Some people think visual images (e.g. photographs, videos) in a news story can accurately tell what happened. Others think it cannot tell the full news story. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Sample 1:

In contemporary times, there is a belief that visual images can offer sufficient evidence of an event, for example, a crime. However, some individuals oppose this notion and argue that additional evidence is necessary. I concur with the opinion that further evidence is needed alongside visual images.

One reason why certain people consider photos and videos as adequate evidence for a crime is the vivid portrayal of the crime scene. Without visual images, the crime scene would merely exist in the investigators' minds. Evidently, photos and videos can be helpful in illustrating the crime scene. Furthermore, technological advancements have made it easier to ascertain the authenticity of images and how they were captured. Thus, visual images can provide important information in criminal investigations.

Conversely, images may not always capture the complete picture. In other words, they may not be comprehensive enough to convey a crime's details. For instance, photos and videos often capture specific moments, which can lead to misunderstandings or provide limited evidence that might not be sufficient. Moreover, it is crucial to have compelling evidence to establish whether a crime occurred. As such, more reliable evidence, such as a suspect's DNA, should also be required to resolve a case.

In conclusion, while some people argue that visual images provide adequate evidence for a crime due to the clear representation of situations, I firmly believe that they are not sufficient on their own. Stronger evidence, such as DNA, is necessary to ensure a comprehensive and accurate understanding of a crime.

Sample 2:

In contemporary society, there is a debate surrounding the reliability of visual images, such as photographs and videos, as sources of news and information. While some people trust these visuals as accurate representations, others argue that they cannot always be relied upon. Personally, I am inclined to believe that visual media may not always provide trustworthy information.

One of the main reasons why visual media are often considered reliable is their speed in disseminating information. With the advent of the Internet and social media platforms, it has become effortless to create and share visual content. This accessibility means that anyone can contribute to the dissemination of information without requiring specialized skills or qualifications. For example, simply posting a picture from a birthday party online can convey its significance without the need for additional explanations.

However, the ease and speed of sharing visual content can also lead to issues of reliability. Without proper regulations in place, individuals may post misleading images with sensationalized captions to grab attention, leading to misunderstandings within communities. For instance, during the Vietnam War, conflicting reports and biased language in the media caused confusion among people in the United States about the true events taking place.

In conclusion, while visual media undoubtedly offer benefits in terms of accessibility and immediacy, their reliability as sources of information can be called into question. Therefore, I advocate for a cautious approach to relying solely on visual media for news and suggest cross-referencing information from multiple sources to ensure accuracy and reliability.