khoahoc.vietjack.com

Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 545 Lưu

When a new town is planned, it is more important to develop public parks and sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time in. To what extent do agree or disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Some people argue that town planners should have a preference for more parks and gyms to be created than business districts and shopping malls. While I understand the concerns of people who hold this opinion, it seems to me that shopping centers are just as important as parks and gyms in a town.

There are reasons why public facilities are crucial to city inhabitants. First of all, they provide suitable spaces and equipment for people to exercise. For example, people can go jogging in the park and play tennis or basketball at the sports stadium. That helps to keep their bodies fit and it also elevates their mood during the day. Besides, parks and sports facilities are good spots for people to socialize with their neighbors. People can connect with others when they are playing sports or talking casually with passers by in the park. A harmonious relationship between residents helps build a caring and friendly neighborhood.

Although parks and gyms give the town dwellers all kinds of benefits, I would like to point out the importance of shopping malls to the district. Firstly, a shopping center could make shopping more convenient for the local residents. It would enable them to easily purchase things in town and transport them home with less effort and at lower cost. They would not need to spend extra money on transportation or shipping of the goods. Secondly, a shopping mall can provide employment. Locals can find work in retail, maintenance or security of the mall, hence earning an income to support their families.

In conclusion, although parks and sports facilities serve as places for exercise and social activities for city dwellers, I believe that shopping centers are equally important, since they can provide job opportunities and convenience to the town residents.

Sample 2:

The planning of new towns is a critical undertaking that sets the foundation for a community's development and the quality of life it offers to its residents. In this regard, I wholeheartedly agree that a greater emphasis should be placed on constructing public parks and sports facilities rather than prioritizing shopping centres. This essay will expound on the reasons behind this perspective.

Firstly, the provision of ample public parks and sports facilities contributes significantly to the physical and mental well-being of the residents. These spaces serve as venues for exercise, recreation, and social interaction. For instance, a well-maintained park provides an environment for people of all ages to engage in various physical activities, from jogging and yoga to team sports. Such activities not only promote a healthier lifestyle but also foster a sense of community and belonging among the residents.

Secondly, public parks and sports facilities play a pivotal role in enhancing overall aesthetics and ambiance of a town. Lush green spaces, well-designed playgrounds, and sports fields create an inviting and pleasant environment for residents to enjoy. This not only adds to the town's aesthetic appeal but also contributes to a higher quality of life for its inhabitants. On the other hand, an overemphasis on shopping centres may lead to congestion, increased traffic, and a more commercialized atmosphere, which could detract from the town's overall livability.

In conclusion, prioritisation of public parks and sports facilities while planning for new towns is paramount for fostering a healthier, more vibrant, and cohesive community. By creating spaces that facilitate physical activity, recreation, and social interaction, towns can promote the well-being and happiness of their residents. This approach ensures that the development of new towns aligns with the broader goal of enhancing the overall quality of life for its inhabitants.

Sample 3:

In recent times, the government has a responsibility to provide better facilities to citizens. Some individuals continue to argue that the government should invest in public parks and sports facilities instead of retail malls. I partially disagree with this statement and my preference will be discussed further.

To begin with, technology is always advancing, and as a consequence, there are several online buying platforms accessible. Moreover, when pollution reaches its pinnacle, public parks and sports facilities will assist individuals in maintaining their health. To cite an example, the government of Delhi increased the number of parks and trees; consequently, people are spending their evening over there and live happily. Thus, public parks are more inevitable than shopping malls.

In addition, young people and the elderly always prefer to sit with their friends outdoors, where they may discover tranquillity and beauty. Since competition in sports is intensifying, every young person wants to participate in sports and create history. If they will play outside, then it would be advantageous to their health as well. Thus, in order to stay fit and healthy, people want public parks and sport facilities instead of retail malls.

However, I would not disregard the aspect that not each individual is using technology. Because the old generation are still finding difficulties to do any work online; as a result, shopping malls are required. Moreover, there are lots of varieties available at shops than online. Hence, shopping malls are required in the town as well.

To conclude, although shopping malls have their own benefits, sports and public facilities are more important for citizens.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, people want each and every facility from the government for their leisure time. Some individuals argue that when planning new cities, sports facilities and public gardens should be constructed rather than commercial malls. I agree with this statement to a major extent, and my preference will be discussed further.

To embark on, more green spaces and sports facilities would foster a healthy lifestyle among the populace. Moreover, public parks have a variety of useful activities for the public, such as gym use, running, etc. As an example, the Reva Park in Vadodara has gym equipment, jogging tracks, and yoga courses; thus, many people spend their mornings and evenings there. Thus, public gardens have lots of benefits to increase immunity.

Furthermore, youth may use sports most effectively to increase immunity and maintain physical fitness. Moreover, since sports facilities offer the greatest workout equipment, they are more advantageous for people's health. For instance, individuals engage in physical activity to maintain their physical fitness, which also improves their mood throughout the day. Therefore, sports facilities are most inevitable. 

However, shopping complexes also provide certain advantages. Although online shops are available, people prefer hand to hand shopping as they can touch the material of the product, and they can try it before buying. Hence, shopping malls are essential for individuals who are inquisitive about their merchandise.

To conclude, although shopping malls are required to get better material, sports and parks facilities are more important as it helps people to keep fit and socialise.

Sample 5:

In recent years, whenever new cities are created, it is always controversial which amenities are most necessary. Some individuals believe that instead of constructing retail malls in new cities, public parks and sports facilities should be constructed first. I partially agree with this statement and my preference will be explained further.

To begin with, fashion is becoming a trend that everyone wants to follow. Moreover, since shopping malls provide a variety of products and the ability to examine them before purchase, it is advantageous for both the mall and its clients. A User report illustrated that the Pooja showroom in Vadodara is the most popular among people owing to the client services it offers.

Additionally, shopping malls are good not just for the owner but also for the nation as a whole. Due to the fashion trend, each nation is competing with one another, and as a result, business of malls and the country's economy are growing. For example, Reliance mall has locations all over the globe and offers outfits for fashion events.

The drawback of this capability is that not everyone can purchase pricey clothing or obtain as much fashion expertise as they would want. On the other hand, the construction of public parks and sports facilities is very important for senior citizens. The majority of votes for park and sport facilities come from both older and younger individuals.

To conclude, people's growing interest in fashion has increased the need for shopping malls rather than public parks or sports facilities. However, older individuals may use their time by visiting a friend, and younger individuals can exercise at home by purchasing equipment.

Sample 6:

In the contemporary world, urban planning has gained widespread attention and has become a subject of great importance. It is often stated that when planning for new towns, more emphasis must be given to public parks or sports facilities than shopping centres. I wholeheartedly agree with this viewpoint for various reasons.

Public parks and sports facilities play an important role in promoting a healthy lifestyle among the residents. It provides extra space for physical activities including jogging, cycling, and various sports, which is essential for maintaining physical fitness. For example, many major cities that invested in creating community sports fields and accessible parks saw a significant increase in residents engaging in outdoor activities, leading to improved overall health. In contrast, when it comes to shopping centres, they promote consumerism and do not help contribute to the physical health of individuals.

Furthermore, public parks and sports facilities also play a vital role as shared communal spaces where individuals can gather and participate in community activities. They foster a sense of unity and belonging among the residents, which is crucial for the overall social well-being of the town. In contrast, shopping centres primarily function as commercial areas and do not facilitate social interactions to the same extent.

From an environmental perspective, prioritising public parks contributes to the preservation of green spaces and biodiversity in urban regions. These areas provide habitats for various species, thereby aiding in maintaining ecological balance. On the contrary, shopping centres contribute to urban sprawl, leading to environmental degradation due to increased energy consumption and waste generation.

To conclude, while shopping centres are important for economic growth and convenience purposes, the benefits brought by parks and sports facilities exceed those of shopping centres. Therefore, when designing towns, it is indeed essential to prioritise constructing public parks and sports facilities in order to ensure the physical, social, and environmental well-being of the residents.

Sample 7:

Building healthy, functioning, and productive cities is probably humanity’s most pressing problem today. Public areas are an important feature of these cities. I disagree with the assertion that parks and sports facilities are better for public areas than retail malls. I believe that retail malls are just as essential as parks and sports facilities and that all of these public places should be given similar weight when planning new communities.

To begin with, public parks that are designed as “places” and built around important public locations foster social interaction and happiness, both of which are valuable commodities in an increasingly congested urban setting. A magnificent urban park is a city’s safety valve, providing breathing space for those living in densely populated areas. Public parks are places where everyone feels comfortable to play and relax, and where tension may be relieved. Another advantage is that when more people are out on the street and know their neighbors, crime and gang activity decrease. These locations also provide significant environmental advantages. Trees assist in making cities cooler by reducing pollutants in the air and water.

Furthermore, sports facilities must be planned and built to be both practical and appealing in order to encourage people to participate in sports and improve their overall well-being. Modern life is highly sedentary, and public areas like stadiums and playgrounds would undoubtedly encourage active living and give significant physical, psychological, and social health advantages to people and society.

Visiting a shopping mall is one of the most popular pastimes among people all around the world. Shopping malls are increasingly being used as public places by city dwellers. Shopping malls have evolved into gathering places where people may socialize and spend their spare time doing a variety of things other than shopping. Some shopping malls, for example, feature skating rinks where parents and children may spend quality time together while having fun. The elderly visit to sit and rest on the sofas and couches that are spaced out at regular intervals.

To summarise, public parks, sports facilities, and retail malls are all vital public places. They are diverse, yet they all share the goal of enhancing the lives of city dwellers in their own unique way.

Sample 8:

As the sight of burgeoning new residential areas is becoming more and more common, there inherently emerges a host of dilemmas, the thorniest of which is town planning. Therefore, the authority is still considering whether the construction of public parks and sports facilities or shopping centers should be given priority. Personally, I am of the view that the former should be prioritized over the latter.

There is no denying that the development of public parks and sporting facilities brings about immense benefits for the well-being of the community. First, as sporting facilities are erected, health-consciousness is likely to be cultivated among community members. A case in point is the Sports Center in my hometown that dispenses a decent number of classes with quality instruction. This, in turn, incentivizes local residents to actively engage in physical activities, which has substantially benefited their health. Furthermore, thanks to their closeness to nature, parks are the go-to destinations for those seeking natural therapy in that visitors can admire the beauty of the flora and fauna. Public parks are also known as ideal meeting spots. Some parks even have designated areas for such social gatherings as outdoor barbecues, which further facilitate positive social dynamics.

While shopping centers are of certain use to town dwellers, it is important not to disregard their negative implications. On the one hand, an immediate benefit of shopping would be that customers can have their needs immediately accommodated simply by visiting the nearest shopping mall. However, this is largely overshadowed by possible risks of escalating consumerism and its dire consequences on the environment. More often than not, customers could easily indulge themselves in impulsive behaviors since products are orchestrated in eye-catching ways. This subliminal manipulation is the main culprit behind a consumerist society with uncontrollable consumption rates and immense waste output. As a result, the inclusion of shopping centers in town planning could exert negative impacts on our planet.

In conclusion, it stands to reason that the town planners should place more emphasis on the development of public parks and sporting services, rather than shopping centers.

Sample 9:

Designing the layout of a new town is an extremely intricate process. The question of what should and should not be included sets the foundation of the town’s identity forever. In my opinion, the addition of public parks, shopping malls and sports facilities is essential to the incubation of community and the encouragement of healthy lifestyles. I thus agree that these items should be included when a new town is being planned, and I will share examples to prove this.

Firstly, public parks and shopping centers help new towns foster a sense of community. For example, my small Canadian town has a very nice park near its center. At weekends, the open context of the park environment makes it possible for people to meet each other and create friendships. This sort of organic community building is seen in my hometown’s shopping mall, too. Shopping malls encourage interaction, and thus they are great forums within which people can mingle and have experiences that could evolve into friendships. Thus, the helpful role public parks and shopping malls play in the establishment of a new town is clear.

Secondly, sports facilities catalyze positive lifestyle choices among townsfolk. For instance, the central location of my small town’s football pitch is a regular reminder to people passing by that exercise is important. Children in the town are visually aware that sport is accessible to them, and thus they engage in physical activity regularly. This is a clear advantage to town designs that include sports facilities.

As the above shows, public parks, shopping malls and sports facilities are helpful in many ways to the establishment of a town. Their inclusion in the planning of new towns is thus highly recommended.

Sample 10:

Judicious urban planning is a very important feature of modern life. A well-planned city should have all the amenities like good shopping centers, open spaces, and so on, needed for the denizens to lead a good life. I am in complete agreement with the given statement.

The first reason for my assertion is that modern cities should be designed in such a way that the people living there have access to all resources needed for a comfortable living. Since shopping is one of the most popular activities among the people, while designing a new locality, easily approachable shopping complexes should be kept in mind.

Furthermore, people have become very health conscious and realized the importance of playing different sports. For this, it is important that the architects should give fair importance to the construction of stadiums and so on. In addition to this, the public parks act as the green lungs, of the otherwise concrete jungle, where the people of all age groups can rejuvenate themselves by indulging in activities like walking, jogging, cycling and so on. Thus, it is very important to keep provision for such means.

Yet another important reason is that when a settlement is being planned, it should be planned logically, keeping in mind all the needs and the requirements of the natives. If the planning is not proper, it will lead to a lop-sided development of the area. Hence for the holistic development of a township, these features should be included in the designing stage only.

To conclude, areas like shopping arcades, parks and playing fields are very essential features of modern life and it would be better not to overlook them at the developmental stage of city planning. 

Sample 11:

It is argued that when a new town is to be designed, constructing public parks and sports facilities for people to spend their leisure time is of greater significance compared with building shopping malls. Personally, I totally agree with this idea in terms of assisting people in leading an interesting and healthy life and enhancing their sense of belonging to their local community.

Compared with planning shopping centers, developing parks and sporting areas for the public to spend their free time plays a more essential part. This is mainly because parks can provide people with places to perform varied activities, which enrich their lives, while sports facilities assist people in improving their health. More specifically, in parks, people can do a great number of activities, such as playing chess, playing Frisbee and walking dogs. At the same time, having easy access to sports facilities allows them to find it convenient to work out, helping them develop the habit of exercising to keep fit. 

Another reason is that a sound social relationship can be established, and a strong sense of community can also be formed. People will be given opportunities to meet many people who live in the neighborhood and start to interact with others to make friends, when they take a walk after dinner in public parks or participate in exercise by utilizing exercise facilities. Meanwhile, with some community events held in the parks, residents may find they are one of many members of a group, which strengthens their feeling of belonging to the community.  

In conclusion, I completely approve of the viewpoint that it is more vital to build public parks and equipment for exercise than shopping centers. This is because they encourage the public to live a diversified and healthy life, bridge the relationship between social members and promote a good sense of community, and those benefits are what building shopping malls can never bring. Also, people are able to make purchases online these days, which also makes it unnecessary to plan any places for shopping.  

Sample 12:

Building healthy, functional, and productive cities is perhaps the greatest challenge facing humanity today. A key part of these cities is the public spaces. I disagree with the statement that parks and sports facilities are better than shopping centres as public spaces. I firmly believe that shopping centres are as important as parks and sports facilities, so when designing new towns, all these public spaces should be given equal importance.

To begin with, public parks, if developed as “places” and planned around major public destinations, build social connection and human happiness - both precious commodities in an increasingly congested urban landscape. A great urban park is a safety valve for the city, where people living in high density can find breathing room. Public parks are places where all people feel safe to play and relax and can relieve stress. Another benefit is that crime rates and gang activities go down when more people are out on the street and know their neighbors. These places also have substantial environmental benefits. Trees reduce air and water pollution and thus they help to keep cities cooler.

Furthermore, sports facilities need to be designed and constructed so as to be functional as well as attractive in a way that encourages people to do sports and boosts their feeling of well-being. Modern lifestyle is very sedentary, and such public spaces such as stadiums and playgrounds would definitely promote active living and provide important physical, psychological and social health benefits for individuals and the community.

Visiting a shopping centre is one of the most desirable activities of people everywhere in the world. Today, it is observed that shopping centers are used as public spaces by many urban inhabitants. Shopping centers have become places where social life is experienced, and leisure time is spent through a wide range of activities offered besides shopping. For example, some shopping malls have skating rinks, where parents and children can have good time together and have fun. The elderly come there for sitting and relaxing on the sofas and couches placed at regular intervals.

To sum up, public parks, sports facilities and shopping centres are all equally important public spaces. They are different but have a common role of improving the life of urban residents in their own specific way.

Sample 13:

In urban planning, the debate over prioritizing public parks and sports facilities versus shopping centers in new towns is significant. I disagree with prioritizing public parks and sports facilities over shopping centers, as both play vital roles in fostering a vibrant community.

Firstly, public parks and sports facilities are undoubtedly essential components of any town's infrastructure. They offer residents spaces for physical activity, leisure, and social interaction, promoting a healthier lifestyle and a sense of community. These areas contribute to the overall well-being of residents, addressing concerns related to physical fitness and mental health. However, it is essential to recognize that not everyone has the same interests and preferences. While some individuals may prioritize outdoor activities and sports, others may derive relaxation and enjoyment from shopping, dining, or cultural experiences.

Shopping centers, on the other hand, provide a diverse range of services and amenities that are integral to modern urban life. They offer access to a variety of goods, dining options, entertainment venues, and employment opportunities. Moreover, shopping centers can serve as hubs for cultural exchange, where people from different backgrounds come together to explore and appreciate the diverse offerings of a community. These centers also generate revenue for the local economy, which can be reinvested in the development of public infrastructure, including parks and sports facilities. Consider the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota. This massive complex with stores, restaurants, and an indoor theme park called Nickelodeon Universe attracts millions of visitors yearly, benefiting the local economy and offering diverse recreational experiences.

In conclusion, urban planning should strike a balance. While public parks and sports facilities are valuable, so are shopping centers. It's about creating a harmonious blend of spaces that cater to diverse community needs, fostering a vibrant and inclusive town.

Sample 14:

During the initial phases of urban design, some believe that public parks and sports facilities should take priority over shopping centres as a means of citizens’ recreation. Personally, I believe a mixture of both should be incorporated in order to generate revenue and ensure the wellbeing of the general populace.

Firstly, whilst it should never be the main goal of a town, it is important for urban centers to generate revenue through shopping centres in order to fund infrastructure projects and maintain existing buildings. This would not be possible with the development of free public parks or sports facilities alone, for shopping centres bring in jobs and create tax revenue in ways that public recreational projects cannot. Many people travel to Bangkok, for instance, in order to shop for high quality goods at a cheap price - prioritizing public parks over this would cost the country an underdeveloped tourism industry, making a dent in the country’s main source of income.

On the other hand, it is not enough to merely aim to generate revenue, and it should be spent on something that benefits the general populace, like public facilities that are free to use and that encourage wellbeing overall. Public parks have multiple health benefits such as helping cardiovascular health and improving mental health. Furthermore, public facilities may encourage tourists to visit, increasing revenue as they partake in the town’s services. This is why a city such as London, despite being very industrial, still contains large parks in order to help preserve the wellbeing of its inhabitants.

In general, I argue that although there is a need for economic growth and thus a reason to build shopping centres, it is also imperative that the local population can reap the benefits of public parks and sports facilities - hence, the perfect city should strive to have a good mixture of both.

Sample 15:

Nobody would dispute the fact that recreational centres and public gardens are unavoidable parts of cities, and rather than malls it is an influential part of major city design structure. I hold the view that malls should not be allowed; however, many people disagree with this opinion. In this essay, I will discuss both sides and give reasons for my opinion.

Initially, the first and foremost thing is in our hectic life we always forget the importance of outdoor activities and exercises. Definitely, sports facility centres always support the same. Secondly, recreational activities help both children and adults to keep fit and enthusiastic. Rather than this, it is one of the best places for spending and participating in time with friends and family members. Thirdly, sports centres are also used for conducting numerous cultural activities. For example, seminars, award ceremonies, graduation events, and so on. Apart from this, authorities may convert a small portion into a small library or reference for sports. Life is too fast, and people may not get time to get involved in mentioned activities. This is a vital place for all.

In addition, as a town, public parks are an irrefutable part of a city. It is the best place for children, and they can enjoy themselves without limit. Moreover, it helps them to get more botanical knowledge. It is an undeniable part of greenery in the centre of the city. In addition, authorities can also conduct flower shows and other cultural activities inside the park.

On the contrary, Malls are the best places for clear waste of time and money. For construction, it may take years, and people can afford various pollutions like noise and air. Most of the branded shops inside the malls are highly rated, and normal men cannot afford those. Apart from this, children may be obsessed with junk food stores inside the mall. This causes obesity and other hormone-related ailments. Lastly, malls are the best places for creating traffic conjunction in their front roads.

In conclusion, I would summarize that rather than money, looting malls, recreational centres and public gardens are essential for our society. For a better tomorrow and a healthy generation, both of these projects are unavoidable.

Sample 16:

In the development of a new town, there is an ongoing debate about whether it is more important to establish public parks and sports facilities or focus on the construction of shopping centers. While some argue that shopping centers are essential for people to spend their free time, I strongly believe that prioritization should be given to the creation of public parks and sports facilities.

Firstly, public parks and sports facilities contribute greatly to the overall well-being of individuals and the community. By providing spaces for leisure activities and social gatherings, these amenities promote a healthy and active lifestyle. For instance, public parks offer an opportunity to escape the bustling city environment and reconnect with nature, allowing residents to breathe in fresh air and relieve stress. Moreover, sports facilities enable people to engage in physical activities, improving their physical fitness and mental well-being. Without such provisions, individuals may lack the necessary outlets to maintain a balanced and healthy lifestyle.

Secondly, public parks and sports facilities foster community cohesion and interaction. These spaces serve as common grounds where people from all walks of life can come together, allowing for social integration and the forging of friendships. Engaging in recreational activities within these facilities facilitates social interactions and strengthens the sense of belonging within the community. In contrast, shopping centers primarily focus on consumerism, promoting individualism and materialism rather than encouraging social bonds.

Nevertheless, proponents of shopping centers argue that they provide a cultural space where people can not only shop but also enjoy movies, exhibitions, and various cuisines. While this may be true, it is important to note that public parks and sports facilities can also offer recreational amenities such as outdoor cinemas, art installations, and food stalls. Therefore, the argument that shopping centers are necessary for cultural experiences does not outweigh the multitude of benefits that public parks and sports facilities offer.

In conclusion, although shopping centers can cater to certain recreational needs, the establishment of public parks and sports facilities should take precedence in the development of a new town. These amenities promote a healthy lifestyle, provide opportunities for social interaction, and contribute to the overall well-being of individuals and the community. Therefore, investment in such facilities is essential for fostering a vibrant and sustainable living environment.

Sample 17:

The trend of urbanization is seen to increase briskly among people; therefore, the infrastructures of cities are becoming a fascinating part. It is concerned that it is apropos to have more green spaces and sports centers to spend the spare time as such places can be regarded as healing spaces, however, it is not completely preposterous to have shopping complexes because they are beneficial as well.

To deep dive into the benefits of public parks and sports facilities, the focal one is that these things are the gateways to a healthier and truly livable society as these spaces are leaders in improving overall health and wellness since green places and sports facilities always aid people to combat some of the health challenges. It is conspicuous that these spaces are omnipotent to rejuvenate the mind and to engage in outdoor activities. Besides that, there can be an opportunity to establish an equilibrium in the community by reducing the communication gap among dwellers. Thus, these two infrastructures are community support systems and should have more significance.

To propel, it is not entirely justifiable to neglect the shopping centers completely because this can provide an opportunity to have convenient shopping experiences to masses as shopping acts as a stress buster and a way of having some alternations in the sedentary lifestyle. Indeed, there have been some recorded instances where people of all ages showed great affection to shopping malls in order to devote their leisure time.

To conclude, although parks and sports centers are complex elements of the city and tools for revitalization for people, cities, and towns can not be only developed by such places because other factors such as shopping malls also reinforce the progress to a certain degree.

Sample 18:

The pattern of urbanization apparently increases energetically among individuals; thus, the foundations of urban areas are turning into an entrancing part. It is worrying that it is opportune to have more green spaces and sports focuses to invest the extra energy as such places can be viewed as recuperating spaces, in any case, it isn’t totally crazy to have shopping edifices since they are advantageous also.

To profound jump into the advantages of recreational areas and sports offices, the central one is that these things are the doors to a better and really bearable society as these spaces are pioneers in working on general wellbeing and health since green places and sports offices generally help individuals to battle a portion of the wellbeing challenges. It is obvious that these spaces are supreme to revive the brain and to take part in outside exercises. Other than that, there can be a potential chance to lay out a balance locally by decreasing the correspondence hole among inhabitants. In this manner, these two foundations are local area emotionally supportive networks and ought to have more importance.

To drive, it is not any doubt legitimate to disregard the malls totally in light of the fact that this can give a potential chance to have advantageous shopping encounters to masses as shopping goes about as a pressure buster and an approach to having a few variations in the inactive way of life. Without a doubt, there have been a few recorded occurrences where individuals of any age showed extraordinary love to shopping centers to give their relaxation time.

To close, in spite of the fact that parks and sports focuses are intricate components of the city and devices for renewal for individuals, urban communities, and towns can not be just evolved by such places on the grounds that different factors, for example, shopping centers additionally support the advancement somewhat.

Sample 19:

Modern shopping malls are available everywhere in the cities of today. These shopping centers make local residents’ lives easier. However, in many towns there is a dearth of public parks and sports facilities. I am of the opinion that when designing and building new towns, planning officials should give more consideration to the provision of public parks and sports facilities, than ubiquitous malls.

Firstly, in today’s busy world it’s easy to become stressed out living in the urban jungle. People need places to hang out, meet friends and just chill. Public parks are ideal places for workers to relax during a busy working day. Having lunch or dozing in the sunshine can provide relief from having a lot on your plate in the workplace. Secondly, the provision of more sports facilities is also crucial for the wellbeing of the population. As work becomes more sedentary and people suffer from obesity, the provision of gyms and other facilities like swimming pools becomes a no-brainer. Consequently, with the rapid development of e-commerce and working from home we might see a radical change away from city centers full of shopping malls. Planners need to factor in the increased leisure time many people are enjoying nowadays. This suggests that the provision of public parks and sports facilities will take on a greater importance over and above shopping malls. In conclusion, I agree that providing more access to public parks and sports facilities is an essential element when designing a new town. These will significantly impact on the modern citizens’ lifestyle and create good PR for the cities in question.

Sample 20:

It is often suggested that it would be better to erect parks and exercise facilities in new urban developments rather than shopping malls. I agree that this would be an ideal solution as it would spur on increased health awareness.

The main reason detractors are in favour of shopping malls is their benefit to the economy. Malls employ hundreds of workers from cashiers to store clerks to managers as well as the various members of janitorial staff charged with maintaining the mall itself. The benefits are clear when you couple these factors with the increased revenue that businesses bring in the form of taxation and propping up the local consumer product market.

Notwithstanding the economic returns that malls bring, parks and sports facilities would do more to encourage better health. In most developed nations, buying more products, especially with online services such as Amazon readily available, is no longer a pressing issue. However, health has become the dominant concern of the decade as obesity soars and heart disease has reached pandemic levels. Well maintained, beautifully landscaped parks and outdoor exercise facilities would instill in residents an obligation to work out. If they are numerous, then older people and children, who may not be able to travel far, will also be able to access them.

In conclusion, the job market is less important than the health of ordinary residents. The bigger issue is the feasibility of such an approach given the lack of financial incentive for those towns to prioritise the foundations for their residents’ well-being over business interests.

Sample 21:

No doubt, various facilities are planned by the administration keeping in to consideration the effective utilization of leisure time of the dwellers. However, it is often put forward that sports centres and parks should be given more importance than the multiplexes. I completely withstand this viewpoint and the ideas surrounding my opinion shall be presented in the upcoming segments.

To begin, the most convincing argument in the favour of establishing parks and sports facilities is the general well-being of masses. Needless to say, a vast majority lead a sedentary lifestyle these days. The culprit behind is not just their busy routine but lack of open areas like parks and gardens where they could spend some time inhaling fresh air, taking a walk or doing some light exercises in order to stay physically and mentally healthy. In contrast, the encapsulated surroundings and hustle and bustle of shopping centres is not conducive to their holistic health. For example, in most modern cities like Gurugram and Bangalore; the frequent visit of residents to malls than public parks and playgrounds is having a detrimental impact on their health.

Yet another fact is that shopping centres generally attract the grown-ups who tend to spend their time going for shopping, watching a movie in cineplex, sitting in a bar and others, contrary to it, the sports centres and parks attract youngsters and seniors. These age groups find being at malls an expensive affair. For instance, spending an hour at a gaming parlour easily costs around Rs. 1000 in my country which only affluent can afford, while old people do not find anything of interest at these establishments. Understandably, to enjoy recreational activities, the availability of public facilities like gardens and sports grounds is more desirable than shopping complexes.

To conclude, I would like to rewrite, although with changing time city planners have started to give priority to shopping centres for recreation yet these must not replace the open and public places that are indispensable to the general well-being of masses.

Sample 22:

It is suggested by some that urban parks and sports halls are more important than shopping malls, and thus malls do not have to be included in a new town. I disagree with this opinion, however.

The importance of parks in urban planning is undeniable. Children love parks because they can find there rocks, soil, and trees - things that are different from what they see at home. The parks can also have buildings and other artifacts such as fountains, monuments, and statues that attract tourists. Additionally, urban parks increase the health quality of their local residents, since park vegetation reduces pollutants.

Sports halls also improve the quality of life of urban citizens. In crowded cities, sports halls are one of the few options for doing physical activity. Team sports like basketball and football are a great source of entertainment and local pride.

However, it is ridiculous to not build any shopping mall at all just because we need spaces for other recreation areas. Malls are an integral part of our modern life, since the contemporary economic model is built entirely on buying and selling products. To a visitor, a mall is only a place for hanging out, but to a shop owner, it is where she earns money for herself and her staff. Shopping malls also help new towns foster community sense. People often go shopping with their friends, coworkers, or family relatives. During the purchase, customers can chat with each other and mingle, developing friendly relationships.

To conclude, shopping malls are just as important as parks and sports facilities. Their inclusion in the planning of new towns is thus highly recommended.

Sample 23:

When planning new cities, it is claimed that public gardens and gyms should be prioritised above retail malls. I appreciate the worries of those who share this viewpoint, but I feel that shopping malls are just as vital in a city as parks or sports centres.

Sports facilities are important to city inhabitants for a variety of reasons. They first and foremost provide appropriate space and equipment for individuals to exercise. People can jog in the park and play tennis and basketball at the sports stadium, for example. This not only keeps their bodies in good shape, but it also improves their spirits. Parks and sports facilities are also excellent places for individuals to socialise. When people are doing sports or walking in the park, they may connect with one another.

Although parks and gyms assist residents in a variety of ways, I believe shopping malls are equally important. For starters, a retail complex may make shopping easier for local inhabitants. It would allow people to buy items in town more readily and bring them home with less effort and at a lesser cost. They will not have to pay more for goods transportation or shipment. A shopping mall can also generate jobs. Locals can find jobs in retail or mall security to help support their family.

To sum up, while parks and sports centres give areas for city people to exercise and socialise, I feel that shopping malls are just as essential since they bring job possibilities and convenience to residents.

Sample 24:

Building healthy, effective, and productive cities is possibly humanity's biggest task today. The public areas are an important element of these cities. I disagree with the assertion that parks and sports facilities are better public areas than commercial malls. Shopping centres, in my opinion, are just as vital as parks and sports facilities, thus when building new cities, all of these public places should be given similar weight.

To begin, public parks that are designed as "places" and built around key public locations foster social interaction and human happiness, both of which are valuable assets in an increasingly congested urban setting. A beautiful urban park serves as a safety valve again for the city, providing breathing space for individuals who live in densely populated areas. Public parks are places where everyone feels comfortable to play as well as relax, and where tension may be relieved. Another advantage is that crime and gang activity are reduced when more people are on the street & know their neighbours. These locations also provide significant environmental advantages. Trees assist in keeping cities cool by reducing air and water pollution.

Furthermore, sports facilities must be planned and built to be both practical and appealing in order to encourage individuals to participate in sports and improve their overall sense of well-being. The modern lifestyle is largely sedentary, and such public areas as stadiums and playgrounds would undoubtedly promote active living while providing significant physical, psychological, and social health advantages to people and the society.

Visiting a shopping mall is one of the most attractive pastimes for people all over the world. Shopping malls are increasingly being used as public areas by city dwellers. Shopping malls have evolved into locations where people may engage in social activities and spend their free time, in addition to shopping. Some shopping malls, for example, include skating rinks where parents and children may spend quality time together and have fun. The elderly visit to sit and rest on the sofas and couches that are arranged at regular intervals.

To summarise, public parks, sports facilities, and retail malls are all significant public areas. They are distinct, yet they share the goal of enhancing the lives of city dwellers in their own way.

Sample 25:

While planning a new town, there are a lot of factors in terms of planning that come into consideration from the perspective of the government and the citizens. For planning a town, the administration needs to give fair importance to the commercial complexes, apartments and public parks, and sports facilities. However, some people argue that building public parks and sports complexes must be given more importance than shopping centers for leisure. I completely agree with this point.

Society has advanced to a modern stage where people are involved so much socially that they hardly get time for themselves. With the increasing infrastructure of shopping centers, cafes, malls, etc., people spend most of their leisure time hanging out with their friends primarily in clubs and shopping centers. Hence, it becomes important to create spaces like sports facilities and public parks for people to relieve themselves mentally and physically and spend some precious time with themselves among the greens.

Also, with the rapid pace of urbanization, cities and towns have become more environmentally populated and there is an alarming need to expose the towns and cities with greeneries and trees to balance out the harmful releases of the gases like carbon dioxide, sulfur, carbon monoxide, etc., in the environment. The public parks will act as a countermeasure against the polluting environment. Also, people in the cities and towns have become physically weaker than the people in the rural areas. People in the town hardly take out time to physically gear up their bodies and have a workout routine to maintain their bodies. In the name of sports, they find their solace in video games or online games. So, while planning a town the administration needs to give due importance to the sports centers for the people to take out some time for the physical activities and gear up their bodies.

From the facts highlighted above in the essay, it becomes quite clear that while planning a town more importance or weightage must be given to public parks and sports centers than shopping centers keeping in mind the working conditions and lifestyles of the citizens of the town.

Sample 26:

A majority of the people believe that the town planners must give more importance to public parks and sports facilities for the town dwellers than the shopping complexes. However, it is important to construct more public parks and sports facilities for town citizens seeing their hectic workload and lifestyle, but the shopping complexes are equally important than the public parks and sports facilities. The arguments given below equally give importance to both the factors in terms of town planning.

Constructing public parks and sports facilities is crucial in town when looking at the lifestyles of the people. Due to rapid urbanization, the people residing in the towns and cities are bound by hectic schedules and workloads and they need a free environment to relax. Studies find that the people residing in towns and cities are more prone to depression and mental illness than the people living in rural areas. Hence, the green environment of the public parks where people can enjoy a short walk, jogging, sports activities, etc., not only gears them up physically but helps them relax mentally and will elevate their mood.

Secondly, equal importance must be given to the shopping complexes to cater to the day-to-day needs of the people. These shopping centers will serve as a one-point center for the people to buy all the daily stuff in one place. Apart from fulfilling the daily materialistic needs of the people, these shopping complexes will help in boosting the economy of the town and also will help in generating employments like that of security guards, shop owners, vendors, etc. for the people. this will in the bigger picture will help in eradicating poverty from the town and support a step forward in the formation of a welfare state.

Analyzing both the arguments, it becomes clear that both shopping complexes and public parks and sports facilities are important catering to the demands of the citizens in different respective. Hence, both the shopping complexes and public parks and sports facilities must be given equal importance in town planning projects as both serve different purposes for the welfare of the citizens.

Sample 27:

Town planning is a strategic process and requires a well-planned structure keeping in mind all the needs of the citizens be it physical, mental, and materialistic needs. It is often argued that the town planners must give more importance to constructing public parks and sports facilities for the betterment of their citizens than shopping complexes. Looking at the hard schedule and lifestyles of the city dwellers it becomes quite obvious that they need some physical and mental relaxation. In the essay given below are some of the points that argue the importance of public parks and sports facilities in the town planning structure.

In the present age of urbanization and modernization, men have become a working machine without relaxing. People have been working for endless hours without relaxing and socializing has become more of clubbing, café dining, etc. this changed lifestyle of the city dwellers have made them more prone to mental illness and depression and most of the people end up doing suicides on go into severe depression stages. Studies have found that people living in towns and cities are more victims of depression than people living in rural areas. Building more public parks and sports centers will help people relax and enjoy the natural environment. People will engage themselves more in physical activities like jogging, running, basketball, volleyball, etc. this will not only help in gearing up their physical strength but will mentally elevate their mood. This will work as a refresh mechanism to their heavy lifestyle. Secondly, towns and cities are more equipped with heavy industries and factories which will result in more pollution and degradation of the environment. The presence of parks will increase the green cover of the town and allow people to breathe fresh air. The trees and greens in the park will absorb the harmful gases released and provide the people with fresh air to live. Thus, it will help in reducing pollution to a great extent.

These arguments stated above point out that public parks and sports facilities are important elements in town planning as they make the life of the people a bit relaxing and refreshing than the kind of machine work they are engaged in. Hence, in town planning more importance must be given to public parks and sports facilities than shopping centers.

Sample 28:

When planning a new town, the authorities have various factors to consider and need to prioritize the construction of different facilities. To encourage active lifestyles, in my opinion, it is more important to build public parks and sports facilities than shopping centers

Providing sports facilities is an effective way to improve city dwellers' health and thus reduce the government's budget for medical expenses in the long term. In this day and age, many people live a sedentary lifestyle, choosing to watch TV or play video games after work and collapsing in front of the screen every evening. With easy access to various kinds of sport facilities they are more likely to make exercise a regular part of their lives

The park is also a good place for exercise, particularly for those who are not interested in competitive sports. Jogging, dancing and practicing Tai Chi in the park are quite common among elderly citizens these days. In a park with a high greening rate, plants and trees can absorb waste gases and provide green shade, creating a comfortable environment for city dwellers. Those who spend leisure time in the park can have close contact with nature and make themselves refreshed

By contrast, the main function of shopping centers is for people to buy various goods, but in today's world where online shopping is becoming increasingly prevalent, the role of physical stores seems to be weakened. Large shopping centers can also include some leisure facilities such as cafés and cinemas, but these are not as important as parks and sports centers.

To conclude, in the process of urban planning and construction, building parks and sports facilities should be emphasized, in comparison to developing.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.

Sample 2:

It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.

Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.

Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.

In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.

Sample 3:

Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.

Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.

Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.

Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.

Sample 4:

The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.

Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.

For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.

Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.

Sample 5:

To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.

Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.

To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.

All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.

Sample 6:

The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.

Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.

The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.

In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.

In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.

Sample 7:

The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.

We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.

This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.

Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.

To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.

Sample 8:

Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.

Sample 9:

In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.

More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.

By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.

 

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Although fossil fuels still remain the most important energy sources in many places, some countries are now already using alternative sources like solar or wind power. In my opinion, it can be difficult for a country to move towards using alternative energy at first, but this development brings about several benefits in the long run.

On the one hand, the change towards using alternative types of energy would probably put a heavy financial burden on the government and companies as they will have to invest millions of dollars in purchasing and developing new equipment and facilities for harnessing solar, wind or hydro-electric power. For example, the average cost of installing a wind turbine for generating electricity is about $3 million, and an average country would require a wind farm with hundreds of turbines to supply power to all companies and households. In addition, the production cost of large solar panels is still very high, which is why many countries, especially those with a poor economy, are still unable to use this power source.

However, I still believe that shifting towards using alternative energy is a worthwhile investment due to the great benefits it brings. Firstly, fossil fuels are the main cause of air pollution nowadays since petroleum-powered vehicles and factories are releasing tremendous amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere every day. Therefore, replacing coal and petroleum with wind or solar power will help to reduce the level of emissions in the atmosphere and improve air quality. Secondly, fossil fuels, like natural gas or oil, are finite resources and will soon be depleted, which will potentially threaten the economy if there are no alternative sources. This fact emphasizes the need to develop renewable energy to gradually replace traditional sources when fossil fuels inevitably run out.

In conclusion, I hold the view that despite the high initial cost of new equipment and facilities, the switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is still necessary for the long-term development of the planet.

Sample 2:

The debate around our primary sources of energy has been intensifying in recent decades, with some pushing for more sustainable energy while others arguing that fossil fuels should remain the main source of power globally. I personally think renewable energy production should be encouraged, since it’s important that nations should seek to reduce their own carbon emissions to divert the dangers of climate change as well as build a more sustainable economy.

Firstly, fossil fuel should be discouraged because it could bring about the existential threat of climate change. As a result, biodiversity is at an all-time low, with shifting climates and rising sea levels slowly eroding the delicate tapestry of food webs across the globe. As scientists are convinced this is directly the cause of human activity, such as in agriculture and fossil fuel consumption, renewable energies would help slow this threat immediately and might be our only solution to salvaging the planet.

Secondly, one could argue that renewable energies are more sustainable and would therefore be better for the economy in the long run. While oil and coal are a finite resource and take millions of years to replenish, energy from wind and solar can in theory never run out. Therefore, making a switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy can be a solution that thinks of the longer term, since it could avert an economic crash when oil fully depletes. Many analysts have warned that with the current trajectory, oil could run out by 2050; when this happens, it could sharply affect the biggest economies in the world that are still heavily dependent on oil.

Overall, I argue that the climate effects as a result of fossil fuels consumption combined with the economic benefits of renewable energies mean that we should encourage the development of these forms of energy.

Sample 3:

Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, have long been the dominant sources of energy in many countries. However, their extensive use has resulted in significant environmental harm, prompting the need for alternative sources of energy. In response to this, many countries are encouraging the adoption of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. This essay will discuss the reasons behind the promotion of alternative energy sources and argue that it is a positive development.

One of the key reasons for the promotion of alternative energy sources is their potential to mitigate the negative environmental impacts associated with fossil fuels. Unlike fossil fuels, renewable energy sources produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions during operation, thereby reducing the contribution to climate change. For instance, countries like Germany have implemented strong incentives and subsidies to support the development of solar power, leading to a significant increase in the share of renewable energy in their energy mix. This shift towards cleaner sources of energy is driven by the recognition of the urgent need to combat climate change and reduce dependence on finite fossil fuel reserves.

The encouragement of alternative energy sources has numerous positive implications and is a positive trend. It promotes energy diversification, reducing reliance on a single energy source and increasing energy security. By harnessing the power of wind, solar, and other renewable sources, countries can decrease their vulnerability to fluctuations in fossil fuel prices and geopolitical tensions related to energy resources. Additionally, the transition to renewable energy stimulates innovation and job creation. As governments invest in renewable energy infrastructure and technologies, new industries and employment opportunities emerge.

In conclusion, the encouragement of alternative energy sources, such as wind and solar power, is driven by the need to address environmental concerns and promote sustainable development. By reducing greenhouse gas emissions, diversifying energy sources, and fostering economic growth, the adoption of renewable energy brings numerous benefits. Therefore, it is crucial for countries to continue investing in research, technology, and policy frameworks that support the widespread adoption of renewable energy, ensuring a cleaner and more sustainable energy future.

Sample 4:

Fossil fuel, though extensively used, is not eco-friendly, and its usage comes with huge environmental costs. Considering global warming and climate change, and the detrimental effects fossil fuels have on the environment, green fuel, such as solar, hydro and wind power, is increasingly being used in many countries. It is a good thing that many countries have already started using these green power sources.

The promotion of alternative sources of energy has gained significant momentum in numerous countries because of a growing concern about the adverse effects of fossil fuels on the environment such as greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Governments and environmental organizations recognize the urgent need to transition to cleaner and more sustainable energy options. For instance, countries like Germany have implemented ambitious renewable energy targets, investing heavily in wind and solar power to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and combat climate change.

The stock of fossil fuels is limited and would get exhausted at a certain point. So, alternative and green sources, which are renewable, would be the main source of our energy in the future. Despite the shift from fossil fuel to green energy being expensive and labour-intensive, green energy like wind and solar energy is renewable, their use should be as much encouraged as possible from right now, and it is a good thing that the trend has already started. Alternative sources of power, such as solar and wind power, do not pollute the environment, have lower carbon emissions and are eco-friendly. So, their use could save the planet from the disaster of global warming which is already visible around us. Wind power and solar power are in use in countries like Denmark, Germany and France, and more and more countries are joining the list. We already have extremely efficient technology to produce solar and wind power, and the trend is quite encouraging.

To conclude, the energy demand is increasing at a fast pace, and the stock of fossil fuels is diminishing. So, we should turn to alternative green energy sources and share the technology and expertise with all nations so that the transition happens all around the world to save our otherwise dying planet due to climate change and greenhouse effects.

Sample 5:

Every year the energy demand is increasing globally. So, the strains on the current and already limited resources are high. Since these energy resources, like fossil fuels, are mostly imported by countries, some countries have opted for alternative sources of energy to enjoy greater energy security. I wholeheartedly believe that it is a positive trend.

Alternative sources of energy offer greater energy security and independence and that is why their production and use is increasing. Relying on traditional energy sources, often imported from other countries, can leave nations vulnerable to price fluctuations and geopolitical tensions. Embracing renewable energy sources, such as hydroelectric, geothermal, or biomass, allows countries to tap into their own natural resources and reduce dependence on foreign energy imports. This is why it has already gained popularity.

Fossil fuels, like coal and oil, are not unlimited. A few countries like Germany and Japan, for example, are completely dependent on the import of such resources. For all these countries, alternative energy, also known as green energy, is the answer for the future, and it is a welcoming trend that many countries have already started producing green energy. By embracing renewable energy options, countries can address climate change, enhance energy independence, create employment opportunities, and drive technological progress. Countries like France and Norway, among others, have invested in the technology needed to produce extremely efficient solar panels to store energy from the sun or produce wind power. The positive impacts of this development are innumerable, and many countries are following in their footsteps.

In conclusion, the use of green energy sources is gaining traction because many countries want to become energy self-sufficient. This is definitely a positive trend as it reduces reliance on energy imports, helps countries fight climate change, advances technology and creates more employment.

Sample 6:

These days, the environment is being severely affected by the excessive use of nonrenewable energy resources, such as petrol, diesel, coal and natural gas. However, eco-friendly and renewable power sources like wind and solar power are being adopted in many countries mainly because they do not harm the environment, and I wholeheartedly think that it is a positive trend.

The shift towards renewable energy sources in many countries is primarily to fight global warming and climate change. Fossil fuels are often the reason climate change is so severe and threatens the existence of humans on the mother planet. Many countries, including Germany, Norway and France, have adopted the use of green energy like solar and wind power to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels to save the environment.

It is a positive trend as it greatly reduces the carbon content of the environment and makes the planet more sustainable. Without extensive use of green energy, we will soon transform our planet into an uninhabitable one. To save our planet from destruction, we need to produce and use more green and renewable energy. Moreover, it is cheaper to produce such clean energy than to extract coal or natural gas which makes these eco-friendly energies affordable to mass people. A recent study by Oxford University reveals that the production of solar power is 30% cheaper than that of fossil fuel. This finding again emphasizes how important it is for all nations to opt for renewable energy sources, and how beneficial it is that many countries have already invested in generating clean power.

In conclusion, even though we have harmed our mother planet to a great extent by indiscriminately using fossil fuels, some countries have already shown us a better way to produce and use power. It is expected that more countries will invest in alternative sources of energy to make the planet green again and make energy affordable for all.

Sample 7:

While fossil fuels have been the backbone of our energy supply for centuries, they have severe harmful impacts on our environment. Therefore, some countries have started relying on green energy to reverse the situation. And it is a positive trend that we have started researching and using alternative sources of energy, also known as green energy, that are sustainable and do not cause long-term damage to our environment.

One of the main reasons alternative energy sources are being used to produce green energy in many countries is their ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which are a major contributor to climate change. According to the International Energy Agency, the use of renewable energy sources can help reduce global CO2 emissions by up to 70% by 2050. This is a significant step towards protecting our planet from the devastating effects of climate change, including rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and loss of biodiversity.

The use of renewable sources to generate energy is a positive development for a variety of reasons. For instance, investing in renewable energy can also create jobs and boost the economy. According to the Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2020, the renewable energy sector employed around 11.5 million people worldwide in 2019, a 6% increase from the previous year. This growth in employment opportunities can help to stimulate local economies and provide new job opportunities for people in both developed and developing countries. For example, in Germany, the government's decision to phase out nuclear power plants and invest in renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, has created over 300,000 jobs and contributed to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

In conclusion, the shift towards green energy sources is a positive development that can help to protect our environment and create new job opportunities. While it may take time and investment to transition away from fossil fuels, it is a necessary step to ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.

Sample 8:

Many nations are now supporting the adoption of various energy alternatives in order to reduce fossil fuel consumption. In my opinion, though there may be short-term economic downsides, this is a decidedly positive development due to the implications on the environment generally.

Those who feel the sudden adoption of alternative energies is a negative point out the financial repercussions. There are economies around the world that are currently dependent on exporting fossil fuels, in particular in The Middle East, South America, and Eastern Europe. Many of these countries are still developing and have few other natural resources or industries that could replace a decline in the energy sector. The economic effects will extend far beyond exporters though. Both developed and developing nations ranging from the United States and Vietnam to China and Russia exploit oil for private vehicles and various industries. Substituting cheap oil for a more expensive alternative might result in economic catastrophe with wide-ranging repercussions.

However, the environmental effect is overwhelmingly more important for the long-term health of the planet. The economic results of less dependence on fossil fuels will cause short-term problems but the issues caused by climate change are also becoming a present reality. For instance, there has been a rise in the number of cataclysmic natural disasters related to rising ocean temperatures and deforestation. Even more troubling are the less noticed problems such as habitats being destroyed in remote areas like Antarctica and the Amazon Rainforest. Beyond the animals becoming endangered and extinct, it is only a number of years before human life is affected. This existential threat is the reason alternative energies are a pressing need.

In conclusion, despite the economic drawbacks of a sudden shift to alternative power sources, this reorientation will have a markedly positive long-term impact on the environment. Governments should therefore implement and bolster alternative energy initiatives.

Sample 9:

The development of renewable energies like wind power, wave power, or solar energy to replace the electricity generated from burning fossil fuels has become an increasingly popular trend in the world. I believe this is a green movement in the energy sector with countless benefits that people should welcome.

The most palpable advantage one can recognize at once when mentioning renewable energies is that they reduce the burden on the environment. The use of solar power creates no emission at all, and thus provides for the need of power at almost no environmental cost. It is similarly clean and sustainable when wind, wave, and water moving around the Earth eternally can be used in energy production. Also, the independence from fossil fuels in electricity generation saves the world from a rapid depletion of coal, oil and natural gases, and slow down the imminent energy crisis which may even cause wars over energy sources among countries.

Moreover, the production of green energy also benefits individuals and the country as a whole. Thanks to less burning of fossil fuels in thermal energy plants, workers in energy companies face less risks of occupational health problems especially those related to respiratory diseases and may lead to early death. On the large scale of a country, the utilization of wind, wave, sunlight, and even geothermal heat to produce electricity will diversify the energy portfolio of different nations, making them free from reliance on limited natural resources to generate electricity due to their unfavourable geographical locations.

In conclusion, the movement of the world towards more use of renewable energy is completely positive when it solves multiple problems of environmental pollution, dependence on natural resources for energy, and poor health of workers in thermal power plants.

Sample 10:

Governments across continents have turned their attention to more sustainable sources of energy as alternatives to fossil fuels. In my opinion, this could be seen as a progress for the following reasons.

First, there is no arguing that producing energy from buried dead organisms lacks sustainability, which means such production could not guarantee the survival of humans in the long term. In fact, the consumption of energy generated from fossil fuels tends to accelerate in direct correlation with the growth of the world population. With the current rate of exploitation, this valuable resource would dwindle away in no time, leaving no other choice than seeking additional reserves such as nuclear power or hydroelectricity. This is a safe solution to the fear of energy scarcity and ensures the future development of the human race.

Second, dependence on fossil fuel for worldwide energy supply would cause environmental degradation while using solar power, for example, is considered an ultimate choice of energy conservation. The combustion of fossil fuels is the culprit of greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants, leading to tremendous damage to the environment. Such suffering of the Earth could not be justified by the growing need of humans. By contrast, this would never be the case when it comes to other alternatives as mentioned above. If governments continue to invest in exploiting those new sources, there will be an unlimited amount of inexpensive energy in the long run.

In conclusion, I believe that the use of other potential energy sources to replace fossil fuels is obviously an important step forward.

Sample 11:

Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, are extensively used in many countries and cause harm to the environment. The use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, however, is being encouraged in many countries. Is this a positive or negative development?

In several nations, non-renewable sources of energy, namely coal, petroleum, and gasoline, are used inordinately, which is severely damaging the ecosystem. However, other countries are promoting the usage of non-conventional sources of power, such as wind and solar energy. I personally consider that this has been a positive development because the non-traditional approach will aid in efficient energy output and protect the ecosystem from feasible hazards.

Primarily, the remarkable advantage of the aforementioned alternative sources is that they are renewable. These energy sources have a constant supply of power and there is no requirement for significant raw materials. Although it could be argued that the initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind farms is extremely high, I would assert that once the installation cost has been met with, their maintenance is practically negligible. Apart from this, it is widely accepted that fossil fuels take millions of years to form, and once consumed, they cannot be re-used. To illustrate, if modern individuals burn immense petroleum and coal, these resources are likely to vanish, and future generations would not be capable of using these precious energy sources.

Another major benefit of eco-friendly energy sources is their non-polluting nature. The intensive usage of natural resources forms carbon emissions and emits noxious gases that are nurturing global warming and depleting the ozone layer. Even worse, by inhaling such poisonous gases and carbon fumes, human beings are susceptible to various health ailments such as asthma and lung cancer. However, when energy is harnessed from wind turbines and solar panels there are no such deleterious by-products. Unlike other automobiles, for instance, commuting through a solar car would not emit carbon dioxide.

In conclusion, not only do alternative sources provide an inordinate amount of energy supply constantly, but they also preserve the environment in a very effective way. Therefore, I completely believe that this trend is a wholly positive development and one that authorities ought to promote.

Sample 12:

In this day and age, the consumption of non-renewable resources is burgeoning day by day. Owing to this it reached an alarming rate. It takes millions of years to form. However, some nations are taking a step forward and using non-conventional sources of power. This essay will highlight that this is certainly an optimistic approach that needs to be opted.

At the outset, non-conventional sources can be recycled and utilized again. Although, the use of alternative sources has some hurdles like the initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind farms is very high and these also rely on geographical locations. When masses use this energy source for a long period of time, the energy can be renewed and produced, no extra cost will have more economic benefit than the others. Besides this, the use of renewable energy could help to conserve foreign exchange and generate local employment if conservation technologies are designed, manufactured, assembled, and installed locally.

Moving further, alternative sources- wind power, tidal power, solar power – sources are totally safe for the environment, have lower carbon emission, and are eco-friendly. The research concluded that there are some countries that have utilized alternative sources namely German, France, and Denmark as these nations save the planet from a disaster of global warming. Some countries use automobile cars that work on solar power. Consequently, it has reduced the carbon footprint of such countries and made its greenery.

Based on this study it can be reiterated that the use of alternative sources of energy is an optimistic evolvement, which can save the whole globe from the catastrophic impact of greenhouse emissions as well as global warming. Furthermore, more and more folks should adopt renewable sources to ameliorate the conditions of the environment. In this way, by taking joint efforts individuals can preserve the world.

Sample 13:

Due to the shortage of fossil fuels, whether other natural power resources should be encouraged to harness or not, becomes a paramount concern for many countries. I believe, while this advancement may decrease awareness among people about protecting the fuels, it also solves the problem of the lack of energy sources.

First of all, fossil fuels which are the major energy resources in many nations are facing the threats of becoming obsolete due to the overuse by the human race in daily life. As a result, people should be encouraged to raise awareness of fuel conservation. However, the utilization of alternative natural energy sources could prevent people from doing this by reducing the fears of coal or oil that might be running out. Because there are other sources to use, they would use more energy generated from gas or oil without hesitation. In my personal opinion, the negative sides of using different resources of power could deteriorate the shortage of fuels.

Harnessing alternative power sources (such as solar or wind power), in contrast, could reduce the usage of fossil fuels in generating energy for a range of demanding activities such as heating and driving. While coal and oil mines are limited, natural resources such as wind and solar power are considered unlimited. This wind power or solar energy is consequently able to produce enough energy for human demand without the help of fossil fuels. As a result, it should be encouraged to be utilized in more countries in the world to gradually cut down the usage of fossil fuels.

To sum up, the encouragement of using natural resources (such as solar or wind) for producing energy has both negative and positive sides. However, I deem that humankind should consider using more power from solar or wind and less from coal and gas to protect the remaining parts of fossil fuels.

Sample 14:

Coals, oil, and gas are some fossil fuels that are the most common sources of energy for the majority of countries. On the other hand, some countries encourage the use of renewable resources like wind and solar energy. I believe this is a strongly positive development as we will be in grave danger if the world runs out of these natural non-renewable resources like fossil fuels.

Fossil fuels are used in almost all industries and for running motor vehicles. We can minimize this by using alternatives wherever possible. If it goes on like this, we will soon have such a shortage of these fuels that can pose a threat to running things efficiently. For example, some industries can only run on coal or oil, though this is not the case for cars. Automobiles can easily run on electricity, and so we should limit the use of such fuels. Burning too much of these fossil fuels also contributes to air pollution. Thus, it is important to minimize usage wherever possible.

On the other hand, wind energy and solar energy take comparatively longer time to generate, and they are largely dependent on the sun and the wind. We do not have any control over them, so the production of goods might slow down if there is less generation of energy as we cannot, in fact, control the weather. Perhaps tropical countries, where there is an abundant amount of sunshine and wind, can be encouraged to use these natural sources and not waste fossil fuels. However, for temperate climates, this might not be an option. Dependency on nature can have slower production rates and lead to not meeting the deadline or having scarcity in the market.

On the whole, I believe all the countries should be aware of the hazards of wasting too much of our natural reserves of energy and use them consciously and responsibly. Initiatives such as building consciousness about the issue should be taken to build a more environmentally friendly atmosphere.

Sample 15:

Fossil fuels harm the environment and to save our planet we need to encourage the use of green energy. The use of alternative sources of energy, or ‘green’ energy, is a positive trend of development, and indeed their use should be encouraged further.

As the demand for energy worldwide is increasing the strains on the existing and already limited resources also increase. To solve this problem, we must consider two issues: how to better use the existing, limited fossil fuel resources and how we can encourage the use of alternative energy sources.

It is universally acknowledged that there is a limitation on the use of fossil fuels, especially coal and oil. Some countries are rich in oil deposits like OPEC, whereas China is rich in coal deposits and Russia in natural gas. Others, such as Japan and Germany, are completely dependent on the import of resources. For all countries- resource-rich versus resource-poor, alternative energy should be encouraged and utilised to reduce the dependence on fossil fuels as well as to keep the global environment in balance and ‘healthy’.

The only way is to turn to other sources to get energy supply. Wind power and solar power are at present feasible alternatives. France is one country that has the advanced technology needed to produce extremely efficient solar panels to store energy from the sun. Both kinds of power can reduce a country’s dependence on fossil fuels. Furthermore, they do not pollute the environment and in turn, help keep the ecosystem stable.

To conclude, while fossil fuel resources are diminishing, the energy demand continues to increase year after year. It is a positive trend to develop other alternative sources of power and experiences should be shared and promoted. If this switch to alternative energy is encouraged early enough, then we may yet avoid the pending energy crisis and environmental disaster.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP