The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
|
Population (Millions) |
|||
|
Countries |
Year |
||
|
2003 |
2025 |
2050 |
|
|
Argentina |
34 |
48 |
62 |
|
Indonesia |
238 |
274 |
312 |
|
Italy |
54 |
47 |
45 |
|
Republic of Korea |
48 |
52 |
52 |
Sample 1:
The table provides population data for Argentina, Indonesia, South Korea, and Italy for the year 2003, alongside projections for 2025 and 2050.
Overall, the population numbers for Argentina, Indonesia, and South Korea are projected to increase, while Italy's population is expected to decline. Indonesia had the largest population among the four countries in 2003, and it is forecasted to remain the most populous until 2050.
In 2003, Indonesia had the largest population among the four countries, with 238 million people. This figure is projected to grow significantly, reaching 274 million by 2025 and 312 million by 2050. Argentina also shows a notable increase, starting at 34 million in 2003, and expected to rise to 48 million by 2025, eventually reaching 62 million by 2050. Meanwhile, South Korea's population is predicted to grow modestly from 48 million in 2003 to 52 million by 2025, and then remain stable through to 2050.
In contrast, Italy is expected to experience a population decline. In 2003, Italy had a population of 54 million, which is projected to decrease to 47 million by 2025 and further decline to 45 million by 2050. This represents a significant reduction over the 47-year period.
Sample 2:
The table displays the number of people in four countries in 2003 and their projected figures in 2025 and 2050. Overall, all countries, except Italy, are expected to experience population growth. Indonesia was the most populous country in 2003, and it is predicted to maintain its top ranking in the future years.
In 2003, Indonesia’s population was 238 million, dwarfing the figures for Italy, Korea, and Argentina, which were 54, 48, and 34 million, respectively. According to the table, by 2025, this data will have increased by 36 million to 274 million people. The Argentinian and Korean populations are also predicted to grow to 48 million for the former, and 52 million for the latter. Italy’s figure, meanwhile, is expected to shrink to 47 million, making it the least populous country by 2025.
According to 2050’s projections, Indonesia’s population is likely to reach 312 million, and while that of Argentina will also grow, it amounts to merely one-fifth of Indonesia’s, at 62 million. There seems to be no change after 2025 in Korea’s data, whereas Italy’s population is predicted to continue declining to 45 million. At the end of the period, Italy will have been the country with the fewest people.
Sample 3:
The table indicates the population of four countries in 2003 as well as the predicted information for 2025 and 2050.
Overall, the population figures of three countries are forecast to rise: Argentina, Indonesia and South Korea, but not Italy. Besides, the number of people in Indonesia in 2003 was the highest out of the four, and this country is projected to continue to be the most populous until 2050.
In 2003, Indonesia had the biggest population, reaching 238 million. In contrast, Argentina, which had a population of only 34 million, shows the lowest figure. In the same year, the population of Italy was relatively larger than that of the Republic of Korea, at 54 million and 48 million, respectively.
The projections made for 2025 and 2050 highlight that the population of Indonesia will increase dramatically, with an extra 75 million people in 2050. It is foreseen that Argentina’s population will increase roughly 1.5 times by 2050, whereas that of South Korea is predicted to grow slowly over the course of 22 years from 2003 before levelling out at 52 million. However, Italy’s population in 2050 is expected to be just five-sixths of the initial figure.
Sample 4:
The table provides statistics regarding the populations of four nations in 2003 with forecasts for 2025 and 2050. Overall, the populations of most countries are predicted to rise over the given period, except for Italy. Additionally, it is anticipated that Indonesia's population would remain the highest throughout the years.
Regarding 2003, Indonesia ranked 1st with 238 million residents, followed by Italy and the Republic of Korea at 54 million and 48 million, respectively. At 34 million, Argentina's population was the lowest among the four countries,
As of 2025, changes in the population ranking are expected to occur as the Republic of Korea's population is forecast to rise to 52 million, surpassing Italy which is expected to decrease to 47 million. Both Argentina and Indonesia are predicted to witness moderate population growth, with the former ascending to 48 million and the latter to 274 million.
Turning to 2050, Italy's population is anticipated to decline slightly to 45 million, widening the gap with the Republic of Korea whose population is projected to remain unchanged. Meanwhile, Indonesia's and Argentina's populations are forecast to climb to 62 million and 312 million, correspondingly.
Sample 5:
The provided table offers a demographic overview of population statistics for Argentina, Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of Korea, in 2003 with projections extending to 2025 and 2050.
Overall, Indonesia stands out as the highest population. While Indonesia and Argentina are on trajectories of significant population increase, Italy faces a declining population, setting it apart from the rest. In contrast, the Republic of Korea's numbers maintain a steady state.
When it comes to the upward trend, Indonesia demonstrated a considerable base population of 238 million in 2003, with a forecasted growth to 274 million by 2025 and an ascending trajectory reaching 312 million by 2050. In parallel, Argentina’s population in 2003 was recorded at 34 million, with prospects of a robust increase to 48 million by 2025, representing a significant upward trend. This momentum is expected to propel the numbers to 62 million by 2050, highlighting a near doubling over the 47-year period. When compared, both countries exhibit substantial population growth, yet Indonesia’s sheer numerical increase dwarfs Argentina’s, despite a smaller relative percentage increase.
Conversely, Italy is projected to witness a demographic downturn from 54 million individuals in 2003 to 47 million by 2025, with a further decline to 45 million anticipated by 2050. The Republic of Korea with its population ascended marginally from 48 million in 2003 to an anticipated 52 million by 2025, a figure that is expected to stabilize through 2050.
Sample 6:
The table delineates demographic statistics in four different nations in 2003 and expected data for 2025 and 2050.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that population figures in all nations in question have experienced upward trajectories throughout the period, with the exception of Italy. Indonesia has recorded by far the most significant figure for citizens in all the years surveyed.
In 2003, the figure for Indonesian residents was greatest at 238 million, while Argentina’s number was least considerable at 34 million. Both countries’ statistics thereafter will see increasing trends, with Indonesia rising substantially to 274 million and Argentina to 48 million in 2025. These patterns are expected to continue as Argentina increases to its peak of (62 million and Indonesia to 312 million in 2050.
In the first year of the period, the figure for Italy’s population was slightly / marginally higher than the Republic of Korea’s, accounting for 54 million and 48 million, respectively. Italy and South Korea’s data are then forecasted to witness opposite patterns, with the former dipping to 47 million and the latter reaching 52 million in 2025. Italy’s number will continue its decline to finish at 45 million in 2025.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Đang tải chế độ Học...
Hot: 1000+ đề thi giữa kì 1 lớp 1-12 đầy đủ các môn (Update 2026) (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Đăng ký VIP để học và luyện thi không giới hạn
Trọn bộ quyền lợi trên Vietjack, trong một tài khoản.
- Phòng luyện thi cấp tốc: ĐGNL - ĐGTD, Tốt nghiệp THPT, Ôn vào 10, Ôn vào 6, Ôn Giữa kì/Cuối kì
- Hơn 200K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
- Với 3tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
- Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
- Xem hàng ngàn bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
- Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
- Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện
- Đăng ký ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The bar chart and pie chart give information about why US residents travelled and what travel problems they experienced in the year 2009.
It is clear that the principal reason why Americans travelled in 2009 was to commute to and from work. In the same year, the primary concern of Americans, with regard to the trips they made, was the cost of travelling.
Looking more closely at the bar chart, we can see that 49% of the trips made by Americans in 2009 were for the purpose of commuting. By contrast, only 6% of trips were visits to friends or relatives, and one in ten trips were for social or recreation reasons. Shopping was cited as the reason for 16% of all travel, while unspecific ‘personal reasons’ accounted for the remaining 19%.
According to the pie chart, price was the key consideration for 36% of American travellers. Almost one in five people cited safety as their foremost travel concern, while aggressive driving and highway congestion were the main issues for 17% and 14% of the travelling public. Finally, a total of 14% of those surveyed thought that access to public transport or space for pedestrians were the most important travel issues.
Sample 2:
The bar chart compares the figures for Americans going out for five reasons and the pie chart illustrates the percentage of six problems that concerned them when travelling in 2009. Overall, it is clear that the main reason why people in the US went out in 2009 is to commute to work, and the cost of travelling is the problem concerning them the most.
Looking first at the bar graph, the proportion of Americans going out for commuting to work stood at 49%, while the figure for those leaving their house for personal reasons accounted for 19%. In addition, the rate of people in the US going out for shopping and recreation made up 16% and 10%, respectively, while visiting friends or relatives accounted for the lowest percentage, at only 6%.
Turning to the pie chart, the cost of travelling was the most concerning problem of Americans when going out, with the figure making up 36%, while the proportion of safety concerns is half of that, at 19%. In addition, 17% of US citizens were concerned about aggressive drivers, while highway congestion made 14% of them worried when leaving their house. Access to public transportation and places for people to walk accounted for the lowest percentages, at only 8% and 6%, respectively.
Sample 3:
The provided charts offer insights into the reasons for travel and the primary concerns faced by the traveling public in the United States during the year 2009. The data is presented through a bar chart illustrating travel purposes and a pie chart highlighting key issues.
Notably, the primary motivation for travel among Americans in 2009 was commuting to and from work. Simultaneously, the major concern for the traveling public during their trips revolved around the cost associated with travel.
Examining the bar chart in detail reveals that almost half of the trips made by Americans in 2009, precisely 49%, were attributed to commuting. Conversely, visits to friends or relatives accounted for a mere 6%, while social or recreational trips constituted one in ten journeys. Shopping emerged as the purpose for 16% of all travel, leaving the remaining 19% for unspecific ‘personal reasons.’
Turning attention to the pie chart, it becomes evident that cost was the primary consideration for 36% of American travelers. Safety closely followed, with nearly one in five people, or 19%, expressing it as their foremost travel concern. Aggressive driving and highway congestion were significant issues for 17% and 14% of the traveling public, respectively. Additionally, 14% of respondents identified access to public transport or space for pedestrians as the most crucial travel issues.
Sample 4:
The bar chart shows why American people chose to travel, and the pie chart shows the main issues for the travelling public in the USA, both for 2009. The trend suggests that the reason and price were the main issues for travel in the United States. It is clear that commuting from work was reported as the biggest contribution to travel, at 49%. People who went travelling for personal reasons and shopping accounted for 35% when these two groups are combined. However, interaction with friends and relatives only accounted for 25% less than the above categories. And social and recreational activities took up only 6%, which was the lowest figure by more than 43%. The travelling public’s main issues were related to price and safety, with 55% of respondents reporting these two issues. While other issues accounted for a relatively small part. Only 17% of the respondents reported issues with aggressive drivers, while highway congestion accounted for even less at 14% of the issues reported. The percentage of access to public transport and space for pedestrians was much lower than the other categories at less than 10% for both. To conclude, price and commuting time were the dominant factors relating to travel in the US in 2009.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.
In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.
Sample 2:
The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.
In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.
Sample 3:
The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.
In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.
With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng nhập để xem lời giải
Lưu tiến độ và luyện tập hiệu quả hơn. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Đăng ký để học cùng Vietjack. Hoàn toàn miễn phí!
Bằng việc đăng ký, bạn đồng ý với Điều khoản sử dụng và Chính sách bảo mật của Vietjack.