Some people think that plastic shopping bags should be banned because they contribute to land and sea pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sample 1:

Some people argue that there should be a ban on plastic shopping bags because they pollute the land and the sea. I completely agree with this point of view because most of them are sent to landfill sites after being discarded and many find their way to the oceans.

The majority of plastic shopping bags end up being landfilled. If there is no ban on plastic bags, most people will continue to use them when they shop since this is more convenient than bringing their own bags. However, plastic bags are difficult and expensive to recycle. Consequently, after they have been thrown away, most of them are sent to landfill sites. As they sit there, they break down into tiny particles, which then enter the soil and food chain.

In addition, plastic shopping bags can always find their way to the sea. The ones discarded on the beach may be blown into the sea. Even those thrown on the streets and sitting on landfill sites may be blown into gutters and discharged with sewage into rivers, and then reach the sea. Since plastic bags take hundreds of years to decompose, they become deadly waste in the oceans. For example, sea turtles that have ingested plastic bags can die from starvation. They may mistakenly believe that they have eaten enough because their stomachs are full.

In conclusion, most plastic bags are dumped in landfill sites after they have been used and many end up in the oceans. This damages the land and the sea and therefore I strongly believe that their use should not be allowed.

Sample 2:

The use of plastic bags is one of the major causes of environmental pollution. Hence, it is thought that banning plastic shopping bags is a need. I completely agree with this idea and think that the plastic bag ban would reduce the high-level pollution of land and sea.

Shopping bags which are made of plastic play a primary role in increasing pollution. These plastic materials which are thrown into seas lead to the death of marine creatures. For example, the number of marine mammals has decreased alarmingly in the oceans due to the great level of pollution which results from plastic materials. Furthermore, nearly a hundred of Caretta Caretta is dying per year since they consume plastics for food. Therefore, implementing a ban on bags which is made of plastic for the use of shopping would be beneficial to save marine life.

Another justified reason behind such a ban is that plastic materials such as shopper bags contain chemicals which damage the productivity of agriculture because of affecting negatively the soil quality. Furthermore, this situation is threatening to people’s health because leading to severe health issues such as cancer and blood-related diseases. Instead of using plastic bags, for shoppers, the government should invest and promote the use of paper bags, which are eco-friendly and recyclable. Unless the government bans plastic bags, people will suffer from the lack of healthy agricultural products and have a risk of getting cancer.

In conclusion, shopper bags made of plastic should be banned because they are detrimental to both marine lives, and the soil quality, which plays an important role in growing healthy vegetables and fruits. In my opinion, paper or carton bag usage can be replaced the plastic bags shoppers use.

Sample 3:

It is undeniable that plastic bags play an essential role on a daily basis. Numerous people think the government should forbid the use of plastic bags due to devastating pollution. I totally agree with the statement because of some reasons mentioned below.

To begin with, there are a number of factors why plastic bags pollute the land. Initially, plastic wastes have been dumped in landfills. This means that it would deteriorate human health in such a way that leads to diseases like food poisoning. Moreover, Polythene became the silent killer of the human body which contributes to being sick due to its contained chemicals. Consequently, Elastic could harm and adversely affect individuals’ health. To illustrate, over years past the high amount of population workers in India got sick because they grew vegetables in the area that was used to dump the elastic wastes.

Secondly, plastic bags affect not only the land but also seriously the sea. A high number of marine species used to swallow some elastic ones with their food. For instance, every year the reporter has always reported the death of sea animals like fishes and particularly whales caused by an indigestible problem. Therefore, unless there is a stop to the use of polythene bags, the extinction of rare marine species will make the situation worse.

In conclusion, I personally advocate for a ban on using plastic bags. Thus, the government should more strictly prohibit the use of plastic bags and should strongly educate about unsafe elastic before increasing risks.

Sample 4:

Nowadays the question of whether the government should ban plastic shopping bags due to their contribution to land and sea pollution has been receiving a great deal of public attention. I totally agree with the statement because of some reasons mentioned below.

First, there are a number of reasons why plastic bags pollute the land. They can often be dumped in the landfill, so plastic molecules mix in the land. This means that they would deteriorate human health in such a way that leads to diseases like food poisoning. They could be called “The silent killers of the human body”. Moreover, they contained vibrant colours so they could toxicate their content, and adversely affect the users’ health who use them frequently. For example, in 2004, a lot of farmers got sick in Mumbai, India because they used to grow vegetables in the area which was used to dump the plastic waste.

Second, plastic bags affect not only land but also the sea seriously. If people cast them into the ocean, the marine species will swallow plastic bags with their food, which hinder animals’ digestive progress and push them to the brink of death. According to a report by the World Health Organization has revealed that every year, ten million fishes die on account of the consumption of polythene. Unless there is a stop in the use of plastic bags, the extinction of rare marine species will make the situation worse.

In conclusion, I advocate that forbidding the use of plastic bags is an essential action. The authority should invest more money in producing alternative products for people to use in their daily lives.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, plastic carrier usage has increased at an alarming rate. Whilst some people and I hold the view that plastic shopping bags should be outlawed because they have deleterious effects on the environment. In addition, the Oceans’ marine life has borne the brunt of drawbacks caused by their disposal. My contention will be further explained.

Firstly, plastic bags have a negative impact on the habitat because they are non-biodegradable. In other words, when these bags are buried in the soil or even thrown into the ocean and wild animals eat them, plastic will enter the food chain causing different issues or even death. For example, a hungry turtle may be mistaken transparent plastic bags for a jellyfish and eat it, the turtle will choke on the plastic as it cannot digest it and die painfully. Hence, what can be said is that these types of carriers maybe take hundreds of years to decompose into pieces.

Moreover, plastic bags contain toxic chemical elements that will negatively affect the air when burnt. This means that if these harmful by-products are released into the air and inhaled by people, they will result in many lethal diseases such as cancer. A prime example of this is research conducted by the World Health Organization revealed that a plethora of Chinese people had lung cancer due to air pollution. Thus, plastic bags not only affect the air but also have a detrimental impact on the soil’s fertility resulting in a reduction in crops’ yield.

In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the above-mentioned points, it can be reiterated that bags made of plastic should be completely banned. Therefore, I am convinced that the government should legislate the laws that prohibited the usage of these packs.

Sample 6:

Nowadays, it is proven that non-biodegradable products are very negative for the natural environment. The highly plastic waste has polluted cities, the countryside and the oceans. As a result of this, some people would argue that plastic shopping bags should be lessened. As far as I am concerned, if this is prohibited, it will enable us to save the earth.

First of all, plastic-based products are a manufacturing process of petroleum, which is the main material for fuel. For this reason, these are produced at an extremely low cost, which contributed to widespread. For example, 9 billion tones of plastic have been produced during the time period 1950-2017. Moreover, it was 400 million tones in 2020. Therefore, statistics predict that it will double in amount by 2050 according to the rate of using plastic at the moment.

In addition, if the government banned shopping bags, it would result in a significant reduction of waste that goes to the oceans. For instance, the state of Queensland in Australia banned free plastic bags from shops in 2018. As a result of this action, the consumption of plastic drastically reduced by 40% from the same period in 2016. Hence, it is the council’s responsibility to ensure that the consumption of plastic is being diminished.

To conclude, from the arguments presented above, it is inconceivable not to understand that plastic-free is paramount to the preservation of species and nature. Despite the fact of some other individuals do not believe in sustainability, I believe that it is invaluable the method of ban these plastic-based products on behalf of environmental protection.

Sample 7:

It is irrefutable that plastic bags have become increasingly a severe threat to the environment. Conservationists and I hold the view that there should be legislated restrictions against consuming plastic bags. Apart from that, I also agree that there are other crucial regulations that should be undertaken.

To embark on, there is a common consensus that using plastic bags prone the ecosystems to hazardous consequences. In other words, if disposable plastics are dumped into the ocean, they will be entangled with marine life and food, leading to detrimental effects such as digestion issues. This marine debris frequently sticks to animals, resulting in painful diseases. Another dilemma is that plastic bags are considered non-biodegradable substances, which may take hundreds of years to decompose. Thus, if it is mixed with fertilized land, it will jeopardize the soil, dredge it, and ultimately lead to soil erosion. Hence, plastic bags devastate the ecosystem, owing to such human activities, land and marine life are prone to endangered and degradation.  

Subsequently, in my opinion, there are plenty of methods that should be adopted to curb this phenomenon. Firstly, the concerned bodies should impose immense regulations to diminish plastic bag consumption and enforce hefty taxes in case of any violation of the disposal attitudes. Secondly, citizens have a vital role in conservation activities. For example, an increasing number of brand retailers have launched beneficial schemes, acting as an activity to exhort myriads of customers to purchase accompanied by increasing awareness of conservation. While they stimulate dwellers to accumulate plastic waste for the recycling process, they can redeem it for other goods. Accordingly, there are numerous methods to overcome such a disaster.

To conclude, while I acknowledge that plastic bags have severely damaged the ecosystem when they hinder, endanger marine life and erode the soil. I concur that it should be their strict penalty against waste-discarding behaviours and unleash a campaign against consumed plastic bags.

Sample 8:

While the growth in the manufacture of plastic non-organic packs has been widely acknowledged, a category of individuals I advocate that these specific bags must be eradicated as they pose a threat to both the soil and the marine life. In the following essay, the evidence that substantiates my claims will be further scrutinized.

To begin with, chemically made bags have a detrimental impact on marine life since they are made from non-biodegradable materials. To illustrate this, when people carelessly throw plastic bags into the sea, one of the sea creatures will be inevitably hurt. An eminent example of this is Egypt where a plethora of marine creatures are endangered since they are confused about transparent bags for jellyfish and eat them; consequently, these bags linger in their stomach inflicting diseases on them or even causing their death. Thus, what can be said from this example is that if people pay no attention to this issue, one day valuable sea creatures will extinct, which will deleteriously affect countries' tourism as well as economic sectors.

Furthermore, despite the turmoil, plastic bags have a negative influence on the fertility of the soil. This is because, if these carcinogenic bags are buried in fertile soils, they will impede the penetration of plants' roots deeper into their desired destination. Moreover, they also release hazardous chemicals that change the composition of healthy soils. For instance, as per the recommendations of a study commissioned by the World Health Organization, they affirmed that by 2030 the agricultural lands will be immensely afflicted by the effect of plastics and harmful chemicals released; therefore, effective initiatives to curb the use of plastic carriers ought to be conducted immediately in the foreseeable future. Hence, not only does the extensive use of plastics that the world witnesses today deleteriously affect agricultural lands, but it will also inflict national economic growth by decreasing the yield.

In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the above-mentioned points, it can be reiterated that although plastics are omnipresent as daily gadgets, I am of the belief that their detrimental influence on both the land and the sea is alarming. I discern that a pragmatic approach to mitigating this problem is by imposing laws by governments that will deter people who litter plastics in natural habitats and limit the factories that still produce them in considerable quantities.

Sample 9:

Although plastic bags are deemed to be convenient for shopping, its waste has a detrimental effect on the fauna of land and sea. Some activists think that governments should prohibit them entirely. I completely agree with their opinion, but educating the public and introducing other alternatives should be considered first.

It is undeniable that plastics have caused an immense litter problem. Firstly, land drains into the oceans have formed what is known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, which is estimated by the size of a continent of plastic rubbish. In addition, blockage of drainage systems is mostly related to plastics as it happens in Bangladesh. Furthermore, the extinction of whales and turtles is due to foraging for plastic flotsam. This is because indigestible shards of plastics fester inside their stomach causing death. As a consequence, plastic bags are regarded as a salient source of pollution.

Governments should take some viable steps to mitigate wastage. Some introduced safety net to collect plastics lest blocking the pipes nor polluting the water. Raising awareness campaigns to disseminate information over the implication of plastic bags on the environment. Moreover, encourage the public to cut down on using disposable bags by introducing versatile reusable bags. Some stores as Aldie’s store chains in Europe are offering cashback credits for not using plastic bags. Finally, municipalities should help to recycle by distributing recycle bins for plastics. Thus, if governments and citizens implemented the concept of “reuse, reduce, and recycle”, the swift deterioration in animal life and the environment would be impeded.

In conclusion, I would argue that plastic bags litters pose a threat to the environment. If authorities teach the public to deter them using plastics and spur them to recycle, swift outcomes would be reaped.

Sample 10:

Environmental problems nowadays are being a one the most important issues which requires a prompt action. Finding the most appropriate bag for carrying daily needs is one of them. According to some people plastic bag option, as far as has negative impact on an environment, should be banned. I'm strongly advocating this idea, since the scale of potential problems is enormously large.

Using the plastic bags on a daily basis is considered to have a negative effect, since it's capable to be decomposed into a toxic component. This element, in turn, are being accumulated by soil or eaten by animals. As a result of which soils became toxicated and unfruitful while the animals either are being poisoned and eventually dead. It affects not only an environment, but also domestic economy, due to the lack of productive land, people become an unemployed and struggle to provide their family. There are a lot of examples out there where the water bodies are being polluted with these plastic bags. Thus, the negative aspects of using it lays foundation for accepting proposed suggestion.

On the other hand, plastic bags are the most suitable one from the perspective of the cost of its production. The plastic resources are in an enormous amount, and the process of it manufacturing is less expensive in comparison with the other options, such as glass or metal. Furthermore, the plastics are recyclable and its procession even less capital-intensive. Additionally, negative effects of plastic bags, mentioned earlier, might be handled with the right approach, so it's only concerning the measures taken after its usage.

To conclude, using plastic bags can have a negative effect on our environment and be a good choice in terms of its cost production. In my opinion, the damage which comes from the usage of plastic bags despite the measures is being taken still will remain, so finding the replacement for it would be the best decision.