The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organizations from 2008 to 2011.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Sample 1:

The bar graph compares how much money was provided by five different organisations to developing countries between 2008 and 2011. Overall, the financial allocations from organisation 2 witnessed the most significant increase while those from organisations 4 and 5 took the opposite direction. Among these, organisation 3 remained the most significant contributor during the first 2 years while this position belonged to organisation 2 in the latter half of the period.

At the start of the period, the largest funding came from organisation 3, amounting to 1.5 billion dollars. This was followed by organisation 2 and 5, with each providing an allocation of around 1.25 billion dollars. The fourth and fifth place went to organisation 4 and organisation 1, with respective figures being approximately 0.7 and 0.6 billion dollars.

Thereafter, the amount of money provided by organisation 2 registered a sharp growth to an unprecedented 2.6 billion dollars, establishing it as the organisation with the largest investment. In contrast, the trend for organisation 5 and 4 was downward, decreasing to 0.4 and 0.3 billion dollars respectively in 2011. Finally, the figure for organisation 3 and 1 witnessed fluctuations, hovering around 1.5 and 0.7 billion dollars in turn.

Sample 2:

The bar graph delineates the financial contributions made by five distinct organizations to developing nations from 2008 to 2011.

Overall, among these entities, organization 3 maintained its status as the most significant contributor during the initial two years, but organization 2 assumed this position during the latter part of the period. The funding provided by organization 2 experienced a surge, while organizations 4 and 5 witnessed a contrasting decline.

At the onset, organization 3 allocated the most substantial financial support, amounting to $1.5 billion. Following closely were organizations 2 and 5, each contributing approximately $1.25 billion. Organization 4 and organization 1 secured the fourth and fifth positions, disbursing around $0.7 and $0.6 billion, respectively.

Subsequently, Organization 2 exhibited an exponential rise in its financial provisions, skyrocketing to an unprecedented $2.6 billion, positioning it as the foremost contributor. Conversely, the financial contributions of organizations 5 and 4 followed a downward trajectory, dwindling to $0.4 and $0.3 billion, respectively, by 2011. Meanwhile, the figures for organizations 3 and 1 fluctuated, oscillating around $1.5 and $0.7 billion, respectively.

Sample 3:

The bar graph details the financial aid from five various organisations to emerging nations between 2008 and 2011. Overall, the sum of monetary resources provided by Organisations 1 and 2 increased whereas

Organisations 4 and 5 saw a downward trend and Organisation 3 remained stable despite some minor fluctuation.

Concerning the categories that rose, in 2008, the amount of funding donated by Organisation 2 was nearly double Organisation 1, at roughly $1.3 $billion, and about $0.6 billion, respectively. While Organisation 2 increased most significantly and consistently to the overall highest point of just over $2.5 billion in the end, Organisation 1 saw a slight rise to approximately $0.9 billion in 2009, followed by a drop of around $0.2 billion a year later and remained the same until the final year.

Moving to the other categories, the donations of Organisation 5 dropped constantly from roughly $1.2 billion to slightly under $0.5 billion between 2008 and 2011. Moreover, Organisation 4 contributed the least, at around $0.7 billion in 2008, dipping to about 0.3 billion in 2009 before falling further to nearly $0.2 billion in 2011. Finally, starting at the highest result of $1.5 billion at the beginning, the amount of Organisation 3 fluctuated at this level until the end, and was surpassed by Organisation 2.