Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
As it has been discovered that excessive eating does proportional harms as smoking, arguments have been raised whether food products should be excluded from advertisements the same way as tobacco goods. In my perspective, I oppose this viewpoint, based on the following ground. To commence with, due to there are stark differences between food and cigarettes in their nature, there is no point in applying the same banning measures. Food products, regardless of their types, could provide certain nutrients, or at least sufficient energy, for the human body to function properly. Even junk food like snacks or fast food could sometimes respond well to the needs of eaters who seek instant and convenient solutions to their hunger. The beneficial aspects of foods strikingly contrast those of cigarettes comprised of dangerous and addictive chemicals, namely nicotine, which pose direct threats to people. Such obvious differences illustrate the fact that eating, even overeating, is an unavoidable demand which would not be reduced by any kind of advertisement.
Furthermore, I fervently opine that the ban on food-related advertisements does not prevent overeating. In fact, overeating is rather a habit which mainly depends on the psychological and biological aspects of certain individuals. Eaters can personally decide to excessively eat whenever being in a good mood, so advertising does not affect people's choice about eating habits. In other words, although advertising platform is a tool for producers to spread out their food information to people, it does not mean advertising of certain eatable products would encourage them to eat more than needed. Hence, regulations that prohibit advertising some types of food would fail to prevent surplus eating.
In conclusion, I find the correlation between food products and cigarettes pointless, and it would be futile to implement this policy since no concrete outcomes would be brought forward.
Sample 2:
It is claimed that overeating causes similar damage to human health as smoking, so it is necessary to implement the prohibition of advertisements for both some food products and smoking. In my opinion, the former view is well-founded, yet the latter seems to be rather unreasonable.
It is totally understandable that consuming an unnecessarily large amount of food is a detriment to people’s health conditions, just like smoking is. In fact, excessive food intake increases body fat, potentially resulting in obesity. In recent years, the number of obese people has been constantly growing at an unprecedented rate as a consequence of overeating. Furthermore, consuming unhealthy foods such as fast food or processed food on a regular basis also brings about numerous health-related problems, such as high blood pressure or high cholesterol. Issues regarding people’s state of health caused by eating too much are for sure comparable with those caused by smoking, for example, lung cancer.
However, I do not think it is an effective solution to forbid advertisements for several particular foodstuffs. It is unfair to manufacturers because advertising is their main measure to approach prospective customers and introduce their new products to the market. Without publicity materials, many food manufacturers would experience crises as their profits declined as a result of this prohibition policy. Furthermore, it is a disadvantage to consumers because they will not be informed about the products they want to buy. It is true that advertising encourages people to purchase things, but it only plays a small part in the amount of food intake, which is mainly determined by consumers themselves.
In conclusion, I agree that the way overeating harms human health is similar to smoking, whereas it seems to me that advertising of food products should not be banned.
Sample 3:
It is apparent that overeating has devastating repercussions on human health. Therefore, some researchers believe that advertising some foods should be prohibited as it is equally harmful to smokers. However, I disagree strongly with this statement. In a subsequent essay, I will elaborate on my views with relevant facts and examples.
To begin with, I do not believe that advertisements are the particular cause of overeating, however it is similarly detrimental to health as smoking. Worldwide fast food is gaining popularity since it is inexpensive, tasty, and simple to prepare. Therefore, consumers are compelled to consume easily available street cuisine. Moreover, the eating habits of today’s generations rely more on fast food rather than on home-cooked meals. In addition, everyone has the fundamental right to select what they eat. Hence, their own choice forces them to consume harmful foods, not advertisements.
On the contrary, advertising unquestionably influences the thinking and eating habits of viewers, a warning does not imply that it leads them to choose an unhealthy diet. Instead, it raises awareness and provides important information about a healthy diet. For instance, advertisements can inform consumers about the amount of energy, fat, calories, and vitamins in food products, allowing them to determine whether the item is worth the risk to their health. Moreover, despite television commercials, public campaigns can educate ignorant people about overeating risks.
In conclusion, I believe the government should not place restrictions on advertising programmes since, despite luring customers, advertising also makes them more sensible. Ministries should establish seminars or special programmes to raise public awareness of this problem in order to reduce its prevalence.
Sample 4:
As with smoking, overuse of some types of food products is suggested to have comparable negative health impacts. In many nations, it is thought that advertising for such products is the primary reason, hence the government should outlaw advertising food items just like tobacco products. In my opinion, there are numerous realistic methods to combat overeating.
To begin with, there is no strong evidence that prohibiting advertising efforts for certain types of food reduces obesity rates. Children choose fast food on a daily basis primarily owing to advertising by companies such as Burger King and Subway. Furthermore, social media channels such as Instagram, Facebook, and television are unable to effectively promote their true idea. In long term, youngsters may be susceptible to obesity, which may lead to health issues such as heart-related issues. Secondly, some food firms would hire personalities such pop stars and movie actors to appear in their advertising. Given that prohibiting advertisements for foods may be ineffective in reducing their consumption rates, it may be pointless to prohibit them.
I would argue, however, that there are incomparable approaches to mitigate this issue. First, there are negative impacts of overeating for the health of pupils, thus new teaching initiatives should be implemented in schools to assist children to comprehend. To be more precise, obesity and other health-related issues should be introduced to the curriculum. Moreover, governments should also impose a greater tax on various types of food, so increasing the price of these items. Due to their exorbitant pricing, consumers may be discouraged from ingesting them.
In conclusion, I feel that the issue of overeating can be effectively minimised by prohibiting marketing efforts; nevertheless, there are more viable ways to curb this occurrence.
Sample 5:
Researchers have demonstrated in a number of studies that overeating is as dangerous as smoking a cigar. As there is a ban on cigarette advertising, it is urged that advertising for fast food, which is regarded to be its primary cause, also be prohibited. Everyone has the right to consume less or more food, hence I disagree with the statement. Moreover, certain junk meals contain critical elements that advertising companies wish to emphasise.
To begin with, despite the belief that overeating is as hazardous as smoking a cigar, a prohibition on food advertising that entices consumers to consume more cannot prevent them from eating more. The explanation is that people are addicted to fast food and will consume it at any cost, even if ads for these foods are prohibited. In addition, they consider eating more or less a fundamental right. Consequently, a restriction on fast food ads will only foster resentment towards the government.
Additionally, certain precooked foods include essential nutrients. Therefore, if individuals choose to consume ever-greater quantities of food, they cannot have major health issues. They will be able to satisfy their cravings and hunger. As a result, there is no need for a restriction on these food commercials, whereas cigarettes contain hazardous substances that might be harmful to human health. As a result, the marketing of dangerous substances and the use of those substances are prohibited.
In conclusion, it is no longer necessary to restrict the promotion of fast-food publications. Due to the fact that eating less or more is a matter of personal choice, even if the advertising of certain foods is banned.
Sample 6:
Evidently, due to disastrous effects on health, some researchers argue that the publication of some specific eatables should be put under the ban. I, however, firmly disagree with this ideology. Upcoming segments are going to elaborate my viewpoint and with material facts and examples.
To embark on, overeating is considerably deleterious same as smoking, although I believe adverts are not primarily culpable. Fast food is gaining popularity worldwide since it is affordable, delicious and easy to cook. Hence, people are irresistible to intake readily available foods on the street. Furthermore, what makes today’s generaffordablsb, their own eating habits and surely they are more reliant on fast foods than homemade ones. Moreover, everyone has the fundamental right to choose what they want to eat; as such, their own choice is forcing them to eat unhealthy stuff.
On the contrary, without any doubt, advertisement influences the mentality as well as the eating habits of viewers; alert doesn’t mean it provokes them to adopt an unhealthy diet. Rather it makes people aware and provides useful information regarding a balanced diet. For example, via ads, one can ensure the level of energy, fat, calories and vitamins present in food items, and then they can decide if it is worthy to their precious health or not. In addition to this, despite TV advertisements, public campaigns can make illiterate consumers aware of overheating issues.
To conclude, I believe the government must not impose restrictions on advertising programmes since; despite attracting, it also makes today’s consumers more rational. Ministries should initiate seminars or special programmes that could spread awareness among folks to flatten the curve of this menace.
Sample 7:
Research shows that overeating leads to harmful effects on people s health, so some people contend that governments should prohibit businesses from advertising for certain food products. I disagree with this contention, as I believe that individuals need to be responsible for their own decisions as to whether to eat healthy foods or not.
It is true that some food products can be harmful, especially if not consumed in moderation. And there is no doubt that overeating is currently a major problem in regard to health concerns.
But it is my feeling that the government should not be dictating what people can eat and what they cannot eat, even if that is by dictating which foods can be advertised and which cannot. There is a fine line in determining which food products are harmful and the degree to which they are harmful. Most foods, if consumed in moderation as recommended, are not harmful.
Ultimately, people need to be responsible for their own health, their own eating habits, and their own weight in banning advertising on certain food products, the government would be discouraging people from taking responsibility for their own eating habits and decisions. The government and society would be better served to simply educate people regarding the negative health consequences of overeating, possibly through some free advertisements on various media.
As long as food is healthy if consumed in moderation, the government should not dictate Which foods can be advertised and which foods cannot be advertised It will be better for the government to encourage good eating habits through education.
Sample 8:
In recent studies, the adverse impacts of overeating have been highlighted, leading to a growing consensus that the marketing of certain foods should be curtailed, paralleling the restrictions placed on cigarette advertisements in some nations. I firmly believe that such a measure is necessary to combat the rising tide of diet-related health issues and will discuss the effectiveness of advertising bans and the role of public health education in mitigating overeating.
Firstly, advertising significantly influences consumer behavior, particularly regarding unhealthy food choices. For instance, high-calorie, nutrient-poor foods are often marketed with persuasive techniques that appeal to emotions and desires, overshadowing the health consequences of overconsumption. A ban on such advertisements, similar to the prohibition of cigarette advertising, could substantially reduce these foods' visibility, thereby decreasing their consumption. Countries like Norway and Finland, which have implemented strict advertising regulations, have seen a notable decline in the consumption of junk food, indicating the potential effectiveness of such policies.
Secondly, while banning advertisements can serve as a powerful deterrent, it must be complemented by comprehensive public health initiatives. Education plays a pivotal role in informing individuals about the nutritional value of foods and the dangers of overeating. For example, incorporating mandatory nutritional education in schools and public campaigns can empower individuals to make informed dietary choices. Such knowledge not only promotes healthier eating habits but also instills a critical perspective towards food advertising, thereby reducing the influence of marketing on dietary choices.
In conclusion, the negative repercussions of overeating necessitate a twofold approach: restricting harmful food advertisements and enhancing public health education. By addressing the root causes of overeating and altering the way food is perceived and consumed, we can forge a healthier society that prioritizes well-being over profit. This balanced strategy underscores the importance of both regulatory measures and informed personal choices in the battle against diet-related health issues.
Sample 9:
A growing corpus of evidence illuminating the harmful consequences of overindulgence in food has ignited discussions on whether advertising for certain unhealthy products should face the same fate as tobacco adverts, with many advocating for their prohibition. I assert that enacting such bans is crucial for addressing the burgeoning public health dilemma of poor nutritional choices, advocating for a dual-pronged strategy that not only curtails misleading food advertisements but also amplifies efforts in bolstering nutritional education across society.
Foremost, the omnipresence of advertisements for high-calorie, low-nutrient foods significantly exacerbate the epidemic of overeating by manipulating consumer preferences under the guise of choice. A case in point is the seductive portrayal of fast food in commercials, which often glamorizes unhealthy eating habits, making them appear irresistibly appealing to the unsuspecting viewer. Emulating the precedent set by the prohibition of cigarette advertising, curtailing these advertisements could dramatically diminish their consumption and influence vulnerable demographics. This assertion is substantiated by evidence from jurisdictions like the UK, where restrictions on junk food advertising during children's TV programming have been linked to a discernible decline in unhealthy food consumption among children, signaling a positive shift in dietary habits.
Moreover, an advertising ban should be concomitant with a vigorous campaign to elevate public nutritional awareness, ensuring a holistic approach towards combating dietary missteps. Enlightening the populace about the adverse health impacts of overeating and the benefits of a balanced diet can fundamentally shift dietary paradigms, fostering a more health-conscious society. For instance, initiatives such as the “5 A Day” campaign in England have been instrumental in promoting fruit and vegetable consumption, showcasing the transformative potential of educational endeavours in fostering healthier eating habits. By integrating such campaigns with interactive platforms and social media, the message can reach a wider audience, further amplifying its impact and ensuring that the benefits of healthy eating are understood and embraced across the spectrum of society.
In synthesis, the path to ameliorating the public health implications of overeating is twofold, encompassing both the prohibition of misleading food advertisements and the amplification of nutritional education. Such measures, collectively, can recalibrate societal attitudes towards food, propelling us towards a healthier future. By aligning regulatory and educational strategies, we can dismantle the foundations of the overeating epidemic, ensuring a legacy of health for future generations.
Sample 10:
A number of studies find that excessive amount of eating often leads to numerous detrimental effects on people’s health. While I disagree with the view that advertising of specific foods should be banned in the same way as some countries banned promoting cigarettes, I believe it is very necessary to limit the number of those kinds of advertisements.
It is clear that many foods in general do not pose a health risk; rather, how they are consumed by individuals can do so. Consider overeating as an example. Even the healthiest foods ingested in excess can have negative effects such as nausea, upset stomachs, or chronic conditions like obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular illnesses, etc. Therefore, rather than outright outlawing food marketing as other nations have done to discourage smoking, it would be more beneficial if the significance and fundamentals of healthy eating habits could be widely disseminated.
However, given the enormous influence of advertising, restrictions on the commercial promotion of some food items may be necessary. Making a list of dangerous products and cutting back on the advertising for those foods will eventually help people live healthier lives. In reality, because individuals are influenced by the things they are exposed to, if governments restrict the advertising of food items that are unhealthy, these products will eventually lose their appeal and influence on the minds of the majority of people. Therefore, restricting the advertisement of some particular foods may be a good way to reduce their widespread usage.
In conclusion, regardless of the food quality, eating beyond the healthy limit is always harmful. Also, though this essay does not support the drastic banning of certain products’ promotions, it admits that it is quite necessary to curb the health compromised food item’s advertisements and create awareness among the consumers simultaneously.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.
However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.
In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.
Sample 2:
It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.
Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.
Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.
In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.
Sample 3:
Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.
Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.
Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.
Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.
Sample 4:
The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.
Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.
For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.
Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.
Sample 5:
To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.
Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.
To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.
All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.
Sample 6:
The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.
Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.
The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.
In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.
In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.
Sample 7:
The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.
We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.
This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.
Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.
To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.
Sample 8:
Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.
However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.
In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.
Sample 9:
In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.
More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.
Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.
However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.
In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.
Sample 2:
The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.
Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.
Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.
I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.
Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.
Sample 3:
It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.
There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.
For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.
In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.
Sample 4:
It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.
First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.
However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.
In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.
Sample 5:
It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.
To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.
Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.
There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.
To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.
Sample 6:
In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.
Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.
One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.
In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.
Sample 7:
Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.
In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.
The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.
To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo
Hỏi bài tập