurants and food stands were all closed after nine o’clock, so it’s hard to find something to eat if you are hungry late in the evening. Lastly, teachers in the elementary school might need to teach many courses with different subjects, when necessary, because of a lack of faculty, that is, an English teacher could be asked to teach math or science as well. Also, the facilities in the classroom and the science lab were old- fashioned. From my observation, people can live peacefully in a small town but actually there are more opportunities and availability a big city can offer.

Last but not least, infrastructure and public services are usually prominently featured in a big city. When I want to exercise on a rainy day, I can go to the sport center without worrying about places to go. In contrast, I might be trapped at home in a small town in the same situation. Besides, public services like medical care and care centers are fully developed for people with a pressing need. Libraries also provide better book circulation and activities to cater for their readers, which is not very likely to take place in a town with the number of people which is small. For people who like tranquility and secure, small towns are the best choice. However, for those who prefer economic prosperity, a variety of things to do, places to go and activities to join, the better choice is in a big city. I happen to be the one who prefers the latter and enjoys the lives in it.

Sample 8:

It is crucial to choose a place which suits you to live because where you live has influence over  the quality of  your life and  happiness. Compared to those who prefer to live in a small town with a quiet environment, living in a big city to take advantage of the modern conveniences that it can offer is my choice. 

First of all, the public transportation system is one of amenities people can benefit from.  Big cities usually provide a well-developed transportation network, such as bus, train, subway and airport, so people in the city have very easy access to the vehicles that can help them reach any destination they want to. In contrast, the convenience of public transportation is usually not found in a small town, where people might tend to drive or use other means of transport to get about. 

Besides, there are more opportunities for either finding a job or taking education. With a larger population, more jobs are available for everyone to find than those in the countryside. Take where I live for example, although the job market is very competitive, university graduates often move to Taipei, which is the major city in Taiwan. If you need to develop a skill, it is also likely that you will achieve it and then get a job successfully. More importantly, there are also more educational opportunities and a lot of different courses and institutions available. There is always availability of learning something new or developing practical skills in a big city.

Furthermore, cities can provide a variety of entertainment options every day. There is always something fun to do in a big city to keep people of all different interests from getting bored. Cities provide a lively nightlife, all types of shows, museums and sports facilities. Additionally, you will be able to connect with other people who share the same hobbies at different events.

While the lifestyle in a small town is less stressful, the city lifestyle has a lot of opportunities for people. Personally, I prefer to live in a big city which offers a variety of many options. In the meanwhile, I like the energy and the convenience in a big city. City life can have many positive impacts compared to rural life.

Sample 9:

There are many differences between living in a big city and a small town. Therefore, we must choose based on our personal preferences and needs. If you prefer a calm and peaceful environment, small towns are suitable for you. However, if you want to develop yourself, big cities are the best places to learn and acquire skills essential for your future.

In life, the most important thing for everyone is, of course, health. If someone’s health deteriorates, they might lose everything they have. Small towns often provide a healthier environment. You can enjoy peaceful rivers, mountains, abundant greenery, and a clear night sky filled with stars. Life there is calm and free from the excessive noise of big cities, as the population and number of cars are much smaller. However, living in a small town can mean missing out on global news, fashion trends, and other advancements.

On the other hand, living in a big city provides more opportunities for personal growth and the chance to enhance your competitive skills. Over time, this can help you establish your own identity and attitude in society. People in big cities are often motivated to work hard to support their families. However, city life comes with challenges, such as air pollution and waste management issues. If we do not address these problems, they could have serious consequences for our future.

In conclusion, small towns offer comfort and tranquility, while big cities are dynamic and full of opportunities. Personally, I would choose to live in a big city first to improve myself. Later, when I want to rest and prioritize my health, I would move to the countryside or a small town.

I hope you can choose the place that best suits your needs and appeals to you.

Sample 10:

I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city. I didn't think I would like to live here, but I was wrong. I think life is much better in a big city. Transportation is much more convenient, everything is more exciting, and there is a greater variety of people. I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.

Transportation is easier in a city. In a small town, you have to have a car to get around because there isn't any kind of public transportation. In a city, on the other hand, there are usually buses and taxis, and some cities have subways. Cities often have heavy traffic, and expensive parking, but it doesn't matter because you can always take the bus. Using public transportation is usually cheaper and more convenient than driving a car, but you don't have this choice in a small town.

City life is more exciting than small town life. In small towns usually nothing changes. You see the same people every day, you go to the same two or three restaurants, everything is the same. In a city things change all the time. You see new people every day. There are many restaurants, with new ones to choose from all the time. New plays come to the theaters and new musicians come to the concert halls.

Cities have a diversity of people that you don't find in a small town. There are much fewer people in a small town and usually they are all alike. In a city you can find people from different countries, of different religions, of different races - you can find all kinds of people. This variety of people is what makes city life interesting.

Life in a city is convenient, exciting, and interesting. After experiencing city life, I could never live in a small town again.

Sample 11:

If you were asked to choose between living in a big city or a small town, where would you prefer to live? Some people might choose to live in a small town because the environment is cleaner, and it fosters closer relationships with others. This suggests that living in a small town has its benefits. However, I believe there are three key reasons why living in a big city is more advantageous.

First, living in a big city provides greater opportunities to gain advanced knowledge and develop oneself. In contrast, the range of educational options in a small town is often limited. Furthermore, the presence of many students in a city creates a competitive environment that encourages us to work harder. While education may not be the only important aspect of life, it remains essential because we rely on knowledge throughout our lifetime.

Second, living in a city allows us to meet more people and adapt to society more easily. For example, interacting with diverse individuals helps us learn about their personalities and characteristics. Building relationships and making friends in a city can greatly benefit us as we grow older. By communicating with people in a big city, we gain a better understanding of how society functions and what we need to do to thrive. Therefore, city life prepares us to navigate societal challenges more effectively.

Lastly, living in a big city offers more job opportunities. Securing employment is a crucial aspect of life, and cities typically provide a wider variety of workplaces, such as companies, factories, and universities. For instance, becoming a professor is more achievable in a city where universities are abundant. In contrast, small towns cannot guarantee the same level of employment opportunities.

In conclusion, while small towns have advantages like friendlier communities and a cleaner environment, I believe living in a big city is more beneficial. Cities offer better educational opportunities, greater chances to meet people and adapt to society, and more job prospects. For these reasons, I would prefer living in a big city over a small town.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Vietjack official store
Đăng ký gói thi VIP

VIP +1 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 1 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +3 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 3 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +6 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 6 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +12 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 12 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay