A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your locality. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory establishment? Explain your position.
A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your locality. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory establishment? Explain your position.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:

Sample 1:
To meet the demand of the increasing population large companies, factories, etc are growing faster than any other past time. A new factory means new job opportunities. Again, a new factory means more pollution and a new threat to the environment. In the whole, new factories bring good opportunities to a community but the risk it creates by increasing the environment pollution is too much. In my opinion, the benefits of having a factory near my community are outweighted by the risks. That is why I strongly oppose the establishment of a new factory near my community.
It is true that a new factory offers many positive things to the people. For example, a new factory creates lots of job vacancies as well as many potential employment opportunities. It also creates small business opportunities surrounding the factory. The authority of the factory improves the transportation and communication systems of the area. It is often observed that a locality having a large factory or industry offers better economic freedom than an ordinary urban area.
But I believe people of my locality are happy with their current economic condition. My community is a beautiful and calm area with almost ignorable pollution. My community would be harmed by a large factory. In particular, the factory will destroy the calm and neat environment as well as will increase the air, water and sound pollution. In the long run, the environment will be seriously hurt, and people's health will be affected. Again, the newly created factory will make the community crowded. To accommodate more workers more homes will be needed. I don't want to see too many cheaply constructed townhomes in my locality.
I heartily believe this growth will change my community too much. I was born here and most of my memories regarded of the area. I love my community very much. I feel that the dangers of the factory are greater than the benefits. So, I would strongly oppose the idea of establishing a factory near my community.
Sample 2:
People have argued about the plan of building a factory near the residential area. Some people think that it will bring many benefits for the local society, while others believe that it will have a negative effect on the environment. The following essay will discuss in detail the advantages and disadvantages of it.
On the one hand, it is true that building a new factory near the local residential area will bring a lot of benefits for many parties. Firstly, it will generate a lot of job opportunities for the local people. It is common that a factory will absorb many employments, and for efficiency, it will give priority in hiring the local people. Secondly, the plan will boost the economic development of its' surrounding area. Many investors will build mini markets, gas stations or restaurants as many of the factory's workers will seek these commercial places. As a result, it will positively affect the real estate business of the surrounding area as well.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that the plan could also bring negative effects to society and to the environment. It is a fact that many factories are generating waste, and they could create harmful effects on the local environment. For example, the wastewater from the factory might be directly flown into the local river and contaminated the surrounding environment. And then, the factory might also generate some smoke which might be a treat for the local people. These people might have some serious respiration problems due to inhaling the polluted air. Therefore, there should be clear regulations and strict monitorings over it in the future.
In conclusion, it is a fact that the plan of building a factory near a residential area will create some pros and cons. In my opinion, I do believe that the positive sides of the plan outweigh the negatives, as long as the plan follows the government regulation, and it is clearly monitored by the authority.
Sample 3:
From the very beginning of the modern society concept, humans have structured the community in such a way where the commercial and industrial areas are separated from the residential area. Even after so many new concepts around residential buildings and modern cities, the basic concept of separating the industrial area from the residential area has remained strong among the city architects and its adoption has been worldwide. So, I would absolutely refute the idea of having a large factory near my community as it would have lots of negative effects. To support my opinion, I would consider reasons like pollution and disturbance to the calm ambience of the entire surrounding.
Factories manufacture and process different types of goods including electronics and chemical goods. While it generates employment and revenue, it also pollutes the environment. A large factory can be responsible for high noise pollution, water pollution and air pollution. Water pollution can contaminate the hydra resulting in health problems to the people of the society. Air pollution can annoy the residents who look forward to a serene society at the end of a tiring day. It will also adversely affect the children by exposing them to the polluted air thrown out by the factory. As a result, children will have to stop playing at the playgrounds in society and their mental and physical growth would be hampered. Thus, pollution is the last thing the people of society would prefer to deal with in their day-to-day life.
My society is located at a very neat and calm location. Having a large factory near the society would result in disturbing the peaceful environment near our locality. The society offers a nice park alongside a small lake which is used by the elderly, exercise enthusiasts and animals daily to freshen up and enjoy the natural bliss. With the advent of a factory in the area, the ambience of the park and the locality could be spoiled. To add to the suffering, factories would also increase the traffic in the locality. An increase in traffic means more time on commute resulting in more stress for an individual.
To conclude, I would say that large factories do have advantages like more employment and more revenue, but it should not impact the residential areas. The factories should be built outside the residential zone, thus not disturbing the people living nearby. Thus, I would recommend having the factories out of the city in the factory zone to realise its real unadulterated benefits.
Sample 4:
Since the inception of civilisation, industrialisation has been a paramount requirement of growth around the world. In fact, every government has ratified certain sets of rules for establishing industries along with relevant departments to look after the policies' compliance. Like any other process industrialisation too has pros and cons, and subsequently, people have been debating over the appropriateness and formulating ways to curb its repercussions over denizens.
Firstly, institutionalising factories brings a lot of benefits for local communities. First of all, most industries require a huge skilled workforce and thus, these crop up a lot of exciting and rewarding employment opportunities. This has profound positive effects on the upliftment of life standards of citizens as it accelerates the per capita income and the GDP. Apparently, successful industrialisation also spurs foreign investment. For example, the establishment of Tata Group in Jamshedpur, Jharkhand in 1909 helped the region to stride and today the region is one of the most developed regions in the country. Secondly, there are many other indirect benefits too. No industry just does not create direct job opportunities for the people who work inside the company's premises; it also presents some jobs to people who are not qualified to work inside the company. For example, in any enterprise, we find many indirect housekeeping and canteen workers.
On the other hand, industrialisation has some minor and few potential issues too. First of all, many industries require a large piece of land and generally, it is acquired by deforestation or seizing fertile farmland. Also, companies' waste materials are generally hazardous and pollute the neighbouring environment. This leads to diseases, allergies and sometimes even epidemics. In most of the cases, the direct employees are under the highest threat. Also, the awry effects of local ecosystems cannot be ignored. Moreover, the life risk of industrial accidents over local lives cannot be disregarded. For example, today, every country is reeling under the side effects of global warming, a phenomenon whose onset is contributed to the discharge of industrialisation waste into natural resources like water, air etc., which defines the rising temperature around the world and causing climate changes. Apparently, the proper treatment of industrial waste is a worldwide challenge.
In my opinion, industrialisation is necessary for growth, but it must be regulated. The proper measures must be taken to reduce the negative impacts of byproducts on the environment. This can be ensured by enacting strict laws to mandate the proper treatment of hazardous waste before their discharge. On the other hand, to tackle problems like deforestation, companies must plant a certain number of trees depending upon the intensity of deforestation.
Sample 5:
The proposal to construct a factory near a residential area has sparked debates, with proponents emphasizing its potential benefits for the local community and disadvantages expressing concerns about adverse effects. In this essay, I will be talking both about the advantages and disadvantages of building a factory in the locality.
On the positive side, establishing a new factory in close proximity to residential zones holds several merits. First off, among them is the creation of numerous job opportunities for local residents, with factories typically favouring local hires for efficiency. Additionally, this development is poised to stimulate economic growth in the vicinity, attracting investments in amenities such as mini markets, gas stations, and restaurants to cater to the needs of cooperative workers. Consequently, this economic boost is likely to have a positive impact on the real estate business in the surrounding area.
On the other hand, it is indisputable that such a plan could have some disadvantages on society and the environment. Many factories generate waste that may harm the local environment, as exemplified by the direct discharge of wastewater into local rivers. Furthermore, the emission of smoke poses a health threat to residents, potentially leading to serious respiratory problems. To address these concerns, there is a pressing need for clear regulations and rigorous monitoring in the future.
In conclusion, while the proposal to establish a commercial enterprise near a residential area presents both advantages and disadvantages, I am inclined to believe that the positive aspects outweigh the negatives, provided the plan adheres to government regulations and undergoes close monitoring by the authorities.
Sample 6:
The proposed establishment of a large factory near the local community raises significant considerations. This essay will talk about both the advantages and disadvantages associated with this establishment of a new factory.
Regarding the advantages, the introduction of a large factory can stimulate economic growth within the local community since the opening of news jobs will abolish unemployment, fostering financial stability for residents. Moreover, increased economic activity often leads to enhanced infrastructural development, benefiting the overall standard of living. For example, the factory’s operations can contribute to the local tax base, facilitating the funding of public services such as education and healthcare as well.
While considering the drawbacks, the main primary one is the environmental impact, with factories contributing to air and noise pollution. The growth of trucks and vehicles poses risks to children playing in yards and jeopardizes the overall well-being of nearby residents. Furthermore, the increased migration of workers may escalate crime rates and elevate living costs, adversely affecting the local populace.
In conclusion, while there are economic advantages associated with having factories in the vicinity, the accompanying drawbacks, including pollution and societal upheaval, cannot be overlooked. Hence, I firmly oppose the establishment of an industrial facility near my residence.
Sample 7:
The proposed establishment of a large factory near the local community raises significant considerations. This essay will talk about both the advantages and disadvantages associated with the establishment of a new factory.
Regarding the advantages, the introduction of a large factory can stimulate economic growth within the local community since the opening of new jobs will abolish unemployment, fostering financial stability for residents. Moreover, increased economic activity often leads to enhanced infrastructural development, benefiting the overall standard of living. For example, the factory’s operations can contribute to the local tax base, facilitating the funding of public services such as education and healthcare as well.
However, the potential drawbacks are equally noteworthy. The construction and subsequent operation of a large factory may bring about environmental concerns. Increased pollution, noise, and traffic congestion can adversely impact the overall quality of life for local inhabitants. The rapid urbanization associated with such developments might lead to the displacement of existing communities, potentially causing social disintegration and loss of cultural identity, for instance. From an economic standpoint, if the company were to face financial challenges or relocate, it could lead to an economic downturn, leaving the community with rising unemployment and economic decline.
To conclude, the establishment of a large factory near a community brings both benefits and drawbacks. While it has the potential to increase economic growth and improve living standards, careful consideration must be given to mitigate environmental and social ramifications. Striking a balance between economic progress and community well-being is paramount in navigating the challenges posed by such developments.
Sample 8:
The debate on whether building a large factory near the community has many advantages encompasses diverse viewpoints, revealing its advantages and drawbacks. This essay critically assesses these perspectives.
There are myriad arguments in favour of my stance. Recent research not only outlines the significance of studies as well as people, but also points out the importance of education and coping with vicissitudes. Besides, it provides a brief overview of expanding cultural understanding, followed by enhancing global perspectives. Examples of this can be seen all over the world, especially in affluent nations. Further, the implications of technological advancements on these views are significant, justifying widespread support for the idea that building a large factory near the community has many advantages.
However, there are some arguments against the aforementioned view. Besides, its impact is far-reaching indeed as its influence extends to various facets of society, shaping not only individual experiences but also impacting on the academic research landscape. Therefore, it is apparent why many are against the notion that building a large factory near the community has many advantages.
In conclusion, while the viewpoint that building a large factory near the community has many advantages presents a complex array of advantages and disadvantages, my analysis leads me to firmly support the notion that its benefits substantially outweigh the drawbacks.
Sample 9:
The proposed construction of a large factory near my community presents both advantages and disadvantages. However, I oppose its development due to the potential impact on the health and tranquillity of our residents, which cannot be overlooked.
On the positive side, the establishment of a large factory can significantly boost the local economy. It can create numerous job opportunities for people, reduce unemployment rates and help in improving the standard of living for many families. For instance, the arrival of a major manufacturing plant in a small town can transform its economy, providing opportunities and jobs for various other businesses such as transportation and local retail.
However, there are also drawbacks to this. Factories often contribute to pollution both in terms of air quality and noise levels. This could negatively impact on the health and quality of life of residents. For example, residents living near industrial areas often report higher rates of respiratory problems due to poor air quality. Furthermore, the construction of a large factory could lead to increased traffic and congestion, disrupting the tranquillity of the community. It could also lead to a rise in property prices, making it difficult for some residents to afford their homes.
Personally, I oppose this until and unless strong rules and regulations are put in place to mitigate the potential environmental and social impacts. This could include strict pollution controls, soundproofing, and investment in local infrastructure to manage increased traffic. Furthermore, it is crucial to ensure adequate compensation and support for any community or environment affected by the factory’s operations. This approach is essential not only for maintaining social harmony but also for upholding environmental stewardship.
In conclusion, the economic benefits of new factories are considerable, and the potential negative impacts on the community’s health and tranquillity cannot be ignored. Achieving a balance between economic growth and the well-being of residents requires careful assessment and thoughtful decision-making regarding industrial development in residential areas.
Sample 10:
New factories often bring many good things to a community, such as jobs and increased prosperity. However, in my opinion, the benefits of having a factory are outweighed by the risks. That is why I oppose the plan to build a factory near my community.
I believe that this city would be harmed by a large factory. In particular, a factory would destroy the quality of the air and water in town. Factories bring smog and pollution. In the long run, the environment will be hurt, and people’s health will be affected. Having a factory is not worth that rise.
Of course, more jobs will be created by the factory. Our population will grow. To accommodate more workers, more homes and stores will be needed. Do we really want this much growth, so fast? If our town is going in growth, I would prefer slow growth with good planning. I don’t want to see rows of cheaply constructed townhouses. Our quality of life must be considered.
I believe that this growth will change our city too much. I love my hometown because it is a safe, small town. It is also easy to travel here. If we must expand to hold new citizens, the small-town feel will be gone. I would miss that greatly.
A factory would be helpful in some ways. However, I feel that the dangers are greater than the benefits. I cannot support a plan to build a factory here, and hope that others feel the same way.
Sample 11:
It has been increasingly common to see industrialization take place in every corner of the world, including my surroundings. Some people think that the emergence of a big factory may be conducive to community as a whole while others claim that there are more pains than gains. In this essay, I shall shed light on both sides of this controversial issue.
First, there are those who argue that by dint of this new factory, people have more chances to get a settled job, which means that the unemployment rate is reduced. Thus, the government can stop worrying about a burden while they are already exhausted with so many responsibilities. However, it is highly likely that there are so many people lured into industries that agriculture, in some rural areas, is adversely affected. This may absolutely trigger lack of food and have greatly negative impacts on other key fields. In addition, health-related problems can be well seen in local people who suffer from waste and polluted air.
Second, it is believed that the expansion of industry may help to promote the economic situation of both individuals and societies as a whole. While it may be true to some extent, the fact is that there are lots of trees diminished to give way to the appearance of a new factory which, of course, badly influences the local environment. With nature being destroyed, the number of tourists will witness a significant decline. Facts have shown that a majority of visitors are so afraid of pollution that they hardly select these places for sightseeing. This, in general, leads to governmental loss of money.
To conclude, industrial facilities have both advantages and disadvantages, in terms of environment and economy. I strongly disargee with the construction of a factory near my community due to its potential and immediate risks.
Sample 12:
In our country, in the present reality, the constructions of such objects as factories, waste processing plants, treatment plants and so on is often connected with people’s disapproval and distrust. Of course, factories and plants may emit dangerous compounds, soot and dust, pollute the air, water and soil, cause vibrations and noises, produce unpleasant odours. The other reason that could make people object to those and protest against the construction of the latter is a possible unattractive view of the future factory, that may disfigure a landscape and this, in turn, may hinder the development of tourism and recreation.
But on the other hand, the construction of a large factory would create additional employment for local people, and this could be a good solution to the problem of unemployment in depressed towns and villages. There would also be a great income to the community’s budget from factory's taxes and this money can be used on the development of the community, for example, on the road renovation, street lighting installation, reconstruction and new building of the public centre, laying the pipes for water supply and sewerage.
In general, I think that in this case there are more advantages than disadvantages or some of the flaws can be eliminated or reduced. For instance, in order to decrease the pollution of the environment and protect the nature, it is necessary to install purifying equipment and use modern technologies in production operations, and protective green planting could serve to reduce noise. Further, to improve the appearance of industrial buildings modern materials and design can be used – they will make the view of a factory more attractive. And the main thing is the creation of the area development plan of a factory, in which all the nature and health protection requirements, design norms and rules will be observed. This plan with the intentions of plant construction should be submitted for consideration and approval by the community. The company which wishes to build a factory should explain what this plant will bring to the community and what impact it will have on people’s lives and the conditions of the environment.
To summarize, to my mind, the construction of the factory is a good opportunity to improve the living conditions of the community inhabitants provided that while being designed all the building rules have been abided and nature and health protection requirements have been fulfilled.
Sample 13:
Building factories could help us by providing products and contributing to the development of our communities. Obviously, if we build factories, it will decrease the rate of unemployment. This highlights how important factories are. However, there are many disadvantages to constructing factories as well, which are outlined below.
First, as we can all agree, factories disrupt our lives in many ways. For example, they create excessive noise. A factory is a place where machines operate to produce goods, and during the production process, these machines can generate significant noise. I live near a factory that manufactures iron and metal products, and the noise from it is so loud that I often cannot sleep at night. In such cases, I strongly oppose the construction of factories near residential communities.
Another issue is that building factories, as well as their operation afterward, causes serious traffic problems. Let’s consider the scenario where we all agree to the construction of a factory. During the building phase, a large workforce is required, making the surrounding areas overcrowded. This leads to heavy traffic congestion. How can students get to school on time in the morning? Similarly, how can employees reach their workplaces punctually amidst such traffic? Realistically, commuting will take much longer than before.
The most concerning issue with constructing factories is ‘pollution,’ which is my final point. As you all know, factories cause various types of pollution, such as water and air pollution. Moreover, pollution can lead to serious health issues, including atopic dermatitis, skin diseases, and even cancer. As a result, pollution caused by factories has a detrimental impact on our communities.
In conclusion, while there are undeniable advantages to building factories, I believe the disadvantages, such as noise, traffic, and pollution, are far more serious. Therefore, I strongly oppose the plan to construct factories near our communities.
Sample 14:
A company has announced that it wishes to build another large factory near our community. On the one hand, some people believe that building a factory has some advantages, such as employee opportunities, economic growth; on the other hand, others may think that the factory has many disadvantages, for instance, pollution problems. Different people hold different views on it not only because of their respective background but also due to their alien understanding. However, from my personal point of view, I oppose the factory.
There are numerous reasons why the disadvantages carry more weight than the advantages of a factory, and I shall here explore only a few of the most important ones. First, we need more trees and plants in our community; second, a large factory will bring us a lot of pollution. In the following discussion, I would like to render my evidence to bolster my viewpoint.
The most and first prominent reason for my idea is that we need more plants for our community. Plants contribute much to lessening pollution and making our community a good place to live. We have already many factories, but we don't have a single park where we can spend our weekend? We don't want to take our kids to visit rows of apartment buildings and industrial parks. If we have a park instead of a factory, we can have another reason for entertainment. We will feel more like a human not a machine. Hence, building another factory in our community is not a good idea.
The above is only part of the important aspects, and the second argument supporting my opinion is that we cannot afford the pollution a factory brings. As a proverb says, “Health is more important than wealth". Although I admit that a factory will bring us many economic benefits, a good environment is also crucial. We already have many problems with dirty water and air. There is no denying that the qualities of our living have gone from bad to worse. As far as I am concerned, a factory is not a wise choice.
To sum up, based on what we discussed above. I believe that we cannot have another factory, not only because we have to protect our environment, but also because a factory will give us too much pollution. Consequently, I strongly oppose building a factory.
Sample 15:
In my opinion building a large factory near my community will bring positive consequences such as creating new places of work and developing the town. However, I think that the negative results will be more. Building a large factory will cause pollution of the air and water, wronging people's health and destroying the small-town feel.
On one hand, the idea for a factory near my community is good because many people will be able to find a decent job for themselves. In my town the economics and infrastructure are still in transition and the standard of living is not as high as it is in the towns of Western Europe and North America. So, a large number of young people with high qualifications are unable to find a job because the labor market does not provide enough opportunities. So, I think that building a large factory in my town will have a wonderful affection on all these young men and women who are looking for a prosperous place of work.
In my opinion this idea will also be beneficial for the population because the town itself will develop greatly. Many famous and huge companies would choose to invest in a place where they see that the progress, such as building a large factory, is on. The changes will be obvious for everybody, and every aspect of the economics will prosper.
On the other hand, I think that building a large factory near my community will cause many after-effects. One of the most dangerous is the pollution of air and water. It is well known that all kinds of factories release some harmful industrial waste. And everybody can assess the situation when speaking of a large factory. The waste will be extremely much. And although presidents of such factories try to persuade the population that the environment will not be affected people can feel the results. In my view the water resources near the facilities for manufacturing will be polluted. Harmful gases such as carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and sulfur trioxide will be released, affecting the atmosphere and contributing to the intensification of the greenhouse effect.
It is my strong conviction that another negative consequence from building a large factory in my town will be wronging people's health. The pollution of air and water will bring many healthy problems for every man, and I think the ones that will be hit most are elderly people and small children because they have non-persistent immunity.
Another important disadvantage of a factory near my community is pulling down the atmosphere of my small hometown. A large project like that will pay the attention of many other companies and enterprises. They would probably make significant investments in my town because they would view it as a promising center of progress in that part of the country. So, the population would increase greatly, the borders of the town would broaden out. In my opinion, such kind of fast growth will change the atmosphere in the place where I live. And I would like to say that it would be shameful for all citizens because I am sure that we all adore our small and safe town.
In conclusion I want to say that building a factory in my town will have advantages and disadvantages for the place where we live and for all citizens. In my opinion the benefits are outweighed by the risks. That is why I oppose the plan to build a factory near my community.
Sample 16:
I have been living in a peaceful and quiet town for about 10 years. All the people around here are so kind, and the landscape is so beautiful that I love this town very much. Recently I heard news that a company will set up a new factory near my community. I was shocked and I hold a negative opinion about this decision.
The main reason why I oppose this plan is that establishing a new factory will cause air pollution. As we know, a factory will give off a lot of waste air which is harmful to people’s health. Even though the factory will take measures to purify the air, it cannot make the air as clean as before. It is no doubt that people’s health will be affected by the air emitted from the factory. Another reason is that a factory makes too much noise.
My community is always a quiet place, and this is just what I like the most. A factory will cause the town to become too noisy. For example, every morning, we can be awake from our dreams by the noise of buses which take workers to the factory. The noise of engines will also influence our temper, and may cause us to be susceptible to anger, and easily lose temper. Furthermore, a strong reason to oppose this idea is that building a factory will destroy the landscape of this town. Most people living in this town make their living by cultivating and harvesting crops. The factory is inappropriate with the landscape of the town, and it will occupy the land that is used for farming.
Of course, building a factory also has advantages to some extent. For example, it will bring more work opportunities for local people, and also it will help develop the local economics. But comparing with the disadvantages, I strongly oppose the idea to build a factory near my community.
Sample 17:
I support the idea that a factory to be built near our community. I list my reasons as follows.
Firstly, a new factory near our community helps to improve the living standard of people in our community. The factory will employ a lot of workers. As a consequence, the unemployment rate will drop significantly. Many people in our community will find a job in the factory. As people’s income increases, they will be able to spend more money on their food, clothing and leisure time, and the quality of life will be increased.
Secondly, a new factory will bring prosperity to our community. The tax collected from a factory is an important source of revenue for our town. As people have higher income, the income tax collected will also be increased. The town will be able to spend more money on infrastructure and other development. Moreover, in order to accommodate more workers, more homes and stores will be needed. This will boost real estate development in our community. Some people say that a factory would bring smog and pollution and destroy the quality of the air and water in town. This is not the truth. Modern technologies have made today’s factories’ technology intensive and brought pollution to the minimum. There are also worries that the social structure of this community will be changed, and the traditional life will be affected. We should understand that society needs to evolve, and we cannot always stay in the old times.
Of course, there will be some drawbacks of building a new factory here. But in my opinion, the benefits outweigh the dangers. I strongly support building a factory here, and hope that others feel the same way.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
- Sổ tay Hóa học 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- 250+ Công thức giải nhanh môn Toán 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Tuyển tập 30 đề thi đánh giá năng lực Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, TP Hồ Chí Minh (2 cuốn) ( 150.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.
In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.
Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.
Sample 2:
The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common.
In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.
In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.
Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.
Sample 3:
The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.
Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.
In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.
In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.
Sample 4:
The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.
At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.
Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.
Sample 5:
The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.
In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.
Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.
Sample 6:
The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.
Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.
Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.
In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.