It costs a lot of money for a country to host an international sports event, such as the Olympic Games and Football World Cup. Some people think that this is a waste of money, but others believe the opposite. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample 1:

It is true that international sports events such as the Olympic games and Football World Cup are often deemed exorbitant million-dollar investments. Due to the enormous budgets required, opinions are divided on whether countries should not spend money on hosting such events or whether it is beneficial to do the opposite. While I understand the rationale behind the former view, I still strongly advocate the latter.

Granted, those who believe it is wasteful to hold international sports events may point to the massive funding required to build a large number of stadiums and sports facilities to serve varied types of games. These construction projects could incur multi-billion-dollar expenses, yet many of them could quickly fall into disrepair or be left abandoned as the events end. However, organizers of modern sporting events have successfully addressed such concerns by inventing mobile stadiums which can be effortlessly deployed in diverse countries along with turning stadiums into multi-purpose venues. Regarding the former, a remarkable example can be observed in Qatar, where stadiums were ingeniously constructed using containers for the 2022 World Cup. These sports facilities can be installed and dismantled with ease, making it possible to transport them to any destination to be reused and thus save colossal budgets. In addition, many countries also attempt to make stadiums versatile by transforming them into social hubs, meaning that they are not only places for sports matches but also venues for a diverse array of events ranging from live concerts, ceremonies, and so on.

From my perspective, international sports events are of paramount importance and hence undoubtedly worth investment. The reason for this is that host countries could reap a myriad of financial benefits because of a boom in tourism during these events. Flocks of tourists and audiences from countries all over the world would pay a visit to the countries, leading to a steep growth in the demands for various goods and services, including lodging and transportation. In addition to the monetary merits, world sports competitions and tournaments could also provide many intangible values, including the promotion of sportsmanship and a sense of community. Indeed, events such as the World Cup or the Olympic Games provide a valuable opportunity for outstanding athletes from all corners of the world to compete and demonstrate the beauty of different sports while spectators could have enjoyable experiences with their friends and families or even strangers supporting their favorite teams.

In conclusion, while some may oppose the idea of holding sports events on an international scale, I still hold the belief that such events provide multifaceted advantages which far outweigh the costs, making them a worthwhile endeavor.

Sample 2:

Organizing international sporting extravaganzas like the Olympic Games or the FIFA World Cup undoubtedly demands substantial financial investments. While some argue that such expenditures are wasteful, others contend that they bring considerable benefits to the host country. This essay will thoroughly discuss both viewpoints before concluding that I am in favor of the former.

Admittedly, proponents of hosting international sports events may argue that the benefits outweigh the costs. The key rationale behind this thinking is that these events can significantly boost a nation's tourism industry, stimulate local economies, and create numerous job opportunities. For example, the 2016 Rio Olympics drew millions of tourists, injecting billions into the Brazilian economy and providing thousands of jobs in the process. This underscores the belief that hosting such events can be a sound economic investment. 

However, I side with those who claim that the organization of global sports events is not a prudent financial investment. This is because the exorbitant costs associated with constructing state-of-the-art stadiums and upgrading infrastructure can place an immense strain on a nation's budget. For example, the 2004 Athens Olympics left Greece grappling with significant debt due to overspending on infrastructure projects, burdening the country's finances for years to come. Additionally, global-scale sports events often result in underutilized facilities once they conclude, giving rise to maintenance expenses that further drain public funds. This can be seen in the case of the 2016 Rio Olympics, where some venues were left unused, necessitating ongoing maintenance funded by taxpayers. The unfulfilled promise of repurposing these facilities for community use exacerbates the financial strain on the host city.

In conclusion, I feel that hosting international sports events is often a wasteful financial endeavor. While there are potential benefits, the enormous costs, long-term financial burdens, and underutilized amenities typically overshadow these gains.

Sample 3:

International sporting events have become increasingly common in recent decades. While some people reckon that host countries might have to deal with a sudden surge in crime or involve themselves in an exhausting preparation process, more importantly I believe they can take the opportunity to boost tourism.

To begin with, although events such as these are a great opportunity for countries to gain global exposure, there are present significant challenges. Firstly, records have shown that there is a twofold increase in crimes such as prostitution and petty theft when a country organises an event such as the World Cup or the Olympics. Furthermore, the process of preparing for these events is often demanding. For the World Cup 2014, it took Brazil five years to revitalise its cities and construct various facilities including stadiums and indoor athletics arenas to meet the world-class standard set by FIFA.

On the other hand, I am of the opinion that international sporting games can potentially stimulate the tourism sector. By being the host, a country is able to attract a large array of athletes and their supporters from all around the world. This sudden increase in visitors will likely proliferate the sales of products and services such as accommodation and transportation within the period of the events. In the longer term, it is a great chance for the host nations to promote their culture on a global stage. For example, since the pictures of beautifully garnished Vietnamese dishes made headlines during the SEA Games in 2003, Vietnam has been branded as the “Kitchen of the world” and a must visit destination for global food lovers. This obviously does wonders for the Vietnamese economy.

In conclusion, although sports events come at the expense of a few immediate problems, the benefits of boosted gross sales and cultural promotion are of greater significance. In my opinion, host nations can also consider the option of sharing an event with a neighboring country to spread the risk and still enjoy the lucrative long-term benefits.

Sample 4:

Hosting major international sports events like the Olympics or the FIFA World Cup comes with a significant financial commitment. While some argue that these expenses are extravagant, others believe that hosting such events brings a multitude of advantages. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Advocates contend that the costs associated with hosting these events are justified due to the potential economic benefits they bring. Organizing a major sports event draws in tourists, stimulates local businesses, creates job opportunities, and encourages infrastructure development. Moreover, it showcases the host country’s culture, heritage, and capabilities to the world, leading to global recognition. Consequently, these events can act as drivers for economic growth, leaving a lasting positive impact on the host nation.

Detractors argue that the resources earmarked for hosting these events could be better utilized for critical social issues like education, healthcare, and poverty alleviation. They posit that the short-term financial gains may not outweigh the long-term costs, as the infrastructure built for these events may become underused or unsustainable after the event concludes. Critics also assert that the resources invested could be redirected towards addressing more immediate and essential needs of the populace.

In conclusion, I believe that hosting major international sports events can be a beneficial investment, provided there is careful planning and consideration of long-term benefits. While it is imperative to ensure that funds are judiciously allocated and that the event leaves a lasting legacy, the potential economic, cultural, and social benefits should not be disregarded.

Sample 5:

Many people are divided over having a sports tournament for international competitors occurring in their country. While some believe that money is wasted in hosting it, others believe the event’s benefits justify its costs. Although these justifications seem reasonable, I am inclined to express my disapproval toward this decision.

Organizing global sporting events might not be a wasteful venture. Certainly, new jobs will be created, particularly those in the construction and service industries. The former is expected to need more workers to build sporting facilities and lodging for the arriving athletes, while the latter obviously demands more hospitality providers for the sports tourists. Altogether, this results in a higher income overall for the population. Another point of note is that hosting international sports tournaments produces an opportunity to improve a country’s recognizability on the global stage. Such events, it is claimed, may leave lasting impressions in foreign visitors and allow a nation’s tourism industry to flourish for many years to come. The values created from organizing these events seem significant enough to justify the decision.

However, I firmly believe that a nation is squandering its wealth by hosting international sporting events. The expenses involved in such an endeavor, from lobbying for the rights to host to constructing sporting facilities, are massive to the point of extravagance. As a consequence, the home government incurs an exorbitant amount of debt, which ultimately falls to the taxpayers to foot the bill. After a tournament has concluded, meanwhile, the constructed facilities might end up a waste as well. This is likely the case for the host of Olympic-style events, as arenas and sports complexes for less popular disciplines fall into disuse. Even when they are used, the purpose is usually particular, and the public, as usual, has to pay for their maintenance. It is hence reasonable to oppose the holding of international sports tournaments.

In conclusion, organizing sports events for athletes from all over the globe is largely a waste of money, and can be one of the worst financial decisions a nation can make. Any government which likes to explore the possibility of doing so, in my opinion, would need a good reason for it.

Sample 6:

Opinions differ on whether hosting international sporting events is advantageous or disadvantageous for the host nation. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my own standpoint.

It is conceivable that staging global sporting events may pose challenges for the host country. For instance, the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Russia serves as a compelling illustration. The country made a substantial investment in constructing sports stadiums to meet FIFA’s stringent requirements, resulting in a significant financial burden on the government. Once the event concluded, many of these venues were left unused, leading to ongoing maintenance costs and draining government resources. This could potentially lead to budget deficits, increased taxes, or reduced social welfare programs, thereby negatively impacting the country’s overall economic health.

Conversely, international sports events have the potential to create opportunities for the host nation, particularly in the tourism sector. These events often attract a large influx of international tourists, showcasing the host country’s cultural heritage, including its culinary traditions. This surge in tourism can generate employment opportunities for local residents and stimulate economic growth. Furthermore, by enhancing the country’s global image, the event can contribute to the overall development of sports and, consequently, the economy.

Taking into consideration the aforementioned points, while hosting global sports events may have adverse effects on a country, especially without prudent governmental oversight, I am firmly of the opinion that when managed effectively, these events can serve as a catalyst for a nation’s prosperity by showcasing its unique heritage and attracting international visitors.

Sample 7:

Hosting international sports events can incur a significant expense for a country. While some argue that such costs are a waste of resources, others believe there are invaluable benefits attached. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own viewpoint on the matter.

Opponents of hosting global sports events often cite financial burdens as their primary concern. They argue that the initial investments, often running into billions, may not always ensure a profitable return. The 2016 Olympics in Rio, for instance, left Brazil with a considerable debt and underused facilities. Additionally, prioritizing sports can divert funds from more critical sectors like education or health, potentially stalling development in these areas.

Conversely, advocates highlight the numerous advantages of such events. Hosting sports competitions can significantly boost a nation’s image, portraying it as a global player in the world arena. Moreover, these events often draw tourists, promoting local businesses and generating substantial revenue. The 2012 London Olympics, for example, witnessed a surge in tourism and boosted the local economy, with job creation in various sectors.

In my opinion, while the costs are indeed substantial, the potential long-term benefits of hosting such events can outweigh the initial expenses. However, countries should meticulously plan and ensure that funds are judiciously utilized, guaranteeing a lasting positive impact.

Sample 8:

Hosting international events like the Olympic Games and the Football World Cup costs a significant amount of money, which some people believe is a waste of resources. Others argue that these events are not wasteful because they elevate a country's global standing, especially for developing nations. This essay will discuss both perspectives.

On one hand, countries hosting large-scale events have the opportunity to showcase their hospitality to the world, which benefits their tourism industry. These events are broadcast globally, providing insight into the host country to people around the world. For instance, Dubai recently hosted the Indian Premier League, a cricket tournament typically held in India. By inviting sponsors and hosting the event, Dubai boosted its international tourism profile, as cricket is followed by many worldwide. Thus, organizing events of international stature can be beneficial for countries.

On the other hand, hosting worldwide events involves enormous costs, which may not be sustainable for all nations. Events that invite people from around the world require expenses for accommodation, transport, and food, which can be extremely high and could otherwise be used for the development of the country. For example, India spent close to 6,500 crore rupees on hosting the 2019 Olympics, funds that could have been used to create more job opportunities for the unemployed, as India ranks high in global unemployment rates. Therefore, proper allocation of resources is essential, and developing nations should consider avoiding hosting such costly events.

In conclusion, while hosting international events can enhance a country's global position, developing countries need to carefully consider their resource allocation before committing to such expensive endeavors.