Câu hỏi:
11/01/2025 183The table shows the cost of water in five cities in Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
The table below shows the cost of water in five cities in Australia |
|||
City |
Usage charge per kilolitre (up to 125KL) |
Usage charge per kilolitre (over 125KL) |
Average bill per household |
Adelaide |
$ 0.42 |
$ 1.00 |
$ 312 |
Brisbane |
$ 0.81 |
$ 0.84 |
$ 310 |
Melbourne |
$ 0.78 |
$ 0.78 |
$ 253 |
Perth |
$ 0.42 |
$ 1.50 |
$ 332 |
Sydney |
$ 0.98 |
$ 0.98 |
$ 319 |
Sample 1:
The table details how much residents in five Australian cities are required to pay for water consumption.
A glance at the table reveals that people living in Adelaide and Perth pay the least if they use less than 125KL, or else they pay the most. Another highlight is that households in Perth have the highest average bill for water usage among the five surveyed cities.
Locals in Adelaide and Perth only have to pay $0.42 per kiloliter if they use less than 125KL, roughly half of the price for those of other cities. However, if water use in two aforementioned cities surpasses 125KL, the cost nearly doubles ($1.00) in Adelaide or almost triples ($1.50) in Perth. Residents in Melbourne and Sydney pay the same amount of money, $0.78 and $0.98 respectively, regardless of how much water they use. Brisbane’s people only pay an extra $0.03 if they use more than 125KL.
In general, people residing in Perth have the highest cost of water use, at $332, far exceeding the figures for Sydney ($319), Adelaide ($312) and Brisbane ($310). Households’ spending on water consumption in Melbourne is only $253, the smallest amount recorded among five cities.
Sample 2:
The table illustrates how much water costs across five major urban areas in Australia. Overall, there are increases in usage charges once people in Adelaide, Brisbane, and Perth use more than 125 kiloliters (KL) of water, whereas the other two cities in question maintain consistent water pricing. Additionally, while the highest average water bill per household is recorded in Perth, the opposite is true in the case of Melbourne.
Regarding usage charges for the initial 125 KL, Adelaide and Perth have the cheapest rates, both standing at $0.42. This is in stark contrast to Sydney, as it imposes the highest cost at $0.98 in this category. Meanwhile, a close similarity can be seen in the charges levied by Brisbane and Melbourne, with respective figures of $0.81 and $0.78.
When water usage exceeds 125 KL, water prices in Adelaide and Perth climb approximately twofold and threefold, respectively, making them the most expensive out of the five cities listed. A slight rise of $0.03 is also witnessed in Brisbane, but residents in Sydney and Melbourne still pay the same rates.
Turning to the average water bill, an Australian household living in Perth pays $332, followed by those in Sydney, Adelaide, and Brisbane, with their expenses being around $310. In the last place is Melbourne, where a family spends only $253.
Sample 3:
The table compares unit water prices per kilolitre and average water bills in various Australian cities.
Overall, Perth has the highest water bill, followed closely by Sydney. It is noteworthy that when water consumption exceeds 125KL, Melbourne and Sydney maintain a consistent rate, while other cities apply higher charges.
In terms of unit prices for water usage under 125KL, Sydney has the highest rate at $0.98 per kilolitre. Brisbane and Melbourne follow closely behind at $0.81 and $0.78, respectively. These rates are approximately double those of Adelaide and Perth, which charge only $0.42 per kilolitre.
Regarding charges for consumption exceeding 125KL, Perth imposes the highest rate at $1.50 per kilolitre, which is $0.50 more than Adelaide's rate. Meanwhile, other cities charge approximately $0.78 to $0.98 per kilolitre.
As for the average water bill, Perth residents face the highest expenses, with an average of $332. In contrast, Adelaide, Brisbane, and Sydney residents experience slightly varying bills ranging from $310 to just under $320. Finally, those living in Melbourne have the lowest average bill at $253.
Sample 4:
The table provides a breakdown of the cost of water in various Australian cities. Overall, inhabitants in all cities except Melbourne and Sydney are charged more per kilolitre if their usage exceeds 125 KL. In addition, Perth households record the highest water bill on average.
Under 125 KL of consumption, water is the most expensive in Sydney, where each kilolitre costs 0.98 dollars. This is followed by the prices in Brisbane and Melbourne, at $0.81 and $0.78 per kilolitre, respectively. Adelaide and Perth, meanwhile, report the same rate of $0.42, which is less than half the cost in Sydney.
Once water consumption surpasses the aforementioned threshold, the per kilolitre cost in Perth outstrips that in any other city, with $1.50. Additionally, it is over three times the price for Perth households that use under 125 KL. Adelaide residents pay $1 for every kilolitre of water according to this scheme, which is the second highest rate. The water cost in Brisbane increases slightly to $0.84, whereas Melbourne and Sydney households incur no surcharge. This makes Melbourne’s water the cheapest beyond 125 KL of usage. Furthermore, the water bill tends to be the most expensive in Perth, with $332 on average. The data of Adelaide, Brisbane and Sydney range from $310 to $320, while Melbourne reports the lowest water bill of $250.
Sample 5:
The table gives information about how much water costs in five different cities in Australia.
Overall, the highest average cost of water use is seen in Perth with over 125 KL while the reverse is true for Melbourne. Notably, citizens in Sydney pay more money when using under 125KL in comparison with the other places.
Looking at Melbourne and Sydney, they both have the same prices for each kilometer no matter how much water is used, at $0.78 and $0.98 respectively. However, there is a significant discrepancy in the bill that each household has to pay, with the average amount of money for water in Sydney being the most expensive although people in Melbourne spend least. A similar pattern is witnessed in Brisbane, with its figures for both types of water capacity being roughly the same, at $0.81 per kiloliter for up to 125KL and $0.84 per kiloliter for more than 125KL. Although paying the second most expensive price per kiloliter of water, people in Brisbane still pay less in water bills, at $310, only higher than Melbourne.
Turning to Perth and Adelaide, both cities charge the same price for each kiloliter, at $0.42, when using less than 125KL. Nevertheless, when the water usage exceeds 125 KL, the former pays $0.5 higher for each kiloliter than the latter, at $1.5 and $1.0 in return. Likewise, most money in the average bill is paid in Perth, at $332, which is slightly higher than Adelaide, at $312.
Sample 6:
The table illustrates the price of water, and the average household water bill, in five Australian cities.
Overall, it can be seen that Melbourne residents have the lowest water bill per household on average, while Perth households have the largest water bills. Additionally, there is little to no difference in the cost of water for residents exceeding 125 kilolitres in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne, whereas Perth and Adelaide residents pay significantly higher rates.
The cost of water in Adelaide and Perth is $0.42 per kilolitre for use of up to 125 kilolitres. However, this cost increases to $1.00 in Adelaide and $1.50 in Perth for water use exceeding 125 kilolitres. Residents in Melbourne and Sydney, on the other hand, pay a set rate of $0.78 and $0.98 respectively per kilolitre of water, regardless of the total amount used, while those in Brisbane pay $0.81 per kilolitre and $0.84 for water use surpassing 125 kilolitres.
Regarding household water bills, Perth residents have the highest on average, at $332, while the average in Melbourne is $253. Residents in other cities pay an average of between $310 to $320 per household.
Sample 7:
The table provides information on average bills and rates paid by households in five Australian cities for water usage, categorized into two thresholds, under and over 125 kiloliters (KL).
Overall, Sydney charges the highest price for the under 125 KL threshold. Although Perth and Adelaide have the lowest starting rates, they pay the most for water over 125 KL. Moreover, residents of Perth have the highest bills among the given cities.
Beginning with the charge for bills below the threshold, Sydney residents pay $0.98 per KL, followed by their counterparts in Brisbane and Melbourne, at around $0.80 per KL, which was nearly double the figures in Adelaide and Perth, coming in at $0.42. For consumption exceeding 125 KL, Sydney’s and Melbourne’s rates are fixed, while Brisbane sees a slight increase of $0.03 per KL. In contrast, there are significant price hikes in Adelaide and Perth, with rates approximately doubling to $1.00 in Adelaide and quadrupling to $1.50 in Perth.
Regarding the average water bill per household, Perth and Sydney have the highest bills at $332 and $319, respectively. They are closely followed by Adelaide and Brisbane, both around $310, whereas the bill is lowest in Melbourne, at only $253.
Sample 8:
The table illustrates the cost of water usage per kilolitre and the average household water bill in five Australian cities in 2004.
Overall, there was little change between the cost of water use under and over 125 kilolitres in Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney, while the difference in Perth and Adelaide was significant. It was also apparent that households in Perth paid the largest water bill while those in Melbourne paid the lowest.
Adelaide and Perth paid much lower for water use under 125 kilolitres than the other cities, at $0.42 per kilolitre. However, the cost would rise to $1 and $1.50 respectively if the water consumption exceeded 125 kilolitres. Regarding residents in Melbourne and Sydney, they paid $0.78 and $0.98 regardless of how much water was used. It took Brisbane residents $0.03 more per kilolitre when the total water use surpassed 125 kilolitres.
In terms of the average water bill per household, residents in Perth had the highest rate of $332, whereas the average water bill in Melbourne was the lowest, at $253. Residents in other cities paid from $310 to $319 per household on average.
Sample 9:
The table illustrates the varying costs of water consumption for residents in five major Australian cities.
Overall, the inverse relationship between usage and cost in Adelaide and Perth is clear, where lower consumption leads to lower expenses, while the rest show almost no change regardless of water consumption level. Perth stands out with the highest average bill for water usage.
Adelaide and Perth distinguish themselves by offering a substantially lower rate of $0.42 per kiloliter for those using less than 125KL, a rate nearly half that of other cities. However, when consumption exceeds this threshold, the cost rises dramatically, reaching $1.00 in Adelaide and $1.50 in Perth. In contrast, Melbourne and Sydney maintain consistent charges of $0.78 and $0.98 per kiloliter respectively, regardless of consumption levels. Brisbane, similarly, experiences a minor increase of only $0.03, from $0.81 to $0.84, for usage beyond 125KL.
Residents in Perth face the highest expenses for water usage, totaling $332 which notably surpasses those of Sydney ($319), Adelaide ($312), and Brisbane ($310). Conversely, households in Melbourne bear the lowest financial burden, with a modest expenditure of $253.
Sample 10:
The table compares the price and average water expense per family in different Australian metropolises. Overall, within the regulated quota, Sydney records the most expensive water price, whereas citizens in Perth pay the highest when their usage exceeds the quota and also the highest average bill per household. Additionally, the cost of water remains unchanged regardless of volume used in Melbourne and Sydney.
Regarding water cost up to 125 kilolitres, residents in Sydney experience the highest price of $0.98 per kilolitre, followed by Brisbane and Melbourne at $0.81 and $0.78 per kilolitre, respectively. The figures for Adelaide and Perth are identical at $0.42 per kilolitre.
Exceeding 125 kilolitres, the water price in Perth more than triples to $1.50 per kilolitre, which is the highest in this category. Citizens in Brisbane are charged slightly higher at $0.84 per kilolitre, while the price in Adelaide rises significantly to $1 per kilolitre. However, Melbourne and Sydney witness no increments.
Turning to average water cost per family, Perth dwellers exhibit the highest price of $332 per household, whilst the lowest is witnessed among Melbourne families at $253 each. Sydney households spend an average of $312, which is minimally higher than those in Adelaide and Brisbane with comparable bills of approximately $310.
Sample 11:
The given table details the price of water according to different kiloliter units and average household water bill in five Australian cities (Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney).
Overall, Perth residents have the highest bills for water consumption, whereas those in Melbourne pay less than other cities. In addition, the water prices remain stable regardless of the volume used in Sydney and Melbourne while other cities impose higher prices for water volume exceeding 125 KL.
In terms of the cost of water consumption, Adelaide and Perth apply the same prices for water usage under 125KL, at 0.42$ each. However, these figures rise significantly to 1.00$ in Adelaide and 1.50$ for consumption exceeding 125KL. Meanwhile, Brisbane residents only pay an extra 0.03$ (at 0.84$) if water use surpasses 125KL. In contrast, Melbourne and Sydney charge the same price regardless of the total amount used, at 0.78$ and 0.98$ respectively.
Relating to the average water bill, households in Perth have to pay the highest bill at 332$, which is 13$ more than Sydney. This is closely followed by Adelaide and Brisbane, with 312$ and 310$ respectively. Finally, Melbourne’s families have the lowest average bills, at just 253$.
Sample 12:
This table shows the water rates and average household water bills in five Australian cities. It is clear that Melbourne residents have the lowest water bills per household on average, while Perth households have the highest.
Furthermore, while there is little difference in water bills for residents who use more than 125 kilolitres of water in Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne, residents in Perth and Adelaide pay significantly higher rates. In Adelaide and Perth, the cost of water is $0.
42 per kilolitre, up to a maximum usage of 125 kilolitres. However, if you use more than 125 kilolitres of water, this cost rises to $1.00 in Adelaide and $1.50 in Perth.
Meanwhile, Melbourne and Sydney residents pay fixed rates of $0.78 and $0.98 per kilolitre of water respectively, regardless of the total amount of water consumed, while Brisbane residents pay $0. 81 or $0. 84 per kilolitre for the total amount of water used. When it comes to residential water bills, Perth residents have the highest average water bill at $332, while Melbourne's average is $253. Residents of other cities pay an average of $310 to $320 per household.
Sample 13:
There is a table that shows the costs of domestic water for five cities in Australia, as well as their average billing amount.
Overall, it is clear that the cost of using each kilolitre changes according to how much is used, and Perth has the highest average household bill. According to the table, in Sydney, water usage charge per kilolitre when used up to 125KL is highest with slightly less than one Australian dollar. Closely behind Sydney comes Brisbane where the cost for the same category is $0.81. The charges per kilolitre in other cities range from $0.42 to $0.78.
When looking at the cost per kilolitre, if a household uses more than 125KL, Perth is highest at $1.50. This price is $0.50 higher compared to Adelaide's rate. In the remaining three cities - Brisbane, Melbourne, and Sydney - the amount stays below one Australian dollar.
About the average bill per home, except in Melbourne ($253), water costs are between $310 and $332. Perth is the city where people pay the most for water.
Sample 14:
The table gives details about the costs that Australian citizens in five particular cities - Adelaide, Perth, Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne - have to bear for using water. Generally, in Perth, the average water bill for each household is quite higher compared to other cities. On the other hand, in Melbourne, it is the cheapest among five cities. In Particular, people who live in Perth need to pay an average bill up to 332 dollars. But in Adelaide, Brisbane, and Sydney, each household only pays from 310 to 319 dollars for the average bill.
To explain more in detail, the cost of water is split into two groups: one for using up to 125 kiloliters and another for using more than 125 kiloliters. If living in Sydney or Melbourne, people pay the same price for water use - 0.98 dollars per kiloliter in Sydney and 0.78 dollars per kiloliter in Melbourne - regardless of how much water they actually use. Australians who live in Brisbane pay 0.81 dollars for using water if they use less than 125 kiloliters and 0.84 dollars if the amount of water used is more than that. But different rates are applied in Adelaide and Perth. If using under 125 kiloliters, then pay $0.42. If you use over 125 kiloliters, the cost is $1.00 per extra kiloliter and $1.50 for more after that limit of usage.
Sample 15:
Given is a table depicting the water cost in five Australian metropolises in 2004.
Overall, Australians did not always have to pay more per kilolitre when their water usage surpassed 125KL. Furthermore, the difference was minor in the household bills across the five surveyed cities.
Urban dwellers paid less than $2 for water per unit. The rates in Melbourne ($0.78) and Sydney ($0.98) did not vary whether the total water utilisation was under or above 125 kilolitres. Meanwhile, Brisbane residents were required to pay a little more, $0.81 if the sum of usage was up to 125 kilolitres and $0.84 if exceeded. Likewise, even though people living in Adelaide and Perth were charged the lowest regarding the former scenario ($0.42 per unit), they had to pay twofold and threefold, respectively, in the latter case.
In household terms, the average amount Australians were supposed to pay for water was a touch higher than $300, ranging from $310 to $332. Those in Melbourne who had to pay $253 stood out as the only exception.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Everyone has different dreams when it comes to where they wish to live. Personally, I think it is very desirable to live in a large city. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, cities offer a great environment for raising children, and I am a person who values family above all else. Urban areas have numerous parks and recreation centers which encourage children to lead vital and healthy lives, and they also have well-funded community centers which contribute to the intellectual development of young people. My own experience demonstrates the value of such facilities. Both my husband and I work full time jobs and are not home when our two sons finish school. This is not a problem, though, as both of them go directly to a local community center when their classes are over. Our eldest son participates in a computer club there, while our youngest son practices photography. Their participation in these programs sets my mind at ease, as without access to the community center they would just sit at home all alone. This situation compares favorably to a friend of mine who lives in a small town and recently had to hire an expensive babysitter to watch her children when they get home from school, as she was not able to locate any meaningful activities for them to take part in.
Secondly, large cities offer cultural experiences that adults can enjoy and appreciate. Most major cities have a plethora of museums, ethnic restaurants, libraries, theater groups and other stimulating and cosmopolitan facilities. My city is no exception. For instance, my colleagues and I spend every Friday evening visiting a new ethnic restaurant for dinner. Over the past three months we have enjoyed food from more than a dozen different national cuisines. Meanwhile, my sons and I go to a different museum once a month and I have found that I enjoy our visits almost as much as they do. These are the sort of outings that are only possible in a heavily populated urban area. Small towns offer easy access to beautiful natural scenery, but I prefer the intellectual and cultural stimulation that my city offers.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that living in a large city is preferable to living in a small town. This is because cities are better places to raise children, and because they offer stimulating intellectual and cultural experience that grown-ups can enjoy.
Sample 2:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city, so I have experienced the good and bad
sides of both. I never thought that I would like to live in a big city, but I was wrong. After ten years of living in one, I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Small towns and big cities both have some problems in terms of transportation. In a small town, you have to own a car to ensure comfortable living. You can't get around without one because
there isn't any kind of public transportation. Big cities generally have heavy traffic and expensive
parking, but there you have a choice of taking public transportation. It's not free, but it's often cheaper than driving when you consider gas and time. Especially if you don't have a car, you're
better off in the city.
I love the excitement of big cities. Small towns have a slow pace. Large cities mean you have to
adapt to a variety of situations, like finding a new route to work or trying a new restaurant. I enjoy that challenge very much. Another source of the excitement of city living is the variety of cultural activities available. There is a wide assortment of theatre, music and dance performances
available in big cities. These things are rare in small ones.
The final thing I like about large cities is the diversity of the people. The United States is made up of people of different races, religions, abilities, and interests. However, you seldom find such a variety of people in a smaller town. I think that living in an area where everyone was just like me would quickly become boring.
Of course, security is a concern, and that's one area where small towns are superior to big cities.
Still, I would rather be a bit more cautious and live in a large city than feel secure but bored.
Sample 3:
Where should we live? Some may choose to live in big cities, while others like the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside. As far as I am concerned, I would like to live in a big city because living in a big city has more advantages than living in the countryside.
To begin with, the city is the symbol of human civilization and there are many facilities for living, recreation and health care. Therefore, living there is more convenient than living in countryside. For example, we can find plenty of malls around our neighborhood, where we can buy everyday necessities at a low price. Furthermore, people are more concerned about their health and safety than other things in their lives. In big cities, medical facilities and emergency services are more easily accessible than in the countryside. Big cities also have convenient transportation and utility systems. They also offer faster Internet connections. These all make our life easier in big cities.
In addition, we can take part in a variety of events in big cities. Human beings like to live together and need to interact with each other. In a big city, the population density is high therefore there are always plenty of social activities, sports events and concerts. There are more recreational places in big cities, such as opera houses, movie theatres, clubs, and swimming pools. You will have many kinds of entertainment in big cities and meet many people. In the countryside, however, life may be dull and quiet, and you may only have a few neighbors. Living alone with few activities can easily cause mental diseases.
Some may argue that the pollution in cities makes people sick. However, with automobiles and modern highways we can easily take a break to expose ourselves to fresh air in the countryside and sunshine on the beach.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that living in big cities is much better than living in countryside because of the advanced facilities and social activities in cities. Moreover, the autos and highways
enable us to enjoy the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside.
Sample 4:
In our modern world, people have different opinions on where the best place would be to live, and many argue that living in a small town is the ideal location, while others argue that living in a big city is preferred. Both places have their benefits and drawbacks, but I would prefer to live in a big city. This is because big cities offer diverse job opportunities, cultural experiences, and convenient amenities.
Big cities have a broader range of job opportunities than small towns. In a big city, one will have a chance to secure a job in various sectors and pursue a career. Many big companies and industries are typically located in larger cities, which means that job seekers have plenty of options. Moreover, a big city offers numerous opportunities for growth, as one can change jobs and pursue their passion. The job market in big cities also offers higher salaries and better benefits. Hence, for those who want to make a radicle career change and those who want to earn a decent living, a big city is the ideal place to live.
Cultural experiences are another reason why I prefer to live in a big city. Big cities offer diverse and unique cultural experiences that small towns
cannot, such as trying new foods and attending cultural festivals. In big cities, there is always a movie or a theatre show to attend, a concert or sporting event to watch, a museum or an art gallery to visit. The diversity of cultural experiences in big cities provides people with various opportunities to learn and broaden their horizons, which is an enriching experience.
Convenient amenities are also reasons why I prefer to live in big cities. Cities are often equipped with modern infrastructure. Cities have better medical facilities, public transportation systems, and essential services like banks and grocery stores. Big cities have a good public transportation system that is well-planned and suitable for people who do not own private cars. People in big cities have access to modern medical facilities with well-trained medical specialists.
Despite the benefits, big cities have some drawbacks. One of the most significant drawbacks is the high cost of living. Housing and rent are expensive in larger cities compared to small towns. Moreover, noise pollution and air pollution are common in big cities. Residents must always be aware of their surrounding environments to protect themselves from the effects of pollution. Additionally, congestion and crowding are other issues that plague many big city neighborhoods.
In conclusion, while big cities have their issues, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Big cities offer more job opportunities, an array of cultural experiences, and convenient amenities. Therefore, for me, getting the chance to live and experience all of this makes living in a big city very appealing.
Sample 5:
People seldom agree with one another, even on such trivial issues as the preference between living in a big city and a small town. It’s a bit hasty to claim that it is better to live in a big city than in a small town, or vice versa.
Living in a big city has several benefits. First, there are more job opportunities readily available in big cities compared to small towns. Furthermore, not only are there more job positions in big cities, but the quality of these positions is much higher as well. In addition, the pay is often more competitive.
Second, children are likely to receive a higher-quality education compared to their counterparts in small towns. For families, children’s education is always a top priority.
Finally, big cities generally offer a superior overall standard of living compared to small towns. There are more commodities and services available in city markets, more public utilities, and even a greater variety of television channels.
However, living in a small town also has its advantages. People in small towns often enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle. Most are free from the high work-related stress common in big cities. Although the average pay is lower, the cost of daily necessities, such as vegetables and meat, is usually more affordable.
Instead of experiencing the loneliness often prevalent in big cities, children in small towns may grow up more healthily due to harmonious relationships among residents. People in small towns don’t have to wake up as early in the morning, as there are no traffic jams, and drivers tend to be more cautious, reducing the likelihood of accidents. While they may have fewer television channels, they have more friends readily available for socializing and entertainment.
As for my current situation, although I long for the cozy atmosphere and close relationships among neighbors and friends, which are often unique to small towns, I have chosen to live in one of the biggest cities in my country - Beijing. This is because I have found a good job here with a decent salary. I think I would prefer living in a small town when I retire one day.
Sample 6:
In English, there is a well-known fairy tale about a poor country boy, Dick Whittington, who goes to London believing that the streets of the city are “paved with gold.” The story is a classic “rags to riches” tale. Dick eventually becomes the Lord Mayor of London. Like the hero of that story, I always find wonder and adventure in cities.
Cities contain a fascinating assortment of people. Whenever I walk around a shopping precinct at midday on a weekend, I am captivated by the variety of individuals hurrying through the shops. Sometimes, I simply sit on a public bench and observe the diverse streams of shoppers passing by.
Today, in the age of globe-trotting transport and advanced communication, city life is more diverse than ever. Capital cities are now highly cosmopolitan and eager to attract foreign trade and currency. There is a contemporary English joke that says, “You can never find an Englishman in London.”
Whether rightly or wrongly, governments and local authorities tend to prioritize building public amenities in big cities. Money is invested in transportation, libraries, parks, and museums. Often, countries compete to construct the most impressive “showcase” buildings. For example, Malaysia has built a skyscraper taller than anything in New York. Similarly, within large countries, regions compete with each other: New York against Chicago, Shanghai against Hong Kong, or Beijing.
All of this benefits city dwellers. The magic of the Dick Whittington story is rekindled in me whenever I enter a library housed in a magnificent building. For university students studying art or music, large cities often offer galleries and public performances. Even as a teenager, I appreciated living in a city because it gave me the opportunity to attend rock concerts by my favorite bands several times a year.
Architecture shapes the urban landscape. For those who appreciate it, a city can be as visually exciting as the Himalayas. A modern metropolis resembles a mountain range with its height, light, and solidness. At the same time, old buildings add to its charm - quaint, unspoiled side streets, or shops and homes from distant ages. Even someone who spends their entire life in one large city could continue discovering its architectural secrets well into old age.
Humans are “social animals.” They talk, interact, and create. Cities provide libraries, universities, and café bars where people can meet and share ideas with others of their kind.
Sample 7:
Some people would like to live in a small town because the surroundings could be more picturesque, and people are friendlier compared to people in a big city. However, in my opinion, living in a big city is more effective and beneficial based on the following reasons.
First, living in a big city is convenient. Thanks to public transportation, any place in a big city is usually accessible. Without driving, you have many options among buses, trains and subway. Taxis are also available on almost every corner of the city. Besides, it is easy to find a restaurant or food stands in your neighborhood within walking distance whenever you are hungry. There are also convenience stores all over, so city residents can buy any stuff easily at any time without bothering to drive to a certain place to get what they need. Convenience is the best what a city can offer while a small town is less likely to.
In addition, a big city provides more education opportunities. The residents have easier access to schools and education resources, so do they to faculty and advanced facilities. Take teachers for example, they are willing to teach in a big city because of the better salary and there are more resources they need available in libraries and related institutes when they want to go further to sharpen their teaching skills. Similarly, when children plan to take some talented courses such as piano, art, and the like, a city with more options and business activities is where parents want their children to live and grow.
Here is another perfect example to illustrate my preference of a city. I used to be a volunteer in an elementary school in a small town. Although the town was lovely and clean, there was some inconvenience caused in daily life. First, less bus service was provided, so people usually had no choice but to wait a long time to take the bus. Second, restaurants and food stands were all closed after nine o’clock, so it’s hard to find something to eat if you are hungry late in the evening. Lastly, teachers in the elementary school might need to teach many courses with different subjects, when necessary, because of a lack of faculty, that is, an English teacher could be asked to teach math or science as well. Also, the facilities in the classroom and the science lab were old- fashioned. From my observation, people can live peacefully in a small town but actually there are more opportunities and availability a big city can offer.
Last but not least, infrastructure and public services are usually prominently featured in a big city. When I want to exercise on a rainy day, I can go to the sport center without worrying about places to go. In contrast, I might be trapped at home in a small town in the same situation. Besides, public services like medical care and care centers are fully developed for people with a pressing need. Libraries also provide better book circulation and activities to cater for their readers, which is not very likely to take place in a town with the number of people which is small. For people who like tranquility and secure, small towns are the best choice. However, for those who prefer economic prosperity, a variety of things to do, places to go and activities to join, the better choice is in a big city. I happen to be the one who prefers the latter and enjoys the lives in it.
Sample 8:
It is crucial to choose a place which suits you to live because where you live has influence over the quality of your life and happiness. Compared to those who prefer to live in a small town with a quiet environment, living in a big city to take advantage of the modern conveniences that it can offer is my choice.
First of all, the public transportation system is one of amenities people can benefit from. Big cities usually provide a well-developed transportation network, such as bus, train, subway and airport, so people in the city have very easy access to the vehicles that can help them reach any destination they want to. In contrast, the convenience of public transportation is usually not found in a small town, where people might tend to drive or use other means of transport to get about.
Besides, there are more opportunities for either finding a job or taking education. With a larger population, more jobs are available for everyone to find than those in the countryside. Take where I live for example, although the job market is very competitive, university graduates often move to Taipei, which is the major city in Taiwan. If you need to develop a skill, it is also likely that you will achieve it and then get a job successfully. More importantly, there are also more educational opportunities and a lot of different courses and institutions available. There is always availability of learning something new or developing practical skills in a big city.
Furthermore, cities can provide a variety of entertainment options every day. There is always something fun to do in a big city to keep people of all different interests from getting bored. Cities provide a lively nightlife, all types of shows, museums and sports facilities. Additionally, you will be able to connect with other people who share the same hobbies at different events.
While the lifestyle in a small town is less stressful, the city lifestyle has a lot of opportunities for people. Personally, I prefer to live in a big city which offers a variety of many options. In the meanwhile, I like the energy and the convenience in a big city. City life can have many positive impacts compared to rural life.
Sample 9:
There are many differences between living in a big city and a small town. Therefore, we must choose based on our personal preferences and needs. If you prefer a calm and peaceful environment, small towns are suitable for you. However, if you want to develop yourself, big cities are the best places to learn and acquire skills essential for your future.
In life, the most important thing for everyone is, of course, health. If someone’s health deteriorates, they might lose everything they have. Small towns often provide a healthier environment. You can enjoy peaceful rivers, mountains, abundant greenery, and a clear night sky filled with stars. Life there is calm and free from the excessive noise of big cities, as the population and number of cars are much smaller. However, living in a small town can mean missing out on global news, fashion trends, and other advancements.
On the other hand, living in a big city provides more opportunities for personal growth and the chance to enhance your competitive skills. Over time, this can help you establish your own identity and attitude in society. People in big cities are often motivated to work hard to support their families. However, city life comes with challenges, such as air pollution and waste management issues. If we do not address these problems, they could have serious consequences for our future.
In conclusion, small towns offer comfort and tranquility, while big cities are dynamic and full of opportunities. Personally, I would choose to live in a big city first to improve myself. Later, when I want to rest and prioritize my health, I would move to the countryside or a small town.
I hope you can choose the place that best suits your needs and appeals to you.
Sample 10:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city. I didn't think I would like to live here, but I was wrong. I think life is much better in a big city. Transportation is much more convenient, everything is more exciting, and there is a greater variety of people. I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Transportation is easier in a city. In a small town, you have to have a car to get around because there isn't any kind of public transportation. In a city, on the other hand, there are usually buses and taxis, and some cities have subways. Cities often have heavy traffic, and expensive parking, but it doesn't matter because you can always take the bus. Using public transportation is usually cheaper and more convenient than driving a car, but you don't have this choice in a small town.
City life is more exciting than small town life. In small towns usually nothing changes. You see the same people every day, you go to the same two or three restaurants, everything is the same. In a city things change all the time. You see new people every day. There are many restaurants, with new ones to choose from all the time. New plays come to the theaters and new musicians come to the concert halls.
Cities have a diversity of people that you don't find in a small town. There are much fewer people in a small town and usually they are all alike. In a city you can find people from different countries, of different religions, of different races - you can find all kinds of people. This variety of people is what makes city life interesting.
Life in a city is convenient, exciting, and interesting. After experiencing city life, I could never live in a small town again.
Sample 11:
If you were asked to choose between living in a big city or a small town, where would you prefer to live? Some people might choose to live in a small town because the environment is cleaner, and it fosters closer relationships with others. This suggests that living in a small town has its benefits. However, I believe there are three key reasons why living in a big city is more advantageous.
First, living in a big city provides greater opportunities to gain advanced knowledge and develop oneself. In contrast, the range of educational options in a small town is often limited. Furthermore, the presence of many students in a city creates a competitive environment that encourages us to work harder. While education may not be the only important aspect of life, it remains essential because we rely on knowledge throughout our lifetime.
Second, living in a city allows us to meet more people and adapt to society more easily. For example, interacting with diverse individuals helps us learn about their personalities and characteristics. Building relationships and making friends in a city can greatly benefit us as we grow older. By communicating with people in a big city, we gain a better understanding of how society functions and what we need to do to thrive. Therefore, city life prepares us to navigate societal challenges more effectively.
Lastly, living in a big city offers more job opportunities. Securing employment is a crucial aspect of life, and cities typically provide a wider variety of workplaces, such as companies, factories, and universities. For instance, becoming a professor is more achievable in a city where universities are abundant. In contrast, small towns cannot guarantee the same level of employment opportunities.
In conclusion, while small towns have advantages like friendlier communities and a cleaner environment, I believe living in a big city is more beneficial. Cities offer better educational opportunities, greater chances to meet people and adapt to society, and more job prospects. For these reasons, I would prefer living in a big city over a small town.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
500 bài Đọc hiểu ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 21)