Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 312 Lưu

The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack
The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The given bar graphs illustrate the amount of protein and calories consumed by an average person in 4 regions. Overall, North America registers the highest figures, followed by Latin America, East Africa and lastly India in both charts. In addition, only the consumption statistics in North America exceed the recommended levels, and animals are the main source of protein in most regions.

Regarding average protein intake, the total in North America stands at 80 units, surpassing the advised figure of around 67 units. Out of the total, animal protein accounts for a major 62 units. In comparison, the overall figure in Latin America is significantly lower, at 45 units, of which 32 is from animals. In East Africa and India, other protein sources register 15 units in both areas, while the statistics for animal sources are16 and 13 units respectively.

Concerning the intake of calories, North Americans account for the greatest figure of around 3400 on average, which is about 500 higher than the recommendation. Latin American people, however, consume less than the ideal amount, at approximately 2800 calories. The figures in East Africa and India were even lower, standing at about 2200 and 2000 consecutively.

Sample 2:

The bar charts illustrate the protein and calorie consumption of people in India, East Africa, Latin America, and North America.

Overall, North Americans not only consume more protein and calories than any other region in the chart`but are also the only people whose consumption exceeds the ideal protein and calorie intake levels (nearly 70 units and 3000 calories). This is in stark contrast to India, where the consumption of both protein and calories is the lowest.

In terms of protein intake, North Americans consume an average of 80 units, distantly followed by Latin Americans, who consume approximately 45 units. Notably, the majority of the protein consumed in both regions comes from animals, at 62 and 32 units, respectively. Meanwhile, there is a negligible difference in the protein intake between East Africa and India, both at roughly 30 units, with approximately half of these derived from other unspecified sources.

Regarding caloric intake, North American people again top the list, at 3500 units. In contrast, the figures for Latin America, East Africa, and India are lower, standing at close to 3000, just over 2500, and 2000 calories, in that order.

Sample 3:

The bar charts compare the consumption of protein and calories by individuals from four particular regions around the world.

In both charts, North America has the largest overall numbers, followed distantly by Latin America, East Africa and India. It is also clear that people from North America consume more protein and calories than they are expected to with animal protein being preferred over other protein while the remaining regions do not exceed the recommended intake of these nutrients.

Regarding average protein intake, residents in North America get around 62 units of protein from animals and 18 units of other protein, surpassing the ideal levels of protein consumption. This figure is followed by Latin America with animal protein accounting for 32 units, almost 2 times as many units as other protein. Individuals from East Africa and India consume roughly similar amounts of protein, at around 30 units, with the exception of Indians who ingest more non-meat protein.

Concerning the calorie intake, North America is still the only continent that consumes more than required, at 3500. With 2800 calories ingested compared to 3000, Latin America nearly meets the necessary daily intake of calories. East Africa and India have far lower figures, with about 2400 and 2000 calories, respectively.

Sample 4:

The given bar charts offer a detailed comparison of protein and calorie consumption among individuals in four different regions around the world.

Overall, it is evident that North America and Latin America show higher levels of both protein and calorie intakes, whereas those figures are considerably lower in East Africa and India. Another noteworthy observation is that North America is the only territory exceeding the recommended amount for both categories.

Turning to the details, North America has the highest protein intake, with an average of approximately 80 grams. Latin America follows closely with 45 grams of protein, comprising one-third from animal sources and the remaining from alternative origins. Meanwhile, individuals in East Africa and India consume a similar amount of protein (roughly 30%), with half derived from animals and the other half from other sources.

Regarding the average calorie consumption, North America records the highest intake among four areas, averaging at 3500 calories. Latin America and East Africa have slightly lower figures, around 2700 and 2400 calories respectively. On the contrary, Indians take in an average of 2000 calories, which is the lowest among the four regions.

Sample 5:

The bar chart illustrates a comparison of the average protein and calorie consumption among populations in four distinct regions worldwide.

It is apparent that North American individuals not only consume the highest quantities of protein and calories but also exceed the recommended intake levels.

In terms of protein consumption, citizens in India and East Africa consume approximately 30g of protein each, with nearly equal divisions between two protein sources: animal products and others. In stark contrast, North America leads with an average protein intake of 80g, surpassing the ideal quantity by over 10g and nearly doubling the intake of Latin American individuals, who consume around 45g. Interestingly, the majority, approximately three-quarters, of protein intake in both North America and Latin America is derived from animal sources.

Regarding calorie absorption, the recommended level stands at 3000g, a threshold exceeded by North American consumers by 500g. Latin American people have their calorie intake very close to the ideal level, at roughly 2750g. Conversely, individuals in India and East Africa exhibit notably lower figures, at about 2000g and 2350g on average.

Sample 6:

The two bar charts provide a breakdown of consumption of protein and calories by people from four regions of the world. Generally, the inhabitants of North America have the highest intake of both, and this is also the only region where overconsumption of protein and calories occurs.

The average protein intake of North Americans is 80 units, exceeding the ideal value by 10. There are 62 units of protein derived from animals, while the remaining amount originates from other sources. Latin Americans report the second highest consumption, with 45 units, nearly three-quarters of which is from animals. The figures for East Africans and Indians are 31 and 28 units, respectively. Notably, India is the only region where the share of non-animal protein consumed is over 50%, with 15 units.

With regard to calorie intake, people from North America record a figure of 3500 calories, which is 600 above the recommended value. This is followed by the data of Latin America, where inhabitants' average intake hovers around 2800 calories, 100 short of the ideal threshold. About 2300 and 2000 calories are consumed by East Africans and Indians, correspondingly. Indians display the lowest figure out of all regions, at approximately two-thirds of the recommended consumption.

Sample 7:

The bar charts display the average intake of protein and calories in India, East Africa, Latin America and North America. It is clear that North America people had a much higher value of the average intake of protein or calories than the other countries.

In terms of the average intake of protein, North America had the highest rate of 80%, which includes the maximum percentage protein (62%) that derived from the fats and meats of animals, and other protein (18%). Latin America was the second (45%), which contains animal protein (32%) and other protein (13%). Then, East Africa was listed the third (31%), which involves animal protein (16%) and other protein (15%). finally, India had the minimum proportion of the account of the average intake of calories (28%), which embody animal protein (13%) and other protein (15%).

For the average intake of calories, much more calories intake by North America individuals than the people of Latin American, East Africa and India, the figure was 3500, which was followed by Latin America (2750), East Africa (2250), and India (2000).

Sample 8:

The graphs illustrate how much protein and energy are taken in by people in four different areas of the world, namely India, East Africa, Latin America, and North America.

Overall, animal sources fulfill the majority of the protein needs in all regions except India. In addition, North Americans, with the most protein-rich and high-calorie diets among the groups, are the only population to exceed ideal levels of protein and calories.

Regarding dietary protein, the ideal amount is 68. In North America, 62 out of a total of 80 protein units come from animals, which is almost double the corresponding figure for Latin America, with 32 units derived from animal sources, and other proteins coming to 13 units. Meanwhile, East Africa and India have similar animal protein intakes, at 16 and 13 units respectively, and both places have the exact same consumption of vegan protein, at 15 units each.

In terms of gross energy intake, people from India consume the lowest amount, at 2000 calories, nearly 1000 short of the ideal level, and 300 less than their East African counterparts. The caloric intake of the typical Latin American is the second highest, at approximately 2800 calories, compared to North America’s figure of 3500, which exceeds the recommended quota by over 500.

Sample 9:

The charts illustrate the amount of protein and calories consumed by the average person from four regions around the world.

It is immediately clear that among the people of four areas, North American residents consume the highest amount of protein and calories, while the opposite was true for people from India. Additionally, the former is also the only demographic whose intake is higher than the ideal for both protein and calories.

In terms of protein consumption, the ideal intake stands at about 68 grams. With an average consumption of 62 grams of animal protein and 18 grams of other protein combined, North American people are the only group to exceed the aforementioned threshold. This is followed distantly by the figure for Latin America, whose residents consume 32 grams of animal protein and 13 grams of other proteins on average. People from India and East Africa take in far below the ideal amount of protein, with both groups consuming, on average, 15 grams of other protein and 13 grams and 16 grams of protein, respectively.

Regarding calorie intake, the ideal average amount is 3000 calories. Similarly, North Americans are the only group to consume more than the recommended amount at 3500 calories on average, whereas the figure for Latin America stood at 2800, slightly short of the recommended amount. The average calorie consumption of India and East Africa once again fall far lower than the standard amount at 2000 calories and 2300 calories respectively.

Sample 10:

The bar charts give information about protein and calorie consumption in India, East Africa, Latin America and North America.

Overall, people in all of the countries examined generally did not consume the amounts of protein and calorie considered to be ideal, with North Americans consuming more than both amounts recommended, and an exception being recorded among Latin Americans, who consumed nearly the suggested calorie intake.

In terms of average protein intake, it was advisable that the average amount of protein eaten was a little under 70 units, and North America was the only country that exceeded that amount suggested, with 80 units of protein being consumed in this country. Although people in Latin America ate less protein in comparison to the ideal protein intake, averaging at 45 units, somewhat similar patterns can be observed between Latin America and North America, with the number of other kinds of protein being three times as high as that of animal protein, at 32 and 62 units for the former type, and 13 and 18 units for the latter one. Meanwhile, the consumption levels of protein in India and East Africa were relatively the same, hovering around 30 units and notably, their intake of animal protein and other types of protein were balanced, with each accounting for 15 units.

With regard to average calorie intake, the number of calories one was advised to consume was a little under 3000 calories, and again North Americans did not adhere to this as their dietary choices were high in calories (3500 calories) when compared to the ideal calorie intake. By comparison, the calorie-consuming number among Latin Americans was just minimally lower compared to the level of consumption suggested, whereas far fewer calories were eaten by people from East Africa and India (2200 as opposed to 2000 units).

Sample 11:

The charts illustrate the amount of protein and calories consumed by citizens from India, East Africa, Latin America, and North America. Overall, it can be seen that North America had the highest protein and calorie intakes while the lowest place belonged to India.

In terms of protein consumption, North America consumed 80 units, which was 11 units higher than the ideal intake level, with 62 units sourced from animal protein. In contrast, Latin America’s protein intake was nearly half of North America’s, totaling 45 units, of which 70% were from animal sources. Meanwhile, India recorded the lowest protein intake at 28 units, with animal protein accounting for only 13 units, and other proteins contributing 15 units. East Africa’s protein consumption totaled 31 units, evenly distributed between animal and other protein sources.

Regarding calorie intake, North America led with approximately 3500 calories, exceeding the ideal figure by 600 calories. Latin America followed with 2900 calories, 100 calories below the ideal intake. East Africa consumed 2200 calories, while India had the lowest average intake of 2000 calories, which was 900 calories below the ideal amount.

Sample 12:

Detailed in the shown bar charts is a comparison of average protein and calorie intake in four distinct regions of the world. 

Overall, the average absorption rate of animal protein is relatively higher than that of other protein in almost all regions bar India. While the figure for average protein and calorie intake amongst citizens in North America surpasses the recommended levels, that in the remaining regions is recorded with a subpar performance.

North America leads in per capita protein consumption, with animal protein being a far more preferable source than other protein among consumers. More specifically, the consumption rate of animal-based protein (62 units) triples that of other proteins (18 units), and the sum of both is 10 units higher than the recommended protein serving size. Similarly, significantly more units (nearly 20 units) of animal protein are consumed by Latin Americans than those of other protein. In stark contrast, the lowest per capita consumption of animal-based protein and other types of protein can be found in India (15 units) and Latin America (13 units) respectively. The ratio of protein intake from animals to other sources among Indians and East Africans is relatively one to one (both at 15 units). Regarding daily caloric intake, Indians consume far fewer calories each day than is recommended – a mere 2,000, while North Americans consume most calories – in excess of 3,500 calories per diem. Seemingly, the figure for daily calorific consumption among Latin Americans and East Africans is closest to North Americans, standing in the vicinity of 3,000 and around 2,500 calories respectively.

Sample 13:

The given bar charts compare four different regions in terms of their protein and calories intake on average.

Overall, of all countries, citizens in North America consumed the largest amount of protein and calories on average, and it was also the only country that achieved an ideal meal intake for these two essential nutrients. What also stands out from the charts is that protein from animals accounts for a larger share than that from other sources in almost all countries surveyed with the exception of India.

As far as protein intake is considered, in North America, around 62 units of protein is from animals, almost triple that from other sources, the total of which exceeds the ideal amount, at nearly 70 units. This was followed by Latin America as the total amount of protein consumed stood at 45 units, with animal-based protein making up a third of the total. The average intake of Indian and East African citizens was relatively similar, ranging from 28 to 31 units. The ratio of protein from animals to others was almost one to one in these 2 countries.

Regarding calories intake, North America recorded the highest number of calories consumed, at nearly 3500 units, surpassing the ideal amount by nearly 500 units. The total intake of an average person in Latin America almost reaches the ideal level, standing at nearly 3000. The figures for East Africa and India were significantly lower, at 2300 and 2000 respectively.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.

Sample 2:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.

Sample 3:

The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.

In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.

With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.

Lời giải

The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The chart illustrates a comparison of the three kinds of foreign tourist visits to a certain European nation during a twenty-year period, beginning in 1987 and ending in 2007.

Overall, the majority of survey years showed that most foreign visitors flocked to coastal locations, while mountainous places received the fewest. Furthermore, the number of visitors visiting all three locations rose throughout this time frame.

Over 40,000 tourists from outside of this European nation visited its shore in 1987. Its number plummeted to roughly 35,000 in 1992 but has steadily increased since then, peaking at over 75,000 in 2007. Meanwhile, the annual number of international visitors to the mountains ranged from 20,000 to 30,000 in the first half of the decade and then jumped to 35,000 in 2007.

For the first fifteen years, the number of international visitors to this country's lakes steadily increased, reaching a high of 75,000 in 2002. In the following years, however, this number dropped dramatically, reaching 50,000 in 2007.

Sample 2:

The chart presents a comparative analysis of three categories of foreign tourist visits to a specific European nation from 1987 to 2007.

In general, there was a consistent increase in the number of tourists across all three locations throughout the specified period. Coastal areas witnessed the highest influx of foreign tourists in almost all the periods.

The year 1987 marked the arrival of over 40,000 foreign tourists to the nation’s coastal regions. However, this figure experienced a decline, dropping to approximately 35,000 visitors by 1992. The numbers then surged significantly, peaking at over 75,000 visitors by 2007. Conversely, visits to mountainous locations started at the second highest level of 20,000, progressing to over 30,000 in 1997. Thereafter, this figure stayed unaltered towards 2002 before a modest increment to about 38,000 in 2007.

The volume of international tourists visiting the country’s lakes saw consistent growth over the initial fifteen years, reaching a pinnacle of 75,000 visitors in 2002. Subsequently, there was a substantial decline in visitation, plummeting to 50,000 by the year 2007.

Sample 3:

The graph illustrates the number of tourists to three distinct regions in a European country, spanning from 1987 to 2007. Overall, the places have experienced an increased tourist attraction from the past two decades.

Initially, the coast, with around 40,000 visitors, was known to be the most popular region among the three. On the contrary, the lakes were the least liked, only comprising around 10,000 visitors. It is also notable that both the coast and the lakes had the same number of maximum visitors in this period, which was around 75,000.

By 2007, the coast had become the most popular tourist destination, having visited by almost 75,000 visitors. Although the lakes too saw a steep rise initially, the visitors started to decline, gaining the maximum attraction of approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002. By 2007, it had declined to 40,000 visitors. The mountains surprisingly did not experience any great inclination. They only had around 15,000 more visitors since 1987.

Sample 4:

The given graph illustrates the number of overseas travellers who visited three different attractions in a European country from 1987 to 2007. It is noticeable that the number of tourists visiting all the areas witnessed an upward trend over the given period.

In 1987, the coast attracted the most overseas visitors, with 40 thousand while the converse held true for the lakes, with only 10 thousand. Over the next two decades, the number of overseas tourists opting for the lakes rose gradually to approximately 35 thousand. Similarly, there was a dramatic jump in the number of visitors to the lakes to about 75 thousand, followed by a drop to 50 thousand in 2007.

At the beginning of the period, 20 thousand tourists from other countries visited the mountains. The mentioned attractions welcomed 30 thousand visitors in 1997 and the figure remained relatively stable until 2002. At the end of the period, the number of tourists to the mountains reached the highest point of 35 thousand.

Sample 5:

The given line graph depicts information about how many foreigners visited three separate regions in a European nation, during the span of a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007.

Overall, the most notable detail is that those three regions all attracted an increasing number of foreigners. In addition, the lakes’ tourist figures witnessed the most dramatic change among those given.

In more detail, at approximately 10,000 visitors in 1987, the quantity of foreign travelers who were attracted to the lakes gradually rose to around 50,000 in 2000, before peaking at approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002, This figure then dropped back down to approximately 50,000 people in 2007.

With regards to tourist numbers in coastal and mountainous areas, the overall figures increased, however mountainous areas remained the least attractive travel option out of the three. In 1987, the number of those who chose the coast as a travel destination stood at 40,000, compared to only 20,000 travelers who went to the mountains. In the next 14 years, the coast witnessed a slight decrease in the quantity of visitors by a few thousand, which was followed by a significant climb to around 60,000 people, whereas the number of those visiting mountainous areas went up remarkably to 30,000 in 2001.

In the final 6 years, while the quantity of overseas tourists going to the coast rose moderately to above 70,000, there was a slight climb in those who paid a visit to the mountains to about 35,000.

Sample 6:

The line chart details statistics about foreign travellers to three types of tourist destinations in an unspecified nation in Europe from 1987 to 2007. Overall, all categories witnessed an upswing with the most significant growth being seen in the number of tourists to the lakeside areas.

The coastal region welcomed the highest level of alien sightseers in the first year, at 40,000. Despite dipping to about 35,000 five years later, it recovered rapidly and consistently to approximately 76,000 in the final year.

Regarding the visitors to the mountainous attractions, this figure rose moderately from 20,000 in 1987 to 30,000 in 1997. Subsequently, it documented a period of stability until 2002, followed by a rise of nearly 7,000 by the end.

Finally, starting at the lowest result of 10,000 in the beginning, the number of overseas tourists to the lakes surged to 40,000 by 1997. In the next five years, it increased more sharply to a peak of just over 75,000 which surpassed the coast, before dropping quickly back to second position with 50,000 by 2007.

Sample 7:

The given outline is the number of people who have gone to the distinctive three places (the coast, the mountains, and the lakes) in the European nation from 1987 to 2000. Looking at the by-and-large structure it is quickly clear that the number of worldwide guests to the coast has diminished over the past five years. In spite of the first moo numbers, there has been a sharp increment in the number of guests to the lake by the conclusion, whereas those going to the mountains have expanded slowly.

After dissecting the chart, it can be seen that in 1987, 40% of worldwide people went by the coast which declined to around 35% in 1992. After that, the esteem expanded to roughly 75% in 2007. While, in 1987, 20% of universal people went to see the mountains which expanded consistently to around almost 33% in 2007.

In 1987, the rate of outside guests was 10%, expanding to 40% by 1997. This figure rose to 72% in 2002, sometime recently dropping to 50% in 2007. The coast had the most elevated guest numbers among the three zones. In the interim, both the coast and the mountains experienced development in their guest tallies.

Sample 8:

The line chart outlines the number of universal sightseers gone by the diverse three places in a European nation from 1887 to 2007. The unit is measured in thousands. By and large, it can be apparent that an expansive lion's share of guests went to Europe in 2002 and 2007, and a few thousand individuals in 1987. A look at the chart reveals that more at that point 70 thousand people went by the lakes in 2002, and the same number of individuals went to the mountains in 2007. Within the same year, a decrease was observed in the number of guests who went to lakes as it was 50 thousand. In 1987, as it was, 40 thousand individuals visited the coastal regions, and after that sudden expanded drift watched from 1992 to 2007.

For the mountain ranges, 20 thousand individuals went in 1987, and exceptionally few increases were observed over a period of time. Around 35 thousand sightseers went by the mountains in 2007.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP