Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 413 Lưu

The number of vehicles registered for use between 1996 and 2006 in a European country.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack
The number of vehicles registered for use between 1996 and 2006 in a European country.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The bar chart shows how many road vehicles were registered for usage in a particular country in Europe in two years, 1996 and 2006.

Overall, there was an upward trend in the registration of private cars and other vehicle types while lorries and motorcycles took the opposite direction, except buses whose figures remained unchanged. Among these categories, private cars had the highest registration in both years.

At the start of the period, by far the leading mode of transportation was private cars, with 19 million vehicles registered. The figures for the remaining options were negligible, ranging from 0.1 to 1.2 million vehicles.

Thereafter, the number of automobiles registered for private use witnessed a substantial increase, hitting a record high of 24 million in 2006. The trend for other types of vehicles was relatively similar, although the magnitude of change was less pronounced, with 1.9 million vehicles recorded in 2006. Conversely, the figures for motorcycles and lorries experienced a downward shift, declining to 0.6 and 0.4 million vehicles respectively at the end of the period. Finally, the number of registered buses in use remained stable at 0.1 million.

Sample 2:

The bar chart shows the number of registered road vehicles being used in a European country in 1996 and 2006. Overall, registered private cars and other types of vehicles showed an upward trend in numbers, with private cars experiencing the greatest increase, whereas negligible declines were seen in the numbers of registered lorries and motorcycles. In addition, private automobiles dominated other vehicles in both years, while the opposite was true in the case of bus registrations.

Private car registration stood at 19 million in 1996, after which it experienced a remarkable rise to 24 million in 2006. The only other category to witness an increase, albeit to a lesser extent, was other types of vehicles, which climbed from 1.2 million in 1996 to 1.9 million 20 years later.

Conversely, only half a million lorries were registered in 1996, compared to 1 million motorcycles registered in the same year. By 2006, the figures for both these vehicle types had dropped to 0.4 and 0.6, respectively.

Bus registrations, on the other hand, remained unchanged in both given years, with 0.1 million buses being registered in 1996 as well as in 2016, representing a minority among all the listed modes of transport.

Sample 3:

The bar chart depicts the changes in the quantity of registered road vehicles in a European nation between 1996 and 2006. Overall, except for lorries and motorcycles, the use of the remaining means of transport either increased or stayed unchanged. Furthermore, private cars were by far the most commonly used vehicle over the surveyed period.

It can be clearly observed that the disparity between car usage and other modes of transport was highly significant. In 1996, there were a total of 19 million private cars in use on the road, far exceeding the figures for all the remaining vehicles, which hovered merely between a marginal number of 0.1 million to 1.2 million.

The gap was further widened after a decade, in which the number of registered cars continued to top the chart after rising substantially to 24 million, roughly 12 times higher than that of other types of vehicles (1.9 million). Meanwhile, negligible declines to 0.4 and 0.6 million were recorded in the figures for lorries and motorcycles respectively, whereas bus usage remained unaltered at only 0.1 million in 2006.

Sample 4:

The bar chart illustrates the registration figures for various categories of vehicles in Europe over a decade, specifically from 1996 to 2006.

Overall, private cars had the highest number of registrations in both years, showing a significant increase over the decade. In contrast, the registrations for lorries and motorcycles declined, while the number of buses remained unchanged. The category of other types of vehicles also experienced notable growth.

In 1996, private cars dominated the vehicle registration landscape with 19 million units, which significantly rose to 24 million by 2006, indicating a growth of 5 million or a 26.3% increase. Similarly, the category of other types of vehicles also experienced an increase, climbing from 1.2 million in 1996 to 1.9 million in 2006, which corresponds to a rise of 0.7 million or approximately 58.3%.

Conversely, the registration figures for lorries and motorcycles demonstrated a different trajectory. Lorries, which had 0.5 million registrations in 1996, saw a minor decline to 0.4 million in 2006. This drop of 0.1 million constitutes a reduction of 20%. Motorcycles also fell significantly, recording a decrease from 1 million in 1996 to 0.6 million in 2006, representing a decline of 0.4 million or 40%. Interestingly, the number of buses remained static at 0.1 million throughout the decade.

Sample 5:

The bar chart provides information on the number of vehicles registered for use in a European country between 1996 and 2006, measured in millions, across categories including Other Types, Lorries, Buses, Motorcycles, and Private Cars.

Overall, Private Cars dominated vehicle registrations in both years, with a notable rise over the decade. Motorcycles and Other Types also increased, whereas Lorries saw a minor decrease, and Buses remained constant.

In 1996, Private Cars were the most registered vehicles at 19 million, rising significantly to 24 million by 2006, marking the highest increase among all categories. Other Types also saw growth from 1.2 million to 1.9 million.

Lorries experienced a slight decline from 0.5 million to 0.4 million, while Buses remained stable at 0.1 million over the decade. Motorcycles had an increase from 1 million to 1.6 million.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

The table and the chart below provide a breakdown of the total expenditure and the average amount of money spent by students per week while studying abroad in 4 countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The bar graph illustrates the overseas students' spending on accommodation, tuition, and living expenses, while the table depicts information about the average weekly expenses by international students in four countries: A, B, C, and D.

Overall, foreign students need to spend the highest in country A and the lowest in D. In nearly every nation, the international students’ weekly average living expenses are the greatest, while their housing cost registers the lowest.

The costliest country for studying is A, with a weekly average expense of 875 dollars. This is followed by B, C, and D, which have weekly expenses of 735, 540, and 435 dollars, respectively. However, foreign students always pay the least for accommodation, which incurs on average weekly 220, 280, 240, and 200 dollars in the nations A, B, C, and D, respectively.

On the other hand, living expenditures account for the highest portion of average weekly costs for international students in countries A, B, and C, with 430, 350, and 275 dollars, correspondingly. Tuition fees in the same countries (A, B and C) come in second with the weekly averages of 358, 320, and 250 dollars in order. However, D is the only nation where education accounts for the highest average spending area, coming in at USD 235, followed by the cost of living (USD 225) and housing (USD 200).

Sample 2:

The table illustrates information regarding the weekly spendings by overseas students in four countries, A, B, C and D, while the bar graph depicts the students’ expenditure on the sectors, housing, education fees and living expenses.

Overall, the cost of studying abroad is the highest in country A and the lowest in D. Apart from country D, living costs account for the most part of the weekly spendings in all countries, while accommodation registers the least.

Regarding the total cost of studying, A is the most expensive country with weekly average 875 dollars, followed by B, C and D with 735, 540 and 435 dollars, respectively. On the other hand, the overseas students always spend the least on accommodation, which are on average weekly 220, 280, 240 and 200 dollars in the corresponding countries A, B, C and D.

Considering the living cost, it takes the largest share of foreign students’ average weekly expenses in countries A, B, and C with 430, 350 and 275 dollars, respectively, while tuition fees in the same countries hold the second place with weekly average 358, 320 and 250 dollars, sequentially. However, D is the only country where tuition fee occupies the highest expenditure with average weekly 235 dollars, followed by living cost (USD 225) and accommodation (USD 200.)

Sample 3:

The table and bar graph depict information regarding the weekly spendings by overseas students in countries A, B C and D.

Overall, there are three elements, housing, school fees and living costs that contribute to the total weekly spendings. The total expenditure in country A is the highest while it is the lowest in country D. Living costs account for the most part of the weekly spendings in all countries except D.

The total mean weekly cost for pupils to study in country A is US$875, next by country B at US$735, and then by country C at US$540, and finally by country D at US$435. The living costs are always the biggest component of the expenditure except for country D, with about US$10 less than the major spending which is the school fees.

Accommodation accounts for the least among all spendings in all countries. The most expensive housing is found in country B, at US$280, and the cheapest in country D at US$200. The middle range can be seen in country A at US$220 and country C at US$240, respectively. Costs of the tuition fee range between US$ 358 and US$235 in country A and D, in order.

Lời giải

The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.

Sample 2:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.

Sample 3:

The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.

In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.

With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP