Câu hỏi:
10/01/2025 179The tables below provide information about the consumption and production of potatoes in five parts of the world in 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
The given charts compare five different regions in terms of their production and consumption of potatoes in 2006.
Overall, Asian countries were by far the largest potato producers, while the lowest production was observed in South America and Africa. Regarding average potato consumption, Europe recorded the highest figures, in contrast to Africa, where consumption was the lowest.
Asia led potato production with slightly over 131 million tonnes, closely followed by Europe with 126.3 million tonnes. North America produced significantly less, at approximately 25 million tonnes. South America, Central America, and Africa had similar production capacities, ranging from 15.6 to 16.4 million tonnes.
In terms of consumption, the average European consumed slightly over 96 kg of potatoes, the highest among the five regions. North Americans consumed roughly 58 kg per person, more than double the consumption in Asia, South America, and Central America, where figures ranged from 23.6 to 26 kg. Finally, African consumption was the lowest, with an average of just 14.1 kg per person.
Sample 2:
The tables show how much potato was consumed and produced across various parts of the world in 2006.
Overall, Europe had the highest potato consumption per capita, though its production was slightly lower than that of Asia and Oceania, who were the largest producers. In contrast, South and Central America, and Africa produced and consumed the least potatoes.
Regarding potato consumption, Europe was the biggest consumer in 2006, with an intake of 96.1 kilograms per person (kg/capita), followed by North America, averaging 57.9 kg/capita. This was approximately double the consumption in Asia and Oceania, and South and Central America, both standing at around 25 kg/capita, while the lowest consumption was recorded in Africa, at only 14.1 kg/capita.
Turning to potato production, Asia and Oceania were the leading producers, with a total output of 131.2 million tonnes (Mt). Although European people ate more potatoes than those in any other regions listed, their production was the second highest, at 126.3 Mt. Meanwhile, North America, Africa, and South and Central America registered the smallest production figures, ranging from 15 to 25 Mt.
Sample 3:
The tables illustrate the quantity of potatoes produced in five different regions and correspondingly how much per person consumed in 2006.
Overall, Europe and North America were the two largest consumers, whereas Asia and Europe were considered two principal potato producing regions.
Regarding the consumption, Europe led the position with 96.1 kg potatoes eaten on average, followed by North America where the personal consumption of potatoes was relatively less, only 57.8 kg. In comparison, Asia and South and Central America had similar eating preferences with 25.8 and 23.6 kg. It is worth noticing that Africans consumed potatoes at a small quantity (14.1 kg) per person, ranking the smallest consumer of the five regions.
As to potato production, Asia and Europe were the two largest potato suppliers in 2006, amounting to approximately 131 million and 126 million tonnes. The output figure for North America was far behind that for Europe and Asia, only contributing 24.7 million tonnes to the potato market. The other two regions, South and Central America and Africa, produced around 16 million tonnes, nearly one-eighth of the European proportion.
Sample 4:
The tables give data regarding the quantity of potatoes consumed per person (in kg) and grown (in million tonnes) in five regions in 2006.
Looking at the regional consumption, Europe was the biggest consumer with 96.1 kg potatoes eaten per person. It was followed by North America where per capita potato usage was comparatively less, only 57.8 kg. At the next levels, i.e. the third and fourth, were Asia and South and Central America. These areas had similar levels of consumption, 25.8 and 23.6 kg respectively. In comparison, an average person in Africa ate less than half this amount (14.1 kg) annually, making it the smallest consumer.
As regards the production, Asia and Europe were the two largest potato producers in 2006. Their production amounted to approximately 131 and 126 million tonnes respectively. North America stood at the third position. But its contribution was only 24.7 million tonnes which is about one fifth of the European share. The other regions, South and Central America and Africa, were far behind Europe. Each of them produced around 16 million tonnes of potatoes, nearly one eighth the European proportion.
Overall, Asia and Europe were two primary potato producing regions whereas Europe and North America were the two largest consumers.
Sample 5:
The provided information illuminates the consumption and production of potatoes in five different global regions during the year 2006, presenting a clear picture of regional dietary patterns and agricultural outputs.
In a sweeping overview, Europe emerges as the region with the most voracious appetite for potatoes, with consumption figures topping the charts, and it stands as a close contender to Asia in terms of production. Both continents demonstrate a remarkable capacity for potato production, jointly accounting for the lion's share of the world's supply in 2006.
Digging into specifics, Europe's potato consumption soared to an impressive 96.1 kilograms per individual, dwarfing the global average. North America's consumption was also noteworthy, with an average of 57.9 kilograms per person, situating it comfortably in second place. On the contrary, the figures from Asia, despite its dominance in production, suggest a moderate consumption level of 25.8 kilograms per person. South and Central America's consumption stood at a respectable 23.6 kilograms per person, while Africa lagged behind, with a modest average of 14.1 kilograms per person.
Turning to production, Asia's fertile lands yielded a prodigious 131.2 million tonnes of potatoes, surpassing all other regions. Europe, with its substantial 126.3 million tonnes, was Asia's closest competitor. Meanwhile, North America, Africa, and South and Central America trailed with 24.7, 16.4, and 15.6 million tonnes respectively, illustrating a significant disparity in production scales across the continents. These figures reflect a world where potato farming flourishes most in Asia and Europe, aligning with their historical and climatic predispositions for this crop.
Sample 6:
The tabular data delineates the patterns in both consumption and production of potatoes across five regions globally in the annum 2006, charting a comparative analysis of these agrarian statistics.
A cursory evaluation of the data reveals a dichotomy where Europe's populace stands as the premier consumer of potatoes, with Asia and Europe jointly dominating the sphere of production. This overview paints a picture of a continent deeply rooted in potato consumption, contrasted by an Asian market that, while prolific in production, showcases a comparatively restrained individual consumption rate.
Europeans on average ingested a prodigious 96.1 kilograms of potatoes each, a testament to the tuber's culinary prominence in their diet. North America's proclivity for potatoes was also significant, with an average intake of 57.9 kilograms per person. In stark contrast, Asia, despite being a titan in terms of production with an immense yield of 131.2 million tonnes, recorded a per capita consumption of a mere 25.8 kilograms. The figures carve out a narrative of diverse regional consumption habits, with South and Central America's average standing at 23.6 kilograms per person, and Africa's consumption being the most modest at 14.1 kilograms per individual.
Production metrics reinforce the narrative of regional agricultural strength, with Europe's impressive harvest of 126.3 million tonnes narrowly trailing Asia's production figures. North America, Africa, and South and Central America's outputs, though significant, pale in comparison, illustrating a global pattern where the epicentres of potato production are clearly demarcated, with Europe and Asia leading the charge. These statistics not only provide a lens into the consumption habits of various cultures but also reflect the agronomic capacities of the regions delineated.
Sample 7:
The data sets provided offer a thorough comparison of the consumption and production of potatoes in five parts of the world in 2006, affording a granular view into regional agricultural practices and dietary preferences.
At the macro level, Europe distinguishes itself with the highest per capita potato consumption, while Asia and Europe together outpace other regions in production by a considerable margin. These overarching trends indicate a stark variance in potato-related dietary staples and agricultural yield across the continents.
Drilling down, we see Europeans leading the consumption stakes with an average individual devouring 96.1 kilograms of potatoes in the aforementioned year. North America follows suit with a substantial but lesser figure of 57.9 kilograms, signalling a sizeable gap between the first and second rankings. Conversely, Asia, despite its heavyweight title in potato production at 131.2 million tonnes, sees a relatively modest per capita consumption of 25.8 kilograms. The data further delineates a descending scale of consumption, with South and Central America and Africa at 23.6 and 14.1 kilograms per person, respectively.
On the production front, Europe's bountiful harvest of 126.3 million tonnes closely tails Asia's, suggesting a competitive agrarian output. Meanwhile, North America, Africa, and South and Central America present lower production figures, reflecting a global agricultural landscape where Europe and Asia are the predominant potato producers. The statistics not only shed light on regional consumption patterns but also underscore the disparities in agricultural efficiency and focus across the continents.
Sample 8:
The tables illustrate the consumption and production of potatoes in five regions of the world in 2006.
Overall, Asia and Europe were the primary potato producers, while Europe and North America had the highest consumption rates.
In terms of consumption, Europe led with 96.1 kg of potatoes consumed per person, followed by North America at 57.9 kg. Asia and South and Central America showed similar consumption levels, with 25.8 kg and 23.6 kg respectively. Africa had the lowest consumption, with an average of 14.1 kg per person annually.
Regarding production, Asia and Europe dominated, producing approximately 131 and 126 million tonnes respectively. North America, though third in rank, produced only 24.7 million tonnes, about one-fifth of Europe's output. South and Central America, along with Africa, were significantly lower, each producing around 16 million tonnes, nearly one-eighth of Europe's production.
Sample 9:
The table illustrates the quantity of potatoes consumed and produced in five world regions in 2006. Overall, European residents consumed the highest level of this produce, while Asia was the primary producer of potatoes among the surveyed areas.
Regarding consumption per individual, the level of potatoes incorporated into each European resident's diet was 96.1 kg, followed by North America at nearly 58 kg. Furthermore, the figures for South and Central America combined and Asia were fairly comparable at around 24 kg, whereas Africa was the lowest at 14.1 kg.
Turning to production level, despite exhibiting a modest consumption number, Asia cultivated a remarkably large quantity of potatoes at 131.2 million tonnes. Moreover, Europe ranked second at 126.3 million tonnes. The remaining regions produced significantly lower levels of potatoes, with the highest among those being North America at just 24.7 million tonnes. Finally, the outputs of South and Central America combined and Africa were relatively similar at approximately 16 million tonnes.
Sample 10:
The tables present data on potato consumption and production in five regions globally in 2006, covering both average consumption per person and the total production for each area.
Overall, Europe displayed the highest consumption per individual, whereas Asia led in total amount of potato produced. On the other hand, Africa recorded the lowest figures in both categories, underlining distinct regional differences.
Regarding individual consumption, Europe outpaced all other regions, with 96.1 kg per person, nearly double that of North America, which came in second at 57.9 kg. Asia followed with a moderate figure of 25.8 kg per person, slightly ahead of South and Central America at 23.6 kg. Africa had the smallest figure, with only 14.1 kg per person.
Turning to total production, Asia ranked first with 131.2 million tonnes, narrowly surpassing Europe’s 126.3 million tonnes. North America consumed a significantly smaller amount, at 24.7 million tonnes, followed by South and Central America with 15.6 million tonnes. Africa had the lowest overall production statistics, at just 16.4 million tonnes.
Sample 11:
The tables provide information about the consumption of potatoes per person (in kilograms) and the production of potatoes (in million tonnes) across five regions of the world in 2006.
Overall, Europe had the highest consumption of potatoes per person, while Asia and Europe were the leading producers. In contrast, Africa had the lowest consumption per capita and also produced relatively low quantities compared to other regions.
In terms of consumption, Europe was the largest consumer, with each person eating an average of 96.1 kg of potatoes in 2006. North America followed, with 57.9 kg per person. The consumption figures for South & Central America and Asia were similar, at 23.6 kg and 25.8 kg per person, respectively. Africa, however, had the lowest consumption, with only 14.1 kg per person.
When it comes to production, Asia was the largest producer, generating 131.2 million tonnes of potatoes. Europe was the second-largest producer with 126.3 million tonnes. North America produced significantly less, with 24.7 million tonnes, while Africa and South & Central America produced relatively small amounts, at 16.4 million tonnes and 15.6 million tonnes, respectively.
Sample 12:
The provided tables present an overview of potato consumption and production across five global regions in the year 2006.
Overall, Europe led in potato consumption, whereas Africa had the lowest consumption figures. In contrast, Asia was the largest producer of potatoes, while South and Central America recorded the smallest production volumes.
In terms of potato consumption, Europe stood out with the highest per capita intake at 96.1 kilograms, far surpassing other regions. North America followed as the second highest, with an average consumption of 57.9 kilograms per person. In contrast, Africa exhibited the lowest consumption rates, at just 14.1 kilograms per capita. South and Central America and Asia had comparable consumption figures at 23.6 kilograms and 25.8 kilograms, respectively, highlighting a moderate dietary reliance on potatoes in these regions.
Regarding potato production, Asia emerged as the predominant producer, cultivating an impressive 131.2 million tonnes of potatoes in 2006. Europe closely followed, with a substantial production of 126.3 million tonnes, which emphasized its role as a significant contributor in this sector. South and Central America produced 15.6 million tonnes, slightly less than Africa with 16.4 million tonnes. North America, while having a relatively high consumption rate, reflected a lesser production figure of 24.7 million tonnes, indicating a reliance on imports or other sources for its high potato consumption.
Sample 13:
The tables present data on potato consumption and production across various regions of the world in 2006.
Overall, Europe had the highest per capita consumption of potatoes, although its production was slightly lower than that of Asia and Oceania, which emerged as the top producers. In contrast, South and Central America, along with Africa, recorded the lowest levels of both consumption and production.
In terms of potato consumption, Europe led in 2006, with an average consumption of 96.1 kilograms per capita (kg/capita). North America followed, with a figure of 57.9 kg/capita, which was almost twice the consumption level of both the Asia/Oceania region and South and Central America, each of which consumed around 25 kg/capita. Africa had the lowest consumption rate, with only 14.1 kg/capita.
Regarding production, Asia/Oceania was the largest producer, with a total output of 131.2 million tonnes (Mt). Although Europe consumed the most potatoes, it ranked second in production, generating 126.3 Mt. In contrast, North America, Africa, and South and Central America had the lowest production levels, with figures ranging between 15 and 25 Mt each.
In summary, while Europe stood out as the highest consumer of potatoes, Asia and Oceania surpassed other regions in production. Africa and South and Central America exhibited the lowest figures in both categories.
Sample 14:
The tables given above describe the information about the consumption and production of potatoes in five different locations of the world in the year 2006.
Based on the two tables, it is clearly understood that the largest producer of potatoes is Asia and the European population is at the top position in consuming potatoes.
From the first table, data shows that North America is the second largest consumer where people intake nearly 58 kilograms of potatoes. As already mentioned, European people consume 96. 1 kilogram of potatoes which is the highest compared to the other four countries in 2006.
According to the second table chart, South and Central America are the lowest potato producers while people there consume 23. 6 kilograms of potatoes. Europe is the second largest producer while Asia remains the first place in potato production. Furthermore, Asia and Europe are the major potato producers in the year 2006.
Sample 15:
The tables provided illustrate a comparative overview of potato consumption and production across five global regions in 2006. A notable contrast emerges, with Europe and North America leading in consumption, while Asia and Europe are at the forefront of production.
In terms of consumption, Europe is the highest consumer, with an average per capita intake of 96.1 kilograms. Following closely, North America registers a per person consumption of 57.9 kilograms. Asia and South and Central America display similar consumption figures, averaging 25.8 and 23.6 kilograms per capita, respectively. Africa, on the other hand, has the lowest consumption rate at just 14.1 kilograms, which is significantly less than that of the other regions.
Regarding production, Asia and Europe emerge as the leading producers, generating approximately 131 million and 126 million tonnes, respectively. In contrast, North America's production is considerably lower, amounting to 24.7 million tonnes. South and Central America and Africa together contribute around 16 million tonnes, which is roughly one-eighth of Europe's output.
Sample 16:
The tables illustrate the consumption and production of potatoes in five different regions of the world in 2006. The first table shows the average consumption per person in kilograms, while the second table provides the total potato consumption in million tonnes.
Overall, Europe had the highest average potato consumption per person, while Asia consumed the largest quantity in total. Africa, on the other hand, showed the lowest figures in both categories.
In terms of per capita consumption, Europe led significantly with 96.1 kg per person, almost double that of North America, which had the second-highest consumption at 57.9 kg. Asia, despite having a large population, had a relatively low average consumption of 25.8 kg per person, followed by South and Central America at 23.6 kg. Africa had the lowest individual potato consumption at 14.1 kg per person.
When it comes to total potato consumption, Asia topped the list with 131.2 million tonnes, which was marginally higher than Europe's total of 126.3 million tonnes. North America consumed much less in total at 24.7 million tonnes, and South and Central America followed closely behind with 15.6 million tonnes. Africa consumed the least amount overall, at just 16.4 million tonnes.
Sample 17:
The two tables delineate the average consumption of potatoes per person and total production volumes across five continents in the globe, measured in 2006.
It is discernible that potato was a staple in Europe, which led in the per capita potato consumption, while the highest production of this food was recorded in Asia.
In terms of consumption, European nationals were the largest potato consumers, with 96.1 kilograms per head, a pronounced margin ahead of the second largest figure belonging to North America, averaging 57.8 kilograms per person. In this year, Asia and South and Central America presented a relatively identical potato consumption, at 25.8 and 23.6 kilograms per capita respectively. The lowest intake was in Africa, where each national consumed a mere 14.1 kilograms of potatoes on average.
Shifting focus on potato production, the lion’s share was shown in Asia, at 131.2 million tonnes of potatoes in 2006, closely followed by Europe’s output at 126.3 million tonnes. In stark contrast, North America produced 24.7 million tonnes, and Africa and South and Central America yielded low outputs of 16.4 and 15.6 million tonnes, respectively.
Sample 18:
The table information gives data on potato utilization and generation in completely different parts of the world in 2006. By and large, normal potato admissions in Europe were the most noteworthy whereas Asia and Europe were the major potato makers in 2006.
As the information recommends, a normal European ate marginally over 96 kilograms of potato in 2006 which was higher than the potato utilization in other parts of the world. With a general 58 kg potato utilization per individual in 2006, North America stood at the moment-beat position. Asia, in spite of its most noteworthy potato aggregation, accounted for generally 26 kg per individual potato admissions. South and Central American citizens ate more than 23 kg per person whereas the slightest potato utilization might be observed in Africa, at over 14 kg per African.
Asian nations delivered over 131 million tons of potatoes in 2006 which was altogether higher than the potato development in Africa and America. Europe's potato collection was the moment biggest, roughly 5 million tons less than that of Asia. It is worth taking note that Asia and Europe were the foremost potato cultivators in 2006.
Sample 19:
The table information outlines per individual potato utilization and adds up to the generation of this edit in five distinctive locales within the world- South and Central America, Africa, North America, Europe, and Asia, in 2016. Agreeing to the data given, Europeans ate more potatoes than the citizens of other locales on a normal basis and Asia collected the biggest number of potatoes in 2016.
In points of interest, Europeans were the chief buyers of potatoes in 2006 as each European ate 96.1 kilograms of potatoes. At that point, North America and Asia taken after the moment and the third most noteworthy customer list of this trim, 57.9 and 25.8 kg per individual admission individually. It is curious to note that a normal European devoured nearly the same number of potatoes as a North American and nearly four times higher than that of an Asian citizen. The utilization in Africa was the slightest, about 14 kg per individual whereas it was 23.6 kg in South and Central America.
Moreover, Asia delivered the most elevated number of potatoes, 131.2 million tons in spite of their lower utilization rate. Europe developed over 126 million tons of potato and these two districts were the most potato makers in 2006.
Sample 20:
The tables outline the sum of potatoes which have been devoured and created by five diverse landmasses in 2006. Units are measured in kg per individual for utilization and million tons for generation.
In general, with respect to the utilization, it can be seen that Europe had the most noteworthy information among the other places, whereas the most reduced admissions had been experienced by Africa. In terms of generation, the major potato makers were Europe and Asia.
In 2006, 14.1 kg per individual of potatoes were eaten in Africa, followed by South and Central America and Asia which accounted for 23.6kg and 25.8 kg separately. At that point, North America has come to 57.9 kg, succeeded by Europe which has detailed the foremost pertinent esteem of 96.1kg.
With respect to the makers, South and Central America with Africa have displayed comparable information (15.6 and 16.4 million tons separately), as well as North America has contributed 24.7 million tons. Europe has delivered 126.3 million tons of potatoes, compared to Asia, which has collected 131.2million tons.
Sample 21:
The tables provide data on potato consumption (in kilograms per person) and production (in tonnes) across five world regions in 2006.
Overall, Europe had the highest per capita potato consumption, while Asia/Oceania led in production. Africa showed the lowest figures for both consumption and production.
In terms of consumption, Europeans consumed significantly more potatoes per person (96.1 kg) than any other region, followed by North America with 57.9 kg per person. Asia/Oceania and South and Central America had similar consumption levels, at 25.8 kg and 23.6 kg, respectively. Africa had the lowest consumption, at just 14.1 kg per person.
For production, Asia/Oceania was the leading producer, generating 131.2 million tonnes, slightly surpassing Europe, which produced 126.3 million tonnes. North America followed at a distant third with 24.7 million tonnes. South and Central America and Africa had the smallest production levels, at 15.6 million and 16.4 million tonnes, respectively.
It is notable that Europe, despite its high consumption, produced slightly less than Asia/Oceania. Similarly, Africa had the lowest potato consumption and one of the lowest production figures, reflecting a minimal reliance on potatoes in the region. In contrast, Asia/Oceania, with moderate consumption, dominated production. This disparity indicates variations in regional reliance on potatoes as a staple food.
Sample 22:
The table chart illustrates information about the potato consumption and production in different parts of the world in 2006.
On analyzing the data, it is clear that an average European ate a little over 96 kg of potatoes in 2006, which was higher than potato consumption in other parts of the world. North America ranked second, with a per capita consumption of about 58 kg of potatoes in 2006. Asia, despite its highest potato accumulation, consumes about 26 kg of potatoes per person. South and Central American citizens ate more than 23 kg per person, while the lowest potato consumption can be seen in Africa, only 14 kg per African.
Asian countries produced over 131 million tonnes potato in 2006 which was significantly higher than the potato growth in Africa and the America. Europe’s potato harvesting was the second largest, approximately 5 million tonnes less than that of Asia. It is worth noticing that Asia and Europe were the principal potato producers in 2006.
Overall, it is crystal clear that the average potato consumption in Europe was the highest, while Asia and Europe were the major potato producers in 2006.
Sample 23:
The given tables compare the yield of potatoes in million tonnes with the consumption in kg per person in 2006 in five regions of the world, which are South and Central America, Africa, North America, Europe and Asia, in 2006. It is clear that expect for the Americas, the production of potatoes outstripped the consumption in all other areas.
The production of potatoes was the highest in Europe and Asia at around 130 million tonnes each. The production in all other regions was between 15 and 25 million tonnes. However, as far as the consumption is concerned, the Europeans seemed to be the fondest of potatoes, eating about 96 kg per person. North America took the second place in the consumption at just below 60 kg per person. People of South and Central America and Asia ate around 25 kg per person, but the Africans were the least fond of potatoes, consuming approximately 14 kg per person in 2006.
Overall, in North America, the production was less than half the consumption whereas in Asia the production was six times more than the consumption.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Everyone has different dreams when it comes to where they wish to live. Personally, I think it is very desirable to live in a large city. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, cities offer a great environment for raising children, and I am a person who values family above all else. Urban areas have numerous parks and recreation centers which encourage children to lead vital and healthy lives, and they also have well-funded community centers which contribute to the intellectual development of young people. My own experience demonstrates the value of such facilities. Both my husband and I work full time jobs and are not home when our two sons finish school. This is not a problem, though, as both of them go directly to a local community center when their classes are over. Our eldest son participates in a computer club there, while our youngest son practices photography. Their participation in these programs sets my mind at ease, as without access to the community center they would just sit at home all alone. This situation compares favorably to a friend of mine who lives in a small town and recently had to hire an expensive babysitter to watch her children when they get home from school, as she was not able to locate any meaningful activities for them to take part in.
Secondly, large cities offer cultural experiences that adults can enjoy and appreciate. Most major cities have a plethora of museums, ethnic restaurants, libraries, theater groups and other stimulating and cosmopolitan facilities. My city is no exception. For instance, my colleagues and I spend every Friday evening visiting a new ethnic restaurant for dinner. Over the past three months we have enjoyed food from more than a dozen different national cuisines. Meanwhile, my sons and I go to a different museum once a month and I have found that I enjoy our visits almost as much as they do. These are the sort of outings that are only possible in a heavily populated urban area. Small towns offer easy access to beautiful natural scenery, but I prefer the intellectual and cultural stimulation that my city offers.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that living in a large city is preferable to living in a small town. This is because cities are better places to raise children, and because they offer stimulating intellectual and cultural experience that grown-ups can enjoy.
Sample 2:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city, so I have experienced the good and bad
sides of both. I never thought that I would like to live in a big city, but I was wrong. After ten years of living in one, I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Small towns and big cities both have some problems in terms of transportation. In a small town, you have to own a car to ensure comfortable living. You can't get around without one because
there isn't any kind of public transportation. Big cities generally have heavy traffic and expensive
parking, but there you have a choice of taking public transportation. It's not free, but it's often cheaper than driving when you consider gas and time. Especially if you don't have a car, you're
better off in the city.
I love the excitement of big cities. Small towns have a slow pace. Large cities mean you have to
adapt to a variety of situations, like finding a new route to work or trying a new restaurant. I enjoy that challenge very much. Another source of the excitement of city living is the variety of cultural activities available. There is a wide assortment of theatre, music and dance performances
available in big cities. These things are rare in small ones.
The final thing I like about large cities is the diversity of the people. The United States is made up of people of different races, religions, abilities, and interests. However, you seldom find such a variety of people in a smaller town. I think that living in an area where everyone was just like me would quickly become boring.
Of course, security is a concern, and that's one area where small towns are superior to big cities.
Still, I would rather be a bit more cautious and live in a large city than feel secure but bored.
Sample 3:
Where should we live? Some may choose to live in big cities, while others like the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside. As far as I am concerned, I would like to live in a big city because living in a big city has more advantages than living in the countryside.
To begin with, the city is the symbol of human civilization and there are many facilities for living, recreation and health care. Therefore, living there is more convenient than living in countryside. For example, we can find plenty of malls around our neighborhood, where we can buy everyday necessities at a low price. Furthermore, people are more concerned about their health and safety than other things in their lives. In big cities, medical facilities and emergency services are more easily accessible than in the countryside. Big cities also have convenient transportation and utility systems. They also offer faster Internet connections. These all make our life easier in big cities.
In addition, we can take part in a variety of events in big cities. Human beings like to live together and need to interact with each other. In a big city, the population density is high therefore there are always plenty of social activities, sports events and concerts. There are more recreational places in big cities, such as opera houses, movie theatres, clubs, and swimming pools. You will have many kinds of entertainment in big cities and meet many people. In the countryside, however, life may be dull and quiet, and you may only have a few neighbors. Living alone with few activities can easily cause mental diseases.
Some may argue that the pollution in cities makes people sick. However, with automobiles and modern highways we can easily take a break to expose ourselves to fresh air in the countryside and sunshine on the beach.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that living in big cities is much better than living in countryside because of the advanced facilities and social activities in cities. Moreover, the autos and highways
enable us to enjoy the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside.
Sample 4:
In our modern world, people have different opinions on where the best place would be to live, and many argue that living in a small town is the ideal location, while others argue that living in a big city is preferred. Both places have their benefits and drawbacks, but I would prefer to live in a big city. This is because big cities offer diverse job opportunities, cultural experiences, and convenient amenities.
Big cities have a broader range of job opportunities than small towns. In a big city, one will have a chance to secure a job in various sectors and pursue a career. Many big companies and industries are typically located in larger cities, which means that job seekers have plenty of options. Moreover, a big city offers numerous opportunities for growth, as one can change jobs and pursue their passion. The job market in big cities also offers higher salaries and better benefits. Hence, for those who want to make a radicle career change and those who want to earn a decent living, a big city is the ideal place to live.
Cultural experiences are another reason why I prefer to live in a big city. Big cities offer diverse and unique cultural experiences that small towns
cannot, such as trying new foods and attending cultural festivals. In big cities, there is always a movie or a theatre show to attend, a concert or sporting event to watch, a museum or an art gallery to visit. The diversity of cultural experiences in big cities provides people with various opportunities to learn and broaden their horizons, which is an enriching experience.
Convenient amenities are also reasons why I prefer to live in big cities. Cities are often equipped with modern infrastructure. Cities have better medical facilities, public transportation systems, and essential services like banks and grocery stores. Big cities have a good public transportation system that is well-planned and suitable for people who do not own private cars. People in big cities have access to modern medical facilities with well-trained medical specialists.
Despite the benefits, big cities have some drawbacks. One of the most significant drawbacks is the high cost of living. Housing and rent are expensive in larger cities compared to small towns. Moreover, noise pollution and air pollution are common in big cities. Residents must always be aware of their surrounding environments to protect themselves from the effects of pollution. Additionally, congestion and crowding are other issues that plague many big city neighborhoods.
In conclusion, while big cities have their issues, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Big cities offer more job opportunities, an array of cultural experiences, and convenient amenities. Therefore, for me, getting the chance to live and experience all of this makes living in a big city very appealing.
Sample 5:
People seldom agree with one another, even on such trivial issues as the preference between living in a big city and a small town. It’s a bit hasty to claim that it is better to live in a big city than in a small town, or vice versa.
Living in a big city has several benefits. First, there are more job opportunities readily available in big cities compared to small towns. Furthermore, not only are there more job positions in big cities, but the quality of these positions is much higher as well. In addition, the pay is often more competitive.
Second, children are likely to receive a higher-quality education compared to their counterparts in small towns. For families, children’s education is always a top priority.
Finally, big cities generally offer a superior overall standard of living compared to small towns. There are more commodities and services available in city markets, more public utilities, and even a greater variety of television channels.
However, living in a small town also has its advantages. People in small towns often enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle. Most are free from the high work-related stress common in big cities. Although the average pay is lower, the cost of daily necessities, such as vegetables and meat, is usually more affordable.
Instead of experiencing the loneliness often prevalent in big cities, children in small towns may grow up more healthily due to harmonious relationships among residents. People in small towns don’t have to wake up as early in the morning, as there are no traffic jams, and drivers tend to be more cautious, reducing the likelihood of accidents. While they may have fewer television channels, they have more friends readily available for socializing and entertainment.
As for my current situation, although I long for the cozy atmosphere and close relationships among neighbors and friends, which are often unique to small towns, I have chosen to live in one of the biggest cities in my country - Beijing. This is because I have found a good job here with a decent salary. I think I would prefer living in a small town when I retire one day.
Sample 6:
In English, there is a well-known fairy tale about a poor country boy, Dick Whittington, who goes to London believing that the streets of the city are “paved with gold.” The story is a classic “rags to riches” tale. Dick eventually becomes the Lord Mayor of London. Like the hero of that story, I always find wonder and adventure in cities.
Cities contain a fascinating assortment of people. Whenever I walk around a shopping precinct at midday on a weekend, I am captivated by the variety of individuals hurrying through the shops. Sometimes, I simply sit on a public bench and observe the diverse streams of shoppers passing by.
Today, in the age of globe-trotting transport and advanced communication, city life is more diverse than ever. Capital cities are now highly cosmopolitan and eager to attract foreign trade and currency. There is a contemporary English joke that says, “You can never find an Englishman in London.”
Whether rightly or wrongly, governments and local authorities tend to prioritize building public amenities in big cities. Money is invested in transportation, libraries, parks, and museums. Often, countries compete to construct the most impressive “showcase” buildings. For example, Malaysia has built a skyscraper taller than anything in New York. Similarly, within large countries, regions compete with each other: New York against Chicago, Shanghai against Hong Kong, or Beijing.
All of this benefits city dwellers. The magic of the Dick Whittington story is rekindled in me whenever I enter a library housed in a magnificent building. For university students studying art or music, large cities often offer galleries and public performances. Even as a teenager, I appreciated living in a city because it gave me the opportunity to attend rock concerts by my favorite bands several times a year.
Architecture shapes the urban landscape. For those who appreciate it, a city can be as visually exciting as the Himalayas. A modern metropolis resembles a mountain range with its height, light, and solidness. At the same time, old buildings add to its charm - quaint, unspoiled side streets, or shops and homes from distant ages. Even someone who spends their entire life in one large city could continue discovering its architectural secrets well into old age.
Humans are “social animals.” They talk, interact, and create. Cities provide libraries, universities, and café bars where people can meet and share ideas with others of their kind.
Sample 7:
Some people would like to live in a small town because the surroundings could be more picturesque, and people are friendlier compared to people in a big city. However, in my opinion, living in a big city is more effective and beneficial based on the following reasons.
First, living in a big city is convenient. Thanks to public transportation, any place in a big city is usually accessible. Without driving, you have many options among buses, trains and subway. Taxis are also available on almost every corner of the city. Besides, it is easy to find a restaurant or food stands in your neighborhood within walking distance whenever you are hungry. There are also convenience stores all over, so city residents can buy any stuff easily at any time without bothering to drive to a certain place to get what they need. Convenience is the best what a city can offer while a small town is less likely to.
In addition, a big city provides more education opportunities. The residents have easier access to schools and education resources, so do they to faculty and advanced facilities. Take teachers for example, they are willing to teach in a big city because of the better salary and there are more resources they need available in libraries and related institutes when they want to go further to sharpen their teaching skills. Similarly, when children plan to take some talented courses such as piano, art, and the like, a city with more options and business activities is where parents want their children to live and grow.
Here is another perfect example to illustrate my preference of a city. I used to be a volunteer in an elementary school in a small town. Although the town was lovely and clean, there was some inconvenience caused in daily life. First, less bus service was provided, so people usually had no choice but to wait a long time to take the bus. Second, restaurants and food stands were all closed after nine o’clock, so it’s hard to find something to eat if you are hungry late in the evening. Lastly, teachers in the elementary school might need to teach many courses with different subjects, when necessary, because of a lack of faculty, that is, an English teacher could be asked to teach math or science as well. Also, the facilities in the classroom and the science lab were old- fashioned. From my observation, people can live peacefully in a small town but actually there are more opportunities and availability a big city can offer.
Last but not least, infrastructure and public services are usually prominently featured in a big city. When I want to exercise on a rainy day, I can go to the sport center without worrying about places to go. In contrast, I might be trapped at home in a small town in the same situation. Besides, public services like medical care and care centers are fully developed for people with a pressing need. Libraries also provide better book circulation and activities to cater for their readers, which is not very likely to take place in a town with the number of people which is small. For people who like tranquility and secure, small towns are the best choice. However, for those who prefer economic prosperity, a variety of things to do, places to go and activities to join, the better choice is in a big city. I happen to be the one who prefers the latter and enjoys the lives in it.
Sample 8:
It is crucial to choose a place which suits you to live because where you live has influence over the quality of your life and happiness. Compared to those who prefer to live in a small town with a quiet environment, living in a big city to take advantage of the modern conveniences that it can offer is my choice.
First of all, the public transportation system is one of amenities people can benefit from. Big cities usually provide a well-developed transportation network, such as bus, train, subway and airport, so people in the city have very easy access to the vehicles that can help them reach any destination they want to. In contrast, the convenience of public transportation is usually not found in a small town, where people might tend to drive or use other means of transport to get about.
Besides, there are more opportunities for either finding a job or taking education. With a larger population, more jobs are available for everyone to find than those in the countryside. Take where I live for example, although the job market is very competitive, university graduates often move to Taipei, which is the major city in Taiwan. If you need to develop a skill, it is also likely that you will achieve it and then get a job successfully. More importantly, there are also more educational opportunities and a lot of different courses and institutions available. There is always availability of learning something new or developing practical skills in a big city.
Furthermore, cities can provide a variety of entertainment options every day. There is always something fun to do in a big city to keep people of all different interests from getting bored. Cities provide a lively nightlife, all types of shows, museums and sports facilities. Additionally, you will be able to connect with other people who share the same hobbies at different events.
While the lifestyle in a small town is less stressful, the city lifestyle has a lot of opportunities for people. Personally, I prefer to live in a big city which offers a variety of many options. In the meanwhile, I like the energy and the convenience in a big city. City life can have many positive impacts compared to rural life.
Sample 9:
There are many differences between living in a big city and a small town. Therefore, we must choose based on our personal preferences and needs. If you prefer a calm and peaceful environment, small towns are suitable for you. However, if you want to develop yourself, big cities are the best places to learn and acquire skills essential for your future.
In life, the most important thing for everyone is, of course, health. If someone’s health deteriorates, they might lose everything they have. Small towns often provide a healthier environment. You can enjoy peaceful rivers, mountains, abundant greenery, and a clear night sky filled with stars. Life there is calm and free from the excessive noise of big cities, as the population and number of cars are much smaller. However, living in a small town can mean missing out on global news, fashion trends, and other advancements.
On the other hand, living in a big city provides more opportunities for personal growth and the chance to enhance your competitive skills. Over time, this can help you establish your own identity and attitude in society. People in big cities are often motivated to work hard to support their families. However, city life comes with challenges, such as air pollution and waste management issues. If we do not address these problems, they could have serious consequences for our future.
In conclusion, small towns offer comfort and tranquility, while big cities are dynamic and full of opportunities. Personally, I would choose to live in a big city first to improve myself. Later, when I want to rest and prioritize my health, I would move to the countryside or a small town.
I hope you can choose the place that best suits your needs and appeals to you.
Sample 10:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city. I didn't think I would like to live here, but I was wrong. I think life is much better in a big city. Transportation is much more convenient, everything is more exciting, and there is a greater variety of people. I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Transportation is easier in a city. In a small town, you have to have a car to get around because there isn't any kind of public transportation. In a city, on the other hand, there are usually buses and taxis, and some cities have subways. Cities often have heavy traffic, and expensive parking, but it doesn't matter because you can always take the bus. Using public transportation is usually cheaper and more convenient than driving a car, but you don't have this choice in a small town.
City life is more exciting than small town life. In small towns usually nothing changes. You see the same people every day, you go to the same two or three restaurants, everything is the same. In a city things change all the time. You see new people every day. There are many restaurants, with new ones to choose from all the time. New plays come to the theaters and new musicians come to the concert halls.
Cities have a diversity of people that you don't find in a small town. There are much fewer people in a small town and usually they are all alike. In a city you can find people from different countries, of different religions, of different races - you can find all kinds of people. This variety of people is what makes city life interesting.
Life in a city is convenient, exciting, and interesting. After experiencing city life, I could never live in a small town again.
Sample 11:
If you were asked to choose between living in a big city or a small town, where would you prefer to live? Some people might choose to live in a small town because the environment is cleaner, and it fosters closer relationships with others. This suggests that living in a small town has its benefits. However, I believe there are three key reasons why living in a big city is more advantageous.
First, living in a big city provides greater opportunities to gain advanced knowledge and develop oneself. In contrast, the range of educational options in a small town is often limited. Furthermore, the presence of many students in a city creates a competitive environment that encourages us to work harder. While education may not be the only important aspect of life, it remains essential because we rely on knowledge throughout our lifetime.
Second, living in a city allows us to meet more people and adapt to society more easily. For example, interacting with diverse individuals helps us learn about their personalities and characteristics. Building relationships and making friends in a city can greatly benefit us as we grow older. By communicating with people in a big city, we gain a better understanding of how society functions and what we need to do to thrive. Therefore, city life prepares us to navigate societal challenges more effectively.
Lastly, living in a big city offers more job opportunities. Securing employment is a crucial aspect of life, and cities typically provide a wider variety of workplaces, such as companies, factories, and universities. For instance, becoming a professor is more achievable in a city where universities are abundant. In contrast, small towns cannot guarantee the same level of employment opportunities.
In conclusion, while small towns have advantages like friendlier communities and a cleaner environment, I believe living in a big city is more beneficial. Cities offer better educational opportunities, greater chances to meet people and adapt to society, and more job prospects. For these reasons, I would prefer living in a big city over a small town.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
500 bài Đọc hiểu ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 21)