Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 309

Some people think children have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

The debate on child development revolves around whether children should have the freedom to make mistakes or if adults should intervene to prevent errors. In my opinion, both perspectives offer valid insights, and striking a balance between these viewpoints is crucial.

On one side of the debate, proponents of allowing children to freely make mistakes present compelling arguments for its benefits. Firstly, this approach fosters a sense of responsibility in children. When they face consequences resulting from their choices, the lessons learned tend to leave a lasting impact. The repercussions can instill a healthy fear of repeating mistakes, guiding children toward more prudent decisions. Additionally, granting children autonomy to err enhances their cognitive abilities. Specifically, having to devise solutions for their errors promotes problem-solving skills and boosts confidence, particularly if these resolutions prove effective.

However, there are clear advantages to preventing children from encountering potentially hazardous situations. This approach can avert life-threatening scenarios, such as touching live electrical wires with wet hands or recklessly crossing roads without regard for traffic signals. Without parental guidance, children, especially toddlers lacking full control and understanding of their environment, may engage in such actions, putting themselves at significant risk. Therefore, it is imperative to provide children with essential knowledge for survival to mitigate potential harm.

In my opinion, a balanced approach is essential. Children should be given the freedom to make mistakes within a controlled and supportive framework. This means allowing them to explore, take calculated risks, and learn from their experiences while providing guidance and supervision as needed. It's crucial for adults, whether parents or educators, to strike a delicate balance between fostering independence and ensuring safety.

In conclusion, the debate over children's freedom to make mistakes versus adult intervention is complex. Both viewpoints have merits, and the best approach is to find a middle ground between the two opinions.

Sample 2:

When it comes to parenting, there has been long-standing discourse over whether children should be allowed to make mistakes. While some would argue that parents should not let their children make mistakes, I contend that mistakes are vital to fostering in children a greater sense of responsibility.

Adults should take a preventive approach to their children making mistakes if it is aimed at expediting the learning process. An adult can comprehensively instruct a child on how to do a particular task properly, eliminating the need for correction and re-learning. To give an example, children in China are diligently guided by their teachers in solving math problems using standardised methods developed by math professors working for the Ministry of Education. These methods have been proven effective in increasing rates of correct answers, allowing school teachers to move on to the next lesson more speedily. That at least partly explains why Chinese schoolchildren can solve some complex math problems by the end of primary school.

However, allowing children to make mistakes is developmentally better as it instills greater personal responsibility. For instance, when a child fails a test in school since he has not revised his lessons thoroughly, that child should face the consequences of his failure which might include low grades and detention. Hence the child learns that he should be better prepared for the next test. Without their parents interfering to prevent failures from happening, children cannot accept ownership of the situation and take corrective measures to address it. As a result, they are likely to become upstanding adults who are accountable for their own behaviours, striving to be their best to solve their own problems.

In conclusion, although preventing children from making mistakes can be a valid parenting approach to an extent, I hold firm to my belief that children should be allowed to experience failures to learn meaningful lessons. Thus, parents should be more relaxed with their children whenever they make an error to allow them to better learn and grow.

Sample 3:

There are those who opine that young people ought to be free to make mistakes, while others argue that grown-ups ought to help children avoid these. This essay will initially discuss the two ideas, followed by a presentation of my perspective, which is that children should be allowed to make mistakes.

It is justified that children making mistakes is acceptable. This is primarily because they can learn from what they do wrong. For example, they will learn from their errors whilst solving complex maths problems, teaching them to be meticulous, not only in this subject but other areas as well. They can also realise where their shortcomings lie and make every effort to address them. Another point is that they will gain the courage to do what they have a passion for in the future. If young charges are not scolded or punished by their parents when making mistakes, they will not be fearful of embarking on something new even if challenges and risks exist.

However, it is also true that there is necessity for adults to reduce the possibility of children making mistakes. The main reason is that children’s self-confidence can be maintained. If children make mistakes, they may doubt their ability, feeling demotivated and unconfident. In contrast, parents’ effort enables children to firmly believe in themselves, ultimately making progress in whatever they do. Moreover, children’s efficiency of accomplishing various tasks can be improved. Without making mistakes, children will not spend time repeating what they intend to accomplish and the amount of time they have saved can be allocated to other activities.

In conclusion, I believe that both sides of the argument are reasonable. On balance, my conviction is that children benefit from making mistakes. After all, they can understand much more than the lessons learned from mistakes and dare to achieve their goals regardless of the difficulty they may encounter. They may well, in my view, achieve something remarkable when they grow up.

Sample 4:

While some people argue that adults should give children the freedom to make mistakes, others think that children should be prevented from making mistakes. In my opinion, adults should balance both sides in order to help children learn and develop well.

On the one hand, children can learn a lot from their mistakes so they should be given the chance of making them. It is obvious that everyone can make mistakes, especially children who lack knowledge and experience. Mistakes can make children upset and hurt but the lessons from them that are so valuable can teach the kids to think and behave better in the future. In addition, when they make mistakes that lead to their failures, they will learn how to deal with negative feelings and emotions from those failures since childhood. Consequently, they can face difficulties and hardships and overcome them better when reaching adulthood. For example, when children get used to cooking. The first dishes may be very bad, maybe burnt, salty but will help them learn from experience to cook better dishes later.

On the other hand, adults should prevent children from making some bad mistakes because of their big consequences. Children are always curious about the world, but they do not know how to distinguish between right and wrong. Therefore, adults need to listen, take care, and prevent them from big mistakes such as being addicted to drugs, alcohol, or dropping out of school. Otherwise, their future will be destroyed, and they may become criminals. In my opinion, adults need to give children the freedom to make mistakes that are beneficial for their learning and development. The lessons from mistakes are highly educational. But they need to prevent their kids from making horrible mistakes.

In conclusion, children should have the freedom to make mistakes, but adults should prevent children from making big mistakes. By doing that, we can ensure that children can learn more and develop themselves.

Sample 5:

Some are of the opinion that children should be allowed to make mistakes, while others feel that adults should take a preventative approach. In my opinion, there are limits, but it is nonetheless essential for healthy development to permit children their errors.

Proponents of reduced freedom for children argue that mistakes can lead to a pattern of misbehavior. This argument is often advanced by over-protective parents who believe human nature naturally trends toward anti-social activity. For example, a child who is mean to classmates and performs poorly in academics and athletics will only continue this behavior if enabled by understanding adults. To counter the child’s wayward impulses, parents should instead either punish or reward in order to motivate more socially acceptable behavior. The theory is that children will then recognize the boundaries set by parents and society and later fit into the adult world as well-functioning members.

Regardless, a sense of autonomy is crucial to mature development. Children who are shielded from making mistakes often lack the skills that encourage healthy growth. The majority of learning, for instance, is achieved through mistakes. A child who is learning a sport makes mistake after mistake but does it with a positive attitude and eventually improves. Later in life, the attitude may become more negative, but the process remains the same for all disciplines, private and public. Parents and other adults must therefore seek to impart unconditional support and ensure children do not develop self-esteem problems based on their mistakes. This approach of fostering a cheerful self-sufficiency will serve them best throughout life.

In conclusion, although some adults may feel that are preventing children from making mistakes for the public good, they are in fact doing great harm to their child’s mental well-being. If larger segments of society accept this perspective, it will benefit all of society.

Sample 6:

Children are extremely ingenuous, owing to which they generally make many mistakes. To this, some people propound that they should be prevented from doing so, while others believe that they should be given the freedom to make mistakes and cannot be expected to behave in the same way adults do. I find I am inclined towards the latter school of thought. In the forthcoming paragraphs, we shall see both the perspectives and put forth my viewpoints on the topic.

From the purview of thoughts that consider curbing children from making mistakes, one of the prime reasons commensurate with it is the future consequences. Children of today would be the resources tomorrow and therefore, such potential assets could not be allowed to make mistakes and let go of them committing it time and again. Also, as they are in the most malleable stage of their lives, they should be channelized and structured in the aptest contour. It might make them have a streamlined flow against the winds and pangs of hardships in the future. Generally, giving them an easy passage of tagging and deeming them as credulous, we exacerbate their status of culminating in becoming a resourceful adult of substance.

In contrariety, others advocate endowing the laxity upon children and I stand in the unwavering anchorage of this very notion. As is known to all, childhood is the golden phase of everyone’s life, a phase that is often cherished and treasured with the most beautiful embellishments of our memory lane. In such a situation, having such a delicate phase filled with too many checks and crosses leads them to have nothing but ultimate losses in terms of proselytizing them in the X-Y plane. As is reconnoitred more often than not, children having a troubled or encumbered childhood are more prone and potent in adopting various forms of stress and nervous disorders, which as a matter of fact, completely obliterates the agenda of creating materialistic and substantial resources for the world. Moreover, if they are thwarted to make mistakes and eschewed facing the eventualities of making them, they could never taste the other side of it. Hence, giving them a practical facet of the consequential problems that arise from making such mistakes will eventually be profitable for them. Also, as is often quoted, “One who fails to fail, plans to wail,” and so, as per my conscience, they should be allowed to walk, stutter, fall, and eventually learn to trod themselves, but of course under a watchful tutelage.

In conclusion, I believe children should be allowed to make mistakes, as these experiences help them develop into wise and capable adults. By learning from their errors in a safe environment, they can grow into virtuous and thoughtful individuals.

Sample 7:

While some people believe that children should be allowed to make mistakes, others would argue that parents' intervention in preventing children’s mistakes is necessary. Personally, I am more in favour of the former opinion.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why some people believe that parents should prevent their children from making mistakes. First, certain mistakes can cause permanent, dangerous physical damage to children, and therefore should be prevented in the first place. For example, if children are not warned against electrical hazards, they might suffer injuries or even fatal accidents when carelessly playing with electricity. In addition, forestalling mistakes is to shield children from failures and negative emotions. When children repeatedly make mistakes, it is likely that they would encounter emotional problems such as anxiety or depression. These problems, if not handled well, may result in low self-esteem and the lack of self-confidence when children grow older.

On the other hand, advocates of children’s freedom to make mistakes believe that mistakes are crucial to children's development. To begin with, allowing children to learn from trial and error helps them build resilience and self-confidence. After missteps and failed attempts, children will learn how to bounce back to fix those problems, which enables them to feel more confident when facing other challenges later in life. Moreover, letting children learn from mistakes helps them develop a sense of responsibility as they can learn natural consequences from their actions. Children with this trait are more likely to be honest with themselves, willing to self-reflect and make self-improvement instead of giving excuses or blaming others when things go wrong in the future.

In conclusion, I would side with those who believe that children should be allowed to make mistakes as this provides them with invaluable lessons in their later stages of life.

Sample 8:

While some believe that children should be free to make mistakes, others argue that preventive measures should be taken by parents to ensure that children do nothing wrong. In my opinion, I side with the latter notion.

To begin with, hampering children from causing mishaps is advantageous to an extent. First, it can prevent mortality when it comes to dangerous situations such as touching a naked wire with wet hands or crossing the road without looking at the traffic lights. Without parental guidance, children may perform these actions and harm themselves, which could be extremely probable among toddlers who have not had full control of their actions and proper understanding of their surroundings. Therefore, children should be educated on essential knowledge for survival before they have any chance to hurt themselves.

On the other hand, advocates of allowing children to make mistakes freely also have grounds to believe why this practice is beneficial. Firstly, children will learn to become responsible. As children face consequences from their choices, the lessons learnt will stay with them longer. This is because the repercussions can instill fear of the wrongdoings into children and prevent them from taking similar courses of action. Another point is that having the autonomy to make mistakes will equip children with sharper minds. To be more specific, having to come up with a solution for their mishaps will help children develop problem solving skills and build their confidence should these resolutions prove to be useful.

All in all, although parents’ intervention is beneficial in some cases, letting children learn from their mistakes has more positives for children’s development.

Sample 9:

Some people argue that children should sometimes be allowed to enjoy the freedom to commit mistakes, yet others feel that adults ought to adopt a preventive approach whenever they feel that their children are going to commit any errors. This essay believes that while allowing children the freedom to make mistakes can form bad behaviour to some extent, freedom is more important because it boosts self-confidence as well as wisdom.

To begin with, some people think that the liberty for children to make mistakes can lead to a form of misbehaviour and they might take them for granted. They go on arguing that some children may be inclined to fail from the way of reason than others. In simple words, if a child is not guided properly, he or she could become an irrational being because the minds of children are as comfortably turned this or that way as water itself. This is why, for example, many parents in our country, think that children should never be allowed to make any errors, and they should always guide their offspring toward good actions.

Nevertheless, if children are given the freedom to make some occasional mistakes, it can bolster their self-confidence and develop wisdom by learning from their mistakes. In other words, a child develops self-confidence when he or she is allowed to make a decision on his or her own, which is something children need to become mature. Most of my cousins, who were given the freedom to make decisions in many instances and commit some mistakes turned out to be more responsible individuals in their later life. I believe that, when children do something by trial and error, they test many different methods of doing something so as to find the best. This helps them to be confident and they are not too afraid of failure when trying new things. Beyond this, as children are granted to make some mistakes, they will learn from the natural consequences and will make sensible decisions in the future.

To conclude, while allowing children the space to make mistakes can cause misbehaviour, I wholeheartedly believe that granting children some freedom to commit mistakes would develop self-confidence and understanding, which is far more valuable later in life.

Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is by providing free public transport 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.

Sample 2:

It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.

Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.

Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.

In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.

Sample 3:

Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.

Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.

Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.

Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.

Sample 4:

The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.

Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.

For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.

Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.

Sample 5:

To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.

Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.

To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.

All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.

Sample 6:

The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.

Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.

The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.

In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.

In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.

Sample 7:

The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.

We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.

This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.

Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.

To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.

Sample 8:

Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.

In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.

Sample 9:

In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.

More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.

By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.

Câu 2

The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life. Why is it the case? Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.

Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.

However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.

In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.

Sample 2:

The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.

Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.

Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.

I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.

Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.

Sample 3:

It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.

There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.

For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.

In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.

Sample 4:

It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.

First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.

However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.

In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.

Sample 5:

It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.

To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.

Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.

There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.

To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.

Sample 6:

In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.

Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.

One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.

In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.

Sample 7:

Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.

In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.

The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.

To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.

Câu 3