The table shows the cost of water in five cities in Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The table shows the cost of water in five cities in Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
The table below shows the cost of water in five cities in Australia |
|||
City |
Usage charge per kilolitre (up to 125KL) |
Usage charge per kilolitre (over 125KL) |
Average bill per household |
Adelaide |
$ 0.42 |
$ 1.00 |
$ 312 |
Brisbane |
$ 0.81 |
$ 0.84 |
$ 310 |
Melbourne |
$ 0.78 |
$ 0.78 |
$ 253 |
Perth |
$ 0.42 |
$ 1.50 |
$ 332 |
Sydney |
$ 0.98 |
$ 0.98 |
$ 319 |
Sample 1:
The table details how much residents in five Australian cities are required to pay for water consumption.
A glance at the table reveals that people living in Adelaide and Perth pay the least if they use less than 125KL, or else they pay the most. Another highlight is that households in Perth have the highest average bill for water usage among the five surveyed cities.
Locals in Adelaide and Perth only have to pay $0.42 per kiloliter if they use less than 125KL, roughly half of the price for those of other cities. However, if water use in two aforementioned cities surpasses 125KL, the cost nearly doubles ($1.00) in Adelaide or almost triples ($1.50) in Perth. Residents in Melbourne and Sydney pay the same amount of money, $0.78 and $0.98 respectively, regardless of how much water they use. Brisbane’s people only pay an extra $0.03 if they use more than 125KL.
In general, people residing in Perth have the highest cost of water use, at $332, far exceeding the figures for Sydney ($319), Adelaide ($312) and Brisbane ($310). Households’ spending on water consumption in Melbourne is only $253, the smallest amount recorded among five cities.
Sample 2:
The table illustrates how much water costs across five major urban areas in Australia. Overall, there are increases in usage charges once people in Adelaide, Brisbane, and Perth use more than 125 kiloliters (KL) of water, whereas the other two cities in question maintain consistent water pricing. Additionally, while the highest average water bill per household is recorded in Perth, the opposite is true in the case of Melbourne.
Regarding usage charges for the initial 125 KL, Adelaide and Perth have the cheapest rates, both standing at $0.42. This is in stark contrast to Sydney, as it imposes the highest cost at $0.98 in this category. Meanwhile, a close similarity can be seen in the charges levied by Brisbane and Melbourne, with respective figures of $0.81 and $0.78.
When water usage exceeds 125 KL, water prices in Adelaide and Perth climb approximately twofold and threefold, respectively, making them the most expensive out of the five cities listed. A slight rise of $0.03 is also witnessed in Brisbane, but residents in Sydney and Melbourne still pay the same rates.
Turning to the average water bill, an Australian household living in Perth pays $332, followed by those in Sydney, Adelaide, and Brisbane, with their expenses being around $310. In the last place is Melbourne, where a family spends only $253.
Sample 3:
The table compares unit water prices per kilolitre and average water bills in various Australian cities.
Overall, Perth has the highest water bill, followed closely by Sydney. It is noteworthy that when water consumption exceeds 125KL, Melbourne and Sydney maintain a consistent rate, while other cities apply higher charges.
In terms of unit prices for water usage under 125KL, Sydney has the highest rate at $0.98 per kilolitre. Brisbane and Melbourne follow closely behind at $0.81 and $0.78, respectively. These rates are approximately double those of Adelaide and Perth, which charge only $0.42 per kilolitre.
Regarding charges for consumption exceeding 125KL, Perth imposes the highest rate at $1.50 per kilolitre, which is $0.50 more than Adelaide's rate. Meanwhile, other cities charge approximately $0.78 to $0.98 per kilolitre.
As for the average water bill, Perth residents face the highest expenses, with an average of $332. In contrast, Adelaide, Brisbane, and Sydney residents experience slightly varying bills ranging from $310 to just under $320. Finally, those living in Melbourne have the lowest average bill at $253.
Sample 4:
The table provides a breakdown of the cost of water in various Australian cities. Overall, inhabitants in all cities except Melbourne and Sydney are charged more per kilolitre if their usage exceeds 125 KL. In addition, Perth households record the highest water bill on average.
Under 125 KL of consumption, water is the most expensive in Sydney, where each kilolitre costs 0.98 dollars. This is followed by the prices in Brisbane and Melbourne, at $0.81 and $0.78 per kilolitre, respectively. Adelaide and Perth, meanwhile, report the same rate of $0.42, which is less than half the cost in Sydney.
Once water consumption surpasses the aforementioned threshold, the per kilolitre cost in Perth outstrips that in any other city, with $1.50. Additionally, it is over three times the price for Perth households that use under 125 KL. Adelaide residents pay $1 for every kilolitre of water according to this scheme, which is the second highest rate. The water cost in Brisbane increases slightly to $0.84, whereas Melbourne and Sydney households incur no surcharge. This makes Melbourne’s water the cheapest beyond 125 KL of usage. Furthermore, the water bill tends to be the most expensive in Perth, with $332 on average. The data of Adelaide, Brisbane and Sydney range from $310 to $320, while Melbourne reports the lowest water bill of $250.
Sample 5:
The table gives information about how much water costs in five different cities in Australia.
Overall, the highest average cost of water use is seen in Perth with over 125 KL while the reverse is true for Melbourne. Notably, citizens in Sydney pay more money when using under 125KL in comparison with the other places.
Looking at Melbourne and Sydney, they both have the same prices for each kilometer no matter how much water is used, at $0.78 and $0.98 respectively. However, there is a significant discrepancy in the bill that each household has to pay, with the average amount of money for water in Sydney being the most expensive although people in Melbourne spend least. A similar pattern is witnessed in Brisbane, with its figures for both types of water capacity being roughly the same, at $0.81 per kiloliter for up to 125KL and $0.84 per kiloliter for more than 125KL. Although paying the second most expensive price per kiloliter of water, people in Brisbane still pay less in water bills, at $310, only higher than Melbourne.
Turning to Perth and Adelaide, both cities charge the same price for each kiloliter, at $0.42, when using less than 125KL. Nevertheless, when the water usage exceeds 125 KL, the former pays $0.5 higher for each kiloliter than the latter, at $1.5 and $1.0 in return. Likewise, most money in the average bill is paid in Perth, at $332, which is slightly higher than Adelaide, at $312.
Sample 6:
The table illustrates the price of water, and the average household water bill, in five Australian cities.
Overall, it can be seen that Melbourne residents have the lowest water bill per household on average, while Perth households have the largest water bills. Additionally, there is little to no difference in the cost of water for residents exceeding 125 kilolitres in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne, whereas Perth and Adelaide residents pay significantly higher rates.
The cost of water in Adelaide and Perth is $0.42 per kilolitre for use of up to 125 kilolitres. However, this cost increases to $1.00 in Adelaide and $1.50 in Perth for water use exceeding 125 kilolitres. Residents in Melbourne and Sydney, on the other hand, pay a set rate of $0.78 and $0.98 respectively per kilolitre of water, regardless of the total amount used, while those in Brisbane pay $0.81 per kilolitre and $0.84 for water use surpassing 125 kilolitres.
Regarding household water bills, Perth residents have the highest on average, at $332, while the average in Melbourne is $253. Residents in other cities pay an average of between $310 to $320 per household.
Sample 7:
The table provides information on average bills and rates paid by households in five Australian cities for water usage, categorized into two thresholds, under and over 125 kiloliters (KL).
Overall, Sydney charges the highest price for the under 125 KL threshold. Although Perth and Adelaide have the lowest starting rates, they pay the most for water over 125 KL. Moreover, residents of Perth have the highest bills among the given cities.
Beginning with the charge for bills below the threshold, Sydney residents pay $0.98 per KL, followed by their counterparts in Brisbane and Melbourne, at around $0.80 per KL, which was nearly double the figures in Adelaide and Perth, coming in at $0.42. For consumption exceeding 125 KL, Sydney’s and Melbourne’s rates are fixed, while Brisbane sees a slight increase of $0.03 per KL. In contrast, there are significant price hikes in Adelaide and Perth, with rates approximately doubling to $1.00 in Adelaide and quadrupling to $1.50 in Perth.
Regarding the average water bill per household, Perth and Sydney have the highest bills at $332 and $319, respectively. They are closely followed by Adelaide and Brisbane, both around $310, whereas the bill is lowest in Melbourne, at only $253.
Sample 8:
The table illustrates the cost of water usage per kilolitre and the average household water bill in five Australian cities in 2004.
Overall, there was little change between the cost of water use under and over 125 kilolitres in Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney, while the difference in Perth and Adelaide was significant. It was also apparent that households in Perth paid the largest water bill while those in Melbourne paid the lowest.
Adelaide and Perth paid much lower for water use under 125 kilolitres than the other cities, at $0.42 per kilolitre. However, the cost would rise to $1 and $1.50 respectively if the water consumption exceeded 125 kilolitres. Regarding residents in Melbourne and Sydney, they paid $0.78 and $0.98 regardless of how much water was used. It took Brisbane residents $0.03 more per kilolitre when the total water use surpassed 125 kilolitres.
In terms of the average water bill per household, residents in Perth had the highest rate of $332, whereas the average water bill in Melbourne was the lowest, at $253. Residents in other cities paid from $310 to $319 per household on average.
Sample 9:
The table illustrates the varying costs of water consumption for residents in five major Australian cities.
Overall, the inverse relationship between usage and cost in Adelaide and Perth is clear, where lower consumption leads to lower expenses, while the rest show almost no change regardless of water consumption level. Perth stands out with the highest average bill for water usage.
Adelaide and Perth distinguish themselves by offering a substantially lower rate of $0.42 per kiloliter for those using less than 125KL, a rate nearly half that of other cities. However, when consumption exceeds this threshold, the cost rises dramatically, reaching $1.00 in Adelaide and $1.50 in Perth. In contrast, Melbourne and Sydney maintain consistent charges of $0.78 and $0.98 per kiloliter respectively, regardless of consumption levels. Brisbane, similarly, experiences a minor increase of only $0.03, from $0.81 to $0.84, for usage beyond 125KL.
Residents in Perth face the highest expenses for water usage, totaling $332 which notably surpasses those of Sydney ($319), Adelaide ($312), and Brisbane ($310). Conversely, households in Melbourne bear the lowest financial burden, with a modest expenditure of $253.
Sample 10:
The table compares the price and average water expense per family in different Australian metropolises. Overall, within the regulated quota, Sydney records the most expensive water price, whereas citizens in Perth pay the highest when their usage exceeds the quota and also the highest average bill per household. Additionally, the cost of water remains unchanged regardless of volume used in Melbourne and Sydney.
Regarding water cost up to 125 kilolitres, residents in Sydney experience the highest price of $0.98 per kilolitre, followed by Brisbane and Melbourne at $0.81 and $0.78 per kilolitre, respectively. The figures for Adelaide and Perth are identical at $0.42 per kilolitre.
Exceeding 125 kilolitres, the water price in Perth more than triples to $1.50 per kilolitre, which is the highest in this category. Citizens in Brisbane are charged slightly higher at $0.84 per kilolitre, while the price in Adelaide rises significantly to $1 per kilolitre. However, Melbourne and Sydney witness no increments.
Turning to average water cost per family, Perth dwellers exhibit the highest price of $332 per household, whilst the lowest is witnessed among Melbourne families at $253 each. Sydney households spend an average of $312, which is minimally higher than those in Adelaide and Brisbane with comparable bills of approximately $310.
Sample 11:
The given table details the price of water according to different kiloliter units and average household water bill in five Australian cities (Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney).
Overall, Perth residents have the highest bills for water consumption, whereas those in Melbourne pay less than other cities. In addition, the water prices remain stable regardless of the volume used in Sydney and Melbourne while other cities impose higher prices for water volume exceeding 125 KL.
In terms of the cost of water consumption, Adelaide and Perth apply the same prices for water usage under 125KL, at 0.42$ each. However, these figures rise significantly to 1.00$ in Adelaide and 1.50$ for consumption exceeding 125KL. Meanwhile, Brisbane residents only pay an extra 0.03$ (at 0.84$) if water use surpasses 125KL. In contrast, Melbourne and Sydney charge the same price regardless of the total amount used, at 0.78$ and 0.98$ respectively.
Relating to the average water bill, households in Perth have to pay the highest bill at 332$, which is 13$ more than Sydney. This is closely followed by Adelaide and Brisbane, with 312$ and 310$ respectively. Finally, Melbourne’s families have the lowest average bills, at just 253$.
Sample 12:
This table shows the water rates and average household water bills in five Australian cities. It is clear that Melbourne residents have the lowest water bills per household on average, while Perth households have the highest.
Furthermore, while there is little difference in water bills for residents who use more than 125 kilolitres of water in Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne, residents in Perth and Adelaide pay significantly higher rates. In Adelaide and Perth, the cost of water is $0.
42 per kilolitre, up to a maximum usage of 125 kilolitres. However, if you use more than 125 kilolitres of water, this cost rises to $1.00 in Adelaide and $1.50 in Perth.
Meanwhile, Melbourne and Sydney residents pay fixed rates of $0.78 and $0.98 per kilolitre of water respectively, regardless of the total amount of water consumed, while Brisbane residents pay $0. 81 or $0. 84 per kilolitre for the total amount of water used. When it comes to residential water bills, Perth residents have the highest average water bill at $332, while Melbourne's average is $253. Residents of other cities pay an average of $310 to $320 per household.
Sample 13:
There is a table that shows the costs of domestic water for five cities in Australia, as well as their average billing amount.
Overall, it is clear that the cost of using each kilolitre changes according to how much is used, and Perth has the highest average household bill. According to the table, in Sydney, water usage charge per kilolitre when used up to 125KL is highest with slightly less than one Australian dollar. Closely behind Sydney comes Brisbane where the cost for the same category is $0.81. The charges per kilolitre in other cities range from $0.42 to $0.78.
When looking at the cost per kilolitre, if a household uses more than 125KL, Perth is highest at $1.50. This price is $0.50 higher compared to Adelaide's rate. In the remaining three cities - Brisbane, Melbourne, and Sydney - the amount stays below one Australian dollar.
About the average bill per home, except in Melbourne ($253), water costs are between $310 and $332. Perth is the city where people pay the most for water.
Sample 14:
The table gives details about the costs that Australian citizens in five particular cities - Adelaide, Perth, Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne - have to bear for using water. Generally, in Perth, the average water bill for each household is quite higher compared to other cities. On the other hand, in Melbourne, it is the cheapest among five cities. In Particular, people who live in Perth need to pay an average bill up to 332 dollars. But in Adelaide, Brisbane, and Sydney, each household only pays from 310 to 319 dollars for the average bill.
To explain more in detail, the cost of water is split into two groups: one for using up to 125 kiloliters and another for using more than 125 kiloliters. If living in Sydney or Melbourne, people pay the same price for water use - 0.98 dollars per kiloliter in Sydney and 0.78 dollars per kiloliter in Melbourne - regardless of how much water they actually use. Australians who live in Brisbane pay 0.81 dollars for using water if they use less than 125 kiloliters and 0.84 dollars if the amount of water used is more than that. But different rates are applied in Adelaide and Perth. If using under 125 kiloliters, then pay $0.42. If you use over 125 kiloliters, the cost is $1.00 per extra kiloliter and $1.50 for more after that limit of usage.
Sample 15:
Given is a table depicting the water cost in five Australian metropolises in 2004.
Overall, Australians did not always have to pay more per kilolitre when their water usage surpassed 125KL. Furthermore, the difference was minor in the household bills across the five surveyed cities.
Urban dwellers paid less than $2 for water per unit. The rates in Melbourne ($0.78) and Sydney ($0.98) did not vary whether the total water utilisation was under or above 125 kilolitres. Meanwhile, Brisbane residents were required to pay a little more, $0.81 if the sum of usage was up to 125 kilolitres and $0.84 if exceeded. Likewise, even though people living in Adelaide and Perth were charged the lowest regarding the former scenario ($0.42 per unit), they had to pay twofold and threefold, respectively, in the latter case.
In household terms, the average amount Australians were supposed to pay for water was a touch higher than $300, ranging from $310 to $332. Those in Melbourne who had to pay $253 stood out as the only exception.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.
In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.
Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.
Sample 2:
The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common.
In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.
In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.
Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.
Sample 3:
The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.
Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.
In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.
In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.
Sample 4:
The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.
At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.
Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.
Sample 5:
The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.
In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.
Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.
Sample 6:
The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.
Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.
Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.
In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.