Câu hỏi:

07/01/2025 234

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Academicians are split when it comes to deciding the most important school subject. Some believe that history, as a subject, is most important, yet others put forward science and technology to be more significant. In my opinion, history is as crucial as science and technology in schools.

Educationists who find history foremost, believe that it is inescapable. History delves deeply into the past and the legacy of the past influences the present conditions. In simple words, it provides us crucial insight into the phenomena around us, which in turn serves as springboards for later ideals, like political beliefs, sociological theory, and even technological evolution, for example. A case in point is the French Revolution. The event advanced the political ideals that still resonate across the globe. When governments try to make political reforms to entertain the vested political interests, they are generally retreated by the illegal disruptions and strikes. The spirit of the revolution still lives on around the world as the vanguard of democracy reminding us of the importance of history.

However, some people favour teaching science and technology more than any other subject because technology will take the centre stage in almost every aspect of human life as the world embarks on the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It is a new horizon in human civilization, opened up by unprecedented technological advancements in tandem with those of the first, second and third industrial revolution. The revolution is just more than the technology-driven change. It paves the way for helping everybody, consisting of academicians, scientists, policymakers, and people from all walks of life. Therefore, students should be taught science and technology so as to equip them with the skills set they need to walk firmly into the world ahead.

In conclusion, ideally, one-size-fits-all does not work when it comes down to a balanced curriculum in schools to answer the needs of the future. Therefore, we should emphasize both history and, science and technology so that pupils can be well prepared for the future.

Sample 2:

Education is the cornerstone of modern society, and it is widely acknowledged that the curriculum should include a variety of subjects to provide students with a well-rounded education. However, there is a growing debate about the importance of history compared to other subjects, such as science and technology. Some individuals believe that history is of utmost importance, while others argue that science and technology hold more significance in today's world. My opinion is that they are both important subjects.

On the one hand, proponents of history subject argue that it is essential for students to learn about the past. By studying history, students can gain valuable insights into the events, ideas, and cultural practices that have shaped our world. It allows individuals to learn from the past and make informed decisions in the present. Moreover, studying history helps students develop critical thinking skills, as they learn to analyze and evaluate historical sources and interpret different perspectives.

On the other hand, those who advocate for science and technology argue that they are the most important subjects in today's world. The rapid advancements in technology and the ongoing impact of science on society make it critical for students to learn about these subjects. Science and technology play a crucial role in many aspects of modern life, from healthcare to communication to transportation. It is essential for students to gain a comprehensive understanding of these subjects to be prepared for the future workforce.

In my opinion, both history and science and technology are important subjects that should be included in the school curriculum. While history provides insights into the past, science and technology equip students with the knowledge and skills necessary to succeed in the future. By learning about these subjects, students can develop a broader perspective and enhance their critical thinking skills.

In conclusion, there are compelling arguments for the importance of history and science and technology in the school curriculum. While history allows students to gain insights into the past and develop critical thinking skills, science and technology equip students with the knowledge and skills necessary to succeed in today's world. Therefore, it is essential to strike a balance between these subjects and ensure that students receive a well-rounded education.

Sample 3:

Many people consider History as an essential subject in school curriculum while others contend that science and technology should get more priority. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and argue that science and technology-related subjects should be given more importance in school syllabi as the current era is defined by the advancement of technology rather than history.

On the one hand, people who advocate for the significance of History as a school subject assert that without learning about history, our young generation can not shape a better future. This is because history repeats itself, and without learning and examining the lessons from history, we will always be oblivious when it comes to making important decisions for our future. For instance, if we do not know what caused devastating famines in the past or what sparked a civil war, we cannot expect to prevent them and make a better future.

On the contrary, proponents of prioritising science, engineering and technology subjects in schools express that we are living in a world which is shaped and driven by scientific breakthroughs and technological advancements. This is why students should be prepared to use them to have a better career and a prosperous future. They argue that history teachers in schools mostly talk about important dates, events from the past, and the life of famous leaders which may be irrelevant in this current technology-driven era. Moreover, history as a subject often forces pupils to memorise noteworthy dates and names and offers very little practical value. Science and technology, on the other hand, become integral in the life and career of a student. I tend to support this opinion considering the extraordinary impact science and technology have in our life and how knowledge in science and technology can help us get prepared for a thriving future.

In conclusion, while some people emphasize the importance of History in academies, there is no denying that science and technology play a more impactful role in shaping our learners' minds and equipping them for the future.

Sample 4:

Some people argue that courses in history should be a top priority in the school curriculum, whereas others claim that nowadays courses related to science and technology are of greater importance than history courses. I agree with the latter opinion because those who focus on disciplines related to science and technology can earn higher salaries in the future.

On the one hand, it can be argued that courses in history can foster patriotism in the young. This is because by taking these courses, young people can know that without their ancestors' sacrifice and hard work, they would not be able to live the type of lifestyle they are living now. As a result, they will love their country more and want to give back to their country. However, I think history courses do not equip students with the hard skills needed to contribute to their nation, which makes patriotism useless.

On the other hand, students who put much effort into courses in science and technology will have a better chance of securing high-paying positions in the future. The reason is that these courses train their ability to innovate, and with this ability, they will be able to bring innovation to their future employers. Their employers in turn will reward them with high salaries. For example, even entry-level software engineers at Facebook get paid 166, 000 dollars a year. I agree with this argument because getting a well-paid job after graduation is the main reason why most people go to school.

In conclusion, while courses in history can turn students into patriots, I believe subjects related to science and technology are more important because they help students get high-paying jobs.

Sample 5:

The debate over prioritizing history or science and technology in education is a crucial one. This essay will argue that although history provides essential insights, the tangible benefits of science and technology in today's world are more significant. The discussion will explore the deep lessons history offers about our past, contrasted with the immediate impacts and future-oriented nature of science and technology.

History, as a subject, offers profound lessons about humanity. It teaches us about the triumphs and failures of past civilizations, offering a unique lens through which to view and understand the human journey. Studying historical events, such as wars and their resolutions, not only provides context for present-day issues but also develops critical thinking and empathy. For example, examining the causes and outcomes of World War II can offer insights into current international relations and conflict resolution strategies. Furthermore, history encourages students to consider different viewpoints, fostering a deeper comprehension of complex social dynamics and human behaviors.

In contrast, science and technology are fundamentally shaping our current and future reality. These fields are the bedrock of innovation and are vital for economic growth and societal advancement. The impact of scientific development is evident in areas like health care, where advancements in medical technology have revolutionized treatments and increased life expectancy. The importance of technology is further highlighted in our digital era; knowledge in this field is not just beneficial but essential for navigating the contemporary job market and societal infrastructure. The rapid evolution of technology, from artificial intelligence to renewable energy, underscores its critical role in solving modern challenges and paving the way for a sustainable future.

In conclusion, while history offers invaluable insights into our past, science and technology are crucial for addressing the needs and challenges of the present and future.

Sample 6:

In today’s world, it is often argued that history is an essential subject, while others say that science and technology are of greater relevance than history. Though we can learn invaluable lessons by studying history, this essay believes that the modern lifestyle convenience is mainly based on revolutionary scientific and technological innovation. I am going to elucidate the same in the following paragraphs.

On the one hand, advocates of history believe that knowledge about the past plays a crucial role in understanding the present and predicting the future. This is because they believe that past experiences will likely be repeated in the future, which will assist humanity in overcoming future challenges. For example, many years ago, the world experienced a pandemic that killed thousands of people in many countries, similar to the one that we live with nowadays. This way, knowledge about history can assist people in dealing with today’s challenges with the COVID pandemic. Therefore, we cannot deny that learning about the past facilitates overcoming today’s problems.

On the other hand, science and technology subjects are more relevant because they enable our lifestyle development and progress. In other words, only these subjects can effectively transform the world, make life more convenient, and improve people’s well-being. For instance, the development of new medicines is of greater importance than any historical moment. Furthermore, technological development makes our lives easier. Nowadays, we can drive electric cars and establish live instant communication with someone on the other side of the world. All these developments would not be possible if science and technology subjects were not prioritized.

In conclusion, although learning history helps us to understand current world issues so that we can confront the challenges efficiently, the benefit of prioritising science and technology is significantly high because it provides unprecedented comfort and progress in our life. Therefore, while they both have their own significance and importance, science and technology have a more immediate impact on people's daily lives and the way society functions.

Sample 7:

History has been a subject of great importance in the educational systems across the globe, but in recent times, some people believe that science and technology subjects have gained more relevance. While some argue that history is still vital for us to understand the present and prepare for the future, others claim that the world has evolved so much that we need to prioritize science and technology. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and offer my opinion on the matter.

On one hand, proponents of history argue that it plays a critical role in shaping our understanding of the present and future. Through the study of the past, we can gain insight into how people and societies have evolved over time and learn valuable lessons from the successes and failures of our predecessors. Furthermore, history helps us to develop empathy and understanding towards people from different cultures and backgrounds.

On the other hand, those who advocate for science and technology argue that in today's world, these subjects are crucial to drive innovation and progress. With technological advancements shaping nearly every aspect of our lives, understanding science and technology is necessary to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the modern era. Moreover, science and technology education can lead to job opportunities in fields that are in high demand, such as engineering and computer science.

In my opinion, while both history and science and technology are important subjects, history should not be neglected in favour of science and technology. The lessons we can learn from history are invaluable, and without them, we risk repeating past mistakes. Additionally, an understanding of history helps us to better comprehend contemporary issues, such as social, economic, and political problems. However, it is also important to recognize the importance of science and technology education in preparing students for the future job market and to drive innovation and progress.

In conclusion, while some argue that history has lost its relevance in today's world, others maintain that it is still a critical subject. In my view, both history and science and technology are important and should be given equal importance in our educational systems to prepare students for a successful future.

Sample 8:

There are many people who have called into question the importance in today’s world of subjects like history, which do not have an immediately discernible impact on most future careers. While I think that history should still be mandatory, more practical subjects related to technology and the arts are more needed in our evolving world.

The main reason that students should study some history in school is that it provides crucial insights into nations around the world that serve as springboards for later political beliefs. In America, students learn about the American Revolution, the constitution and the founding fathers periodically from elementary to high school. They learn about why the war started (so that the colonies could tax and govern themselves) as well as the great figures from history like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin. Some of the principles students learn include the ideas of American exceptionalism, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and the responsibility of citizens to vote in a representative democracy. Later in life, most people will lean liberal or conservative but still hold the same basic convictions about individual liberty and responsibility. By knowing the context in which these ideas emerged students can become adults with well-informed political beliefs, and it will be more difficult for unscrupulous politicians to make false assertions about the past.

Although history should still be taught, the practical sciences and arts should be prioritised because these are more likely to have an impact on a person’s future career. Very few students will end up with careers in history, as historians or professors, but a large percentage will work in the arts and especially the sciences. For example, in Vietnam the most popular university majors are engineering, finance, and graphic design. If schools emphasise maths at school, then this will better prepare them to make calculations in complex engineering projects or when working at a bank or accountancy firm. Even learning how to draw and use colors in art class is more useful for students because of the high demand for graphic designers on websites and advertisements. Countries that devote more of their educational budget towards these practical subjects will give students a head start on a potential future career and increase their chances of having a higher standard of living.

It is clear that in this case a moderate approach is best. School administrators should not remove history from the timetable but in my opinion, they should devote more time and resources to the teaching of subjects related to technology and the arts. This will become ever more important as the tech industry continues to dominate the future job market.

Sample 9:

Some people think that History is among the most important subjects during one's school time, whereas others argue that nowadays, Science is of more importance. While I do believe that subjects like Science are essential, I also think History is as important as other subjects.

First of all, History is one of the vital subjects about which one should acquire good knowledge. This is important because it may give information about cultural heritage and our ancestors along with the ways in which they have lived their lives. For instance, if we know about the freedom fighters, how they fought and many sacrificed their lives for the freedom we enjoy today, we will not take it for granted. In addition, these days world is moving towards primitive lifestyle to reduce the escalated stress levels and if we do not learn history, we would know nothing about that.

On the other hand, there are lots of inventions and improvements that are taking place in modern age, which are beneficial for the mankind such as modern transport systems. These would not have been possible without studying Science, and that is why I think it is an indispensable subject of study. For professions such as engineering and medicine, Science lay down the foundations for those who aspire to be engineers and doctors in future. If there was no study of such subjects, there would be an acute shortage of competent doctors, and thus we would not have recovered from our illness as fast as we experience today.

In conclusion, although Science is important to study as it provides engineers and doctors needed in the present world, History is also required to acknowledge and venerate our founding fathers, and also to get a glimpse of basic lifestyle.

Sample 10:

Some argue that science and technology are more important than history in the modern world, while others maintain that history is a necessary subject. In my opinion, all of these courses have value because, while science and technology move people closer to progress and creativity, history explains how the world became to be what it is now.

On the one hand, people think studying history can give students a deep understanding of both their own culture and the formation and development of a nation. Likewise, it is regarded as an excellent way for people to understand the significance of traditional customs as well as to save and transfer them to future generations. An important aspect of studying history can help students learn that problems can be solved through discussions rather than fighting a war. Thus, knowledge of history is essential and valuable.

But many people believe that students must acquire knowledge in science areas due to the swift progress in technology and the continuous influence of science on society. Modern life depends heavily on science and technology in many areas, including healthcare, communication, and transportation. For students to be ready for the workforce in the future, they must have a thorough understanding of these disciplines.

In summary, there are exciting prospects for both areas in the future. I believe studying history will impart important lessons and might prevent mistakes from being made in the past while understanding science and technology will increase our chances of survival and success in the future.

Sample 11:

Critics argue that science and technology should take priority over history in the educational curriculum, whereas many others view history as a crucial subject. Both of these subjects are invaluable since history illustrates how the world came to be how it is now. At the same time, science and technology bring people closer to progress and creative thinking. 

Studying history is important because it teaches us vital lessons about humanity by allowing us to know the strengths and failures of past civilizations and provides a distinctive perspective on how humans interact. It fosters a sense of empathy and critical thinking in youngsters while researching past events, including wars and their outcomes. For instance, researching the beginnings and aftermath of World War II can shed light on contemporary approaches to international relations and conflict resolution. In addition, studying history helps students to think critically about numerous viewpoints which promotes a deeper understanding of intricate social dynamics and human behavior.

On the other hand, science and technology are radically reshaping both the present and the future of our very existence. Such fields constitute the cornerstone of innovation and are essential to both societal progress and economic expansion. Scientific progress is felt in fields such as health care, where new developments in medical technology have transformed treatments and extended life. In the current digital age, the significance of technology is further emphasized; familiarity with this area is not only advantageous but also necessary for navigating the modern labor market and social infrastructure. Technology's quick development—from Robotic intelligence to sustainable energy—underlines how important it is to address today's problems and lay the groundwork for the future to be environmentally friendly.

In a nutshell, technology and science serve as crucial for overcoming the challenges and requirements of the present and the future, while history provides invaluable glimpses into our ancestors. Therefore, it is crucial to create a balance between various topics to ensure that students receive comprehensive schooling. 

Sample 12:

Modern society's foundation rests upon education; it stands as an incontrovertible truth that a comprehensive curriculum – encompassing a variety of subjects – is necessary to equip students with the tools they need for their intellectual development.

A burgeoning debate, however, questions the primacy of history against other disciplines: science and technology in particular. While some uphold the utmost importance of history, others assert a stronger significance for science and technology in our contemporary world.

Proponents of history assert its importance in students' learning; they argue from one particular perspective: the past serves as a vital teacher. The study of history equips students with invaluable insights: it unveils the past's significant events; and explores prevailing ideas and cultural practices – all factors that have collectively sculpted our world. Individuals can learn from the past, thereby enabling them to make informed decisions in the present. Moreover, the study of history cultivates in students an aptitude for critical thinking: they learn to dissect and evaluate historical sources; interpreting myriad perspectives becomes second nature. On the flip side, science and technology advocates assert that these disciplines encapsulate - indeed, embody - the paramount global concerns of our era. Rapid technological advancements and the ever-increasing impact of science on society underscore the importance for students to acquaint themselves with these subjects.

Many aspects of modern life - medicine, communication, and transportation specifically - hinge significantly on the crucial role that science and technology play. Students must cultivate a comprehensive understanding of these topics; such preparation equips them for the future job market. The inclusion of history in the curriculum is crucial, as it mirrors science and technology in significance; this viewpoint represents my opinion at its core. Insight into the past is provided by history; however, science and technology equip students with future-oriented knowledge - integral skills for their success. Studying these topics equips students to cultivate a broader perspective, enhancing their critical thinking skills.

To summarize, the school curriculum indeed finds compelling arguments for incorporating history, science, and technology; these disciplines hold paramount importance. Students gain insight into the past and develop critical thinking skills through history; concurrently, they acquire the knowledge—essential for success in today's world—from science and technology. Balancing these subjects and ensuring a well-rounded education for students is imperative.

Sample 13:

History: a subject many deem necessary in the curriculum; others, however – diverging from this viewpoint - argue for prioritizing science and technology. This essay engages in a dual exploration, contending for the elevation of science and technology-related subjects within school curricula. The rationale behind this stance lies within our contemporary epoch; an age primarily marked not by historical events but rather by relentless strides forward in technological advancement.

Advocates for history as a school subject argue on one hand: our young generation cannot shape a better future without the crucial lessons it offers.

Unless we learn from history, consider its lessons, and apply them to our future decision-making; we are destined for perpetual ignorance - a cycle in which the past continually repeats itself. We cannot aspire to prevent devastating famines or civil wars in the future if we remain ignorant of their causes from the past. Proponents of prioritizing science, engineering, and technical subjects in schools argue for a valid point: our world thrives on the continuous evolution ushered in by scientific and technological progress.

Hence, students must prepare themselves to use these tools for an enhanced career and a future filled with success. School history teachers, they assert, primarily focus on important dates and past events - specifically those of the lives of famous leaders. These topics - in our technology -driven era - are often deemed irrelevant.

Moreover, the study of history frequently necessitates students to memorize significant dates and names: a task that offers minimal pragmatic worth. Meanwhile, science and technology have become an integral part of students' lives and careers. Given the profound impact science and technology exert on our lives, coupled with their potential to pave the way for a prosperous future when utilized judiciously; I inherently align myself with this viewpoint - one that champions knowledge of these disciplines as essential preparation for tomorrow's success.

Conclusively, while some underscore the primacy of history in advanced learning, science and technology - undeniably more potent catalysts for molding minds, equipping them futuristically – take center stage.

Sample 14:

For as long as there have been schools, people have debated what should be taught in them. Nowadays, with economic troubles creating additional pressure for people, there is a call for school curriculums to include more practical subjects and less of the arts and humanities. This essay will look at both sides of the argument and conclude that subjects like history should continue to be taught.

In the modern era, people often clamour for changes to school curriculums and the range of subjects is continuously changing according to social demands. People now ask that their children are taught practical subjects that can help them in their lives, and this is a very reasonable request. In the twenty-first century, science and technology are booming fields and so these areas are important for young people to study in order that they may one day contribute and get a good job.

However, to include these subjects at the expense of traditional ones like history is misguided. History is important for a number of reasons. Perhaps one of the most overlooked aspects of studying history is that it teaches critical thinking that many people simply do not learn elsewhere in life. It is clear that people who have studied history are able to discern what is and isn’t true far more easily than others. By critically assessing historical sources, they may seem to be learning an arcane skill, but in fact they are learning something that is important in life. Particularly in an era of social media and “fake news,” being able to pick apart truth and lies is increasingly important.

In conclusion, history may seem less important than more practical subjects, but the underlying skills taught in this subject are very useful for people in the modern world.

Sample 15:

Primary education has always played a major role in building the foundation of knowledge. Students study various subjects to enhance their understanding about different areas of life. History is one of them, which provides us with knowledge about our past. Some people believe that history must be taught in primary schools, whereas others think that priority should be given to subjects like Science and Technology. I will discuss both views in my essay.

On the one hand, this subject is essential to learn about the evolution of societies and causes of change. Moreover, we also get to know about different cultures and dynasties prevalent worldwide. History compiles real life stories which further motivate many people. It also educates us about the causes of sufferings we had in the past. This knowledge can help us avoid those mistakes in the future. We generally believe that one must not dwell on the past but rather should focus on the present and future. But the roots of the present and future are always linked to the past. Hence, we cannot ignore the importance of knowing about the past to create a better future.

Certainly, history is beneficial to mankind. Nevertheless, the absence of its practical applications in today’s contemporary world has affected its popularity. Cramming dates and years of the past incidents kills the creativity of the learner. Today’s generation is focusing more on technological innovations for future developments. For that reason, subjects like history do not fit into the current education system. In addition, teachers use conventional methodology to teach History. Consequently, the subject becomes boring and less participative.

To conclude, students often question the relevance of having a history class in schools. But they do not understand the intensity of change this subject can bring to our lives. Every subject has its relevance and contribution to our lives. Even though, in the age of robots, it is essential to study science-based subjects, in my opinion, the information about our culture and origin is equally important.

Bình luận


Bình luận

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Although fossil fuels still remain the most important energy sources in many places, some countries are now already using alternative sources like solar or wind power. In my opinion, it can be difficult for a country to move towards using alternative energy at first, but this development brings about several benefits in the long run.

On the one hand, the change towards using alternative types of energy would probably put a heavy financial burden on the government and companies as they will have to invest millions of dollars in purchasing and developing new equipment and facilities for harnessing solar, wind or hydro-electric power. For example, the average cost of installing a wind turbine for generating electricity is about $3 million, and an average country would require a wind farm with hundreds of turbines to supply power to all companies and households. In addition, the production cost of large solar panels is still very high, which is why many countries, especially those with a poor economy, are still unable to use this power source.

However, I still believe that shifting towards using alternative energy is a worthwhile investment due to the great benefits it brings. Firstly, fossil fuels are the main cause of air pollution nowadays since petroleum-powered vehicles and factories are releasing tremendous amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere every day. Therefore, replacing coal and petroleum with wind or solar power will help to reduce the level of emissions in the atmosphere and improve air quality. Secondly, fossil fuels, like natural gas or oil, are finite resources and will soon be depleted, which will potentially threaten the economy if there are no alternative sources. This fact emphasizes the need to develop renewable energy to gradually replace traditional sources when fossil fuels inevitably run out.

In conclusion, I hold the view that despite the high initial cost of new equipment and facilities, the switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is still necessary for the long-term development of the planet.

Sample 2:

The debate around our primary sources of energy has been intensifying in recent decades, with some pushing for more sustainable energy while others arguing that fossil fuels should remain the main source of power globally. I personally think renewable energy production should be encouraged, since it’s important that nations should seek to reduce their own carbon emissions to divert the dangers of climate change as well as build a more sustainable economy.

Firstly, fossil fuel should be discouraged because it could bring about the existential threat of climate change. As a result, biodiversity is at an all-time low, with shifting climates and rising sea levels slowly eroding the delicate tapestry of food webs across the globe. As scientists are convinced this is directly the cause of human activity, such as in agriculture and fossil fuel consumption, renewable energies would help slow this threat immediately and might be our only solution to salvaging the planet.

Secondly, one could argue that renewable energies are more sustainable and would therefore be better for the economy in the long run. While oil and coal are a finite resource and take millions of years to replenish, energy from wind and solar can in theory never run out. Therefore, making a switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy can be a solution that thinks of the longer term, since it could avert an economic crash when oil fully depletes. Many analysts have warned that with the current trajectory, oil could run out by 2050; when this happens, it could sharply affect the biggest economies in the world that are still heavily dependent on oil.

Overall, I argue that the climate effects as a result of fossil fuels consumption combined with the economic benefits of renewable energies mean that we should encourage the development of these forms of energy.

Sample 3:

Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, have long been the dominant sources of energy in many countries. However, their extensive use has resulted in significant environmental harm, prompting the need for alternative sources of energy. In response to this, many countries are encouraging the adoption of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. This essay will discuss the reasons behind the promotion of alternative energy sources and argue that it is a positive development.

One of the key reasons for the promotion of alternative energy sources is their potential to mitigate the negative environmental impacts associated with fossil fuels. Unlike fossil fuels, renewable energy sources produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions during operation, thereby reducing the contribution to climate change. For instance, countries like Germany have implemented strong incentives and subsidies to support the development of solar power, leading to a significant increase in the share of renewable energy in their energy mix. This shift towards cleaner sources of energy is driven by the recognition of the urgent need to combat climate change and reduce dependence on finite fossil fuel reserves.

The encouragement of alternative energy sources has numerous positive implications and is a positive trend. It promotes energy diversification, reducing reliance on a single energy source and increasing energy security. By harnessing the power of wind, solar, and other renewable sources, countries can decrease their vulnerability to fluctuations in fossil fuel prices and geopolitical tensions related to energy resources. Additionally, the transition to renewable energy stimulates innovation and job creation. As governments invest in renewable energy infrastructure and technologies, new industries and employment opportunities emerge.

In conclusion, the encouragement of alternative energy sources, such as wind and solar power, is driven by the need to address environmental concerns and promote sustainable development. By reducing greenhouse gas emissions, diversifying energy sources, and fostering economic growth, the adoption of renewable energy brings numerous benefits. Therefore, it is crucial for countries to continue investing in research, technology, and policy frameworks that support the widespread adoption of renewable energy, ensuring a cleaner and more sustainable energy future.

Sample 4:

Fossil fuel, though extensively used, is not eco-friendly, and its usage comes with huge environmental costs. Considering global warming and climate change, and the detrimental effects fossil fuels have on the environment, green fuel, such as solar, hydro and wind power, is increasingly being used in many countries. It is a good thing that many countries have already started using these green power sources.

The promotion of alternative sources of energy has gained significant momentum in numerous countries because of a growing concern about the adverse effects of fossil fuels on the environment such as greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Governments and environmental organizations recognize the urgent need to transition to cleaner and more sustainable energy options. For instance, countries like Germany have implemented ambitious renewable energy targets, investing heavily in wind and solar power to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and combat climate change.

The stock of fossil fuels is limited and would get exhausted at a certain point. So, alternative and green sources, which are renewable, would be the main source of our energy in the future. Despite the shift from fossil fuel to green energy being expensive and labour-intensive, green energy like wind and solar energy is renewable, their use should be as much encouraged as possible from right now, and it is a good thing that the trend has already started. Alternative sources of power, such as solar and wind power, do not pollute the environment, have lower carbon emissions and are eco-friendly. So, their use could save the planet from the disaster of global warming which is already visible around us. Wind power and solar power are in use in countries like Denmark, Germany and France, and more and more countries are joining the list. We already have extremely efficient technology to produce solar and wind power, and the trend is quite encouraging.

To conclude, the energy demand is increasing at a fast pace, and the stock of fossil fuels is diminishing. So, we should turn to alternative green energy sources and share the technology and expertise with all nations so that the transition happens all around the world to save our otherwise dying planet due to climate change and greenhouse effects.

Sample 5:

Every year the energy demand is increasing globally. So, the strains on the current and already limited resources are high. Since these energy resources, like fossil fuels, are mostly imported by countries, some countries have opted for alternative sources of energy to enjoy greater energy security. I wholeheartedly believe that it is a positive trend.

Alternative sources of energy offer greater energy security and independence and that is why their production and use is increasing. Relying on traditional energy sources, often imported from other countries, can leave nations vulnerable to price fluctuations and geopolitical tensions. Embracing renewable energy sources, such as hydroelectric, geothermal, or biomass, allows countries to tap into their own natural resources and reduce dependence on foreign energy imports. This is why it has already gained popularity.

Fossil fuels, like coal and oil, are not unlimited. A few countries like Germany and Japan, for example, are completely dependent on the import of such resources. For all these countries, alternative energy, also known as green energy, is the answer for the future, and it is a welcoming trend that many countries have already started producing green energy. By embracing renewable energy options, countries can address climate change, enhance energy independence, create employment opportunities, and drive technological progress. Countries like France and Norway, among others, have invested in the technology needed to produce extremely efficient solar panels to store energy from the sun or produce wind power. The positive impacts of this development are innumerable, and many countries are following in their footsteps.

In conclusion, the use of green energy sources is gaining traction because many countries want to become energy self-sufficient. This is definitely a positive trend as it reduces reliance on energy imports, helps countries fight climate change, advances technology and creates more employment.

Sample 6:

These days, the environment is being severely affected by the excessive use of nonrenewable energy resources, such as petrol, diesel, coal and natural gas. However, eco-friendly and renewable power sources like wind and solar power are being adopted in many countries mainly because they do not harm the environment, and I wholeheartedly think that it is a positive trend.

The shift towards renewable energy sources in many countries is primarily to fight global warming and climate change. Fossil fuels are often the reason climate change is so severe and threatens the existence of humans on the mother planet. Many countries, including Germany, Norway and France, have adopted the use of green energy like solar and wind power to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels to save the environment.

It is a positive trend as it greatly reduces the carbon content of the environment and makes the planet more sustainable. Without extensive use of green energy, we will soon transform our planet into an uninhabitable one. To save our planet from destruction, we need to produce and use more green and renewable energy. Moreover, it is cheaper to produce such clean energy than to extract coal or natural gas which makes these eco-friendly energies affordable to mass people. A recent study by Oxford University reveals that the production of solar power is 30% cheaper than that of fossil fuel. This finding again emphasizes how important it is for all nations to opt for renewable energy sources, and how beneficial it is that many countries have already invested in generating clean power.

In conclusion, even though we have harmed our mother planet to a great extent by indiscriminately using fossil fuels, some countries have already shown us a better way to produce and use power. It is expected that more countries will invest in alternative sources of energy to make the planet green again and make energy affordable for all.

Sample 7:

While fossil fuels have been the backbone of our energy supply for centuries, they have severe harmful impacts on our environment. Therefore, some countries have started relying on green energy to reverse the situation. And it is a positive trend that we have started researching and using alternative sources of energy, also known as green energy, that are sustainable and do not cause long-term damage to our environment.

One of the main reasons alternative energy sources are being used to produce green energy in many countries is their ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which are a major contributor to climate change. According to the International Energy Agency, the use of renewable energy sources can help reduce global CO2 emissions by up to 70% by 2050. This is a significant step towards protecting our planet from the devastating effects of climate change, including rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and loss of biodiversity.

The use of renewable sources to generate energy is a positive development for a variety of reasons. For instance, investing in renewable energy can also create jobs and boost the economy. According to the Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2020, the renewable energy sector employed around 11.5 million people worldwide in 2019, a 6% increase from the previous year. This growth in employment opportunities can help to stimulate local economies and provide new job opportunities for people in both developed and developing countries. For example, in Germany, the government's decision to phase out nuclear power plants and invest in renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, has created over 300,000 jobs and contributed to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

In conclusion, the shift towards green energy sources is a positive development that can help to protect our environment and create new job opportunities. While it may take time and investment to transition away from fossil fuels, it is a necessary step to ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.

Sample 8:

Many nations are now supporting the adoption of various energy alternatives in order to reduce fossil fuel consumption. In my opinion, though there may be short-term economic downsides, this is a decidedly positive development due to the implications on the environment generally.

Those who feel the sudden adoption of alternative energies is a negative point out the financial repercussions. There are economies around the world that are currently dependent on exporting fossil fuels, in particular in The Middle East, South America, and Eastern Europe. Many of these countries are still developing and have few other natural resources or industries that could replace a decline in the energy sector. The economic effects will extend far beyond exporters though. Both developed and developing nations ranging from the United States and Vietnam to China and Russia exploit oil for private vehicles and various industries. Substituting cheap oil for a more expensive alternative might result in economic catastrophe with wide-ranging repercussions.

However, the environmental effect is overwhelmingly more important for the long-term health of the planet. The economic results of less dependence on fossil fuels will cause short-term problems but the issues caused by climate change are also becoming a present reality. For instance, there has been a rise in the number of cataclysmic natural disasters related to rising ocean temperatures and deforestation. Even more troubling are the less noticed problems such as habitats being destroyed in remote areas like Antarctica and the Amazon Rainforest. Beyond the animals becoming endangered and extinct, it is only a number of years before human life is affected. This existential threat is the reason alternative energies are a pressing need.

In conclusion, despite the economic drawbacks of a sudden shift to alternative power sources, this reorientation will have a markedly positive long-term impact on the environment. Governments should therefore implement and bolster alternative energy initiatives.

Sample 9:

The development of renewable energies like wind power, wave power, or solar energy to replace the electricity generated from burning fossil fuels has become an increasingly popular trend in the world. I believe this is a green movement in the energy sector with countless benefits that people should welcome.

The most palpable advantage one can recognize at once when mentioning renewable energies is that they reduce the burden on the environment. The use of solar power creates no emission at all, and thus provides for the need of power at almost no environmental cost. It is similarly clean and sustainable when wind, wave, and water moving around the Earth eternally can be used in energy production. Also, the independence from fossil fuels in electricity generation saves the world from a rapid depletion of coal, oil and natural gases, and slow down the imminent energy crisis which may even cause wars over energy sources among countries.

Moreover, the production of green energy also benefits individuals and the country as a whole. Thanks to less burning of fossil fuels in thermal energy plants, workers in energy companies face less risks of occupational health problems especially those related to respiratory diseases and may lead to early death. On the large scale of a country, the utilization of wind, wave, sunlight, and even geothermal heat to produce electricity will diversify the energy portfolio of different nations, making them free from reliance on limited natural resources to generate electricity due to their unfavourable geographical locations.

In conclusion, the movement of the world towards more use of renewable energy is completely positive when it solves multiple problems of environmental pollution, dependence on natural resources for energy, and poor health of workers in thermal power plants.

Sample 10:

Governments across continents have turned their attention to more sustainable sources of energy as alternatives to fossil fuels. In my opinion, this could be seen as a progress for the following reasons.

First, there is no arguing that producing energy from buried dead organisms lacks sustainability, which means such production could not guarantee the survival of humans in the long term. In fact, the consumption of energy generated from fossil fuels tends to accelerate in direct correlation with the growth of the world population. With the current rate of exploitation, this valuable resource would dwindle away in no time, leaving no other choice than seeking additional reserves such as nuclear power or hydroelectricity. This is a safe solution to the fear of energy scarcity and ensures the future development of the human race.

Second, dependence on fossil fuel for worldwide energy supply would cause environmental degradation while using solar power, for example, is considered an ultimate choice of energy conservation. The combustion of fossil fuels is the culprit of greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants, leading to tremendous damage to the environment. Such suffering of the Earth could not be justified by the growing need of humans. By contrast, this would never be the case when it comes to other alternatives as mentioned above. If governments continue to invest in exploiting those new sources, there will be an unlimited amount of inexpensive energy in the long run.

In conclusion, I believe that the use of other potential energy sources to replace fossil fuels is obviously an important step forward.

Sample 11:

Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, are extensively used in many countries and cause harm to the environment. The use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, however, is being encouraged in many countries. Is this a positive or negative development?

In several nations, non-renewable sources of energy, namely coal, petroleum, and gasoline, are used inordinately, which is severely damaging the ecosystem. However, other countries are promoting the usage of non-conventional sources of power, such as wind and solar energy. I personally consider that this has been a positive development because the non-traditional approach will aid in efficient energy output and protect the ecosystem from feasible hazards.

Primarily, the remarkable advantage of the aforementioned alternative sources is that they are renewable. These energy sources have a constant supply of power and there is no requirement for significant raw materials. Although it could be argued that the initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind farms is extremely high, I would assert that once the installation cost has been met with, their maintenance is practically negligible. Apart from this, it is widely accepted that fossil fuels take millions of years to form, and once consumed, they cannot be re-used. To illustrate, if modern individuals burn immense petroleum and coal, these resources are likely to vanish, and future generations would not be capable of using these precious energy sources.

Another major benefit of eco-friendly energy sources is their non-polluting nature. The intensive usage of natural resources forms carbon emissions and emits noxious gases that are nurturing global warming and depleting the ozone layer. Even worse, by inhaling such poisonous gases and carbon fumes, human beings are susceptible to various health ailments such as asthma and lung cancer. However, when energy is harnessed from wind turbines and solar panels there are no such deleterious by-products. Unlike other automobiles, for instance, commuting through a solar car would not emit carbon dioxide.

In conclusion, not only do alternative sources provide an inordinate amount of energy supply constantly, but they also preserve the environment in a very effective way. Therefore, I completely believe that this trend is a wholly positive development and one that authorities ought to promote.

Sample 12:

In this day and age, the consumption of non-renewable resources is burgeoning day by day. Owing to this it reached an alarming rate. It takes millions of years to form. However, some nations are taking a step forward and using non-conventional sources of power. This essay will highlight that this is certainly an optimistic approach that needs to be opted.

At the outset, non-conventional sources can be recycled and utilized again. Although, the use of alternative sources has some hurdles like the initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind farms is very high and these also rely on geographical locations. When masses use this energy source for a long period of time, the energy can be renewed and produced, no extra cost will have more economic benefit than the others. Besides this, the use of renewable energy could help to conserve foreign exchange and generate local employment if conservation technologies are designed, manufactured, assembled, and installed locally.

Moving further, alternative sources- wind power, tidal power, solar power – sources are totally safe for the environment, have lower carbon emission, and are eco-friendly. The research concluded that there are some countries that have utilized alternative sources namely German, France, and Denmark as these nations save the planet from a disaster of global warming. Some countries use automobile cars that work on solar power. Consequently, it has reduced the carbon footprint of such countries and made its greenery.

Based on this study it can be reiterated that the use of alternative sources of energy is an optimistic evolvement, which can save the whole globe from the catastrophic impact of greenhouse emissions as well as global warming. Furthermore, more and more folks should adopt renewable sources to ameliorate the conditions of the environment. In this way, by taking joint efforts individuals can preserve the world.

Sample 13:

Due to the shortage of fossil fuels, whether other natural power resources should be encouraged to harness or not, becomes a paramount concern for many countries. I believe, while this advancement may decrease awareness among people about protecting the fuels, it also solves the problem of the lack of energy sources.

First of all, fossil fuels which are the major energy resources in many nations are facing the threats of becoming obsolete due to the overuse by the human race in daily life. As a result, people should be encouraged to raise awareness of fuel conservation. However, the utilization of alternative natural energy sources could prevent people from doing this by reducing the fears of coal or oil that might be running out. Because there are other sources to use, they would use more energy generated from gas or oil without hesitation. In my personal opinion, the negative sides of using different resources of power could deteriorate the shortage of fuels.

Harnessing alternative power sources (such as solar or wind power), in contrast, could reduce the usage of fossil fuels in generating energy for a range of demanding activities such as heating and driving. While coal and oil mines are limited, natural resources such as wind and solar power are considered unlimited. This wind power or solar energy is consequently able to produce enough energy for human demand without the help of fossil fuels. As a result, it should be encouraged to be utilized in more countries in the world to gradually cut down the usage of fossil fuels.

To sum up, the encouragement of using natural resources (such as solar or wind) for producing energy has both negative and positive sides. However, I deem that humankind should consider using more power from solar or wind and less from coal and gas to protect the remaining parts of fossil fuels.

Sample 14:

Coals, oil, and gas are some fossil fuels that are the most common sources of energy for the majority of countries. On the other hand, some countries encourage the use of renewable resources like wind and solar energy. I believe this is a strongly positive development as we will be in grave danger if the world runs out of these natural non-renewable resources like fossil fuels.

Fossil fuels are used in almost all industries and for running motor vehicles. We can minimize this by using alternatives wherever possible. If it goes on like this, we will soon have such a shortage of these fuels that can pose a threat to running things efficiently. For example, some industries can only run on coal or oil, though this is not the case for cars. Automobiles can easily run on electricity, and so we should limit the use of such fuels. Burning too much of these fossil fuels also contributes to air pollution. Thus, it is important to minimize usage wherever possible.

On the other hand, wind energy and solar energy take comparatively longer time to generate, and they are largely dependent on the sun and the wind. We do not have any control over them, so the production of goods might slow down if there is less generation of energy as we cannot, in fact, control the weather. Perhaps tropical countries, where there is an abundant amount of sunshine and wind, can be encouraged to use these natural sources and not waste fossil fuels. However, for temperate climates, this might not be an option. Dependency on nature can have slower production rates and lead to not meeting the deadline or having scarcity in the market.

On the whole, I believe all the countries should be aware of the hazards of wasting too much of our natural reserves of energy and use them consciously and responsibly. Initiatives such as building consciousness about the issue should be taken to build a more environmentally friendly atmosphere.

Sample 15:

Fossil fuels harm the environment and to save our planet we need to encourage the use of green energy. The use of alternative sources of energy, or ‘green’ energy, is a positive trend of development, and indeed their use should be encouraged further.

As the demand for energy worldwide is increasing the strains on the existing and already limited resources also increase. To solve this problem, we must consider two issues: how to better use the existing, limited fossil fuel resources and how we can encourage the use of alternative energy sources.

It is universally acknowledged that there is a limitation on the use of fossil fuels, especially coal and oil. Some countries are rich in oil deposits like OPEC, whereas China is rich in coal deposits and Russia in natural gas. Others, such as Japan and Germany, are completely dependent on the import of resources. For all countries- resource-rich versus resource-poor, alternative energy should be encouraged and utilised to reduce the dependence on fossil fuels as well as to keep the global environment in balance and ‘healthy’.

The only way is to turn to other sources to get energy supply. Wind power and solar power are at present feasible alternatives. France is one country that has the advanced technology needed to produce extremely efficient solar panels to store energy from the sun. Both kinds of power can reduce a country’s dependence on fossil fuels. Furthermore, they do not pollute the environment and in turn, help keep the ecosystem stable.

To conclude, while fossil fuel resources are diminishing, the energy demand continues to increase year after year. It is a positive trend to develop other alternative sources of power and experiences should be shared and promoted. If this switch to alternative energy is encouraged early enough, then we may yet avoid the pending energy crisis and environmental disaster.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

It is argued that watching television has an adverse impact on children, whereas other people believe that it brings various benefits to them. I personally agree with the second group.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some people think that children’s development would be negatively affected by watching TV. The first reason is that sitting in front of TV screens for too long is detrimental to children’s health. Many kids these days suffer from various health problems such as obesity, eye strain or fatigue due to prolonged television watching. Another reason is that many TV programmes and movies contain violent contents or sexual images which are inappropriate for children to watch. Heavy exposure to violent movies can put a child at a higher risk of violent behaviour, which could ruin their future.

On the other hand, I personally believe that television has an essential role to play in the development of children. Watching educational TV programmes gives children the opportunity to widen their horizons and enrich their knowledge of the world they live in. Planet Earth and Discovery Channel are prime examples. Their programmes not only take the viewer into unknown natural habitats which are home to various plants and animals, but also educate them about the importance of preserving the wonders of the Earth. In addition, many TV shows and channels provide children with limitless knowledge of almost every aspect of life. A programme called ‘Talent show for kids?’, for example, not only gives children enjoyable moments but also informs them about various subjects.

In conclusion, although some people say that watching TV is harmful to children, I would argue that it is very beneficial for them.

Sample 2:

The matter of screen time for children is open to debate, with some arguing against it while others highlight the benefits it could bring. This essay will examine both stances and present my personal opinion on the issue.

There exist certain health risks associated with TV-viewing for children. In terms of physical health conditions, excessive screen time can result in a wide range of health problems, from eye strain and back pain from prolonged periods in front of the TV, to weight gain and lethargy due to lack of exercise. These risks are also present in the adult population, but much more worrying for young children, who often lack self-control and thus are more prone to addiction. Regarding their mental well-being, children could develop behavioural problems from exposure to explicit content on screen, especially when there is no parental control installed on the device. The effects of violent or sexual acts on young minds are well- documented, with disobedience, aggression, and risk-taking tendencies being the most common issues.

Nevertheless, the advantages of watching TV for children should not be dismissed. One of the most significant benefits is language acquisition. The availability of shows in native tongue or foreign languages, coupled with subtitles and audio-visual aids, allows young children to grasp new vocabulary, as well as its usage. In fact, many children in Vietnam have eagerly learned English from watching shows from channels like Disney and Cartoon Network. Aside from language, TV shows also offer knowledge on numerous areas, including science, environment, history, etc. Vivid imagery and amusing delivery of hosts on kids' educational shows can help children better understand difficult concepts like multiplication compared to traditional textbooks.

In conclusion, after considering both sides of the argument, I believe that children stand to benefit academically from TV shows; however, to minimise the potential drawbacks of screen time, parental guidance and supervision are needed.

Sample 3:

It is pointed out that some individuals believe that viewing television apparently has an adverse bearing on children, while others argue that it brings numerous benefits. This essay discusses both points of view before shedding light on why I side with the latter view.

On the one hand, watching television is conspicuously conductive to children in terms of inventiveness and also enhances language development. To begin with, conveying knowledge through television gives children exposure to a plethora of cultures and perspectives, hence fostering creativity through imaginative storytelling. It is apparent that some television programmes such as Cartoon Network often feature interactive activities and problem-solving challenges, and thus inspire children to think outside the box and explore their creativity. Furthermore, the collosal of children's TV programs incorporate repetition, which is a key element in language reception. To elaborate further, repeated interaction with words, sentences and concepts helps reinforce learning and thus linguistic development.

On the other hand, viewing television takes a toll on children in terms of their mental and also physical health. To start with, TV shows have a lot of negative content that cannot be avoided and thus when the children are exposed to this content such as pornagraphy content that directly affects people who are almost in puberty. A propelling testament of the harmful impact that exposure to erotic material can be captivating to their developing minds, potentially evoking sexual desires that could lead to annulment for their mind and also their mental health. Moreover, viewing television can have disadvantages for children due to binge-watching and prolonged exposure to screen time, which may lead to sedentary behavior and a lack of physical activity. As a result, excessive TV watching can impact attention span, interfere with sleep patterns and even nearsightedness.

In conclusion, both perspectives hold their justifications. From my point of view, I firmly believe that prioritizing their health for the long-term life should outweigh the sake of television brings. Ultimately, moderation and content selection are key.

Sample 4:

In today’s modern society, the issue of whether watching television is beneficial or detrimental to children has sparked a controversial debate. While some individuals argue that television viewing has negative effects on youngsters, I firmly believe that it can be an educational tool for children. In this essay, I will present my reasons to support this viewpoint.

Firstly, television offers a wide range of educational programs that can enhance children’s knowledge and cognitive development. Channels dedicated to educational content, such as documentaries, science programs, and historical shows, provide valuable information that can expand children’s understanding of the world. By watching these programs, children can learn about diverse cultures, scientific concepts, and historical events, fostering their intellectual growth. For instance, renowned educational programs like “Planet Earth” or “Cosmos” captivate young audiences and expose them to the wonders of nature and the universe.

Secondly, television can serve as a powerful medium to promote creativity and imagination among children. Many animated series and children’s shows encourage imaginative thinking and storytelling. By watching these programs, youngsters can be inspired to create their own stories, draw pictures, or engage in imaginative play. This imaginative process is crucial for their cognitive and emotional development, allowing them to explore their creativity and express themselves in unique ways. Moreover, educational cartoons often incorporate moral lessons, teaching children important values such as honesty, empathy, and teamwork.

However, it is important to acknowledge the potential drawbacks of excessive television viewing. Parents should exercise responsible supervision and ensure that children have a balanced viewing experience. Excessive exposure to violent or inappropriate content can have adverse effects on children’s behavior and mental well-being. Therefore, parents should guide their children’s television choices, set limits on screen time, and encourage participation in other activities such as outdoor play, reading, or social interaction.

In conclusion, despite the concerns raised by some individuals, I am of the opinion that watching television can be educational for children. The availability of educational programs and the promotion of creativity and imagination outweigh the potential negative effects. However, parental guidance and responsible viewing habits are crucial to ensure a well-rounded development for children. By striking a balance between television viewing and other activities, children can benefit from the educational and imaginative aspects of television while avoiding its potential pitfalls.

Sample 5:

There is much debate regarding the effects of TV viewing on children. In my opinion, when watched in moderation, educational TV shows can be beneficial for children because they help them develop positive values as they grow up.

On the one hand, those who believe that TV viewing harms children in every way may argue that it is a passive activity that encourages sedentary behavior and limits meaningful play. This can lead to a range of problems, such as poor health and cognitive development. However, I believe that this argument is only valid if children spend too much time in front of the screen. Parents can protect their children from the potential dangers of TV viewing by setting reasonable time limits and providing adequate supervision.

On the other hand, there are people who argue that many TV programs are educational and can instill good values in children. For example, Disney movies often portray characters with admirable traits, such as courage, kindness, and perseverance, which can inspire children to emulate these values and become better individuals. This has led me to believe that educational & television programs can be excellent tools for teaching children moral lessons as they grow and develop. Many children find traditional forms of education boring or difficult, but the visual and interactive nature of TV can make learning more engaging and enjoyable.

In conclusion, although prolonged passive television viewing can be detrimental, watching educational TV shows in moderation can have a positive impact on children's development. Such shows can effectively impart valuable lessons and teach positive values in an engaging and entertaining manner.

Sample 6:

The role of television in children's development has been a subject of ongoing debate, with some individuals vehemently opposing it, while others advocate for its potential benefits. From my perspective, television can be beneficial if appropriately utilised.

Those who argue against children watching television often raise valid points. Primarily, they cite the negative impacts on children's physical health as a concern. With prolonged screen time, children are less likely to engage in physical activity, potentially leading to health issues such as obesity. Furthermore, they worry about the influence of harmful content. Children, being impressionable, can easily internalise violent or inappropriate behaviour depicted in certain shows, leading to negative behavioural outcomes.

On the other hand, advocates for children's television viewing highlight its educational benefits. Many television programmes are designed to be both entertaining and instructive, providing children with a wealth of knowledge about the world, aiding their cognitive development. Shows that portray different cultures, wildlife, or scientific concepts can stimulate children's curiosity and broaden their understanding. Television can also teach moral values and social skills through well-crafted narratives and character interactions.

In my opinion, the key lies in moderation and guidance. While unrestricted, unmonitored television viewing can indeed have detrimental effects, a balanced approach can turn television into a valuable educational tool. Parents and caregivers should control the amount of screen time and ensure that the content children watch is age-appropriate and beneficial.

In conclusion, while the concerns about children watching television are justified, its potential as a developmental tool cannot be dismissed. The onus is on parents and caregivers to utilise it judiciously to foster a balanced growth environment for children.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Vietjack official store
Đăng ký gói thi VIP

VIP +1 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 1 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +3 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 3 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +6 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 6 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +12 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 12 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay