With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas?

Sample 1:

The energy consumption has been growing dramatically in the past few decades, and to meet the rising demand, seeking energy sources in places far away from human habitats has become conventional. Despite some environmental repercussions, I believe the benefits of this exploration are more significant.

The major advantage of such practice is to ensure the quality of individuals’ daily life and the development of various industries of nations. Undoubtedly, exploiting resources in these remote areas can expand the available pool of resources and thus tackle the energy problem. After all, every aspect of life and production requires energy, ranging from the electricity it produces to the fuels for vehicles or manufacturing equipment. Should people stop exploring new sources of energy, the coming shortage could drive the price to a high level that both people and companies are unable to afford. What comes next might be more severe problems that could threaten the normal function of society.

However, I understand the environmental concerns raised by some people. The mining or drilling activities for fossil fuels as well as the construction of solar farms or wind turbines could pose a threat to the ecological balance in that area, considering the destruction of animal habitats and the pollution caused by hazardous chemicals involved in the process. Nevertheless, these worries should not be overstated as the international community is fully aware of the potential danger and in turn well prepared with relevant resolutions. There are already regulations and laws restricting reckless exploitation at both national and international levels, meaning that the risk and impacts could be meticulously monitored and kept at an acceptable level.

In conclusion, with appropriate preventive actions, the possible environmental consequences of seeking energy sources in remote areas could be alleviated. Therefore, I am convinced that this practice has more advantages than disadvantages.

Sample 2:

In today's globe, it is evident that a great number of energy resources, such as oil and natural gas, are in high demand. As a result, drilling for these resources has become an important source of income for individuals all over the world. At the same time, this phenomenon has put additional strain on the global ecosystem. As a result, I am certain that the drawbacks of this phenomena exceed the benefits.

It is undeniable that the exploitation of natural resources such as oil and gas has several benefits, such as the industrial revolution, which will also assist residents find jobs. Oil has a high energy density and is readily available to create numerous types of energy. Furthermore, drilling for oil from the earth generates greater fuel supply. As a consequence, gasoline prices are reduced. Overall, these natural resources contribute to the country's economic growth and long-term development.
The major problem of exploiting these resources is that they will significantly harm the ecosystem. Furthermore, the extraction of natural resources has negative environmental consequences such as global warming and climate change. Excessive usage of fossil fuels, oil and gas extraction cause a rise in global temperatures that affects green spaces. As a result, exploitation of green areas and drilling for natural resources will endanger humanity as more and more illnesses spread faster, hurting human health. As a result of human activity, the environment will be disrupted.

To restate, while the extraction of natural resources has some advantages, it also has a number of disadvantages for the environment that exceed the advantages. As a result, in my opinion, mankind should cease exploring unexplored countries for natural resources and instead look for alternate sources.

Sample 3:

With the recent advancement in technology, the world is seeing unprecedented growth in the demand for oil and gas. Though it is a direct effect of growing consumerism, capitalism, and manufacturing and developmental spheres. These are the new measures of uplifting the quality of life to be stated in easier terms. Though this method is not backed by certain groups of people, it has an uncanny way of escalating the lifestyle standard. Oil and gas are both used for the warming of houses, viable uses of cars, aircraft and also functioning of products.

The standard of living of people has significantly increased due to the vast presence of the supplies. Moreover, people have been trying to shift to remote places only to have access to natural resources at lower costs. No matter how advanced the method is, we can never absolutely affirm the fact that it causes big destruction to the environment. The demand for oil and gas directly sabotages the ecosystem. It causes catastrophic changes in untouched and evergreen places. Let us take, for example, the North Pole, a dwelling of lively penguins, polar bears, and also massive glaciers, and more distinctive species. This is a place that other nations have been eyeing but a single mistake of oil spillage would demolish the whole ecosystem. Since these are sheer unique creatures, protecting them tends to be the utmost priority for everybody across the globe. In fact, the excessive use of gasses and oil results in an immense level of pollutants, and also vehicle usages. Extending the usage of oil and gas is not going to be a helpful solution for the environment. Greenhouse gasses are emitted into the air and that is becoming a risk factor for you. What should be the concern right now is searching for environmentally friendly energy sources. Usage of solar energy for generating power vehicles is a good way to proceed. Hence, the disadvantages can be considered to be higher than advantages. People need to focus on using energy efficient resources which are renewable like solar or wind energy. 

Sample 4:

In today’s time when there is a boundless increase in the transport system, industrial growth, and population, there is a simultaneous increase in consumers, globalization, and industrialization. This growth trend has resulted in the depletion of natural resources, and concurrent demolition of gas and oil. The growth increased so much that the demand for oil and gas is immensely increasing. Therefore, amassing gas and oil from untouched or unscathed places has been concluded as an option.

This decision, no matter how productive would make the present world’s civilization advanced, would impose a traumatizing threat on the ecosystem. It may be identified that many countries have been trying to shift their focus from oil and natural gas to electricity produced from renewable sources. For instance, electric vehicles have come into the market and has been increasingly reducing the pollution concentration in the environment. However, many consider the shift to remote areas as essential to make use of the natural oil and gas. There are only a handful of remote areas left behind on Earth, and attacking those just to feed the avaricious demands of human beings is not worth it. But a prominent factor to consider about the gas and oil demand is, an abundance of people is employed because of these industries. If restrained, they are going to face immense trouble in finding new places to earn their livelihood. If there is a reduction in production, there will also be fewer people earning. The companies when earning a restrained amount will deprive the economy of getting enough revenues. A proper way to gear both the production and ensure the safety of the ecosystem is not uncovering the untouched areas. However, overutilisation of the natural non-renewable resources would eventually result in its scarcity hence, disadvantages are more than advantages. 

Sample 5:

Irrefutably, as more and more nations undertake the process of industrialization and modernization, there will be a corresponding increase in demand for fossil fuels like natural
gas and oil. To satisfy this need, exploration of previously unexplored regions is being considered. That being said, I don't think this is the best way to solve the problem.

Such a tactic does have its advantages. The first is that people everywhere, but especially in less developed regions, want to raise their standard of living, and fuels like oil and gas make that possible by powering things like machinery, vehicles, and factories. All of them contribute to improved quality of life, but they are finite, therefore we need to find replacements. Additionally, there is the risk that we will damage or destroy otherwise stunning natural areas. Any drilling or other extraction processes on precious land would be detrimental to the ecosystem, but spills in particular would have a devastating effect on the natural world.

Furthermore, we should no longer pursue such kinds of energy due to health concerns and global warming. It's clear that the widespread use of these fuels has harmed the environment and the health of residents in cities where automobile use is concentrated. Consequently, carbon dioxide is being released into the air, which could eventually prove fatal to all life on Earth. Consequently, we need to prioritize renewable sources of energy like wind and solar to power homes and vehicles.

To conclude, it is undoubtedly true that discovering new oil and gas reserves will help us maintain and even raise our quality of living, but it will also cause irreparable devastation to the local ecosystems, not to mention the ongoing detriment to our own health and the planet.

Sample 6:

The demand for fossil fuels around the world keeps climbing. Those who think rural regions should be mined for fossil fuels utilize this argument to support their position. Threatening animals and depleting natural resources are the downsides, but it could help with fuel shortages and the economy.

One way to deal with the oil and gas crisis is to develop the undeveloped regions where there may be more of these resources. The growth of cities has led to a rise in demand for fuel to power factories and transportation, yet current resources are inadequate. Therefore, it's essential to seek out alternative resources. For instance, Congo and other economically underdeveloped regions can benefit much from such exploitation. Nonetheless, there are still numerous regions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo that is unexplored and rich in resources, from which a lot of valuable possessions can be mined.

The loss of native plant and animal life is one of its major drawbacks. The areas where fossil fuels are mined take up a lot of space, and the byproducts of the process, such as heat and smoke, make it difficult for local wildlife to thrive. The second disadvantage is that this method leads to the rapid depletion of natural resources. That is, it takes thousands of years for oil and gas to form, and if we exploit even the most remote locations, we will run out of resources in only a few short years.

Finally, the economic and resource benefits from offshore oil and gas development outweigh the potential environmental costs. While it's true that we need a lot of energy on a regular basis, there must be stringent standards in place to save the environment and cut back on our reliance on fossil fuels.

Sample 7:

In this contemporary world, many people think that it is okay to keep penetrating environmentally sensitive areas because they need fossil fuels to power their cars and homes. The benefits of this alone, in my opinion, are sufficient to justify its growth.

However, there are a number of drawbacks, and all of them have to do with protecting the environment. Firstly, there have been instances of severe oil spills that have contaminated previously unspoiled nature preserves. Second, when the planet is facing a potentially catastrophic confrontation with the repercussions of climate change, it is not the time to promote the exploitation of fossil fuels in any form. The last unspoiled regions of Earth should be left alone and not eaten greedily to sustain a situation that is only becoming worse by the day.

In contrast, economically and in terms of safety, drilling for oil and gas in less populated places has its advantages. Oil and gas are vital to the economies of many countries, especially those still on the rise. Businesses in these sectors would suffer a direct hit without their revenue, and the whole economy would feel the effects through lower tax revenues and fewer jobs. The oil and gas industry will continue to operate, but drilling near homes poses a risk to local residents, especially when using more hazardous methods like fracking. Because of the dangers of oil spills and increased air pollution, infiltrating is restricted to areas far from populated areas.

To summarise, the benefits to the economy and the people do not outweigh the threats to the environment from offshore oil and gas extraction. Protocols to safeguard the environment are necessary, but they must be weighed against the value placed on nature by humans.

Sample 8:

Many today believe that growing demand for fossil fuels justifies the continued exploitation of remote natural landscapes. In my opinion, the advantages of this are enough to warrant its expansion.

The disadvantages all relate to environmental conservation. Firstly, there have been cases of disastrous oil spills spoiling untouched natural preserves. This occurred more than a decage ago in an isolated part of Alaska and resulted in the deaths of thousands of rare species and long-lasting damage to the ecosystem. Secondly, fossil fuel exploitation in general should not be encouraged at a time when the Earth is facing a potentially cataclysmic reckoning with the effects of climate change. The last untouched areas of the planet should be left in peace and not greedily consumed to feed a problem that is growing more dangerous daily.

On the other hand, the advantages of drilling for oil and gas in less populated regions relate to economics and safety. Many countries, particularly developing ones, are reliant on oil and gas to prop up their economies. Losing the revenue from these industries would not only affect the companies themselves but they would pay fewer taxes and employ fewer people, who would then contribute less to the consumer economy. The second justification is safety. Companies will continue to drill for oil and gas but if they do it in residential areas there is the potential for human contamination, especially when it comes to more dangerous practices such as fracking. By limiting drilling to remote regions, the human population is safely protected from the risk of spills and increased air pollution.

In conclusion, the environmental risks do not outweigh the benefits to the economy and the citizenry that accrue from remote oil and gas exploitation. There should be protocols to protect the environment, but these must be balanced against humanity’s precedence over nature.

Sample 9:

It has been observed that the need for fossil fuels such as gas and oil is growing, and to meet this need, it has become mandatory to ascertain other sources in developed regions. I believe that the disadvantages are greater than the benefits of exploring other sources in rustic areas as it will destroy the natural scenery of that place as well as global warming will increase.

First off, drilling at such above-mentioned places will destroy the natural beauty of the place. To elaborate, when a place is selected to explore to find energy resources, a lot of digging is done with the assistance of machines or tools. A lot of trees have been cut down, which has been the shelter for many bird species. Resultantly, the place loses its beauty, and it cannot be again as productive as it was before the excavation. For instance, earlier people used to build their farmhouses in the countryside areas to enjoy some holidays or live in those places after retirement. Now they have postponed their plans due to barren land or lack of greenery. So, this step will put humanity and fauna at risk.

On the other hand, if these places are dug, it will undoubtedly create employment opportunities. To explain it, a larger workforce is needed, and individuals can get better facilities and they can raise their living standards. And also, skilled professionals from other nations can be hired, which will strengthen a country’s relations with other nations, and it will generate another source of income for a country. In this way, a country can be economically sound but by putting the environment at risk. To exemplify it, excavation in remote areas brings profit to a country or its people. People enjoy a lavish lifestyle, but they will be living in a world that is full of pollution and lack of green spaces.

To conclude, it is clear that the disadvantages are more as people will not be able to enjoy nature and the places where digging is done will lose their beautiful scenery. Although people enjoy a lofty lifestyle, they will do it at the cost of putting their biodiversity at risk.

Sample 10:

Many nations depend on oil and gas for various reasons, such as providing light, fueling cars, and preparing meals. Therefore, the demand for gas and oil is high, so finding new sources in secluded and new areas is important. The advantages could be that it would help in the development of the area and improve the revenue of the country.

Foremost, opening up a remote area due to the demand for oil production will help in developing the area. Governing bodies that regulate production also help in employing the local people in the community, which would directly increase the employment of people. Once companies notice a direct need for services such as restaurants and stores, they would tend to relocate to the area. For example, in Nigeria, precisely the delta state, the rural areas are now developed due to the opening of refineries.

Furthermore, another of the pros is the improvement of revenue generated by the country. Countries are established on the amount of revenue generated. This would help in putting it into sectors that need more funding. For instance, Arab countries are well known for their natural resources in oil production. This has further enabled their countries to give free access to education and health care.

In conclusion, the pros outweigh the cons because opening up these new areas due to high demand would bring about the advancement of the area and skyrocket the revenues generated.