The chart and graph below give the information about three categories of workers in Australia and unemployment levels within those categories.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The chart and graph below give the information about three categories of workers in Australia and unemployment levels within those categories.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:

Sample 1:
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of three different groups of workers in Australia in the year of 1991 while the line chart shows the changes in the unemployment rates of 3 countries, namely Spain, Germany and Italy, from 1991 to 2005.
Overall, Australia-born workers represented the largest proportion in the total workforce of Australia. In addition, while Spain and Italy witnessed a downward trend in unemployment level, that of Germany grew and remained the highest at the end of the period.
Regarding workforce composition, in 1991, the vast majority were people who were born in Australia, accounting for 76%. Far fewer were those originating from countries that do not speak English, at 13%, which was slightly higher than the figure for workers from English-speaking nations, at 11%.
Concerning the patterns of unemployment, that of Spain fluctuated with a downward trend, dropping from around 13% in 1991 to 9% in 2005 after reaching a peak of 18% in the years between 1993 and 1995. Meanwhile, the unemployment level of Italy grew steadily from 8% in 1991 to hit the highest point of 12% in 1999 before declining back to 8% in 2003 and ending at this figure in 2005. The unemployment rate in Germany, on the other hand, doubled from 4% in 1991 to 9% in 1997. This number, despite a noticeable decrease to 6% in 2001, saw a steep climb from 6% to 11% in 2005, ending the period as the highest among the other countries.
Sample 2:
The given charts illustrate the distribution of the Australian workforce as well as unemployment rates of various worker types in three countries from 1991 to 2005. Overall, the vast majority of the workforce in Australia was Australian, followed distantly by non-English speaking and English-speaking people. Additionally, the unemployment figure for Spain declined, while the statistics of Germany increased and those of Italy fluctuated despite an increase in the middle of the period.
Concerning the worker categories, Australians made up the by far greatest percentage of workers, at 76%. The figures for non-English speaking and English-speaking workers were mostly comparable, standing at 13% and 11% respectively.
Regarding unemployment, the rate of Spanish people started highest at about 13%, then grew rapidly to 18% in 1993. It stayed constant in the next two years before plummeting to a low of approximately 9% in 2005. By contrast, the unemployment level in Germany increased significantly by almost threefolds from 4% in 1991 to rank first at slightly under 12% at the end of the period. Finally, the proportion for Italy underwent a constant growth of about 4% to 12% in the first 8 years prior to a noticeable dive back to 8% in the final year, moving from second to third position.
Sample 3:
The pie chart and line graph provided illustrate the composition of Australia’s workforce and the unemployment rates in Spain, Germany, and Italy over a 14-year period from 1991 to 2005.
Overall, the majority of the Australian workforce is comprised of English speakers, and over the years, Spain saw a dramatic decline in unemployment, while Italy witnessed a fall followed by a slight increase.
The pie chart demonstrates a workforce predominantly composed of Australians, who constitute 76% of the total. Non-English-speaking people account for 13%, while the remaining 11% of the workforce are English speaking people, presumably representing those who do not fall into the former two categories.
Examining the unemployment trends, Spain had a significant reduction in its unemployment rate, from the highest point of approximately 18% in 1993 to just under 8% in 2005. In contrast, Italy’s unemployment rate remained relatively stable with minor fluctuations around 10%, while Germany experienced an increase from the lowest rate of about 4% in 1991 to peak at around 11% in 1999.
Sample 4:
The pie chart depicts three distinct categories of workers residing in Australia. The line graph, on the other hand, illustrates unemployment trends in three different countries throughout the period from 1991 to 2005.
It is clear that Australian workers accounted for a vast majority of the graph given. Regarding the second graph, the interesting point is that there were 3 distinctive trends in accordance with 3 countries.
As the first chart shows, Australians made up the largest portion of the workforce, occupying a substantial 76% share. Conversely, non-English and English-speaking individuals only constituted 13% and 11%, respectively.
The line graph reveals three unique trends for each country’s unemployment rate. Germany’s rate experienced significant fluctuations, starting at 4% in 1991 before reaching 10% by 2005. In contrast, Spain’s rate went up to its peak of 18% in 1995, but then gradually decreased, eventually stabilizing at around 8%. Finally, Italy’s rate saw a rise to 12% in 1999 but then steadily declined to its starting point.
Sample 5:
The pie chart depicts the composition of the Australian workforce, while the line graph illustrates changes in unemployment across three European nations from 1991 to 2005. It is evident that Australians constitute the majority of the workforce in their own country, whereas unemployment trends vary among the countries featured in the line graph.
In Australia, the overwhelming majority of employees are native Australians, comprising 76%. The remaining quarter of the workforce consists of English-speaking and non-English-speaking individuals. Specifically, those who do not speak English constitute 13% of Australia’s workforce, while 11% are foreign English speakers, representing the smallest group.
Regarding the line graph, Spain had the highest unemployment rate among the three countries, at 13%, followed by Italy and Germany, with rates of 8% and 4%, respectively. Spain's unemployment rate peaked between 1993 and 1995 at 18%, before declining for most of the remaining years, reaching 9% in 2005. Italy's data, on the other hand, initially increased steadily to a peak of 12% in 1999, before decreasing until 2005, when the unemployment rate reverted to its 1991 level. Germany was the only country to experience a rise in unemployment; following a period of uncertainty until 2001, its rate surpassed those of Spain and Italy, reaching a record high of 11% in 2005.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi giữa kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.
In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.
Sample 2:
The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.
In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.
Sample 3:
The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.
In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.
With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The bar graph illustrates the overseas students' spending on accommodation, tuition, and living expenses, while the table depicts information about the average weekly expenses by international students in four countries: A, B, C, and D.
Overall, foreign students need to spend the highest in country A and the lowest in D. In nearly every nation, the international students’ weekly average living expenses are the greatest, while their housing cost registers the lowest.
The costliest country for studying is A, with a weekly average expense of 875 dollars. This is followed by B, C, and D, which have weekly expenses of 735, 540, and 435 dollars, respectively. However, foreign students always pay the least for accommodation, which incurs on average weekly 220, 280, 240, and 200 dollars in the nations A, B, C, and D, respectively.
On the other hand, living expenditures account for the highest portion of average weekly costs for international students in countries A, B, and C, with 430, 350, and 275 dollars, correspondingly. Tuition fees in the same countries (A, B and C) come in second with the weekly averages of 358, 320, and 250 dollars in order. However, D is the only nation where education accounts for the highest average spending area, coming in at USD 235, followed by the cost of living (USD 225) and housing (USD 200).
Sample 2:
The table illustrates information regarding the weekly spendings by overseas students in four countries, A, B, C and D, while the bar graph depicts the students’ expenditure on the sectors, housing, education fees and living expenses.
Overall, the cost of studying abroad is the highest in country A and the lowest in D. Apart from country D, living costs account for the most part of the weekly spendings in all countries, while accommodation registers the least.
Regarding the total cost of studying, A is the most expensive country with weekly average 875 dollars, followed by B, C and D with 735, 540 and 435 dollars, respectively. On the other hand, the overseas students always spend the least on accommodation, which are on average weekly 220, 280, 240 and 200 dollars in the corresponding countries A, B, C and D.
Considering the living cost, it takes the largest share of foreign students’ average weekly expenses in countries A, B, and C with 430, 350 and 275 dollars, respectively, while tuition fees in the same countries hold the second place with weekly average 358, 320 and 250 dollars, sequentially. However, D is the only country where tuition fee occupies the highest expenditure with average weekly 235 dollars, followed by living cost (USD 225) and accommodation (USD 200.)
Sample 3:
The table and bar graph depict information regarding the weekly spendings by overseas students in countries A, B C and D.
Overall, there are three elements, housing, school fees and living costs that contribute to the total weekly spendings. The total expenditure in country A is the highest while it is the lowest in country D. Living costs account for the most part of the weekly spendings in all countries except D.
The total mean weekly cost for pupils to study in country A is US$875, next by country B at US$735, and then by country C at US$540, and finally by country D at US$435. The living costs are always the biggest component of the expenditure except for country D, with about US$10 less than the major spending which is the school fees.
Accommodation accounts for the least among all spendings in all countries. The most expensive housing is found in country B, at US$280, and the cheapest in country D at US$200. The middle range can be seen in country A at US$220 and country C at US$240, respectively. Costs of the tuition fee range between US$ 358 and US$235 in country A and D, in order.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.