Câu hỏi:
24/04/2022 2,152
In ________________, I must acknowledge that we were guilty of errors of judgment.
In ________________, I must acknowledge that we were guilty of errors of judgment.
Đáp án chính xác
Câu hỏi trong đề:
[Năm 2022] Đề thi thử môn Tiếng anh THPT Quốc gia có lời giải (25 đề) !!
Sách mới 2k7: Tổng ôn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa…. kỳ thi tốt nghiệp THPT Quốc gia 2025, đánh giá năng lực (chỉ từ 110k).
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Đáp án A
Kiến thức về cụm từ cố định
A. retrospect /ˈretrəspekt/ (n)
→Cụm từ: In retrospect: bây giờ nghĩ lại (điều gì trong quá khứ)
B. review /rɪˈvjuː/ (n): sự xem xét lại, sự cân nhắc lại
C. experience /ɪkˈspɪriəns/ (n): trải nghiệm, kinh nghiệm
D. hindsight /ˈhaɪndsaɪt/ (n)
→Cụm từ: With/in hindsight: nhìn lại, xét lại thì (khả năng có thể hiểu được tình huống và vấn đề chỉ sau khi nó vừa xảy ra về lí do và cách thức nó đã được làm như nào và lẽ ra nó nên được làm ra sao để trở nên tốt hơn)
*Xét cấu trúc trong câu hỏi, chỗ trống cần điền là một từ đi với “in” để mang nghĩa “bây giờ nghĩ lại việc đã xảy ra trong quá khứ”, nhìn chung ta loại hai đáp án B, C.
*Tuy nhiên, ở đây vì hàm ý của câu chỉ muốn nhấn mạnh hành động “nghĩ lại, hồi tưởng lại điều đã làm và thừa nhận nó là đúng”, chứ không có ý sâu xa rằng “nghĩ lại để rồi thấu hiểu và nuối tiếc, mong muốn lẽ ra nó nên được làm tốt hơn”, hơn nữa, với “in retrospect” thường để nghĩ lại vấn đề đã qua sau một thời gian nhất định, còn với “in hindsight” thì ám chỉ việc nhìn lại, xét lại ngay sau khi sự việc mới xảy ra
-> Do đó đáp án D chưa hoàn toàn phù hợp với văn cảnh đang nói đến bởi động từ vế sau chia ở quá khứ đơn “were”, diễn tả hành động đã xảy ra và chấm dứt hoàn toàn trong quá khứ thay vì chia ở thì hiện tại hoàn thành – diễn tả hành động vừa mới diễn ra
Tạm dịch: Bây giờ nghĩ lại, tôi phải thừa nhận rằng tôi đã mắc rất nhiều sai lầm trong cách phán xét, đánh giá của mình.
Nhà sách VIETJACK:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Câu 1:
I’m sorry but I assure you that I had no intention ____________ offending you.
I’m sorry but I assure you that I had no intention ____________ offending you.
Xem đáp án »
24/04/2022
8,506
Câu 2:
“If I ________ and my life depended on the solution, I would spend the first 55 minutes determining the proper question to ask, for once I know the proper question, I could solve the problem in less than five minutes." _ Albert Einstein
“If I ________ and my life depended on the solution, I would spend the first 55 minutes determining the proper question to ask, for once I know the proper question, I could solve the problem in less than five minutes." _ Albert Einstein
Xem đáp án »
24/04/2022
6,992
Câu 3:
One moment you say you love me, the next moment you are dating another girl, __________?
One moment you say you love me, the next moment you are dating another girl, __________?
Xem đáp án »
24/04/2022
6,555
Câu 4:
Veronica broke the school rules so many times that the headmistress finally had no alternative but to expel her.
Veronica broke the school rules so many times that the headmistress finally had no alternative but to expel her.
Xem đáp án »
24/04/2022
6,348
Câu 5:
Mark the letter A, B, C or D to indicate the correct answer to each of the following questions.
The majority of the students _______ home for their holidays for the past few weeks.
Mark the letter A, B, C or D to indicate the correct answer to each of the following questions.
The majority of the students _______ home for their holidays for the past few weeks.
Xem đáp án »
24/04/2022
5,236
Câu 7:
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.
In “How many hours does it take to make a friend?” (2018), Jeffrey A. Hall describes the types of encounters that build a friendship.
His study found that hours of time spent together was linked with closer friendships, as was time spent enjoying leisure activities together. Specifically, he found that the chance of making a “casual friend,” as opposed to a mere acquaintance, was greater than 50 percent when people spent approximately 43 hours together within three weeks of meeting. He further found that casual friends evolve into friends at some point between 57 hours after three weeks, and 164 hours over three months. Hall's research also demonstrated, however, that when it comes to time spent developing friendships, quality is more important than quantity. And when it comes to conversation, topics matter. When it comes to building quality relationships, the duration of conversation is not as important as the content. Meaningful conversation is the key to bonding with others.
Hall found that when it comes to developing friendships, sharing daily life through catching up and joking around promotes closeness; small talk does not. Consider the inane topics that often come up when you are trapped in an elevator with an acquaintance. Discussing the weather or speculating on how many stops you will make before finally reaching the lobby does not facilitate bonding. Nor does mere proximity. Hall found that obligatory time spent together, such as in a classroom or workplace, does not promote closeness. Friendships require an efficient use of time together. Someone who remembers the details of your life and asks questions about your family, your job, your latest vacation, etc., is much more likely on his or her way to becoming someone you consider a friend, as opposed to an acquaintance.
(source: https://www.psychologytoday.com/)
Which best serves as the title for the passage?
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on your answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions.
In “How many hours does it take to make a friend?” (2018), Jeffrey A. Hall describes the types of encounters that build a friendship.
His study found that hours of time spent together was linked with closer friendships, as was time spent enjoying leisure activities together. Specifically, he found that the chance of making a “casual friend,” as opposed to a mere acquaintance, was greater than 50 percent when people spent approximately 43 hours together within three weeks of meeting. He further found that casual friends evolve into friends at some point between 57 hours after three weeks, and 164 hours over three months. Hall's research also demonstrated, however, that when it comes to time spent developing friendships, quality is more important than quantity. And when it comes to conversation, topics matter. When it comes to building quality relationships, the duration of conversation is not as important as the content. Meaningful conversation is the key to bonding with others.
Hall found that when it comes to developing friendships, sharing daily life through catching up and joking around promotes closeness; small talk does not. Consider the inane topics that often come up when you are trapped in an elevator with an acquaintance. Discussing the weather or speculating on how many stops you will make before finally reaching the lobby does not facilitate bonding. Nor does mere proximity. Hall found that obligatory time spent together, such as in a classroom or workplace, does not promote closeness. Friendships require an efficient use of time together. Someone who remembers the details of your life and asks questions about your family, your job, your latest vacation, etc., is much more likely on his or her way to becoming someone you consider a friend, as opposed to an acquaintance.
(source: https://www.psychologytoday.com/)
Which best serves as the title for the passage?
Xem đáp án »
24/04/2022
4,587
về câu hỏi!