khoahoc.vietjack.com

Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 682 Lưu

The table below gives information about the average annual distance traveled by adults and the types of travel in 1977 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Average annual distance (in miles) travelled by adults, by mode of travel

 

1997

2007

Walking

400

300

Bicycle

100

80

Car

3500

7100

Motorcycle

100

90

Bus

800

500

Train

900

1000

Taxi

200

800

Sample 1:

The table compares the average annual distances, measured in miles, that adults traveled using various modes of transport in 1997 and 2007.  

Overall, car travel saw a dramatic increase, while walking, bicycle, motorcycle, and bus travel generally declined over the period. Among these means of transport, the average annual distance traveled by car led in both years.

In 1997, adults traveled an average of 3,500 miles by car, which more than doubled to 7,100 miles by 2007, making car travel the most preferred mode of transportation in both years. Another striking increase occurred in taxi usage, with the distance covered rising fourfold, from 200 miles in 1997 to 800 miles in 2007. Train travel saw a modest increase, from 900 miles to 1,000 miles, indicating a slight rise in usage.

Walking and cycling, however, became less popular over time, with walking decreasing from 400 miles in 1997 to 300 miles in 2007, and cycling declining slightly from 100 to 80 miles. Similarly, bus travel saw a significant drop from 800 miles to 500 miles over the decade, indicating a reduced reliance on public transport. Motorcycle travel remained relatively stable, dropping just 10 miles, from 100 miles in 1997 to 90 miles in 2007.

Sample 2:

The table illustrates the average number of miles adults travelled per year in 1977 and 2007, in terms of seven different modes of transport.

Overall, there were increases in the use of cars, trains and taxis by adults in both years, whereas the opposite was true in the cases of the other forms of transport listed. Additionally, while cars remained by far the most popular type of travel, bicycles and motorcycles were the least common throughout.

In 1977, adults predominantly traveled by car, with an average distance of 3500 miles. This was significantly more than trains and buses, recording 900 and 800 miles respectively. At the same time, adults walked an average of 400 miles, twice the distance covered by taxis, while bicycles and motorbikes were used in equal measure, at an average of 100 miles for the year.

By 2007, the average distance covered by car had more than doubled, reaching 7100 miles and remaining the highest figure. Taxis and trains followed similar increasing trends, with the use of the former rising fourfold, whereas the latter grew by only 100 miles. In contrast, travel by bus and foot experienced declines of 300 and 100 miles, in that order, while minimal changes were observed in the distances traveled by bicycles and motorbikes, both just under 100 miles.

Sample 3:

The table illustrates the average distance that adults commuted by seven different means of transport annually within 30 years, from 1977 to 2007. Overall, cars travelled the farthest distance, and this figure continued to dominate after 30 years. Meanwhile, the other modes of transportation did not commute over 1000 miles yearly in both studied years.

A closer look at the table reveals that commuters by car drove around 3,500 miles on average, marking it as the largest figure in terms of travelled distance in a year. This number was higher than the sum of the other six vehicles. Sharing the second place was bus and train goers, who took turns to travel 800 and 900 miles in 1977. Noteworthily, none of the other commuting methods was able to exceed 500 miles when it came to the average total mileage per year.

Regarding the changes in travel patterns in 2007, car travellers continued to intensify their driven miles annually, which doubled to 7,100 miles. Taxis have overtaken buses since they witnessed a fourfold increase to 800 miles a year and shared the second place with trains. Meanwhile, those who chose to travel by two-wheeled vehicles and buses, or on foot observed a decline in their average travel distance, with the smallest belonging to cyclists and motorcyclists.

Sample 4:

The table presents a comparative analysis of the average annual distances traveled by adults across various modes of transportation in the years 1977 and 2007.

Overall, there was a significant disparity in the distances covered by different modes of transport over the two decades, with notable increases in the utilization of cars, trains, and taxis, while other forms of travel experienced a decline.

In terms of walking and cycling, both activities witnessed a reduction in average distance traveled. Specifically, walking decreased from 400 miles in 1977 to 300 miles in 2007, marking a decline of 100 miles. Similarly, bicycle travel saw a drop from 100 miles to 80 miles during the same period, reflecting a decrease of 20 miles. Conversely, motorcycling exhibited a marginal decrease, with average distances traveled falling from 100 miles to 90 miles.   

In stark contrast, car travel surged dramatically, with adults covering an average of 3,500 miles in 1977, which more than doubled to 7,100 miles by 2007, indicating an increase of 3,600 miles. Taxi usage also showed remarkable growth, rising from 200 miles in 1977 to 800 miles in 2007, a notable increment of 600 miles. The use of buses saw a decline from 800 miles to 500 miles, while train travel experienced a slight increase, from 900 miles to 1,000 miles, signifying a change of 100 miles.

Sample 5:

The table illustrates the mean travel distance per annum by adults, categorized by transport methods, in 1977 and 2007. Overall, only cars, trains and taxis witnessed an increase between the two years. Additionally, the average distance traveled by cars was the highest for both years.

Regarding the increasing categories, surveyed individuals traveled 3500 miles by automobiles in 1977, which then more than doubled to 7100 miles by 2007. Moreover, trains accounted for a distance of around 1000 miles for both years, while the figure for taxis quadrupled from 200 miles to 800 miles for the selected period.

Concerning the remaining categories, adults reduced their walking distance from 400 miles in 1977 to 300 miles in 2007. Cyclists and motorcyclists shared the lowest results of 100 miles in 1977; subsequently, their respective figures declined to 80 miles and 90 miles in the following forty years. Finally, buses contributed to 800 miles of adults' travel distance in 1977, followed by a plunge to 500 miles by 2007.

Sample 6:

The given table compares different means of transportation in terms of the annual distance traveled by adults in two separate years, 1977 and 2007. Units are measured in miles.

Overall, cars were by far the most popular means of transport during the entire 40-year period, witnessing the most dramatic rise. In contrast, bicycles and motorcycles were the least common modes of transportation. Regarding changes in commuting patterns, there was an upward trend in the use of cars, trains, and taxis, while the remaining methods of transport recorded a decline.

In 1977, cars occupied the position as the most prevalent vehicle, with 3,500 miles traveled, nearly quadruple the distance of the second and third most popular methods, buses and trains, which ranged from 800 to 900 miles. Meanwhile, the distance traveled on foot was 400 miles on average, twice as high as that of taxis. Bicycles were as common as motorbikes, with the average distance for each vehicle standing at 100 miles.

By 2007, the distance traveled by car had increased twofold to 7,100 miles, solidifying its position as the most preferred mode of transportation. Similar changes were seen in the figures for trains and taxis, with the former witnessing a slight growth to 1,000 miles and the latter recording a fourfold rise to 800 miles. In contrast, the other transport methods underwent a descending trend, with the most dramatic drop recorded in buses, falling by 300 miles to reach 500 miles in 2007. The distances traveled by walking, motorbikes, and bicycles dropped to 300, 90, and 80 miles, respectively.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

The table and the chart below provide a breakdown of the total expenditure and the average amount of money spent by students per week while studying abroad in 4 countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The bar graph illustrates the overseas students' spending on accommodation, tuition, and living expenses, while the table depicts information about the average weekly expenses by international students in four countries: A, B, C, and D.

Overall, foreign students need to spend the highest in country A and the lowest in D. In nearly every nation, the international students’ weekly average living expenses are the greatest, while their housing cost registers the lowest.

The costliest country for studying is A, with a weekly average expense of 875 dollars. This is followed by B, C, and D, which have weekly expenses of 735, 540, and 435 dollars, respectively. However, foreign students always pay the least for accommodation, which incurs on average weekly 220, 280, 240, and 200 dollars in the nations A, B, C, and D, respectively.

On the other hand, living expenditures account for the highest portion of average weekly costs for international students in countries A, B, and C, with 430, 350, and 275 dollars, correspondingly. Tuition fees in the same countries (A, B and C) come in second with the weekly averages of 358, 320, and 250 dollars in order. However, D is the only nation where education accounts for the highest average spending area, coming in at USD 235, followed by the cost of living (USD 225) and housing (USD 200).

Sample 2:

The table illustrates information regarding the weekly spendings by overseas students in four countries, A, B, C and D, while the bar graph depicts the students’ expenditure on the sectors, housing, education fees and living expenses.

Overall, the cost of studying abroad is the highest in country A and the lowest in D. Apart from country D, living costs account for the most part of the weekly spendings in all countries, while accommodation registers the least.

Regarding the total cost of studying, A is the most expensive country with weekly average 875 dollars, followed by B, C and D with 735, 540 and 435 dollars, respectively. On the other hand, the overseas students always spend the least on accommodation, which are on average weekly 220, 280, 240 and 200 dollars in the corresponding countries A, B, C and D.

Considering the living cost, it takes the largest share of foreign students’ average weekly expenses in countries A, B, and C with 430, 350 and 275 dollars, respectively, while tuition fees in the same countries hold the second place with weekly average 358, 320 and 250 dollars, sequentially. However, D is the only country where tuition fee occupies the highest expenditure with average weekly 235 dollars, followed by living cost (USD 225) and accommodation (USD 200.)

Sample 3:

The table and bar graph depict information regarding the weekly spendings by overseas students in countries A, B C and D.

Overall, there are three elements, housing, school fees and living costs that contribute to the total weekly spendings. The total expenditure in country A is the highest while it is the lowest in country D. Living costs account for the most part of the weekly spendings in all countries except D.

The total mean weekly cost for pupils to study in country A is US$875, next by country B at US$735, and then by country C at US$540, and finally by country D at US$435. The living costs are always the biggest component of the expenditure except for country D, with about US$10 less than the major spending which is the school fees.

Accommodation accounts for the least among all spendings in all countries. The most expensive housing is found in country B, at US$280, and the cheapest in country D at US$200. The middle range can be seen in country A at US$220 and country C at US$240, respectively. Costs of the tuition fee range between US$ 358 and US$235 in country A and D, in order.

Lời giải

The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The bar chart and pie chart give information about why US residents travelled and what travel problems they experienced in the year 2009.

It is clear that the principal reason why Americans travelled in 2009 was to commute to and from work. In the same year, the primary concern of Americans, with regard to the trips they made, was the cost of travelling.

Looking more closely at the bar chart, we can see that 49% of the trips made by Americans in 2009 were for the purpose of commuting. By contrast, only 6% of trips were visits to friends or relatives, and one in ten trips were for social or recreation reasons. Shopping was cited as the reason for 16% of all travel, while unspecific ‘personal reasons’ accounted for the remaining 19%.

According to the pie chart, price was the key consideration for 36% of American travellers. Almost one in five people cited safety as their foremost travel concern, while aggressive driving and highway congestion were the main issues for 17% and 14% of the travelling public. Finally, a total of 14% of those surveyed thought that access to public transport or space for pedestrians were the most important travel issues.

Sample 2:

The bar chart compares the figures for Americans going out for five reasons and the pie chart illustrates the percentage of six problems that concerned them when travelling in 2009. Overall, it is clear that the main reason why people in the US went out in 2009 is to commute to work, and the cost of travelling is the problem concerning them the most.

Looking first at the bar graph, the proportion of Americans going out for commuting to work stood at 49%, while the figure for those leaving their house for personal reasons accounted for 19%. In addition, the rate of people in the US going out for shopping and recreation made up 16% and 10%, respectively, while visiting friends or relatives accounted for the lowest percentage, at only 6%.

Turning to the pie chart, the cost of travelling was the most concerning problem of Americans when going out, with the figure making up 36%, while the proportion of safety concerns is half of that, at 19%. In addition, 17% of US citizens were concerned about aggressive drivers, while highway congestion made 14% of them worried when leaving their house. Access to public transportation and places for people to walk accounted for the lowest percentages, at only 8% and 6%, respectively.

Sample 3:

The provided charts offer insights into the reasons for travel and the primary concerns faced by the traveling public in the United States during the year 2009. The data is presented through a bar chart illustrating travel purposes and a pie chart highlighting key issues.

Notably, the primary motivation for travel among Americans in 2009 was commuting to and from work. Simultaneously, the major concern for the traveling public during their trips revolved around the cost associated with travel.

Examining the bar chart in detail reveals that almost half of the trips made by Americans in 2009, precisely 49%, were attributed to commuting. Conversely, visits to friends or relatives accounted for a mere 6%, while social or recreational trips constituted one in ten journeys. Shopping emerged as the purpose for 16% of all travel, leaving the remaining 19% for unspecific ‘personal reasons.’

Turning attention to the pie chart, it becomes evident that cost was the primary consideration for 36% of American travelers. Safety closely followed, with nearly one in five people, or 19%, expressing it as their foremost travel concern. Aggressive driving and highway congestion were significant issues for 17% and 14% of the traveling public, respectively. Additionally, 14% of respondents identified access to public transport or space for pedestrians as the most crucial travel issues.

Sample 4:

The bar chart shows why American people chose to travel, and the pie chart shows the main issues for the travelling public in the USA, both for 2009. The trend suggests that the reason and price were the main issues for travel in the United States. It is clear that commuting from work was reported as the biggest contribution to travel, at 49%. People who went travelling for personal reasons and shopping accounted for 35% when these two groups are combined. However, interaction with friends and relatives only accounted for 25% less than the above categories. And social and recreational activities took up only 6%, which was the lowest figure by more than 43%. The travelling public’s main issues were related to price and safety, with 55% of respondents reporting these two issues. While other issues accounted for a relatively small part. Only 17% of the respondents reported issues with aggressive drivers, while highway congestion accounted for even less at 14% of the issues reported. The percentage of access to public transport and space for pedestrians was much lower than the other categories at less than 10% for both. To conclude, price and commuting time were the dominant factors relating to travel in the US in 2009.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP