Câu hỏi:
12/01/2025 225Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
The given bar graphs illustrate the amount of protein and calories consumed by an average person in 4 regions. Overall, North America registers the highest figures, followed by Latin America, East Africa and lastly India in both charts. In addition, only the consumption statistics in North America exceed the recommended levels, and animals are the main source of protein in most regions.
Regarding average protein intake, the total in North America stands at 80 units, surpassing the advised figure of around 67 units. Out of the total, animal protein accounts for a major 62 units. In comparison, the overall figure in Latin America is significantly lower, at 45 units, of which 32 is from animals. In East Africa and India, other protein sources register 15 units in both areas, while the statistics for animal sources are16 and 13 units respectively.
Concerning the intake of calories, North Americans account for the greatest figure of around 3400 on average, which is about 500 higher than the recommendation. Latin American people, however, consume less than the ideal amount, at approximately 2800 calories. The figures in East Africa and India were even lower, standing at about 2200 and 2000 consecutively.
Sample 2:
The bar charts illustrate the protein and calorie consumption of people in India, East Africa, Latin America, and North America.
Overall, North Americans not only consume more protein and calories than any other region in the chart`but are also the only people whose consumption exceeds the ideal protein and calorie intake levels (nearly 70 units and 3000 calories). This is in stark contrast to India, where the consumption of both protein and calories is the lowest.
In terms of protein intake, North Americans consume an average of 80 units, distantly followed by Latin Americans, who consume approximately 45 units. Notably, the majority of the protein consumed in both regions comes from animals, at 62 and 32 units, respectively. Meanwhile, there is a negligible difference in the protein intake between East Africa and India, both at roughly 30 units, with approximately half of these derived from other unspecified sources.
Regarding caloric intake, North American people again top the list, at 3500 units. In contrast, the figures for Latin America, East Africa, and India are lower, standing at close to 3000, just over 2500, and 2000 calories, in that order.
Sample 3:
The bar charts compare the consumption of protein and calories by individuals from four particular regions around the world.
In both charts, North America has the largest overall numbers, followed distantly by Latin America, East Africa and India. It is also clear that people from North America consume more protein and calories than they are expected to with animal protein being preferred over other protein while the remaining regions do not exceed the recommended intake of these nutrients.
Regarding average protein intake, residents in North America get around 62 units of protein from animals and 18 units of other protein, surpassing the ideal levels of protein consumption. This figure is followed by Latin America with animal protein accounting for 32 units, almost 2 times as many units as other protein. Individuals from East Africa and India consume roughly similar amounts of protein, at around 30 units, with the exception of Indians who ingest more non-meat protein.
Concerning the calorie intake, North America is still the only continent that consumes more than required, at 3500. With 2800 calories ingested compared to 3000, Latin America nearly meets the necessary daily intake of calories. East Africa and India have far lower figures, with about 2400 and 2000 calories, respectively.
Sample 4:
The given bar charts offer a detailed comparison of protein and calorie consumption among individuals in four different regions around the world.
Overall, it is evident that North America and Latin America show higher levels of both protein and calorie intakes, whereas those figures are considerably lower in East Africa and India. Another noteworthy observation is that North America is the only territory exceeding the recommended amount for both categories.
Turning to the details, North America has the highest protein intake, with an average of approximately 80 grams. Latin America follows closely with 45 grams of protein, comprising one-third from animal sources and the remaining from alternative origins. Meanwhile, individuals in East Africa and India consume a similar amount of protein (roughly 30%), with half derived from animals and the other half from other sources.
Regarding the average calorie consumption, North America records the highest intake among four areas, averaging at 3500 calories. Latin America and East Africa have slightly lower figures, around 2700 and 2400 calories respectively. On the contrary, Indians take in an average of 2000 calories, which is the lowest among the four regions.
Sample 5:
The bar chart illustrates a comparison of the average protein and calorie consumption among populations in four distinct regions worldwide.
It is apparent that North American individuals not only consume the highest quantities of protein and calories but also exceed the recommended intake levels.
In terms of protein consumption, citizens in India and East Africa consume approximately 30g of protein each, with nearly equal divisions between two protein sources: animal products and others. In stark contrast, North America leads with an average protein intake of 80g, surpassing the ideal quantity by over 10g and nearly doubling the intake of Latin American individuals, who consume around 45g. Interestingly, the majority, approximately three-quarters, of protein intake in both North America and Latin America is derived from animal sources.
Regarding calorie absorption, the recommended level stands at 3000g, a threshold exceeded by North American consumers by 500g. Latin American people have their calorie intake very close to the ideal level, at roughly 2750g. Conversely, individuals in India and East Africa exhibit notably lower figures, at about 2000g and 2350g on average.
Sample 6:
The two bar charts provide a breakdown of consumption of protein and calories by people from four regions of the world. Generally, the inhabitants of North America have the highest intake of both, and this is also the only region where overconsumption of protein and calories occurs.
The average protein intake of North Americans is 80 units, exceeding the ideal value by 10. There are 62 units of protein derived from animals, while the remaining amount originates from other sources. Latin Americans report the second highest consumption, with 45 units, nearly three-quarters of which is from animals. The figures for East Africans and Indians are 31 and 28 units, respectively. Notably, India is the only region where the share of non-animal protein consumed is over 50%, with 15 units.
With regard to calorie intake, people from North America record a figure of 3500 calories, which is 600 above the recommended value. This is followed by the data of Latin America, where inhabitants' average intake hovers around 2800 calories, 100 short of the ideal threshold. About 2300 and 2000 calories are consumed by East Africans and Indians, correspondingly. Indians display the lowest figure out of all regions, at approximately two-thirds of the recommended consumption.
Sample 7:
The bar charts display the average intake of protein and calories in India, East Africa, Latin America and North America. It is clear that North America people had a much higher value of the average intake of protein or calories than the other countries.
In terms of the average intake of protein, North America had the highest rate of 80%, which includes the maximum percentage protein (62%) that derived from the fats and meats of animals, and other protein (18%). Latin America was the second (45%), which contains animal protein (32%) and other protein (13%). Then, East Africa was listed the third (31%), which involves animal protein (16%) and other protein (15%). finally, India had the minimum proportion of the account of the average intake of calories (28%), which embody animal protein (13%) and other protein (15%).
For the average intake of calories, much more calories intake by North America individuals than the people of Latin American, East Africa and India, the figure was 3500, which was followed by Latin America (2750), East Africa (2250), and India (2000).
Sample 8:
The graphs illustrate how much protein and energy are taken in by people in four different areas of the world, namely India, East Africa, Latin America, and North America.
Overall, animal sources fulfill the majority of the protein needs in all regions except India. In addition, North Americans, with the most protein-rich and high-calorie diets among the groups, are the only population to exceed ideal levels of protein and calories.
Regarding dietary protein, the ideal amount is 68. In North America, 62 out of a total of 80 protein units come from animals, which is almost double the corresponding figure for Latin America, with 32 units derived from animal sources, and other proteins coming to 13 units. Meanwhile, East Africa and India have similar animal protein intakes, at 16 and 13 units respectively, and both places have the exact same consumption of vegan protein, at 15 units each.
In terms of gross energy intake, people from India consume the lowest amount, at 2000 calories, nearly 1000 short of the ideal level, and 300 less than their East African counterparts. The caloric intake of the typical Latin American is the second highest, at approximately 2800 calories, compared to North America’s figure of 3500, which exceeds the recommended quota by over 500.
Sample 9:
The charts illustrate the amount of protein and calories consumed by the average person from four regions around the world.
It is immediately clear that among the people of four areas, North American residents consume the highest amount of protein and calories, while the opposite was true for people from India. Additionally, the former is also the only demographic whose intake is higher than the ideal for both protein and calories.
In terms of protein consumption, the ideal intake stands at about 68 grams. With an average consumption of 62 grams of animal protein and 18 grams of other protein combined, North American people are the only group to exceed the aforementioned threshold. This is followed distantly by the figure for Latin America, whose residents consume 32 grams of animal protein and 13 grams of other proteins on average. People from India and East Africa take in far below the ideal amount of protein, with both groups consuming, on average, 15 grams of other protein and 13 grams and 16 grams of protein, respectively.
Regarding calorie intake, the ideal average amount is 3000 calories. Similarly, North Americans are the only group to consume more than the recommended amount at 3500 calories on average, whereas the figure for Latin America stood at 2800, slightly short of the recommended amount. The average calorie consumption of India and East Africa once again fall far lower than the standard amount at 2000 calories and 2300 calories respectively.
Sample 10:
The bar charts give information about protein and calorie consumption in India, East Africa, Latin America and North America.
Overall, people in all of the countries examined generally did not consume the amounts of protein and calorie considered to be ideal, with North Americans consuming more than both amounts recommended, and an exception being recorded among Latin Americans, who consumed nearly the suggested calorie intake.
In terms of average protein intake, it was advisable that the average amount of protein eaten was a little under 70 units, and North America was the only country that exceeded that amount suggested, with 80 units of protein being consumed in this country. Although people in Latin America ate less protein in comparison to the ideal protein intake, averaging at 45 units, somewhat similar patterns can be observed between Latin America and North America, with the number of other kinds of protein being three times as high as that of animal protein, at 32 and 62 units for the former type, and 13 and 18 units for the latter one. Meanwhile, the consumption levels of protein in India and East Africa were relatively the same, hovering around 30 units and notably, their intake of animal protein and other types of protein were balanced, with each accounting for 15 units.
With regard to average calorie intake, the number of calories one was advised to consume was a little under 3000 calories, and again North Americans did not adhere to this as their dietary choices were high in calories (3500 calories) when compared to the ideal calorie intake. By comparison, the calorie-consuming number among Latin Americans was just minimally lower compared to the level of consumption suggested, whereas far fewer calories were eaten by people from East Africa and India (2200 as opposed to 2000 units).
Sample 11:
The charts illustrate the amount of protein and calories consumed by citizens from India, East Africa, Latin America, and North America. Overall, it can be seen that North America had the highest protein and calorie intakes while the lowest place belonged to India.
In terms of protein consumption, North America consumed 80 units, which was 11 units higher than the ideal intake level, with 62 units sourced from animal protein. In contrast, Latin America’s protein intake was nearly half of North America’s, totaling 45 units, of which 70% were from animal sources. Meanwhile, India recorded the lowest protein intake at 28 units, with animal protein accounting for only 13 units, and other proteins contributing 15 units. East Africa’s protein consumption totaled 31 units, evenly distributed between animal and other protein sources.
Regarding calorie intake, North America led with approximately 3500 calories, exceeding the ideal figure by 600 calories. Latin America followed with 2900 calories, 100 calories below the ideal intake. East Africa consumed 2200 calories, while India had the lowest average intake of 2000 calories, which was 900 calories below the ideal amount.
Sample 12:
Detailed in the shown bar charts is a comparison of average protein and calorie intake in four distinct regions of the world.
Overall, the average absorption rate of animal protein is relatively higher than that of other protein in almost all regions bar India. While the figure for average protein and calorie intake amongst citizens in North America surpasses the recommended levels, that in the remaining regions is recorded with a subpar performance.
North America leads in per capita protein consumption, with animal protein being a far more preferable source than other protein among consumers. More specifically, the consumption rate of animal-based protein (62 units) triples that of other proteins (18 units), and the sum of both is 10 units higher than the recommended protein serving size. Similarly, significantly more units (nearly 20 units) of animal protein are consumed by Latin Americans than those of other protein. In stark contrast, the lowest per capita consumption of animal-based protein and other types of protein can be found in India (15 units) and Latin America (13 units) respectively. The ratio of protein intake from animals to other sources among Indians and East Africans is relatively one to one (both at 15 units). Regarding daily caloric intake, Indians consume far fewer calories each day than is recommended – a mere 2,000, while North Americans consume most calories – in excess of 3,500 calories per diem. Seemingly, the figure for daily calorific consumption among Latin Americans and East Africans is closest to North Americans, standing in the vicinity of 3,000 and around 2,500 calories respectively.
Sample 13:
The given bar charts compare four different regions in terms of their protein and calories intake on average.
Overall, of all countries, citizens in North America consumed the largest amount of protein and calories on average, and it was also the only country that achieved an ideal meal intake for these two essential nutrients. What also stands out from the charts is that protein from animals accounts for a larger share than that from other sources in almost all countries surveyed with the exception of India.
As far as protein intake is considered, in North America, around 62 units of protein is from animals, almost triple that from other sources, the total of which exceeds the ideal amount, at nearly 70 units. This was followed by Latin America as the total amount of protein consumed stood at 45 units, with animal-based protein making up a third of the total. The average intake of Indian and East African citizens was relatively similar, ranging from 28 to 31 units. The ratio of protein from animals to others was almost one to one in these 2 countries.
Regarding calories intake, North America recorded the highest number of calories consumed, at nearly 3500 units, surpassing the ideal amount by nearly 500 units. The total intake of an average person in Latin America almost reaches the ideal level, standing at nearly 3000. The figures for East Africa and India were significantly lower, at 2300 and 2000 respectively.Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The maps show changes in the layout of a bookstore between 2000 and the present.
In general, the layout of the bookstore has been significantly changed, especially on the left-hand side of the room. A number of features have been moved and modified, while other facilities have been added.
In 2000, there was a large section dedicated to fiction books on the left-hand side of the store. However, that section has been divided into four new sections, in which books on art, hobbies, cookery, and fiction are now displayed.
The area for fiction books in the rear left corner of the store is now used for non-fiction books, while the old non-fiction section has been transformed into a new cafe. The central area of the room, which used to be for art, cookery, and hobby books, is now occupied by tables and chairs. Meanwhile, the space for travel books, new books, and the service desk, has remained unchanged over the years.
Sample 2:
The maps depict the layout changes of a bookstore from 2000 to the present. Overall, the bookstore has undergone significant modifications, including the relocation of several book sections, the introduction of a seating area, and the addition of a café.
In 2000, the bookstore’s central area was occupied by the art, hobbies, and cookery sections. These sections have now been moved to the top left corner, next to the fiction area. As a result, the fiction section, which previously spanned across two large areas, has been reduced in size. The central space, once home to art, hobbies, and cookery, now accommodates three tables for customers to sit and read.
Additionally, the non-fiction section, originally located at the bottom of the store, has been relocated to the top right corner, where the larger fiction area once stood. The space formerly used for non-fiction has been transformed into a café, providing customers with refreshments. Despite these transformations, some areas have remained unchanged. The travel section, new books, service desk, and entrance have all stayed in their original positions throughout the period.
Sample 3:
The two maps depict the transformation of a bookshop over the course of two decades, from the year 2000 to the present.
Overall, the layout of the store has undergone significant changes over time, particularly with regard to the arrangement of the different sections. While the centre of the store is now fully occupied, the relocation of the cooking, hobbies, and art units to the north has resulted in a more balanced distribution of content throughout the store. The addition of a café has also enhanced the shopping experience for customers, offering a comfortable space for reading, relaxing, and enjoying a cup of coffee.
In the year 2000, the central area of the bookshop was primarily occupied by cooking, hobbies, and art units, while the northeast and north edges were dominated by large fiction units. The west and east west corners housed travel, new books, and a service desk, and a non-fiction section was situated on the east side of the store.
Fast forward to the present, and the bookshop has undergone a significant transformation. The central tables are now completely occupied, forcing the cooking, hobbies, and art units to be relocated to the north. The previous large fiction unit in the northeast corner has been replaced by a non-fiction section, and a café now occupies the south side of the store, where the non-fiction department once stood.
Sample 4:
The two maps show the evolution of a bookshop from the year 2000 to the present. Overall, the tables in the centre have been totally occupied, pushing the units for hobbies, literature, and cooking to the north. Also, a café has replaced a non-fiction section in the present bookstore.
The centre of the bookshop included cooking, hobbies, and art areas in 2000. Large fiction units were occupying the northeast and north edges. After the entry area, on the west and east west corners were travel, new books, and a service desk. A non-fiction section was also located on the east side of the bookstore.
The present bookshop has three attached circular tables with four chairs surrounding each one in the centre, displacing the cooking, hobbies, and art units to the north side where there used to be a huge fiction arrangement. Additionally, a non-fiction section has taken the place of the other fiction unit that was in the northeast corner. In fact, the south side of the bookshop, which is currently home to a café, used to house the nonfiction department.
Sample 5:
The two maps depict the changes that have taken place in a bookstore from 2000 to the present day. Overall, the central area has been completely packed with tables, pushing cookery, hobbies, and fiction units on the north side. Meanwhile, at the expense of a non-fiction unit, a café has appeared in the current bookstore.
In 2000, there were cookery, hobbies, and art sections at the centre of the bookstore. Both the north and the northeast sides were occupied by large fiction units. Travel, new books, and service desk were on the west and east west corner right after the entrance area. Moreover, there was a non-fiction unit on the east side of the bookstore.
In the current bookstore, pushing cookery, hobbies, and art units to the north side, where previously there was a large fiction setup, the central space is packed with three round tables attached with four seats around each one. Furthermore, the other fiction unit, which was located at the northeast corner, is now replaced with a non-fiction area. In fact, the nonfiction section was previously on the south side of the bookstore, which is now occupied by a café.
Sample 6:
The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now.
Overall, several scattering book sections have been consolidated to make space for the introduction of some new services.
In 2000, fiction was the most dominating genre, occupying the largest L-shaped shelves running along the top wall and half of the right-side one. Hobbies, cookery, and art took up a modest space in the middle of the bookstore.
Currently, the area right after the entrance has been kept intact with space dedicated to the travel and new book sections. The L-shaped area has been divided into four nearly equal sections to accommodate art, cookery, and fiction at the top, and non-fiction on the right, which has allowed the removal of the four separate display areas. The non-fiction section from 2000 has been removed to establish a café, enhancing customers' experience.
Sample 7:
The maps illustrate the reorganization of a bookstore at present in comparison to its arrangement in 2000.
According to the floor plan of the store, the area right at the entrance has been kept intact with space dedicated to the travel and new books sections. Also, in the near right-hand corner after the front entrance, still stands the service desk.
However, after reshuffling, the fiction section stretching along the left wall in 2000 has been reduced to only a quarter of its original size in the back corner of the store. This leaves room for the art, hobbies, and cookery sections which have been removed from the middle of the store to make way for three sets of tables and chairs. At the back of the store, people now keep non-fiction books where there used to be fictions. Meanwhile the non-fiction section in 2000 has been removed to establish a café which customers can reach when they walk past the service desk on the right of the store.
Overall, the maps demonstrate the resizing and relocation of the same sections of books in the store to accommodate a new in-house café.
Sample 8:
The map illustrates the evolution of a bookstore's layout from the year 2000 to the present day. A comparative analysis reveals a significant reconfiguration of various sections, notably a reduction in the area allocated to fiction, which has been supplanted by new facilities and sections.
Commencing with the left side of the entrance, the original fiction area has undergone a notable transformation, segmenting into four distinct categories: Art, Hobbies, Cookery, and Fiction. This diversification enhances the variety available to customers. Furthermore, the upper right section, which initially housed a dedicated fiction area, has now been occupied by a Non-Fiction section. In contrast, the Travel section, located directly opposite the entrance, has remained unchanged over the years, indicating a stable demand for this genre.
On the right side of the entrance, the sections for New Books and the Service Desk have retained their original positions. However, a Non-Fiction area that existed in 2000 has been converted into a café, reflecting a shift towards a more leisure-oriented experience for patrons. Additionally, the middle section, which previously included Cookery, Hobbies, and Art areas, has transitioned into a cluster of tables, providing customers with spaces to sit, relax, or read while enjoying their visit to the bookstore.
Sample 9:
The changes which occurred to the physical layout of a bookstore since 2000 are portrayed in the given maps. Overall, it is clear that there have been done significant alterations in the store for the introduction of a Cafe and a reading area.
In 2000, the bookstore was a square-shaped building with its entrance at the West. The service desk was there towards its extreme right, crossing the sections for travel and new books. Most area of the store was occupied by books on fiction: at the North and towards the North-east. Non-fiction books were arranged to the South, towards the East of the service desk. At the centre, there were books on cookery, hobbies and art.
The first major change as a part of re-arrangement is seen at the centre, when the area is seen cleared up for reading. The area for fiction at North is seen shrunken by a quarter of its previous size. Books on art, cookery and hobbies occupied the other three portions. The area in the North-east, where fiction books were there in 2000, is seen occupied by non-fiction books now. At the place where the non-fiction books were seen, a café came to existence.
Sample 10:
The two maps illustrate the layout of a bookstore in 2000 and the present day.
Overall, while the core structure of the bookstore remains the same, there have been some noteworthy changes in the arrangement of bookshelves and the addition of a café and tables.
In 2000, the largest section in the bookstore was allocated to fiction books, located on both sides of the store. Non-fiction books occupied the space at the bottom right corner, while genres such as travel, art, hobbies, and cookery were arranged in the middle part of the store. A section labeled “new books” was placed near the entrance, along with a service desk on the left-hand side.
In contrast, the current layout has undergone several modifications. The fiction section has been reduced in size, and the space previously occupied by non-fiction books is now a café. The non-fiction section has been moved to the top right corner, replacing part of the old fiction area. In the center of the store, three tables have been introduced, creating a more communal space. Additionally, the sections for travel, art, hobbies, and cookery books have remained in the same area, but their positions have been slightly adjusted.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.
In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.
Sample 2:
The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.
In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.
Sample 3:
The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.
In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.
With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
500 bài Đọc hiểu ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 21)