The graph below gives information about computer possession by households in one European country between 1997 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The graph below gives information about computer possession by households in one European country between 1997 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
The line graph shows computer ownership statistics per household in a particular European country from 1997 to 2011. Overall, single-computer households were most common for the majority of the period. Meanwhile, there was a distinct downward trend in the percentage of households without any computers, contrasted by corresponding rises in households possessing two or more computers.
During the period shown, the rate of families owning only one computer hovered around the 45% mark, remaining the highest from 1999 onwards.
Meanwhile, households without a computer showed a marked decrease. In 1997, they constituted around 60% of the population, but by 2011, their figure had more than halved.
In contrast, around 7% of households possessed two computers at the beginning of the timeframe, after which the figure grew considerably, overtaking that of those without a computer in 2010 and ending at nearly 30%. While starting from nearly zero in the first few years, households with three or more computers saw a similar, albeit slower increase, reaching roughly 8% in the final year.
Sample 2:
The given graph illustrates the percentage of families with computers in Europe from 1997 to 2011.
From a glance, it can be seen that it was less likely for a household not to have a computer than it was at the beginning of the period. Moreover, it had been highly common for each of them to have a computing device.
In 1997, about half of the European population did not have a computer at home. This figure steadily fell to just under a third in 2006 (30%) before experiencing a minimal recovery to 35% in the next year. It continued to gradually decline and hit its lowest point of 20% in 2011. Meanwhile, the percentage of households with only one computer remained relatively unchanged at 45% throughout the period.
In contrast, the portion of European families with two or three computers underwent an upward trend. At the beginning. 5% of them had two devices. The data doubled the next year, followed by a period of stability which lasted till 2000. It surged to 25% within five years and after that, soared to 30% in 2011. Similarly, the percentage of households with three computers, which was not presented in the 1990s, slowly rose to 5% in 2005. There was a moderate growth of another 5% in this figure during the final years.
Sample 3:
The line chart illustrates computer possession per household in a European nation from 1997 to 2011.
It is evident that computer ownership notably ascended during this period. The majority of households had only one computer, while a modest percentage possessed three or more.
In 1997, the highest proportion of households, approximately 47%, did not own a computer, but this sharply declined to around 20% by the end of the period. Conversely, households with just one computer commenced at approximately 43% in 1997, remained relatively stable throughout the years, and concluded at 45% by 2011. This category consistently represented the largest share of computer ownership over the 1999-2011 time frame.
Regarding two-computer ownership, the figure was significantly lower, amounting to 7% in 1997, and gradually progressed, overtaking the percentage of households with no computers around 2010, to culminate in approximately 30% in 2011. Concurrently, ownership of three or more computers began at a mere 1% in 1997 and also saw a modest rise, reaching around 8% by the conclusion of the period. Despite the increase, the possession of three or more computers remained relatively rare in this nation.
Sample 4:
The line chart provides statistics regarding computer ownership from families in a nation in Europe, from 1997 to 2011. Overall, the proportion of households who possessed at least one computer increased, whereas that of families that did not own a computer showed a reverse trend. Additionally, the rate of three or more computer owners was constantly the lowest.
Regarding the categories that started with the highest, the share of households that did not have a computer in 1997 was approximately half then dropped significantly to 30% in 2007, before it finished at roughly 20%. The proportion of families that owned only one computer started at approximately 43% and witnessed minimal fluctuations over the period, before finishing at 45% in the end.
Concerning the remaining categories, around 7% of households possessed two computers in 1997. The figure then ascended gradually and ended at nearly 30%, after overtaking that of no computer owners sometime around 2010. Finally, in 1997, it was rare for a family in this nation to possess three computers; nevertheless, by 2011, this proportion had moderately risen to approximately 8%.
Sample 5:
The provided illustration depicts how the ownership of computers per family in a European country changed from 1997 to 2011.
Overall, despite experiencing fluctuations at different levels, there were upward trends in the percentages of households owning a single computer, two computers, and three or more computers, but a downward trend in the proportion of households without this electronic device.
Commencing with computer ownership per household in 1997, one striking feature is that almost no families had three or more devices. The highest percentage was among households without any, at over 46%, followed by households with a computer and those with two, at just under 45% and approximately 5%, respectively.
A following observation reveals that the percentage of families with a solitary computer exhibited subtle fluctuations, concluding the period at precisely 45%, emerging as the predominant category among the four. In contrast, households with two computers and three or more, following a consistent pattern throughout the given timeframe, gradually rose to around 25% and 5%, respectively. Notably, only in two years between 2009 and 2011, did the former surpass the number of families without computers, becoming the second most prevalent group in the survey. Conversely, the figures for households without any computers saw a significant decline of about a third over the 14-year span, claiming its position as the third most ubiquitous category.
Sample 6:
The line graph shows changing trends in computer ownership in an unspecified country in Europe from 1997 to 2011. Overall, computer ownership increased significantly during this period and there was an increasing trend for households to have more than one computer. In addition, one-computer possession was generally the dominant category throughout.
At the beginning of this period, in 1991, computer ownership was uncommon in this country in Europe, with slightly under 45% of the population having one computer only and just over 5% of households owning two computers. However, the situation changed quite rapidly over the next 6 years and by 2003, the percentage of households without computers had dropped significantly, falling from around 50% to 35%, while roughly 15% had two computers.
Over the next 8 years, from 2003 to 2011, single-computer families remained relatively stable at around 45%. In contrast, the percentage of households who did not possess a computer continued to fall, albeit slightly more sharply.
This continued decline corresponded with increases in the ownership of multiple computers, with owning two computers rising to marginally below 30% in 2011, while three or more computers accounted for close to 10%. Notably, households having two computers increased to a greater degree than three or more computers during this period, and the trend for three or more did not begin until the early 2000s.
Sample 7:
The given chart illustrates the changes in computer ownership among households in a European country from 1997 to 2011.
Overall, a shift from a significant lack of ownership in 1997 to a landscape in 2011 where a substantial portion of households owned not just one, but multiple computers. Also evident is that households with a single computer retained the majority share despite the growing prevalence of dual or more devices.
At the start of the period in 1997, nearly half of families did not own any computer. Meanwhile, approximately 45% of households had one computer, a figure nearly quadrupling the percentage of those with two computers. There was a mere 2% of families having three or more computers.
Thereafter, computer-less households exhibited a consistent downward trajectory, ending at approximately 20% in 2011. In stark contrast, the ownership of two computers and three or more computers followed an ascending trend. Notably, the former witnessed a dramatic upswing, peaking at almost 30% in 2011, while the latter experienced a more modest growth, reaching around 10% in the same year. Finally, a relatively stable pattern can be seen in the figure for households with just one computer, hovering around 45% throughout the entire period.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.
In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.
Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.
Sample 2:
The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common.
In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.
In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.
Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.
Sample 3:
The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.
Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.
In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.
In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.
Sample 4:
The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.
At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.
Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.
Sample 5:
The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.
In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.
Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.
Sample 6:
The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.
Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.
Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.
In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo